Unexpected strong paramagnetism of hydrogels containing carbon–oxygen double bonds induced by calcium cations
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydrogels do not have observable responses to external magnetic fields as they are conventionally thought to be diamagnetic. These materials require additives for magnetic control, limiting biomedical applications due to potential side effects. Here we show that calcium cations can induce strong paramagnetism of hydrogels rich in groups containing carbon-oxygen double bonds, including alginate, carboxymethyl chitosan, polyacrylamide and N-isopropyl acrylamide. Both experiments and computations reveal that the ubiquitous presence of net magnetic moments, the key to paramagnetism, is induced by the unexpected coupling of a single calcium cation and one carbonyl group under large calcium cation excess conditions. The paramagnetic phenomenon is also observed in the endogenous biomolecule sodium hyaluronate with calcium cations. We further demonstrate the applications of the strongly paramagnetic alginate-calcium hydrogel as a contrast agent in magnetic resonance imaging and a carrier in magnetic drug delivery. Our findings provide insights into the origin of magnetism and advance magnetism-related biomedical innovations.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Micro and Nano Robotics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Fujita, W. & Awaga, A. K. Room-temperature magnetic bistability in organic radical crystals. Science 286, 261–262 (1999).10.1126/science.286.5438.261 ↗
2. Gong, C. & Zhang, X. Two-dimensional magnetic crystals and emergent heterostructure devices. Science 363, eaav4450 (2019).10.1126/science.aav4450 ↗
3. Coronado, E. Molecular magnetism: from chemical design to spin control in molecules, materials and devices. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 87–104 (2020).10.1038/s41578-019-0146-8 ↗
4. Jiang, Q. et al. Room-temperature ferromagnetism in perylene diimide organic semiconductor. Adv. Mater. 34, 2108103 (2022).10.1002/adma.202108103 ↗
5. Magda, G. Z. et al. Room-temperature magnetic order on zigzag edges of narrow graphene nanoribbons. Nature 514, 608–611 (2014).10.1038/nature13831 ↗
6. Grose, J. E. et al. Tunnelling spectra of individual magnetic endofullerene molecules. Nat. Mater. 7, 884–889 (2008).10.1038/nmat2300 ↗
7. Zhang, L. et al. Novel 2D CaCl crystals with metallicity, room-temperature ferromagnetism, heterojunction, piezoelectricity-like property and monovalent calcium ions. Natl Sci. Rev. 8, nwaa274 (2021).
8. Hu, W., Lum, G. Z., Mastrangeli, M. & Sitti, M. Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion. Nature 554, 81–85 (2018).10.1038/nature25443 ↗
9. Zakrzewski, J. J., Liberka, M., Wang, J., Chorazy, S. & Ohkoshi, S. I. Optical phenomena in molecule-based magnetic materials. Chem. Rev. 124, 5930–6050 (2024).10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00840 ↗
10. Feng, Q. K. et al. Recent progress and future prospects on all-organic polymer dielectrics for energy storage capacitors. Chem. Rev. 122, 3820–3878 (2022).10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00793 ↗
11. Perlepe, P. et al. Metal-organic magnets with large coercivity and ordering temperatures up to 242 °C. Science 370, 587–592 (2020).10.1126/science.abb3861 ↗
12. Green, J. J. & Elisseeff, J. H. Mimicking biological functionality with polymers for biomedical applications. Nature 540, 386–394 (2016).10.1038/nature21005 ↗
13. Wang, C. et al. Bioadhesive ultrasound for long-term continuous imaging of diverse organs. Science 377, 517–523 (2022).10.1126/science.abo2542 ↗
14. Yang, Y. et al. Nanosheets and hydrogels formed by 2 nm metal-organic cages with electrostatic interaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 56310–56318 (2020).10.1021/acsami.0c16366 ↗
15. Cangialosi, A. et al. DNA sequence-directed shape change of photopatterned hydrogels via high-degree swelling. Science 357, 1126–1130 (2017).10.1126/science.aan3925 ↗
16. Werner, J. G., Nawar, S., Solovev, A. A. & Weitz, D. A. Hydrogel microcapsules with dynamic pH-responsive properties from methacrylic anhydride. Macromolecules 51, 5798–5805 (2018).10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00843 ↗
17. Liu, K. et al. Adhesive anastomosis for organ transplantation. Bioact. Mater. 13, 260–268 (2022).
18. Xing, Z. et al. Microrheology of DNA hydrogels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 8137–8142 (2018).10.1073/pnas.1722206115 ↗
19. Gantenbein, S. et al. Three-dimensional printing of mycelium hydrogels into living complex materials. Nat. Mater. 22, 128–134 (2023).10.1038/s41563-022-01429-5 ↗
20. Liu, C. et al. Tough hydrogels with rapid self-reinforcement. Science 372, 1078–1081 (2021).10.1126/science.aaz6694 ↗
21. Dobashi, Y. et al. Piezoionic mechanoreceptors: force-induced current generation in hydrogels. Science 376, 502–507 (2022).10.1126/science.aaw1974 ↗
22. Lin, W. et al. Cartilage-inspired, lipid-based boundary-lubricated hydrogels. Science 370, 335–338 (2020).10.1126/science.aay8276 ↗
23. Zwieniecki, M. A., Melcher, P. J. & Holbrook, N. M. Hydrogel control of xylem hydraulic resistance in plants. Science 291, 1059–1062 (2001).10.1126/science.1057175 ↗
24. Zvinavashe, A. T. et al. Programmable design of seed coating function induces water-stress tolerance in semi-arid regions. Nat. Food 2, 485–493 (2021).10.1038/s43016-021-00315-8 ↗
25. Guo, Y. et al. Hydrogels and hydrogel-derived materials for energy and water sustainability. Chem. Rev. 120, 7642–7707 (2020).10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00345 ↗
26. Atkinson, J. T. et al. Real-time bioelectronic sensing of environmental contaminants. Nature 611, 548–553 (2022).10.1038/s41586-022-05356-y ↗
27. Zhou, T. et al. 3D printable high-performance conducting polymer hydrogel for all-hydrogel bioelectronic interfaces. Nat. Mater. 22, 895–902 (2023).10.1038/s41563-023-01569-2 ↗
28. Wang, Z., Wei, H., Huang, Y., Wei, Y. & Chen, J. Naturally sourced hydrogels: emerging fundamental materials for next-generation healthcare sensing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 52, 2992–3034 (2023).10.1039/D2CS00813K ↗
29. Zhao, X. et al. Soft materials by design: unconventional polymer networks give extreme properties. Chem. Rev. 121, 4309–4372 (2021).10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01088 ↗
30. Pardo, A. et al. Magnetic nanocomposite hydrogels for tissue engineering: design concepts and remote actuation strategies to control cell fate. ACS Nano 15, 175–209 (2021).10.1021/acsnano.0c08253 ↗
31. Zelepukin, I. V. et al. Long-term fate of magnetic particles in mice: a comprehensive study. ACS Nano 15, 11341–11357 (2021).10.1021/acsnano.1c00687 ↗
32. Lee, N. et al. Iron oxide based nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and magnetoresponsive therapy. Chem. Rev. 115, 10637–10689 (2015).10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00112 ↗
33. Arami, H., Khandhar, A., Liggitt, D. & Krishnan, K. M. In vivo delivery, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 8576–8607 (2015).10.1039/C5CS00541H ↗
34. Wahsner, J., Gale, E. M., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, A. & Caravan, P. Chemistry of MRI contrast agents: current challenges and new frontiers. Chem. Rev. 119, 957–1057 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00363 ↗
35. Kim, W. S. et al. Magneto-acoustic protein nanostructures for non-invasive imaging of tissue mechanics in vivo. Nat. Mater. 23, 290–300 (2024).10.1038/s41563-023-01688-w ↗
36. Li, Z. et al. Depletion of tumor associated macrophages enhances local and systemic platelet-mediated anti-PD-1 delivery for post-surgery tumor recurrence treatment. Nat. Commun. 13, 1845 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-29388-0 ↗
37. Lee, H. et al. Immobilization of planktonic algal spores by inkjet printing. Sci. Rep. 9, 12357 (2019).10.1038/s41598-019-48776-z ↗
38. Coak, M. J. et al. SquidLab—a user-friendly program for background subtraction and fitting of magnetization data. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 023901 (2020).10.1063/1.5137820 ↗
39. Dubiel, S. M. Relationship between the magnetic hyperfine field and the magnetic moment. J. Alloys Compd. 488, 18–22 (2009).10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.08.101 ↗
40. Xu, J. et al. Magnetic sensitivity of cryptochrome 4 from a migratory songbird. Nature 594, 535–540 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03618-9 ↗
41. Maeda, K. et al. Chemical compass model of avian magnetoreception. Nature 453, 387–390 (2008).10.1038/nature06834 ↗
42. Zhang, L. et al. 27 T ultra-high static magnetic field changes orientation and morphology of mitotic spindles in human cells. Elife 6, e22911 (2017).10.7554/eLife.22911 ↗
43. Battat, S., Weitz, D. A. & Whitesides, G. M. Nonlinear phenomena in microfluidics. Chem. Rev. 122, 6921–6937 (2022).10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00985 ↗
44. Lei, C., Sun, Y., Tsang, D. C. W. & Lin, D. Environmental transformations and ecological effects of iron-based nanoparticles. Environ. Pollut. 232, 10–30 (2018).10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.052 ↗
45. Zhou, H., Mayorga-Martinez, C. C., Pané, S., Zhang, L. & Pumera, M. Magnetically driven micro and nanorobots. Chem. Rev. 121, 4999–5041 (2021).10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01234 ↗
46. Saragi, T. et al. Study of magnetic properties and relaxation time of nanoparticle Fe3O4-SiO2. Materials 15, 1573 (2022).10.3390/ma15041573 ↗
47. Tai, R. & Zhao, Z. Overview of SSRF phase-II beamlines. Nucl. Sci. Tec. 35, 137 (2024).10.1007/s41365-024-01487-1 ↗
48. Zhu, F. et al. Spatial- and spin-resolution ARPES and magnetism beamline at SSRF. Nucl. Sci. Tec. 35, 130 (2024).10.1007/s41365-024-01484-4 ↗
49. Gauthier, M. A. et al. Degree of crosslinking and mechanical properties of crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) beads for use in solid-phase organic synthesis. Polymer 45, 8201 (2004).10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.055 ↗
50. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
51. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
52. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
53. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
54. Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S. & Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456 (2011).10.1002/jcc.21759 ↗