Melamine Sponges Decorated with Polypyrrole Nanotubes as Macroporous Conducting Pressure Sensors
Source abstract
Abstract
The macropores of melamine sponges were coated in situ during the polymerization of pyrrole with either polypyrrole globules or nanotubes and tested as pressure-sensing materials. The dependence of the conductivity of this compressible material on pressure was determined by the four-point van der Pauw method. The conductivity increased from the order of 10–2 S cm–1 to units of S cm–1 at 10 MPa, and it was higher for nanotubes. The pressure dependence of sponge resistance was also recorded in another experimental setup in the design of a simple low-pressure sensor. The information on electrical properties obtained by both methods is discussed. In addition, the use of the melamine sponge decorated with polypyrrole in fields that do not directly exploit conductivity, such as electromagnetic radiation shielding and/or adsorption of organic dye, is also demonstrated. The study proves the superior performance of polypyrrole nanotubes in all applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 162 06 Prague 6, Czech Republic
Faculty of Chemical Engineering, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic
Centre of Polymer Systems, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 180 00 Prague 8, Czech Republic
Funding
Grantová Agentura Ä?eské Republiky
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11696-018-0394-x10.1007/s11696-018-0394-x ↗
2. 10.1039/C6RA19461C10.1039/C6RA19461C ↗
3. 10.1007/s11696-019-00982-910.1007/s11696-019-00982-9 ↗
4. 10.1039/D0TA09655E10.1039/D0TA09655E ↗
5. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2020.11637310.1016/j.synthmet.2020.116373 ↗
6. 10.1002/marc.20050051410.1002/marc.200500514 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.06410.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.064 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10854-020-03513-510.1007/s10854-020-03513-5 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.01.00610.1016/j.jcis.2021.01.006 ↗
10. 10.1002/marc.20200036410.1002/marc.202000364 ↗
11. 10.1002/pi.565410.1002/pi.5654 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsomega.8b0041410.1021/acsomega.8b00414 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10596510.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105965 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2020.11657310.1016/j.synthmet.2020.116573 ↗
15. 10.3390/ijms2122881410.3390/ijms21228814 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0006310.1021/acsanm.1c00063 ↗
17. 10.1039/D0RA06409B10.1039/D0RA06409B ↗
18. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.05.00210.1016/j.synthmet.2016.05.002 ↗
19. 10.1007/s13738-018-01578-y10.1007/s13738-018-01578-y ↗
20. 10.1039/C5RA23671A10.1039/C5RA23671A ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.20410.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.204 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12349710.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123497 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.18010.1016/j.cej.2017.07.180 ↗
24. 10.1039/C8NR01530A10.1039/C8NR01530A ↗
25. 10.1002/ente.20180055110.1002/ente.201800551 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14552910.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145529 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.11432710.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114327 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.03.02510.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.03.025 ↗
29. 10.1007/s13233-020-8105-110.1007/s13233-020-8105-1 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2014.08.00110.1016/j.synthmet.2014.08.001 ↗
31. 10.1002/smll.20140332810.1002/smll.201403328 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.10510.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.105 ↗
33. 10.1007/s12274-019-2360-510.1007/s12274-019-2360-5 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0233010.1021/acsomega.1c02330 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsapm.0c0133110.1021/acsapm.0c01331 ↗
36. 10.1039/D0MA00730G10.1039/D0MA00730G ↗
37. 10.1063/1.186623210.1063/1.1866232 ↗
38. 10.1002/pi.594710.1002/pi.5947 ↗
39. 10.1070/RCR495510.1070/RCR4955 ↗