Ab Initio Predictions of Strong Interfaces in Transition-Metal Carbides and Nitrides for Superhard Nanocomposite Coating Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Conceiving strong interfaces represents an effective direction in the development of superhard nanocomposite materials for practical applications in protective coatings. In the pursuit of engineering strong nanoscale interfaces between cubic rock-salt (B1) domains, we investigate using density functional theory (DFT) coherent interface models designed based on hexagonal (HX) NiAs and WC structures, as well as experiment. The DFT screening of a collection of transition-metal (M = Zr, Hf, Nb, Ta) carbides and nitrides indicates that the interface models provided by the HX polymorphs store little coherency strain and develop an energetic advantage as the valence-electron concentration increases. Our result suggests that harnessing the polymorphism encountered in transition-metal (M = Zr, Hf, Nb, Ta) carbides and nitrides for interface design represents a promising strategy for advancing superhard nanomaterials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota—Twin Cities, 111 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences and Computational Sciences & Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019, United States
Funding
Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.33977010.1063/1.339770 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.106051210.1126/science.1060512 ↗
3. 10.1557/mrs2003.5610.1557/mrs2003.56 ↗
4. 10.1116/1.481859010.1116/1.4818590 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.06410.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.064 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.01550310.1103/PhysRevLett.102.015503 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00957-910.1016/S0257-8972(00)00957-9 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.02.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.02.002 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.21410310.1103/PhysRevB.71.214103 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.274723010.1063/1.2747230 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0944410.1021/acs.jpcc.7b09444 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.05410910.1103/PhysRevB.82.054109 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0808610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b08086 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.482244010.1063/1.4822440 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0750710.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07507 ↗
16. 10.1038/2014810.1038/20148 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
18. Ivashchenko V. I. · 2014 · 4510.1007/978-1-4899-7445-7_2 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.24541810.1103/PhysRevB.81.245418 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.02.01310.1016/j.tsf.2015.02.013 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.08.04710.1016/j.tsf.2013.08.047 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.12.01110.1016/j.commatsci.2009.12.011 ↗
23. 10.1021/ci00038a00310.1021/ci00038a003 ↗
24. 10.1016/0079-6816(94)90005-110.1016/0079-6816(94)90005-1 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.334810.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3348 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗