Nuclear spins keep coming back
Source abstract
Abstract
Semiconducting quantum dots have been extensively investigated with the idea of using single spins for quantum computing. Whereas access to single electrons and their spins has become routine, the challenges posed by nuclear spins remain ever present.
The source flagged this abstract for review. Check formulas and completeness against the original publication.
Source: openaire · Quality: needs review · Source record ↗
Source flags: short_text
Source flags: short_text
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Vandersypen, L. M. K. & Chuang, I. L. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1037–1069 (2004).10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1037 ↗
2. Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C. & Wineland, D. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 281–324 (2003).10.1103/RevModPhys.75.281 ↗
3. Chekhovich, E. A. et al. Nature Mater. 12, 494–504 (2013).10.1038/nmat3652 ↗
4. Warburton, R. Nature Mater. 12, 483–493 (2013).10.1038/nmat3585 ↗
5. Koppens, F. H. L. et al. Nature 442, 766–771 (2006).10.1038/nature05065 ↗
6. Loss, D. & DiVincenzo, D. P. Phys. Rev. A 57, 120–126 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevA.57.120 ↗
7. Petta, J. et al. Science 309, 2180–2184 (2005).10.1126/science.1116955 ↗
8. Elzerman, J. M. et al. Nature 430, 431–435 (2004).10.1038/nature02693 ↗
9. Burkard, G., Loss, D. & DiVincenzo, D. P. Phys. Rev. B 59, 2070–2078 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.2070 ↗
10. Coish, W. A. & Loss, D. Phys. Rev. B 70, 195340 (2004).
11. Foletti, S., Bluhm, H., Mahalu, D., Umansky, V. & Yacoby, A. Nature Phys. 5, 903–908 (2009).10.1038/nphys1424 ↗
12. Petta, J. R., Lu, H. & Gossard, A. C. Science 327, 669–672 (2010).10.1126/science.1183628 ↗
13. Petta, J. R. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 067601 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.067601 ↗
14. Gammon, D. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5176–5179 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5176 ↗
15. Urbaszek, B. et al. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 79–133 (2013).10.1103/RevModPhys.85.79 ↗
16. Xu, X. et al. Nature 459, 1105–1109 (2009).10.1038/nature08120 ↗
17. Bluhm, H., Foletti, S., Mahalu, D., Umansky, V. & Yacoby, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 216803 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.216803 ↗
18. Simon, P. & Loss, D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 156401 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.156401 ↗
19. Ribeiro, H. & Burkard, G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 216802 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.216802 ↗
20. Coish, W. A., Yuzbashyan, E. A., Altshuler, B. L. & Loss, D. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 081715 (2007).10.1063/1.2722783 ↗
21. Rudner, M. S., Vandersypen, L. M. K., Vuletic, V. & Levitov, L. S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 206806 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.206806 ↗
22. Dutt, M. V. G. et al. Science 316, 1312–1316 (2007).10.1126/science.1139831 ↗
23. Fuchs, G. D., Burkard, G., Klimov, P. V. & Awschalom, D. D. Nature Phys. 7, 789–793 (2011).10.1038/nphys2026 ↗
24. Fischer, J., Coish, W. A., Bulaev, D. V. & Loss, D. Phys. Rev. B 78, 155329 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevB.78.155329 ↗
25. Schroer, M. D. & Petta, J. R. Nature Phys. 4, 516–518 (2008).10.1038/nphys1007 ↗
26. Trauzettel, B., Bulaev, D. V., Loss, D. & Burkard, G. Nature Phys. 3, 192–196 (2007).10.1038/nphys544 ↗