journal article·2018-05-25Open access

Ab Initio Predictions of Strong Interfaces in Transition-Metal Carbides and Nitrides for Superhard Nanocomposite Coating Applications

Chongze Hu, Jingsong Huang, Bobby G. Sumpter, Efstathios Meletis, Traian Dumitrică

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 1· Issue 5

Abstract

Conceiving strong interfaces represents an effective direction in the development of superhard nanocomposite materials for practical applications in protective coatings. In the pursuit of engineering strong nanoscale interfaces between cubic rock-salt (B1) domains, we investigate using density functional theory (DFT) coherent interface models designed based on hexagonal (HX) NiAs and WC structures, as well as experiment. The DFT screening of a collection of transition-metal (M = Zr, Hf, Nb, Ta) carbides and nitrides indicates that the interface models provided by the HX polymorphs store little coherency strain and develop an energetic advantage as the valence-electron concentration increases. Our result suggests that harnessing the polymorphism encountered in transition-metal (M = Zr, Hf, Nb, Ta) carbides and nitrides for interface design represents a promising strategy for advancing superhard nanomaterials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota—Twin Cities, 111 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences and Computational Sciences & Engineering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019, United States

Funding

Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.33977010.1063/1.339770 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.106051210.1126/science.1060512 ↗
3. 10.1557/mrs2003.5610.1557/mrs2003.56 ↗
4. 10.1116/1.481859010.1116/1.4818590 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.06410.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.064 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.01550310.1103/PhysRevLett.102.015503 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00957-910.1016/S0257-8972(00)00957-9 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.02.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.02.002 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.21410310.1103/PhysRevB.71.214103 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.274723010.1063/1.2747230 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0944410.1021/acs.jpcc.7b09444 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.05410910.1103/PhysRevB.82.054109 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0808610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b08086 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.482244010.1063/1.4822440 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0750710.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07507 ↗
16. 10.1038/2014810.1038/20148 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
18. Ivashchenko V. I. · 2014 · 4510.1007/978-1-4899-7445-7_2 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.24541810.1103/PhysRevB.81.245418 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.02.01310.1016/j.tsf.2015.02.013 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.08.04710.1016/j.tsf.2013.08.047 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.12.01110.1016/j.commatsci.2009.12.011 ↗
23. 10.1021/ci00038a00310.1021/ci00038a003 ↗
24. 10.1016/0079-6816(94)90005-110.1016/0079-6816(94)90005-1 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.334810.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3348 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗