journal article·2022-03-25

Effect of Surface Nanostructures and Speciation on Undercooling for Low-Temperature Solder Alloys

Andrew Martin, Boyce S. Chang, Martin Thuo

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 5· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Role of surface structure/composition in altering solidification behavior is demonstrated through undercooling of core–shell metal particles. Autonomous surface speciation in the passivating oxide plays a critical role in the relaxation of a molten metal due to divergence in the concentration and composition of oxidizing species across the thickness of the oxide layer. In an unreactive environment, surface speciation is dictated by flux, cohesive energy density, and surface energy minimization. Under oxidizing conditions (e.g., ambient), however, reduction potential, curvature, and surface plasticity dictate the spatial order and concentration(s) across thin passivating oxide layers. It is therefore important to redefine solubility beyond the limitations of Hume–Rothery rules by substituting electronegativity for redox potential and cohesive energy density. Increasing number of components in an alloy does not necessarily lead to increased undercooling, but a maximum is observed around two to three components. These results lead to an empirical observation that ΔGLS (Gibbs’ free energy for liquid–solid transition) around the freezing point can be understood from enthalpy and surface tension balance, with the degree of undercooling being a proportionality term for the enthalpic component. This work extends our understanding of classical nucleation theory by illustrating the importance of asymmetry in surface work in phase change, largely due to changes in structure of nanoscale passivating oxides. This phenomena is critical in development of low-temperature solders.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010, United Sates

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010, United Sates

Micro-Electronics Research Center, Ames, Iowa 50010, United Sates

Funding

Iowa State University

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c2jm32056h10.1039/c2jm32056h ↗
2. Hansen, C. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User’s Handbook; CRC Press: Ukraine, 2007; pp 1–26.10.1201/9781420006834.ch1 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.05.00410.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.05.004 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.05.00310.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.05.003 ↗
5. 10.1016/s0378-3812(02)00184-x10.1016/s0378-3812(02)00184-x ↗
6. Zhang Y. M. · J. Cryst. Phys. Chem. · 2010 · 1 · 103
7. 10.1007/s11661-016-3730-110.1007/s11661-016-3730-1 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20190368710.1002/adfm.201903687 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0644110.1021/acs.iecr.8b06441 ↗
10. 10.1039/c8mh00032h10.1039/c8mh00032h ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20160642510.1002/adma.201606425 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20070121610.1002/adfm.200701216 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41563-018-0084-710.1038/s41563-018-0084-7 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20200580410.1002/adfm.202005804 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20200862110.1002/anie.202008621 ↗
16. 10.1002/admi.20200129410.1002/admi.202001294 ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20210179510.1002/anie.202101795 ↗
18. Martin A. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2020 · 60 · 592810.1002/anie.202013489 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.08.00110.1016/j.jmps.2012.08.001 ↗
20. 10.1017/s095679250000236910.1017/s0956792500002369 ↗
21. Shingu P. H. · 1985 · 3510.1016/B978-0-444-86939-5.50015-4 ↗
22. 10.2320/matertrans.43.182710.2320/matertrans.43.1827 ↗
23. 10.1557/proc-57-8910.1557/proc-57-89 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.174468810.1063/1.1744688 ↗
25. 10.1016/0022-0248(74)90040-210.1016/0022-0248(74)90040-2 ↗
26. 10.1016/0025-5416(84)90206-410.1016/0025-5416(84)90206-4 ↗
27. 10.1557/proc-8-4910.1557/proc-8-49 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cossms.2015.07.00110.1016/j.cossms.2015.07.001 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.174705510.1063/1.1747055 ↗
30. Anderson I. E. · 1987 · 269
31. 10.1063/1.9592610.1063/1.95926 ↗
32. 10.1016/s0921-5093(01)01430-710.1016/s0921-5093(01)01430-7 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.174758810.1063/1.1747588 ↗
34. 10.1146/annurev.ms.21.080191.00032310.1146/annurev.ms.21.080191.000323 ↗
35. 10.1179/09506609379032626710.1179/095066093790326267 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.36122210.1063/1.361222 ↗
37. 10.1021/la503511810.1021/la5035118 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0095610.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00956 ↗
39. 10.1103/physrevlett.113.19830110.1103/physrevlett.113.198301 ↗
40. 10.1038/ncomms1306710.1038/ncomms13067 ↗
41. 10.1016/0022-3093(84)90538-610.1016/0022-3093(84)90538-6 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0143810.1021/acsnano.8b01438 ↗
43. 10.1002/anie.20191263910.1002/anie.201912639 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0204710.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02047 ↗
45. 10.3390/met402019610.3390/met4020196 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.3173810.1063/1.31738 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.170043510.1063/1.1700435 ↗
48. 10.1038/srep2186410.1038/srep21864 ↗
49. 10.1021/cm501478410.1021/cm5014784 ↗
50. 10.1039/c7cp07531f10.1039/c7cp07531f ↗
51. 10.1021/jp212501s10.1021/jp212501s ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0182110.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01821 ↗
53. 10.1021/ja903247x10.1021/ja903247x ↗
54. 10.1039/d0mh01832e10.1039/d0mh01832e ↗
55. 10.1002/anie.20201348910.1002/anie.202013489 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0338410.1021/acs.langmuir.7b03384 ↗
57. 10.1002/sia.627010.1002/sia.6270 ↗
58. 10.1016/0039-6028(83)90800-210.1016/0039-6028(83)90800-2 ↗
59. 10.1039/c9nr03903a10.1039/c9nr03903a ↗
60. 10.1007/bf0266748510.1007/bf02667485 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.10.09810.1016/j.apsusc.2012.10.098 ↗
62. 10.1016/s0022-3093(99)00255-010.1016/s0022-3093(99)00255-0 ↗