Metal hybridization in dilute-alloy catalysts promotes sintering resistance by decreasing surface mobility
Source abstract
Abstract
Dilute-metal-alloy nanoparticles exhibit enhanced catalytic performance compared with monometallic nanoparticles for many reactions. Anecdotal reports indicate that very dilute alloying can also slow the sintering rates of supported nanoparticles, although this has not been rigorously assessed and cannot be explained using bulk descriptors such as metal melting temperature. Here we utilize methanol synthesis reactivity, microscopy and in situ spectroscopy measurements to demonstrate that 1 atom% Pt addition to ~1-2-nm-diameter Cu (Pt1Cu100) nanoparticles supported on SiO2 dramatically decreases their sintering rates. Minimal sintering of Pt1Cu100 nanoparticles is observed during aging in H2 up to 700 °C versus 500 °C for Cu nanoparticles. Scanning tunnelling microscopy reveals that the addition of 0.01 monolayer of Pt to a Cu(110) surface decreases the detachment rate of undercoordinated atoms, demonstrating that dilute dopants can locally decrease the rate of the first step in nanoparticle sintering. Density functional theory calculations quantify the stabilization and predict other sinter-resistant dilute alloys. We find that the degree of host-dopant d-state hybridization correlates with decreased surface mobility, providing a mechanistic framework for designing sinter-resistant catalysts.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Catalysts for Methane Reforming · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Bartholomew, C. H. & Farrauto, R. J. Fundamentals of Industrial Catalytic Processes (John Wiley & Sons, 2005).10.1002/9780471730071 ↗
2. Scott, S. L. A matter of life(time) and death. ACS Catal. 8, 8597–8599 (2018).10.1021/acscatal.8b03199 ↗
3. An, K. & Somorjai, G. A. Size and shape control of metal nanoparticles for reaction selectivity in catalysis. ChemCatChem 4, 1512–1524 (2012).10.1002/cctc.201200229 ↗
4. Matsubu, J. C., Yang, V. N. & Christopher, P. Isolated metal active site concentration and stability control catalytic CO2 reduction selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 3076–3084 (2015).10.1021/ja5128133 ↗
5. Argyle, M. D. & Bartholomew, C. H. Heterogeneous catalyst deactivation and regeneration: a review. Catalysts 5, 145–269 (2015).10.3390/catal5010145 ↗
6. Moulijn, J. A., van Diepen, A. E. & Kapteijn, F. Catalyst deactivation: is it predictable? What to do?. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 212, 3–16 (2001).10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00842-5 ↗
7. Campbell, C. T., Parker, S. C. & Starr, D. E. The effect of size-dependent nanoparticle energetics on catalyst sintering. Science 298, 811–814 (2002).10.1126/science.1075094 ↗
8. Behafarid, F. & Roldan Cuenya, B. Towards the understanding of sintering phenomena at the nanoscale: geometric and environmental effects. Top. Catal. 56, 1542–1559 (2013).10.1007/s11244-013-0149-4 ↗
9. Hu, S. & Li, W.-X. Sabatier principle of metal-support interaction for design of ultrastable metal nanocatalysts. Science 374, 1360–1365 (2021).10.1126/science.abi9828 ↗
10. Hansen, T. W., DeLaRiva, A. T., Challa, S. R. & Datye, A. K. Sintering of catalytic nanoparticles: particle migration or Ostwald ripening?. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1720–1730 (2013).10.1021/ar3002427 ↗
11. Goodman, E. D. et al. Size-controlled nanocrystals reveal spatial dependence and severity of nanoparticle coalescence and Ostwald ripening in sintering phenomena. Nanoscale 13, 930–938 (2021).10.1039/D0NR07960J ↗
12. Cao, A., Lu, R. & Veser, G. Stabilizing metal nanoparticles for heterogeneous catalysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 13499–13510 (2010).10.1039/c0cp00729c ↗
13. Zandkarimi, B., Poths, P. & Alexandrova, A. N. When fluxionality beats size selection: acceleration of Ostwald ripening of sub-nano clusters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 11973–11982 (2021).10.1002/anie.202100107 ↗
14. Zhang, S. et al. Revealing particle growth mechanisms by combining high-surface-area catalysts made with monodisperse particles and electron microscopy conducted at atmospheric pressure. J. Catal. 337, 240–247 (2016).10.1016/j.jcat.2016.02.020 ↗
15. Dai, Y., Lu, P., Cao, Z., Campbell, C. T. & Xia, Y. The physical chemistry and materials science behind sinter-resistant catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 4314–4331 (2018).10.1039/C7CS00650K ↗
16. Farmer, J. A. & Campbell, C. T. Ceria maintains smaller metal catalyst particles by strong metal-support bonding. Science 329, 933–936 (2010).10.1126/science.1191778 ↗
17. Hemmingson, S. L. & Campbell, C. T. Trends in adhesion energies of metal nanoparticles on oxide surfaces: understanding support effects in catalysis and nanotechnology. ACS Nano 11, 1196–1203 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.6b07502 ↗
18. Hanukovich, S., Dang, A. & Christopher, P. Influence of metal oxide support acid sites on Cu-catalyzed nonoxidative dehydrogenation of ethanol to acetaldehyde. ACS Catal. 9, 3537–3550 (2019).10.1021/acscatal.8b05075 ↗
19. Liu, J., Ji, Q., Imai, T., Ariga, K. & Abe, H. Sintering-resistant nanoparticles in wide-mouthed compartments for sustained catalytic performance. Sci. Rep. 7, 41773 (2017).10.1038/srep41773 ↗
20. O’Neill, B. J. et al. Catalyst design with atomic layer deposition. ACS Catal. 5, 1804–1825 (2015).10.1021/cs501862h ↗
21. Goodman, E. D., Schwalbe, J. A. & Cargnello, M. Mechanistic understanding and the rational design of sinter-resistant heterogeneous catalysts. ACS Catal. 7, 7156–7173 (2017).10.1021/acscatal.7b01975 ↗
22. Darby, M. T., Stamatakis, M., Michaelides, A. & Sykes, E. C. H. Lonely Atoms with special gifts: breaking linear scaling relationships in heterogeneous catalysis with single-atom alloys. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 5636–5646 (2018).10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01888 ↗
23. Hannagan, R. T. et al. First-principles design of a single-atom–alloy propane dehydrogenation catalyst. Science 372, 1444–1447 (2021).10.1126/science.abg8389 ↗
24. Shan, J. et al. Selective non-oxidative dehydrogenation of ethanol to acetaldehyde and hydrogen on highly dilute NiCu alloys. Appl. Catal. 205, 541–550 (2017).10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.045 ↗
25. Karelovic, A. & Ruiz, P. The role of copper particle size in low pressure methanol synthesis via CO2 hydrogenation over Cu/ZnO catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 5, 869–881 (2015).10.1039/C4CY00848K ↗
26. Jentys, A. Estimation of mean size and shape of small metal particles by EXAFS. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1, 4059–4063 (1999).10.1039/a904654b ↗
27. Bergeret, G. & Gallezot, P. in Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis 738–765 (Wiley-VCH, 2008).10.1002/9783527610044.hetcat0038 ↗
28. van den Berg, R. et al. Support functionalization to retard Ostwald ripening in copper methanol synthesis catalysts. ACS Catal. 5, 4439–4448 (2015).10.1021/acscatal.5b00833 ↗
29. Jeong, H.-C. & Williams, E. D. Steps on surfaces: experiment and theory. Surf. Sci. Rep. 34, 171–294 (1999).10.1016/S0167-5729(98)00010-7 ↗
30. Tao, C., Stasevich, T. J., Einstein, T. L. & Williams, E. D. Step fluctuations on Ag(111) surfaces with C60. Phys. Rev. B 73, 125436 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.73.125436 ↗
31. Liang, Z. et al. Atomic-scale visualization of surface segregation and ordering of Pt in a dilute Cu(Pt) alloy under a hydrogen atmosphere. J. Phys. Chem. C 128, 18236–18246 (2024).10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c04711 ↗
32. Grabow, L. C. & Mavrikakis, M. Mechanism of methanol synthesis on Cu through CO2 and CO hydrogenation. ACS Catal. 1, 365–384 (2011).10.1021/cs200055d ↗
33. Bartelt, N. C., Einstein, T. L. & Williams, E. D. The influence of step-step interactions on step wandering. Surf. Sci. 240, L591–L598 (1990).10.1016/0039-6028(90)90722-K ↗
34. Bondarchuk, O. et al. Correlation time for step structural fluctuations. Phys. Rev. B 71, 14–16 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevB.71.045426 ↗
35. Stoltze, P. Simulation of surface defects. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 6, 9495–9517 (1994).10.1088/0953-8984/6/45/004 ↗
36. Lane, P. D., Martin, D. S., Hesp, D., Isted, G. E. & Cole, R. J. Effects of steps and ordered defects on Cu(110) surface states. Phys. Rev. B 87, 245405 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.87.245405 ↗
37. Dobberschütz, S. et al. The mechanisms of crystal growth inhibition by organic and inorganic inhibitors. Nat. Commun. 9, 1578 (2018).10.1038/s41467-018-04022-0 ↗
38. Mazal, T. & Doherty, M. F. Modeling impurity-mediated crystal growth and morphologies of centrosymmetric molecules. Cryst. Growth Des. 23, 369–379 (2023).10.1021/acs.cgd.2c01051 ↗
39. Zhao, G.-C., Qiu, Y. & Liu, C.-G. A Systematic theoretical study on electronic interaction in Cu-based single-atom alloys. ACS Omega 7, 41586–41593 (2022).10.1021/acsomega.2c05536 ↗
40. Greiner, M. T. et al. Free-atom-like d states in single-atom alloy catalysts. Nat. Chem. 10, 1008–1015 (2018).10.1038/s41557-018-0125-5 ↗
41. Spivey, T. D. & Holewinski, A. Selective interactions between free-atom-like d-states in single-atom alloy catalysts and near-frontier molecular orbitals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 11897–11902 (2021).10.1021/jacs.1c04234 ↗
42. Dronskowski, R. & Bloechl, P. E. Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): energy-resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density-functional calculations. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 8617–8624 (1993).10.1021/j100135a014 ↗
43. Rao, K. K., Do, Q. K., Pham, K., Maiti, D. & Grabow, L. C. Extendable machine learning model for the stability of single atom alloys. Top. Catal. 63, 728–741 (2020).10.1007/s11244-020-01267-2 ↗
44. Giannakakis, G. et al. NiAu single atom alloys for the non-oxidative dehydrogenation of ethanol to acetaldehyde and hydrogen. Top. Catal. 61, 475–486 (2018).10.1007/s11244-017-0883-0 ↗
45. Hussein, O., Alghalayini, M., Dillon, S. J. & Abdeljawad, F. Unraveling the role of grain boundary anisotropy in sintering: implications for nanoscale manufacturing. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 4, 8039–8049 (2021).10.1021/acsanm.1c01322 ↗
46. Wynblatt, P. & Gjostein, N. A. Supported metal crystallites. Prog. Solid State Chem. 9, 21–58 (1975).10.1016/0079-6786(75)90013-8 ↗
47. Meyer, R. et al. An ab initio analysis of adsorption and diffusion of silver atoms on alumina surfaces. Surf. Sci. 601, 134–145 (2007).10.1016/j.susc.2006.09.028 ↗
48. Campbell, C. T. The degree of rate control: a powerful tool for catalysis research. ACS Catal. 7, 2770–2779 (2017).10.1021/acscatal.7b00115 ↗
49. Goeke, R. S. & Datye, A. K. Model oxide supports for studies of catalyst sintering at elevated temperatures. Top. Catal. 46, 3–9 (2007).10.1007/s11244-007-0309-5 ↗
50. Xu, L. et al. Formation of active sites on transition metals through reaction-driven migration of surface atoms. Science 380, 70–76 (2023).10.1126/science.add0089 ↗
51. Dannar, A. Exploring the Structure and Dynamics of Cu under Reducing and Oxidizing Conditions. PhD thesis, Tufts Univ. (2024).
52. Finzel, J. P. Characterization of Dynamic Catalyst Structures and Impacts on Reactivity. PhD thesis, Univ. of California, Santa Barbara (2024).
53. Liu, J. et al. Tackling CO poisoning with single-atom alloy catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 6396–6399 (2016).10.1021/jacs.6b03339 ↗
54. Genc, A. et al. A versatile machine learning workflow for high-throughput analysis of supported metal catalyst particles. Ultramicroscopy 271, 114116 (2025).10.1016/j.ultramic.2025.114116 ↗
55. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
56. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
57. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
58. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
59. Zhang, G.-X., Reilly, A. M., Tkatchenko, A. & Scheffler, M. Performance of various density-functional approximations for cohesive properties of 64 bulk solids. New J. Phys. 20, 063020 (2018).10.1088/1367-2630/aac7f0 ↗
60. Nelson, R. et al. LOBSTER: local orbital projections, atomic charges, and chemical-bonding analysis from projector-augmented-wave-based density-functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 41, 1931–1940 (2020).10.1002/jcc.26353 ↗
61. Maintz, S., Deringer, V. L., Tchougréeff, A. L. & Dronskowski, R. Analytic projection from plane-wave and PAW wavefunctions and application to chemical-bonding analysis in solids. J. Comput. Chem. 34, 2557–2567 (2013).10.1002/jcc.23424 ↗
62. Maintz, S., Deringer, V. L., Tchougréeff, A. L. & Dronskowski, R. LOBSTER: a tool to extract chemical bonding from plane-wave based DFT. J. Comput. Chem. 37, 1030–1035 (2016).10.1002/jcc.24300 ↗
63. Deringer, V. L., Tchougréeff, A. L. & Dronskowski, R. Crystal Orbital Hamilton Population (COHP) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets. J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 5461–5466 (2011).10.1021/jp202489s ↗
64. Sun, W. & Ceder, G. Efficient creation and convergence of surface slabs. Surf. Sci. 617, 53–59 (2013).10.1016/j.susc.2013.05.016 ↗
65. Momma, K. & Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011).10.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗