journal article·2026-08Open access

Ion correlations explain kinetic selectivity in diffusion-limited solid-state synthesis reactions

Vir Karan, Max C. Gallant, Yuxing Fei, Gerbrand Ceder, Kristin A. Persson

Nature Materials· Volume 25· Issue 8

Abstract

Abstract Establishing viable solid-state synthesis pathways for novel inorganic materials remains a major challenge in materials science. Previous pathway design methods using pairwise reaction approaches have navigated the thermodynamic landscape with first-principles data but lack kinetic information, limiting their effectiveness. This gap leads to suboptimal precursor selection and predictions, especially for reactions forming competing phases with similar formation energies, where ion diffusion is a critical influence. Here we demonstrate an inorganic synthesis framework by incorporating machine learning-derived transport properties through ‘liquid-like’ product layers into a thermodynamic cellular reaction model. In the Ba–Ti–O system, known for its competitive polymorphism, we obtain accurate predictions of phase formation with varying BaO:TiO 2 ratios as a function of time and temperature. We find that diffusion–thermodynamics interplay governs phase compositions, with cross-ion transport coefficients critical for predicting diffusion-limited selectivity. This work bridges length scales and timescales by integrating solid-state reaction kinetics with first-principles thermodynamics and spatial reactivity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. DiSalvo, F. J. Solid-state chemistry: a rediscovered chemical frontier. Science 247, 649–655 (1990).10.1126/science.247.4943.649 ↗
2. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: the Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
3. McDermott, M. J., Dwaraknath, S. S. & Persson, K. A. A graph-based network for predicting chemical reaction pathways in solid-state materials synthesis. Nat. Commun. 12, 3097 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-23339-x ↗
4. Szymanski, N. J., Nevatia, P., Bartel, C. J., Zeng, Y. & Ceder, G. Autonomous and dynamic precursor selection for solid-state materials synthesis. Nat. Commun. 14, 6956 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-42329-9 ↗
5. Szymanski, N. J. et al. Quantifying the regime of thermodynamic control for solid-state reactions during ternary metal oxide synthesis. Sci. Adv. 10, eadp3309 (2024).10.1126/sciadv.adp3309 ↗
6. Khawam, A. & Flanagan, D. R. Solid-state kinetic models: basics and mathematical fundamentals. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 17315–17328 (2006).10.1021/jp062746a ↗
7. Frade, J. R. & Cable, M. Reexamination of the basic theoretical model for the kinetics of solid–state reactions. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 1949–1957 (1992).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb07222.x ↗
8. Huang, G., Montiel, D., McAuliffe, R. D., Veith, G. M. & Thornton, K. Phase-field modeling of solid-state metathesis reactions with the charge neutrality constraint. Comput. Mater. Sci. 221, 112080 (2023).10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112080 ↗
9. Yang, Q. et al. A thermodynamically consistent phase-field model for viscous sintering. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 102, 674–685 (2019).10.1111/jace.16021 ↗
10. Hu, J.-M. et al. Phase-field based multiscale modeling of heterogeneous solid electrolytes: applications to nanoporous Li3Ps4. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 33341–33350 (2017).10.1021/acsami.7b11292 ↗
11. Chen, L.-Q. & Zhao, Y. From classical thermodynamics to phase-field method. Prog. Mater. Sci. 124, 100868 (2022).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100868 ↗
12. Cordova, D. L. M. & Johnson, D. C. Synthesis of metastable inorganic solids with extended structures. ChemPhysChem 21, 1345–1368 (2020).10.1002/cphc.202000199 ↗
13. Beauger, A., Mutin, J. C. & Nièpce, J. C. Synthesis reaction of metatitanate batio3. J. Mater. Sci. 18, 3543–3550 (1983).10.1007/BF00540726 ↗
14. Brzozowski, E., Sanchez, J. & Castro, M. BaCO3–TiO2 solid state reaction: a kinetic study. J. Mater. Synth. Process. 10, 1–5 (2002).10.1023/A:1021099510990 ↗
15. Bierach, J. W. The Formation of Barium Titanate Ceramics by Solid State Reaction. Report No. LBL-2185-4 (Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1988).
16. McDermott, M. J. et al. Assessing thermodynamic selectivity of solid-state reactions for the predictive synthesis of inorganic materials. ACS Cent. Sci. 9, 1957–1975 (2023).10.1021/acscentsci.3c01051 ↗
17. Buscaglia, M. T., Bassoli, M., Buscaglia, V. & Vormberg, R. Solid-state synthesis of nanocrystalline BaTio3: reaction kinetics and powder properties. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 2862–2869 (2008).10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02576.x ↗
18. Wu, J. -M. & Wang, H. -W. Factors affecting the formation of Ba2Ti9O20. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71, 869–875 (1988).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb07538.x ↗
19. Gallant, M. C., McDermott, M. J., Li, B. & Persson, K. A. A cellular automaton simulation for predicting phase evolution in solid-state reactions. Chem. Mater. 37, 210–223 (2025).10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c02301 ↗
20. Merkle, R. & Maier, J. On the Tammann rule. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 631, 1163–1166 (2005).10.1002/zaac.200400540 ↗
21. Bondioli, F., Bonamartini Corradi, A., Ferrari, A. M., Manfredini, T. & Pellacani, G. C. Kinetic study of conventional solid-state synthesis of BaTiO3 by in situ HT-XRD. Mater. Sci. Forum 278–281, 379–383 (1998).10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.278-281.379 ↗
22. O’Bryan, H. M. Jr. & Thomson, J. Jr. Preparation of BaTi5O11 by solid-state reaction. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 58, 454–54 (1975).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1975.tb19022.x ↗
23. O’Bryan, H. M. & Thomson, J. Ba2Ti9O20 phase equilibria. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66, 66–68 (1983).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb09970.x ↗
24. Zhu, N. & West, A. R. Formation and stability of ferroelectric BaTi2O5. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93, 295–300 (2010).10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03393.x ↗
25. Cheng, J., Fong, K. D. & Persson, K. A. Materials design principles of amorphous cathode coatings for lithium-ion battery applications. J. Mater. Chem 10, 22245–22256 (2022).10.1039/D2TA06051E ↗
26. Vargas-Barbosa, N. M. & Roling, B. Dynamic ion correlations in solid and liquid electrolytes: how do they affect charge and mass transport? ChemElectroChem 7, 367–385 (2020).10.1002/celc.201901627 ↗
27. Wheeler, D. R. & Newman, J. Molecular dynamics simulations of multicomponent diffusion. 1. Equilibrium method. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 18353–18361 (2004).10.1021/jp047850b ↗
28. Molinari, N., Mailoa, J. P., Craig, N., Christensen, J. & Kozinsky, B. Transport anomalies emerging from strong correlation in ionic liquid electrolytes. J. Power Sources 428, 27–36 (2019).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.085 ↗
29. Ingram, M. D. Ionic conductivity in glass. Phys. Chem. Glasses 28, 215–234 (1987).
30. Neilson, J. R., McDermott, M. J. & Persson, K. A. Modernist materials synthesis: finding thermodynamic shortcuts with hyperdimensional chemistry. J. Mater. Res. 38, 2885–2893 (2023).10.1557/s43578-023-01037-2 ↗
31. Meyer, H.-J. Solid state metathesis reactions as a conceptual tool in the synthesis of new materials. Dalton Trans. 39, 5973–5982 (2010).10.1039/c001031f ↗
32. Martinolich, A. J. & Neilson, J. R. Toward reaction-by-design: achieving kinetic control of solid state chemistry with metathesis. Chem. Mater. 29, 479–489 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04861 ↗
33. Chamorro, J. R. & McQueen, T. M. Progress toward solid state synthesis by design. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 2918–2925 (2018).10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00382 ↗
34. Jiang, Z., Ramanathan, A. & Shoemaker, D. P. In situ identification of kinetic factors that expedite inorganic crystal formation and discovery. J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 5709–5717 (2017).10.1039/C6TC04931A ↗
35. Aykol, M., Montoya, J. H. & Hummelshøj, J. Rational solid-state synthesis routes for inorganic materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 9244–9259 (2021).10.1021/jacs.1c04888 ↗
36. Lee, S., Randall, C. A. & Liu, Z.-K. Modified phase diagram for the barium oxide-titanium dioxide system for the ferroelectric barium titanate. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90, 2589–2594 (2007).10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01794.x ↗
37. Bartel, C. J. et al. Physical descriptor for the Gibbs energy of inorganic crystalline solids and temperature-dependent materials chemistry. Nat. Commun. 9, 4168 (2018).10.1038/s41467-018-06682-4 ↗
38. Fong, K. D., Bergstrom, H. K., McCloskey, B. D. & Mandadapu, K. K. Transport phenomena in electrolyte solutions: nonequilibrium thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. AIChE J. 66, e17091 (2020).10.1002/aic.17091 ↗
39. Drautz, R. Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials. Phys. Rev. B 99, 014104 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.99.014104 ↗
40. Aykol, M., Dwaraknath, S. S., Sun, W. & Persson, K. A. Thermodynamic limit for synthesis of metastable inorganic materials. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq0148 (2018).10.1126/sciadv.aaq0148 ↗
41. Zheng, H. et al. The ab initio non-crystalline structure database: empowering machine learning to decode diffusivity. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 295 (2024).10.1038/s41524-024-01469-2 ↗
42. Lysogorskiy, Y. et al. Performant implementation of the atomic cluster expansion (PACE) and application to copper and silicon. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 97 (2021).10.1038/s41524-021-00559-9 ↗
43. Bochkarev, A. et al. Efficient parametrization of the atomic cluster expansion. Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 013804 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.013804 ↗
44. Erhard, L. C., Rohrer, J., Albe, K. & Deringer, V. L. Modelling atomic and nanoscale structure in the silicon–oxygen system through active machine learning. Nat. Commun. 15, 1927 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-45840-9 ↗
45. Lysogorskiy, Y., Bochkarev, A., Mrovec, M. & Drautz, R. Active learning strategies for atomic cluster expansion models. Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 043801 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.043801 ↗
46. Zimmermann, N. E. & Jain, A. Local structure order parameters and site fingerprints for quantification of coordination environment and crystal structure similarity. RSC Adv. 10, 6063–6081 (2020).10.1039/C9RA07755C ↗
47. Ong, S. P. et al. Python materials genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source Python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
48. Schmalzried, H. & Pfeiffer, T. The build-up of internal pressures during compound formation. Phys. Chem. 148, 21–32 (1986).
49. Lu, C.-H. & Lee, J.-T. Kinetic analysis of the serial reactions of lead magnesium tungstate ceramics using a multiple core-shell model. J. Mater. Sci. 33, 2121–2127 (1998).10.1023/A:1004323320352 ↗
50. Hong, Q.-J., Ushakov, S. V., van de Walle, A. & Navrotsky, A. Melting temperature prediction using a graph neural network model: from ancient minerals to new materials. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2209630119 (2022).10.1073/pnas.2209630119 ↗
51. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
52. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
53. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
54. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
55. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
56. Karan, V., Gallant, M. C. & Persson, K. Ion correlations explain kinetic selectivity in diffusion-limited solid state synthesis reactions: transport coefficients in amorphous Ba-Ti-O interphases. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28207292.v3 (2026).10.6084/m9.figshare.28207292.v3 ↗