Anisotropic lattice distortion makes ultrastrong martensitic steel ductile
Source abstract
Abstract
Making ultrahigh-strength as-quenched carbon martensitic steels ductile remains a critical challenge for structural applications. The ordered occupancy of carbon at interstitial sites in body-centred cubic martensite induces anisotropic lattice distortion, forming brittle body-centred tetragonal martensite with suppressed dislocation activity. Conventional tempering eliminates this distortion to improve ductility. Here we propose a counterintuitive strategy to unlock the ductility of a 2.4-GPa as-quenched carbon martensitic steel by utilizing the anisotropic lattice distortion of martensite. Its severe lattice distortion, that is, its high tetragonality, is driven by large-concentration substitutional solutes and carbon. The deliberately introduced high tetragonality activates deformation twins as a plastic carrier, effectively overcoming the brittleness of quenched carbon martensitic steel. This strategy of using solid-solution-induced anisotropic lattice distortion challenges the conventional view of tetragonal martensite's inherent brittleness, establishing a framework for alloy design that yields strong and ductile metallic materials.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Ritchie, R. O. The conflicts between strength and toughness. Nat. Mater. 10, 817–822 (2011).10.1038/nmat3115 ↗
2. Wei, Y. et al. Evading the strength–ductility trade-off dilemma in steel through gradient hierarchical nanotwins. Nat. Commun. 5, 3580 (2014).10.1038/ncomms4580 ↗
3. He, B. B. et al. High dislocation density-induced large ductility in deformed and partitioned steels. Science 357, 1029–1032 (2017).10.1126/science.aan0177 ↗
4. Wang, L. et al. Tailoring planar slip to achieve pure metal-like ductility in body-centred-cubic multi-principal element alloys. Nat. Mater. 22, 950–957 (2023).10.1038/s41563-023-01517-0 ↗
5. Wang, Y., Chen, M., Zhou, F. & Ma, E. High tensile ductility in a nanostructured metal. Nature 419, 912–915 (2002).10.1038/nature01133 ↗
6. Wu, X., Jiang, P., Chen, L., Yuan, F. & Zhu, Y. T. Extraordinary strain hardening by gradient structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7197–7201 (2014).10.1073/pnas.1324069111 ↗
7. Lu, L., Shen, Y., Chen, X., Qian, L. & Lu, K. Ultrahigh strength and high electrical conductivity in copper. Science 304, 422–426 (2004).10.1126/science.1092905 ↗
8. Lu, K., Lu, L. & Suresh, S. Strengthening materials by engineering coherent internal boundaries at the nanoscale. Science 324, 349–352 (2009).10.1126/science.1159610 ↗
9. Pan, Q. et al. Gradient cell-structured high-entropy alloy with exceptional strength and ductility. Science 374, 984–989 (2021).10.1126/science.abj8114 ↗
10. Fang, T. H., Li, W. L., Tao, N. R. & Lu, K. Revealing extraordinary intrinsic tensile plasticity in gradient nano-grained copper. Science 331, 1587–1590 (2011).10.1126/science.1200177 ↗
11. Cheng, Z., Zhou, H., Lu, Q., Gao, H. & Lu, L. Extra strengthening and work hardening in gradient nanotwinned metals. Science 362, eaau1925 (2018).10.1126/science.aau1925 ↗
12. Valiev, R. Nanostructuring of metals by severe plastic deformation for advanced properties. Nat. Mater. 3, 511–516 (2004).10.1038/nmat1180 ↗
13. Morito, S., Nishikawa, J. & Maki, T. Dislocation density within lath martensite in Fe–C and Fe–Ni alloys. ISIJ Int. 43, 1475–1477 (2003).10.2355/isijinternational.43.1475 ↗
14. Nishiyama, Z. Martensitic Transformation (Elsevier, 2012).
15. Krauss, G. Martensite in steel: strength and structure. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 273–275, 40–57 (1999).10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00288-9 ↗
16. Zener, C. Kinetics of the decomposition of austenite. Trans. AIME 167, 550–595 (1946).
17. Zener, C. Theory of strain interaction of solute atoms. Phys. Rev. 74, 639–647 (1948).10.1103/PhysRev.74.639 ↗
18. Bain, E. C. & Dunkirk, N. The nature of martensite. Trans. AIME 70, 25–47 (1924).
19. Zhang, X. et al. Mechanism of collective interstitial ordering in Fe–C alloys. Nat. Mater. 19, 849–854 (2020).10.1038/s41563-020-0677-9 ↗
20. Chilton, J. M. & Kelly, P. M. The strength of ferrous martensite. Acta Metall. 16, 637–656 (1968).10.1016/0001-6160(68)90137-5 ↗
21. Morsdorf, L., Emelina, E., Gault, B., Herbig, M. & Tasan, C. C. Carbon redistribution in quenched and tempered lath martensite. Acta Mater. 205, 116521 (2021).10.1016/j.actamat.2020.116521 ↗
22. Bhadeshia, H. & Honeycombe, R. Steels: Microstructure and Properties (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017).10.1016/B978-0-08-100270-4.00013-5 ↗
23. Horn, R. M. & Ritchie, R. O. Mechanisms of tempered martensite embrittlement in low alloy steels. Metall. Trans. A 9, 1039–1053 (1978).10.1007/BF02652208 ↗
24. Tanaka, T., Maruyama, N., Nakamura, N. & Wilkinson, A. J. Tetragonality of Fe–C martensite – a pattern matching electron backscatter diffraction analysis compared to X-ray diffraction. Acta Mater. 195, 728–738 (2020).10.1016/j.actamat.2020.06.017 ↗
25. Maruyama, N., Tabata, S. & Kawata, H. Excess solute carbon and tetragonality in as-quenched Fe–1Mn–C (C: 0.07 to 0.8 mass pct) martensite. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 51, 1085–1097 (2020).10.1007/s11661-019-05617-y ↗
26. Xiao, L. et al. Lattice-parameter variation with carbon content of martensite. I. X-ray-diffraction experimental study. Phys. Rev. B 52, 9970–9978 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevB.52.9970 ↗
27. Kajiwara, S. & Kikuchi, T. On the abnormally large tetragonality of martensite in Fe–Ni–C alloys. Acta Metall. Mater. 39, 1123–1131 (1991).10.1016/0956-7151(91)90200-K ↗
28. Chentouf, S. et al. Effect of interstitial carbon distribution and nickel substitution on the tetragonality of martensite:aA first-principles study. Intermetallics 89, 92–99 (2017).10.1016/j.intermet.2017.05.022 ↗
29. Zhang, Y. et al. Multi-aspect characterization of low-temperature tempering behaviors in high-carbon martensite. ISIJ Int. 64, 245–256 (2024).10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2023-251 ↗
30. Taylor, K. A. et al. Spinodal decomposition during aging of Fe–Ni–C martensites. Metall. Trans. A 20, 2717–2737 (1989).10.1007/BF02670166 ↗
31. Taylor, K. A. & Cohen, M. Aging of ferrous martensites. Prog. Mater. Sci. 36, 151–272 (1992).10.1016/0079-6425(92)90010-5 ↗
32. Allain, S., Danoix, F., Goune, M., Hoummada, K. & Mangelinck, D. Static and dynamical ageing processes at room temperature in a Fe25Ni0.4C virgin martensite: effect of C redistribution at the nanoscale. Philos. Mag. Lett. 93, 68–76 (2013).10.1080/09500839.2012.742590 ↗
33. Maugis, P. et al. Carbon diffusivity and kinetics of spinodal decomposition of martensite in a model Fe–Ni–C alloy. Mater. Lett. 214, 213–216 (2018).10.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.007 ↗
34. Maki, T. in Phase Transformations in Steels: Diffusionless Transformations, High Strength Steels, Modelling and Advanced Analytical Techniques (eds Pereloma, E. & Edmonds, D. V.) 34–58 (Woodhead Publishing, 2012).
35. Shi, Z. & Singh, C. V. Competing twinning mechanisms in body-centered cubic metallic nanowires. Scr. Mater. 113, 214–217 (2016).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.11.006 ↗
36. Saeglitz, M. & Krauss, G. Deformation, fracture, and mechanical properties of low-temperature-tempered martensite in SAE 43xx steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 28, 377–387 (1997).10.1007/s11661-997-0139-x ↗
37. Wilde, J., Cerezo, A. & Smith, G. D. W. Three-dimensional atomic-scale mapping of a Cottrell atmosphere around a dislocation in iron. Scr. Mater. 43, 39–48 (2000).10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00361-4 ↗
38. Lei, Z. et al. Enhanced strength and ductility in a high-entropy alloy via ordered oxygen complexes. Nature 563, 546–550 (2018).10.1038/s41586-018-0685-y ↗
39. Cui, D. et al. Oxygen-assisted spinodal structure achieves 1.5 GPa yield strength in a ductile refractory high-entropy alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 157, 11–20 (2023).10.1016/j.jmst.2023.01.038 ↗
40. Chong, Y. et al. Elimination of oxygen sensitivity in α-titanium by substitutional alloying with Al. Nat. Commun. 12, 6158 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-26374-w ↗
41. Ramarolahy, A. et al. Microstructure and mechanical behavior of superelastic Ti–24Nb–0.5O and Ti–24Nb–0.5N biomedical alloys. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 9, 83–90 (2012).10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.017 ↗
42. Chong, Y. et al. Oxygen interstitials make metastable β titanium alloys strong and ductile. Acta Mater. 257, 119165 (2023).10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119165 ↗
43. Jiang, S. et al. Ultrastrong steel via minimal lattice misfit and high-density nanoprecipitation. Nature 544, 460–464 (2017).10.1038/nature22032 ↗
44. Niu, M. et al. Precipitate evolution and strengthening behavior during aging process in a 2.5 GPa grade maraging steel. Acta Mater. 179, 296–307 (2019).10.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.042 ↗
45. Zhao, Y. L. et al. Superior high-temperature properties and deformation-induced planar faults in a novel L12-strengthened high-entropy alloy. Acta Mater. 188, 517–527 (2020).10.1016/j.actamat.2020.02.028 ↗
46. Liu, L. et al. Enhanced strength-ductility synergy via novel bifunctional nano-precipitates in a high-entropy alloy. Int. J. Plast. 153, 103235 (2022).10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103235 ↗
47. Zhao, Y. L. et al. Heterogeneous precipitation behavior and stacking-fault-mediated deformation in a CoCrNi-based medium-entropy alloy. Acta Mater. 138, 72–82 (2017).10.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.029 ↗
48. Sohn, S. S. et al. Ultrastrong medium-entropy single-phase alloys designed via severe lattice distortion. Adv. Mater. 31, e1807142 (2019).10.1002/adma.201807142 ↗
49. Shen, Y. F., Lu, L., Lu, Q. H., Jin, Z. H. & Lu, K. Tensile properties of copper with nano-scale twins. Scr. Mater. 52, 989–994 (2005).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.01.033 ↗
50. Bouaziz, O., Barbier, D., Cugy, P. & Petigand, G. Effect of process parameters on a metallurgical route providing nano-structured single phase steel with high work-hardening. Adv. Eng. Mater. 14, 49–51 (2012).10.1002/adem.201100164 ↗
51. Ashby, M. F. The deformation of plastically non-homogeneous materials. Philos. Mag. 21, 399–424 (1970).10.1080/14786437008238426 ↗
52. Christian, J. W. & Mahajan, S. Deformation twinning. Prog. Mater. Sci. 39, 1–157 (1995).10.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
53. Kurdjumov, G. & Khachaturyan, A. Nature of axial ratio anomalies of the martensite lattice and mechanism of diffusionless γ → α transformation. Acta Metall. 23, 1077–1088 (1975).10.1016/0001-6160(75)90112-1 ↗
54. Goldman, A. J. & Robertson, W. D. Elastic properties of austenite and martensite in iron–nickel alloys. Acta Metall. 12, 1265–1275 (1964).10.1016/0001-6160(64)90111-7 ↗
55. Ledbetter, H. M. & Reed, R. P. Elastic properties of metals and alloys, I. Iron, nickel, and iron–nickel alloys. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2, 531–618 (1973).10.1063/1.3253127 ↗
56. Christian, J. W. Tetragonal martensites in ferrous alloys – a critique. Mater. Trans. JIM 33, 208–214 (1992).10.2320/matertrans1989.33.208 ↗
57. Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. Theory of Transformations in Steels (CRC Press, 2021).10.1201/9781003056782 ↗
58. Kajiwara, S. Characteristic features of shape memory effect and related transformation behavior in Fe-based alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 273–275, 67–88 (1999).10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00290-7 ↗