journal article·2022-04-22Open access

Molecular Dynamics Modeling of Interfacial Interactions between Flattened Carbon Nanotubes and Amorphous Carbon: Implications for Ultra-Lightweight Composites

Prashik S. Gaikwad, Margaret Kowalik, Benjamin D. Jensen, Adri van Duin, Gregory M. Odegard

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 5· Issue 4

Abstract

Flattened carbon nanotubes (flCNTs) naturally form in many carbon nanotube-based materials and can exhibit mechanical properties similar to round carbon nanotubes but with tighter packing and alignment. To facilitate the design, fabrication, and testing of flCNT-based composites for aerospace structures, computational modeling can be used to efficiently and accurately predict their performance as a function of processing parameters, such as reinforcement/matrix cross-linking. In this study, molecular dynamics modeling is used to predict the load transfer characteristics of the interface region between the flat region of flCNTs (i.e., bi-layer graphene) and amorphous carbon (AC) with various levels and locations of covalent bond cross-linking and AC mass density. The results of this study show that increasing the mass density of AC at the interface improves the load transfer capability of the interface. However, a much larger improvement is observed when cross-linking is added both to the flCNT-AC interface and between the flCNT sheets. With both types of cross-linking, substantial improvements in interfacial shear strength, transverse tension strength, and transverse tension toughness are predicted. The results of this study are important for optimizing the processing of flCNT/AC composites for demanding engineering applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nanotechnology research and applications · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan 49931, United States

Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16801, United States

NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia 23681, United States

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/mrs.2015.22810.1557/mrs.2015.228 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.003 ↗
3. 10.1177/002199831664978110.1177/0021998316649781 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20070077610.1002/adma.200700776 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.03810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.038 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.07.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2018.07.013 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.05510.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.055 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.06.01210.1016/j.carbon.2015.06.012 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.04.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2018.04.003 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10997010.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109970 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10867210.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108672 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0180010.1021/acs.langmuir.1c01800 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0258210.1021/acsanm.1c02582 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.03010.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.030 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.03610.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.036 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.09550110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.095501 ↗
17. 10.1103/physrevb.73.07542310.1103/physrevb.73.075423 ↗
18. 10.1103/physrevb.83.13411310.1103/physrevb.83.134113 ↗
19. 10.1063/5.003866610.1063/5.0038666 ↗
20. 10.1021/jp203010z10.1021/jp203010z ↗
21. 10.1021/ja408391410.1021/ja4083914 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.05410.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.054 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.113068110.1126/science.1130681 ↗
24. 10.1088/1742-6596/129/1/01200210.1088/1742-6596/129/1/012002 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.368247510.1063/1.3682475 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.481327110.1063/1.4813271 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp310184c10.1021/jp310184c ↗
28. 10.1063/1.478959410.1063/1.4789594 ↗
29. 10.1080/08927022.2019.168084410.1080/08927022.2019.1680844 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.00310.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.003 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.8b0974110.1021/acsami.8b09741 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.05810.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.058 ↗
33. 10.1103/physrevlett.96.18550310.1103/physrevlett.96.185503 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.02.02610.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.02.026 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.diamond.2011.12.04410.1016/j.diamond.2011.12.044 ↗
36. 10.1038/383321a010.1038/383321a0 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.diamond.2010.01.02410.1016/j.diamond.2010.01.024 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.150694710.1063/1.1506947 ↗
39. 10.1088/0965-0393/24/2/02501210.1088/0965-0393/24/2/025012 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.02.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2018.02.008 ↗
41. 10.1002/adem.20140030610.1002/adem.201400306 ↗
42. 10.1039/c2sc21374e10.1039/c2sc21374e ↗
43. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
44. 10.1021/jp004368u10.1021/jp004368u ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b0429810.1021/acs.jpcb.9b04298 ↗
46. 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
47. 10.1021/jp510274e10.1021/jp510274e ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b1242910.1021/acs.jpca.6b12429 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.06710.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.067 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.12.03810.1016/j.carbon.2020.12.038 ↗
51. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz419110.1126/sciadv.aaz4191 ↗
52. Gray D. · Phys. Solid State. Appl. · 2009 · 6 · 730
53. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.006 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.01.02910.1016/j.commatsci.2011.01.029 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.05610.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.056 ↗
56. 10.1021/jp100110n10.1021/jp100110n ↗
57. Al Mahmud, H.; Radue, M. S.; Odegard, G. M. “Molecular Dynamics Modeling to Probe the Effect of Surface Functionalization on the Interfacial Adhesion and Shear Strength of Graphene/Epoxy Nanocomposites”. ASCE Earth & Space Conference, Virtual Conference, April 19–23, 2021.10.1061/9780784483381.001 ↗
58. 10.3390/polym1312195810.3390/polym13121958 ↗