journal article·2021-09-01

An Improved Fabric Defect Detection Method Based on SSD

Huosheng Xie, Yafeng Zhang, Zesen Wu

AATCC Journal of Research· Volume 8· Issue 1_suppl
Publisher page

Abstract

The fabric defect detection algorithm based on object detection has become a research hotspot. The method based on the Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD) model has a fast detection speed, but the detection accuracy is insufficient. To balance the detection speed and accuracy of the model and meet the actual needs of the industry, an improved fabric defect detection algorithm based on SSD is proposed in this study. The Fully Convolutional Squeeze-and-Excitation (FCSE) block is added into the traditional SSD to improve the detection accuracy of the model. The number of default boxes was adjusted to accommodate the detection of long strip defects on fabric surface. Experimental results on the TILDA and Xuelang dataset confirm that our detection method based on SSD efficiently detected various fabric defects.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Advanced Neural Network Applications · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Fuzhou University

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.09.11010.1016/j.ijleo.2016.09.110 ↗
2. 10.1515/aut-2015-000110.1515/aut-2015-0001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.imavis.2009.03.00710.1016/j.imavis.2009.03.007 ↗
4. Chan C. H · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2000 · 36 · 126710.1109/28.871274 ↗
5. 10.1080/00405000.2015.110245810.1080/00405000.2015.1102458 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.patrec.2004.10.00210.1016/j.patrec.2004.10.002 ↗
7. Liu W. · Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence · 2018 · 31 · 182
8. 10.1016/j.imavis.2011.02.00210.1016/j.imavis.2011.02.002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.patrec.2010.05.03010.1016/j.patrec.2010.05.030 ↗
10. 10.1155/2015/37616310.1155/2015/376163 ↗
11. Gao C. · 2018 · 307
12. 10.1111/cote.1239410.1111/cote.12394 ↗
13. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.291362010.1109/ACCESS.2019.2913620 ↗
14. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.295988010.1109/ACCESS.2019.2959880 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engappai.2008.05.00610.1016/j.engappai.2008.05.006 ↗
16. 10.1049/iet-cvi.2016.002710.1049/iet-cvi.2016.0027 ↗
17. 10.1109/5.72679110.1109/5.726791 ↗
18. 10.1109/TIP.2019.292209510.1109/TIP.2019.2922095 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.image.2018.09.00210.1016/j.image.2018.09.002 ↗
20. 10.1109/IST48021.2019.901009810.1109/IST48021.2019.9010098 ↗
21. Wu X. · Neurocomputing · 2020
22. 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.257703110.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
23. He K., Gkioxari K. G., Dollår P. Mask R-CNN. In Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy, 2017, pp 2980–2988.10.1109/ICCV.2017.322 ↗
24. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.9110.1109/CVPR.2016.91 ↗
25. Redmon J. · Proceedings · 2017 · 6517
26. Redmon J. · arXiv · 1804
27. 10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_210.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 ↗
28. 10.1109/ICCV.2017.32410.1109/ICCV.2017.324 ↗
29. Simonyan K. · arXiv · 2014
30. Liu Z. · 2017 · 10615 · 1
31. Liu Z. · 2019 · 429
32. 10.1145/3282286.328230010.1145/3282286.3282300 ↗
33. 10.1109/DDCLS.2018.851609410.1109/DDCLS.2018.8516094 ↗
34. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.293920110.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939201 ↗
35. Jie H. · 2018 · 7132
36. TILDA dataset. https://lmb.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/resources/datasets/tilda.en.html (accessed October 2020).
37. Xuelang dataset. https://tianchi.aliyun.com/competition/entrance/231666/introduction?spm=5176.12281957.1004.14.38b03eafqnVnpF (accessed October 2020).
38. Chang X. · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · 2018 · 2018
39. Han Y. -J · Applied Sciences · 2020 · 10 · 1