Boundary geometry controls a topological defect transition that determines lumen nucleation in embryonic development
Source abstract
Abstract
Topological defects determine the collective properties of anisotropic materials. Nonetheless, it is not fully understood how their configurations are controlled, especially in three dimensions. In living matter, contributions of two-dimensional topological defects to biological functions have been demonstrated, but whether three-dimensional polar defects have any biological relevance is unclear. Here we report a charge-preserving transition between three-dimensional defect configurations driven by boundary geometry and independent of material parameters. Moreover, we find that three-dimensional polar defects in the mouse embryo are the sites where fluid-filled lumina form, essential structures for subsequent development. We validate these findings by experimentally perturbing embryo shape beyond the transition point, which results in the creation of additional lumen initiation sites near predicted defect locations. Overall, our results reveal how boundary geometry controls polar defects, and how embryos use this mechanism for shape-dependent lumen formation. We expect this defect-control principle to apply broadly to systems with orientational order.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (93)
Show source-provided references
1. Araújo, N. A. et al. Steering self-organisation through confinement. Soft Matter 19, 1695–1704 (2023).10.1039/D2SM01562E ↗
2. Bradley, L. C., Chen, W.-H., Stebe, K. J. & Lee, D. Janus and patchy colloids at fluid interfaces. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 30, 25–33 (2017).10.1016/j.cocis.2017.05.001 ↗
3. Trushko, A. et al. Buckling of an epithelium growing under spherical confinement. Dev. Cell 54, 655–668 (2020).10.1016/j.devcel.2020.07.019 ↗
4. Harmansa, S., Erlich, A., Eloy, C., Zurlo, G. & Lecuit, T. Growth anisotropy of the extracellular matrix shapes a developing organ. Nat. Commun. 14, 1220 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-36739-y ↗
5. Lopez-Leon, T. & Fernandez-Nieves, A. Drops and shells of liquid crystal. Colloid Polym. Sci. 289, 345–359 (2011).10.1007/s00396-010-2367-7 ↗
6. Sieben, A., Schumann, J. & Seyfried, A. Collective phenomena in crowds—where pedestrian dynamics need social psychology. PLoS ONE 12, e0177328 (2017).10.1371/journal.pone.0177328 ↗
7. Barrat, J.-L. et al. Soft matter roadmap. J. Phys. Mater. 7, 012501 (2023).10.1088/2515-7639/ad06cc ↗
8. Nys, I. Patterned surface alignment to create complex three-dimensional nematic and chiral nematic liquid crystal structures. Liq. Cryst.Today 29, 65–83 (2020).10.1080/1358314X.2020.1886780 ↗
9. Daïeff, M. Confined particles in microfluidic devices: a review. Elveflow https://elveflow.com/microfluidic-reviews/confined-particles-in-microfluidic-devices-a-review/ (2020).
10. Xin, H., Chen, H., Song, P. & Sun, Q. Alignment control of thermotropic liquid crystals by topography and chemical functionality of a surface: a review. Mater. Today Commun. 36, 106680 (2023).10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106680 ↗
11. Sheng, P. Phase transition in surface-aligned nematic films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1059–1062 (1976).10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.1059 ↗
12. Sheng, P. Boundary-layer phase transition in nematic liquid crystals. Phys. Rev. A 26, 1610–1617 (1982).10.1103/PhysRevA.26.1610 ↗
13. Crawford, G., Stannarius, R. & Doane, J. Surface-induced orientational order in the isotropic phase of a liquid-crystal material. Phys. Rev. A 44, 2558–2569 (1991).10.1103/PhysRevA.44.2558 ↗
14. Nijjer, J. et al. Biofilms as self-shaping growing nematics. Nat. Phys. 19, 1936–1944 (2023).10.1038/s41567-023-02221-1 ↗
15. Bondarenko, V. et al. Embryo-uterine interaction coordinates mouse embryogenesis during implantation. EMBO J. 42, e113280 (2023).10.15252/embj.2022113280 ↗
16. O’Brien, L. E. et al. Rac1 orientates epithelial apical polarity through effects on basolateral laminin assembly. Nat.Cell Biol. 3, 831–838 (2001).10.1038/ncb0901-831 ↗
17. Akhtar, N. & Streuli, C. H. An integrin–ILK–microtubule network orients cell polarity and lumen formation in glandular epithelium. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 17–27 (2013).10.1038/ncb2646 ↗
18. Rasmussen, J. P., Reddy, S. S. & Priess, J. R. Laminin is required to orient epithelial polarity in the C. elegans pharynx. Development 139, 2050–2060 (2012).10.1242/dev.078360 ↗
19. Davey, C. F. & Moens, C. B. Planar cell polarity in moving cells: think globally, act locally. Development 144, 187–200 (2017).10.1242/dev.122804 ↗
20. Butler, M. T. & Wallingford, J. B. Planar cell polarity in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 375–388 (2017).10.1038/nrm.2017.11 ↗
21. Ladoux, B., Mège, R.-M. & Trepat, X. Front–rear polarization by mechanical cues: from single cells to tissues. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 420–433 (2016).10.1016/j.tcb.2016.02.002 ↗
22. Palmquist, K. H. et al. Reciprocal cell-ECM dynamics generate supracellular fluidity underlying spontaneous follicle patterning. Cell 185, 1960–1973 (2022).10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.023 ↗
23. Vicente, F. N. & Diz-Muñoz, A. Order from chaos: how mechanics shape epithelia and promote self-organization. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 32, 100446 (2023).10.1016/j.coisb.2023.100446 ↗
24. Buckley, C. E. & St Johnston, D. Apical–basal polarity and the control of epithelial form and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 559–577 (2022).10.1038/s41580-022-00465-y ↗
25. Ienaga, R., Beppu, K. & Maeda, Y. T. Geometric confinement guides topological defect pairings and emergent flow in nematic cell populations. Soft Matter 19, 5016–5028 (2023).10.1039/D3SM00071K ↗
26. Vafa, F., Nelson, D. R. & Doostmohammadi, A. Periodic orbits, pair nucleation, and unbinding of active nematic defects on cones. Phys. Rev. E 109, 064606 (2024).10.1103/PhysRevE.109.064606 ↗
27. Ardaševa, A. & Doostmohammadi, A. Topological defects in biological matter. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 354–356 (2022).10.1038/s42254-022-00469-9 ↗
28. Copenhagen, K., Alert, R., Wingreen, N. S. & Shaevitz, J. W. Topological defects promote layer formation in Myxococcus xanthus colonies. Nat. Phys. 17, 211–215 (2021).10.1038/s41567-020-01056-4 ↗
29. Maroudas-Sacks, Y. et al. Topological defects in the nematic order of actin fibres as organization centres of hydra morphogenesis. Nat. Phys. 17, 251–259 (2021).10.1038/s41567-020-01083-1 ↗
30. Li, H. et al. Data-driven quantitative modeling of bacterial active nematics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 777–785 (2019).10.1073/pnas.1812570116 ↗
31. Yaman, Y. I., Demir, E., Vetter, R. & Kocabas, A. Emergence of active nematics in chaining bacterial biofilms. Nat. Commun. 10, 2285 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-10311-z ↗
32. Kawaguchi, K., Kageyama, R. & Sano, M. Topological defects control collective dynamics in neural progenitor cell cultures. Nature 545, 327–331 (2017).10.1038/nature22321 ↗
33. Saw, T. B. et al. Topological defects in epithelia govern cell death and extrusion. Nature 544, 212–216 (2017).10.1038/nature21718 ↗
34. Blanch-Mercader, C. et al. Turbulent dynamics of epithelial cell cultures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 208101 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.208101 ↗
35. Rodriguez-Boulan, E. & Macara, I. G. Organization and execution of the epithelial polarity programme. Nat. Rev. Molec. Cell Biol. 15, 225–242 (2014).10.1038/nrm3775 ↗
36. Blanch-Mercader, C., Guillamat, P., Roux, A. & Kruse, K. Integer topological defects of cell monolayers: mechanics and flows. Phys. Rev. E 103, 012405 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevE.103.012405 ↗
37. Blanch-Mercader, C., Guillamat, P., Roux, A. & Kruse, K. Quantifying material properties of cell monolayers by analyzing integer topological defects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 028101 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.028101 ↗
38. Ichikawa, T. et al. An ex vivo system to study cellular dynamics underlying mouse peri-implantation development. Dev. Cell 57, 373–386 (2022).10.1016/j.devcel.2021.12.023 ↗
39. Bedzhov, I. & Zernicka-Goetz, M. Self-organizing properties of mouse pluripotent cells initiate morphogenesis upon implantation. Cell 156, 1032–1044 (2014).10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.023 ↗
40. Jülicher, F., Grill, S. W. & Salbreux, G. Hydrodynamic theory of active matter. Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 076601 (2018).10.1088/1361-6633/aab6bb ↗
41. De Gennes, P.-G. Short range order effects in the isotropic phase of nematics and cholesterics. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 12, 193–214 (1971).10.1080/15421407108082773 ↗
42. Prinsen, P. & Van Der Schoot, P. Shape and director-field transformation of tactoids. Phys. Rev. E 68, 021701 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevE.68.021701 ↗
43. Seyednejad, S. R., Mozaffari, M. R. & Ejtehadi, M. R. Confined nematic liquid crystal between two spherical boundaries with planar anchoring. Phys. Rev. E 88, 012508 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevE.88.012508 ↗
44. Mertelj, A. & Lisjak, D. Ferromagnetic nematic liquid crystals. Liq. Cryst. Rev. 5, 1–33 (2017).10.1080/21680396.2017.1304835 ↗
45. Prishchepa, O., Shabanov, A. & Zyryanov, V. Y. Director configurations in nematic droplets with inhomogeneous boundary conditions. Phys. Rev. E 72, 031712 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevE.72.031712 ↗
46. Ravnik, M. & Žumer, S. Landau–de gennes modelling of nematic liquid crystal colloids. Liq. Cryst. 36, 1201–1214 (2009).10.1080/02678290903056095 ↗
47. Tran, L. et al. Lassoing saddle splay and the geometrical control of topological defects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7106–7111 (2016).10.1073/pnas.1602703113 ↗
48. Revignas, D. & Ferrarini, A. Interplay of particle morphology and director distortions in nematic fluids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 267802 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.267802 ↗
49. Lavrentovich, O. D. Splay-bend elastic inequalities shape tactoids, toroids, umbilics, and conic section walls in paraelectric, twist-bend, and ferroelectric nematics. Liq. Cryst. Rev. 12, 1–13 (2024).10.1080/21680396.2024.2314305 ↗
50. Mietke, A., Jemseena, V., Kumar, K. V., Sbalzarini, I. F. & Jülicher, F. Minimal model of cellular symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 188101 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.188101 ↗
51. Volovik, G. & Lavrentovich, O. Topological dynamics of defects: boojums in nematic drops. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 85, 1997–2010 (1983).
52. Pollard, J. & Morris, R. G. Morse theory and meron mediated interactions between disclination lines in nematics. Phys. Rev. X. 15, 021099 (2024).
53. Molè, M. A. et al. Integrin β1 coordinates survival and morphogenesis of the embryonic lineage upon implantation and pluripotency transition. Cell Rep. 34, 108834 (2021).10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108834 ↗
54. Ichikawa, T. et al. Boundary-guided cell alignment drives mouse epiblast maturation. Nat. Phys. 22, 461–473 (2026).10.1038/s41567-026-03176-9 ↗
55. Mkaddem, S. & Gartland Jr, E. Fine structure of defects in radial nematic droplets. Phys. Rev. E 62, 6694 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevE.62.6694 ↗
56. Hoffmann, L. A., Carenza, L. N., Eckert, J. & Giomi, L. Theory of defect-mediated morphogenesis. Sci. Adv. 8, eabk2712 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.abk2712 ↗
57. Kim, Y. S. et al. Deciphering epiblast lumenogenesis reveals proamniotic cavity control of embryo growth and patterning. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe1640 (2021).10.1126/sciadv.abe1640 ↗
58. Paul, S. M., Ternet, M., Salvaterra, P. M. & Beitel, G. J. The Na+/K+ ATPase is required for septate junction function and epithelial tube-size control in the Drosophila tracheal system. Development 130, 4963–4974 (2003).10.1242/dev.00691 ↗
59. Rathbun, L. et al. Cytokinetic bridge triggers de novo lumen formation in vivo. Nat. Commun. 11, 1269 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-15002-8 ↗
60. Bryant, D. M. et al. A molecular network for de novo generation of the apical surface and lumen. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 1035–1045 (2010).10.1038/ncb2106 ↗
61. Sigurbjörnsdóttir, S., Mathew, R. & Leptin, M. Molecular mechanisms of de novo lumen formation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 665–676 (2014).10.1038/nrm3871 ↗
62. Pasquier, N., Jaulin, F. & Peglion, F. Inverted apicobasal polarity in health and disease. J. Cell Sci. 137, jcs261659 (2024).10.1242/jcs.261659 ↗
63. Guyomar, T., Lu, L., Hiraiwa, T. & Riveline, D. Asymmetry of acto-myosin cortices as active fluids shape cells in organoids. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.22.609097 (2024).10.1101/2024.08.22.609097 ↗
64. Shahbazi, M. N. et al. Pluripotent state transitions coordinate morphogenesis in mouse and human embryos. Nature 552, 239–243 (2017).10.1038/nature24675 ↗
65. Rosa, V. S., Sato, N. & Shahbazi, M. N. Protocol for generating a 3D culture of epiblast stem cells. STAR Protoc. 5, 103347 (2024).10.1016/j.xpro.2024.103347 ↗
66. Christodoulou, N. et al. Morphogenesis of extra-embryonic tissues directs the remodelling of the mouse embryo at implantation. Nat. Commun. 10, 3557 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-11482-5 ↗
67. Mermin, N. D. The topological theory of defects in ordered media. Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 591–648 (1979).10.1103/RevModPhys.51.591 ↗
68. Wang, X., Miller, D. S., Bukusoglu, E., De Pablo, J. J. & Abbott, N. L. Topological defects in liquid crystals as templates for molecular self-assembly. Nat. Mater. 15, 106–112 (2016).10.1038/nmat4421 ↗
69. Shankar, S., Souslov, A., Bowick, M. J., Marchetti, M. C. & Vitelli, V. Topological active matter. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 380–398 (2022).10.1038/s42254-022-00445-3 ↗
70. Shankar, S., Scharrer, L. V., Bowick, M. J. & Marchetti, M. C. Design rules for controlling active topological defects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2400933121 (2024).10.1073/pnas.2400933121 ↗
71. Guillamat, P., Blanch-Mercader, C., Pernollet, G., Kruse, K. & Roux, A. Integer topological defects organize stresses driving tissue morphogenesis. Nat. Mater. 21, 588–597 (2022).10.1038/s41563-022-01194-5 ↗
72. Durdu, S. et al. Luminal signalling links cell communication to tissue architecture during organogenesis. Nature 515, 120–124 (2014).10.1038/nature13852 ↗
73. Ryan, A. Q., Chan, C. J., Graner, F. & Hiiragi, T. Lumen expansion facilitates epiblast-primitive endoderm fate specification during mouse blastocyst formation. Dev. Cell 51, 684–697 (2019).10.1016/j.devcel.2019.10.011 ↗
74. Neahring, L. & Zallen, J. A. Three-dimensional rosettes in epithelial formation. Cells Dev. 184, 204022 (2025).10.1016/j.cdev.2025.204022 ↗
75. Yang, Z. et al. De novo lumen formation and elongation in the developing nephron: a central role for afadin in apical polarity. Development 140, 1774–1784 (2013).10.1242/dev.087957 ↗
76. Liang, X., Weberling, A., Hii, C. Y., Zernicka-Goetz, M. & Buckley, C. E. E-cadherin mediates apical membrane initiation site localisation during de novo polarisation of epithelial cavities. EMBO J 41, e111021 (2022).10.15252/embj.2022111021 ↗
77. Dasgupta, S., Gupta, K., Zhang, Y., Viasnoff, V. & Prost, J. Physics of lumen growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4751–E4757 (2018).10.1073/pnas.1722154115 ↗
78. Scroggs, M. W., Dokken, J. S., Richardson, C. N. & Wells, G. N. Construction of arbitrary order finite element degree-of-freedom maps on polygonal and polyhedral cell meshes. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 48, 18 (2022).10.1145/3524456 ↗
79. Guruciaga, P. C. Geometry-driven topological defects in a polar system: v1.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19248955 (2026).10.5281/zenodo.19248955 ↗
80. Muzumdar, M. D., Tasic, B., Miyamichi, K., Li, L. & Luo, L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis 45, 593–605 (2007).10.1002/dvg.20335 ↗
81. Hadjantonakis, A.-K. & Papaioannou, V. E. Dynamic in vivo imaging and cell tracking using a histone fluorescent protein fusion in mice. BMC Biotechnol. 4, 33 (2004).10.1186/1472-6750-4-33 ↗
82. Chen, Z.-L. & Strickland, S. Laminin γ1 is critical for Schwann cell differentiation, axon myelination, and regeneration in the peripheral nerve. J. Cell Biol. 163, 889–899 (2003).10.1083/jcb.200307068 ↗
83. Kim, E. J. Y., Sorokin, L. & Hiiragi, T. ECM-integrin signalling instructs cellular position sensing to pattern the early mouse embryo. Development 149, dev200140 (2022).10.1242/dev.200140 ↗
84. Sofroniew, N. et al. Napari: a multi-dimensional image viewer for Python. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15314358 (2025).10.5281/zenodo.15314358 ↗
85. Yaniv, Z., Lowekamp, B. C., Johnson, H. J. & Beare, R. Simpleitk image-analysis notebooks: a collaborative environment for education and reproducible research. J. Digit. Imaging 31, 290–303 (2018).10.1007/s10278-017-0037-8 ↗
86. Haase, R. Napari-simpleitk-image-processing: 0.4.5 Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5813116 (2023).10.5281/zenodo.5813116 ↗
87. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).10.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
88. Stringer, C., Wang, T., Michaelos, M. & Pachitariu, M. Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nat. Methods 18, 100–106 (2021).10.1038/s41592-020-01018-x ↗
89. Pachitariu, M. & Stringer, C. Cellpose 2.0: how to train your own model. Nat. Methods 19, 1634–1641 (2022).10.1038/s41592-022-01663-4 ↗
90. Plunder, S. EpiblastOrientationMaps: v1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19242875 (2026).10.5281/zenodo.19242875 ↗
91. Stokkermans, A. Napari-segmentation-toolbox v.0.0.2 (Napari, 2025).
92. van der Walt, S. et al. Scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ 2, e453 (2014).10.7717/peerj.453 ↗
93. Dawson-Haggerty et al. Trimesh v4.5.0 (2019).