journal article·2022-07-22Open access

Silver-Loaded Xerogel Nanostructures for Iodine Capture: A Comparison of Thiolated versus Unthiolated Sorbents

Brian J. Riley, Saehwa Chong, José Marcial, Nabajit Lahiri, Mrinal K. Bera, Sungsik Lee, Tianpin Wu, Karen Kruska, Josef Matyáš

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 5· Issue 7

Abstract

This paper describes the development and provides comparisons of thiolated (−SH) and unthiolated Ag–Al–Si–O xerogels for iodine gas capture. These xerogels were produced from alkoxides and then heat-treated at 350 °C to provide mechanical strength for subsequent processing steps. Then, a portion of the xerogels was thiolated using (3-mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane. Next, thiolated and unthiolated batches were ion-exchanged in AgNO3 solutions where Ag+ replaced Na+ in the gel network on a near 1:1 molar basis. Subsamples of the Ag-exchanged xerogels were subjected to a reduction step in H2/Ar to convert Ag+ to Ag0 where the rest of the Ag-exchanged (Ag+) were not reduced. X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy revealed nanoscale Ag0 in the Ag+ samples despite no active reduction where actively reduced samples had bimodal Ag0 distribution of ∼2–3 nm hexagonal and ∼6–7 nm cubic crystallites. Synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy was used to assess the oxidization states of Ag, S, and I within the different xerogel samples. The specific surface areas of the base xerogels decreased as subsequent treatments were performed on the as-made samples, albeit the decreases were smaller than aerogel equivalents of these samples from a previous study. All iodine-loaded Ag-based samples showed a mixture of β-AgI and γ-AgI. Comparisons of iodine-loading results with other Ag-based iodine sorbents show that the thiolated Ag0-xerogels in this work have one of the highest iodine-loading capacities (qe) reported to date in saturated conditions with the thiolated Ag0-xerogel showing 522 mg iodine per g of the sorbent.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Energy and Environment Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99354, United States

Physical and Computational Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99354, United States

NSF’s ChemMatCARS, Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, The University of Chicago, Argonne, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States

X-Ray Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. Mattigod S. V. · 200310.2172/15004678 ↗
2. Haefner D. R. · 200710.2172/911962 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.11.03810.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.11.038 ↗
4. 10.1039/c8ra04775h10.1039/c8ra04775h ↗
5. 10.1002/gch2.20207010110.1002/gch2.202070101 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.02.00210.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.02.002 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.04.01410.1016/j.fuproc.2010.04.014 ↗
8. Maeck, W. J.; Pence, D. T. Application of Metal Zeolites to Radioactive Air Cleaning Problems. In 11th AEC Air Cleaning Conference, CONF-700816; U.S. Atomic Energy Commission: Richland, WA, 1970; Vol. 2, pp 607–620.
9. Pence, D. T.; Duce, F. A.; Maeck, W. J. Study of the Adsorption Properties of Metal Zeolites for Airborne Iodine Species Richland. In 11th AEC Air Cleaning Conference, CONF 700816; Idaho Nuclear Corporation, 1970.
10. Pence, D. T.; Duce, F. A.; Maeck, W. J. Developments in the Removal of Airborne Iodine Species with Metal Substituted Zeolites. In 12th AEC Air Cleaning Conference, CONF 720823; Allied Chemical Corp: Oak Ridge, TN, 1973; p 417.
11. 10.1021/ja103110y10.1021/ja103110y ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04542.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04542.x ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.09.03810.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.09.038 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.proche.2016.10.04110.1016/j.proche.2016.10.041 ↗
15. 10.1021/ie200248g10.1021/ie200248g ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.8b0265110.1021/acsami.8b02651 ↗
17. 10.1039/c8ra05137b10.1039/c8ra05137b ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.0c0315510.1021/acsami.0c03155 ↗
19. Fukasawa, T.; Funabashi, K.; Kondo, Y. Influences of Impurities on Iodine Removal Efficiency of Silver Alumina Adsorbent. In 24th DOE/NRC Nuclear Air Cleaning and Treatment Conference; NUREG-CP-0153, 1996; Vol. 29.
20. 10.1134/s106636220904015810.1134/s1066362209040158 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0459010.1021/acs.iecr.0c04590 ↗
22. Matyáš, J.; Fryxell, G. E.; Busche, B. J.; Wallace, K.; Fifield, L. S. Functionalized Silica Aerogels: Advanced Materials to Capture and Immobilize Radioactive Iodine. Ceramics Engineering and Science Proceedings; Lin, H.T., Katoh, Y., Fox, K. M., Belharouak, I., Widjaja, S., Singh, D., Eds. Wiley-The American Ceramic Society: Daytona Beach, FL, 2011; Vol. 32, pp 23–33.10.1002/9781118095386.ch3 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.7b1029010.1021/acsami.7b10290 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10527910.1016/j.jece.2021.105279 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.0c0152710.1021/acsami.0c01527 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.11884810.1016/j.seppur.2021.118848 ↗
27. Thomas T. R. · 1977
28. 10.1021/es405807w10.1021/es405807w ↗
29. 10.1039/c7ta00230k10.1039/c7ta00230k ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.03.03310.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.03.033 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.15222210.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152222 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0390210.1021/acs.iecr.1c03902 ↗
33. Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR 261; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C., 2012.
34. Matyáš J. · 2020
35. Hersh C. K. · 1961
36. Maeck W. J. · 196810.2172/4835080 ↗
37. Julbe A. · 2015 · 1
38. 10.1155/2014/72424810.1155/2014/724248 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.2c0117910.1021/acsami.2c01179 ↗
40. Gattu V. K. · 2020
41. 10.1016/j.ceja.2022.10030010.1016/j.ceja.2022.100300 ↗
42. Linde D. R. · 2007
43. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0023310.1021/acs.iecr.7b00233 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41598-019-44274-410.1038/s41598-019-44274-4 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2012.05.03110.1016/j.vacuum.2012.05.031 ↗
46. 10.6028/jres.109.00210.6028/jres.109.002 ↗
47. 10.1107/9780955360206000074210.1107/97809553602060000742 ↗
48. 10.1021/ja01269a02310.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
49. Gregg S. · 1982
50. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0085210.1021/acsomega.1c00852 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsami.0c0239610.1021/acsami.0c02396 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.susc.2005.05.02110.1016/j.susc.2005.05.021 ↗
53. 10.1107/s010876818709753210.1107/s0108768187097532 ↗
54. 10.1073/pnas.48.6.98210.1073/pnas.48.6.982 ↗
55. 10.1039/c8ta10412c10.1039/c8ta10412c ↗
56. Matyáš J. · 2014
57. Matyáš J. · 2015
58. Matyáš J. · 2018
59. Matyáš J. · 2019
60. Strachan D. M. · 2011
61. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12597810.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125978 ↗
62. Matyas J. · 2021
63. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12868710.1016/j.cej.2021.128687 ↗
64. Donnay J. D. H. · 1973 · 4
65. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.09.05710.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.09.057 ↗
66. 10.1021/cm401762g10.1021/cm401762g ↗
67. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0041310.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00413 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.04110.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.041 ↗
69. 10.1002/adma.20180199110.1002/adma.201801991 ↗
70. 10.1039/c8mh01656a10.1039/c8mh01656a ↗