journal article·2023-06-23Open access

Interactions between Iron and Nickel in Fe–Ni Nanoparticles on Y Zeolite for Co-Processing of Fossil Feedstock with Lignin-Derived Isoeugenol

Zuzana Vajglová, Bibesh Gauli, Päivi Mäki-Arvela, Narendra Kumar, Kari Eränen, Johan Wärnå, Robert Lassfolk, Irina L. Simakova, Igor P. Prosvirin, Markus Peurla, Johan Kaarle Mikael Lindén, Hannu Huhtinen, Petriina Paturi, Dmitry E. Doronkin, Dmitry Yu. Murzin

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 6· Issue 12

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide A set of low-cost monometallic Fe, Ni, and bimetallic Fe–Ni bifunctional H–Y-5.1 catalysts with different metal ratios were synthesized by sequential incipient wetness impregnation. The catalysts were characterized in detail by N 2 physisorption, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy with pyridine, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission and scanning electron microscopy (TEM–SEM), magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Mössbauer spectroscopy, magnetic measurements, temperature-programmed reduction (TPR), and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). The results revealed that introduction of Fe led to a decrease of strong acid sites and an increase of medium Brønsted acid sites, while introduction of Ni increased the number of Lewis acid sites. The particle size of iron was approx. 5 nm, being ca. fourfold higher for nickel. XPS demonstrated higher iron content on the catalyst surface compared to nickel. Both Mössbauer spectroscopy and magnetic measurement confirmed the ferromagnetic behavior of all catalysts. In addition, the results from XRD, TEM, XPS, XAS, and magnetization suggested strong Fe–Ni nanoparticle interactions, which were supported by modeling of TPR profiles. Catalytic results of the co-processing of fossil feedstock with lignin-derived isoeugenol clearly showed that both product distribution and activity of Fe–Ni catalysts strongly depend on the metals’ ratio and their interactions. Key properties affected by the Fe–Ni metal ratio, which played a positive role in co-processing, were a smaller medial metal nanoparticle size (<6 nm), a lower metal–acid site ratio, as well as presence in the catalyst of fcc FeNi alloy structure and fcc Ni doped with Fe.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Johan Gadolin Process Chemistry Centre, Åbo Akademi University, Henriksgatan 2, Turku/Åbo 20500, Finland

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Pr. Ak. Lavrentieva 5, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia

Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, Turku 20520, Finland

Faculty of Science and Engineering/Physics, Åbo Akademi University, Henriksgatan 2, Turku/Åbo 20520, Finland

Wihuri Physical Laboratory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, Yliopistonmäki 5, Turku 20014, Finland

Institute of Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry, and Institute of Catalysis Research and Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstrasse 12, Karlsruhe 76131, Germany

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation · Business Finland

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0092310.1021/acscatal.6b00923 ↗
2. 10.3390/catal709026510.3390/catal7090265 ↗
3. European Commission · Off. J. Eur. Union · 2018 · 328 · 82
4. 10.1039/c5cy01294e10.1039/c5cy01294e ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.05910.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.059 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b0113310.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b01133 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.07.03810.1016/j.fuel.2014.07.038 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.02010.1016/j.rser.2010.11.020 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11819310.1016/j.fuel.2020.118193 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mcat.2019.11051510.1016/j.mcat.2019.110515 ↗
11. 10.22146/ijc.3359010.22146/ijc.33590 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.02.00910.1016/j.fuel.2010.02.009 ↗
13. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0210810.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02108 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.12.00510.1016/j.apcatb.2011.12.005 ↗
15. 10.1021/ef301971a10.1021/ef301971a ↗
16. 10.1021/ef502551p10.1021/ef502551p ↗
17. 10.1039/c5gc01935d10.1039/c5gc01935d ↗
18. 10.1039/c7gc03823b10.1039/c7gc03823b ↗
19. 10.1016/j.molcata.2013.09.02910.1016/j.molcata.2013.09.029 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.03310.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.033 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apcata.2019.04.02810.1016/j.apcata.2019.04.028 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apcata.2016.10.01110.1016/j.apcata.2016.10.011 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.04.06510.1016/j.apcatb.2019.04.065 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.12154510.1016/j.fuel.2021.121545 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.01.00110.1016/j.jiec.2016.01.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.10.02310.1016/j.micromeso.2014.10.023 ↗
27. 10.1088/0022-3727/48/20/20500210.1088/0022-3727/48/20/205002 ↗
28. 10.1039/c8qm00264a10.1039/c8qm00264a ↗
29. 10.1039/c3cy00487b10.1039/c3cy00487b ↗
30. 10.1039/c4ra07932a10.1039/c4ra07932a ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jcat.2023.03.01610.1016/j.jcat.2023.03.016 ↗
32. 10.1006/jcat.1993.114510.1006/jcat.1993.1145 ↗
33. Moulder J. F. · 1992
34. 10.1016/0368-2048(76)80015-110.1016/0368-2048(76)80015-1 ↗
35. 10.1107/s090904950501271910.1107/s0909049505012719 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0282910.1021/acs.iecr.9b02829 ↗
37. 10.1016/0254-0584(85)90059-810.1016/0254-0584(85)90059-8 ↗
38. 10.1021/jp055754k10.1021/jp055754k ↗
39. 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.08210.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.082 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.06.02610.1016/j.cclet.2018.06.026 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.03.00210.1016/j.fuproc.2018.03.002 ↗
42. 10.1080/15567036.2020.176590110.1080/15567036.2020.1765901 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.molcata.2015.09.02110.1016/j.molcata.2015.09.021 ↗
44. 10.1016/0021-9517(90)90116-210.1016/0021-9517(90)90116-2 ↗
45. 10.1021/j100018a03710.1021/j100018a037 ↗
46. 10.1021/ja002689d10.1021/ja002689d ↗
47. 10.1143/jjap.26.l113110.1143/jjap.26.l1131 ↗
48. Foster S. L. · 2021 · 2 · 16
49. 10.12693/aphyspola.133.116510.12693/aphyspola.133.1165 ↗
50. 10.1039/c2nr12121b10.1039/c2nr12121b ↗
51. 10.1007/s11244-013-0029-y10.1007/s11244-013-0029-y ↗
52. 10.1166/jnn.2012.576910.1166/jnn.2012.5769 ↗
53. 10.1016/0304-8853(80)90592-210.1016/0304-8853(80)90592-2 ↗
54. 10.3390/nano812105310.3390/nano8121053 ↗
55. 10.1039/d0na00591f10.1039/d0na00591f ↗
56. 10.1016/S0167-2991(97)80731-810.1016/S0167-2991(97)80731-8 ↗
57. 10.1016/s0144-2449(82)80035-310.1016/s0144-2449(82)80035-3 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11713910.1016/j.fuel.2020.117139 ↗
59. 10.3923/jas.2011.1297.130210.3923/jas.2011.1297.1302 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.04010.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.040 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.05.01910.1016/j.jechem.2019.05.019 ↗
62. Moulijn J. A. · 1993
63. 10.1021/jp011407910.1021/jp0114079 ↗
64. Haario H. · 2001
65. Murzin D. Y. · 2016
66. 10.1107/s160057751402588010.1107/s1600577514025880 ↗
67. 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b0349310.1021/acs.iecr.6b03493 ↗
68. 10.1021/jp103510310.1021/jp1035103 ↗
69. 10.1039/d0cy01396j10.1039/d0cy01396j ↗
70. 10.1051/jp4/199719010.1051/jp4/1997190 ↗