journal article·2026-07Open access

Stress-relaxing granular bioprinting materials enable complex and uniform organoid self-organization

Austin J. Graham, Michelle W. L. Khoo, Vasudha Srivastava, Sara Viragova, Honesty Kim, Kavita Parekh, Kelsey M. Hennick, Malia Bird, Nadine Goldhammer, Jie Zeng Yu, Grace Hu, Natasha T. Brinkley, Lucas Pardo, Jasmine S. Amaya, Cameron D. Morley, Nishant Chadha, Paul Lebel, Sanjay Kumar, Jennifer M. Rosenbluth, Tomasz J. Nowakowski, Ovijit Chaudhuri, Ophir Klein, Rafael Gómez-Sjöberg, Zev J. Gartner

Nature Materials· Volume 25· Issue 7

Abstract

Abstract Complex and robust tissue self-organization requires defined initial conditions and dynamic boundaries—neighbouring tissues and extracellular matrix that actively evolve to guide morphogenesis. A major challenge in tissue engineering is identifying material properties that are compatible with controlling initial culture conditions while mimicking dynamic tissue boundaries. Here we describe a highly tunable granular biomaterial, MAGIC matrix, that supports both long-term bioprinting and gold-standard tissue self-organization. We identify that significant stress relaxation at the long timescales and large deformation magnitudes relevant to self-organization is required for optimal morphogenesis. We apply optimized MAGIC matrices toward precise extrusion bioprinting of saturated cell suspensions directly into three-dimensional culture. Carefully controlling initial conditions for tissue growth yields dramatic increases in organoid reproducibility and complexity across multiple tissue types, enabling high-throughput generation of organoid arrays and perfusable three-dimensional microphysiological systems. Our results identify key biomaterial parameters for optimal organoid morphogenesis and lay the foundation for fabricating more complex and reproducible self-organized tissues.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Cancer Cells and Metastasis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Hofer, M. & Lutolf, M. P. Engineering organoids. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 402–420 (2021).10.1038/s41578-021-00279-y ↗
2. Beck, L. E. et al. Systematically quantifying morphological features reveals constraints on organoid phenotypes. Cell Syst. 13, 547–560.e3 (2022).10.1016/j.cels.2022.05.008 ↗
3. Huycke, T. R. et al. Patterning and folding of intestinal villi by active mesenchymal dewetting. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.039 (2024).10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.039 ↗
4. Trentesaux, C., Yamada, T., Klein, O. D. & Lim, W. A. Harnessing synthetic biology to engineer organoids and tissues. Cell Stem Cell 30, 10–19 (2023).10.1016/j.stem.2022.12.013 ↗
5. Gjorevski, N. et al. Designer matrices for intestinal stem cell and organoid culture. Nature 539, 560–564 (2016).10.1038/nature20168 ↗
6. Gjorevski, N. et al. Tissue geometry drives deterministic organoid patterning. Science 375, eaaw9021 (2022).10.1126/science.aaw9021 ↗
7. Chaudhuri, O., Cooper-White, J., Janmey, P. A., Mooney, D. J. & Shenoy, V. B. Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour. Nature 584, 535–546 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2612-2 ↗
8. Kratochvil, M. J. et al. Engineered materials for organoid systems. Nat. Rev. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-019-0129-9 (2019).10.1038/s41578-019-0129-9 ↗
9. Chrisnandy, A., Blondel, D., Rezakhani, S., Broguiere, N. & Lutolf, M. P. Synthetic dynamic hydrogels promote degradation-independent in vitro organogenesis. Nat. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-01136-7 (2021).10.1038/s41563-021-01136-7 ↗
10. Chrisnandy, A. & Lutolf, M. P. An extracellular matrix niche secreted by epithelial cells drives intestinal organoid formation. Dev. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2025.06.026 (2025).10.1016/j.devcel.2025.06.026 ↗
11. Yavitt, F. M. et al. In situ modulation of intestinal organoid epithelial curvature through photoinduced viscoelasticity directs crypt morphogenesis. Sci. Adv. 9, eadd5668 (2023).10.1126/sciadv.add5668 ↗
12. Cruz-Acuña, R. et al. Synthetic hydrogels for human intestinal organoid generation and colonic wound repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 1326–1335 (2017).10.1038/ncb3632 ↗
13. Hushka, E. A. et al. Fully synthetic hydrogels promote robust crypt formation in intestinal organoids. Adv. Mater. 37, e09672 (2025).10.1002/adma.202509672 ↗
14. Nikolaev, M. et al. Homeostatic mini-intestines through scaffold-guided organoid morphogenesis. Nature 585, 574–578 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2724-8 ↗
15. Sockell, A. et al. A microwell platform for high-throughput longitudinal phenotyping and selective retrieval of organoids. Cell Syst. 14, 764–776.e6 (2023).10.1016/j.cels.2023.08.002 ↗
16. Brandenberg, N. et al. High-throughput automated organoid culture via stem-cell aggregation in microcavity arrays. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 863–874 (2020).10.1038/s41551-020-0565-2 ↗
17. Brassard, J. A., Nikolaev, M., Hübscher, T., Hofer, M. & Lutolf, M. P. Recapitulating macro-scale tissue self-organization through organoid bioprinting. Nat. Mater. 20, 22–29 (2021).10.1038/s41563-020-00803-5 ↗
18. Hinton, T. J. et al. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500758 (2015).10.1126/sciadv.1500758 ↗
19. Lawlor, K. T. et al. Cellular extrusion bioprinting improves kidney organoid reproducibility and conformation. Nat. Mater. 20, 260–271 (2021).10.1038/s41563-020-00853-9 ↗
20. Urciuolo, A. et al. Hydrogel-in-hydrogel live bioprinting for guidance and control of organoids and organotypic cultures. Nat. Commun. 14, 3128 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-37953-4 ↗
21. Caprio, N. D., Hughes, A. J. & Burdick, J. A. Programmed shape transformations in cell-laden granular composites. Sci. Adv. 11, eadq5011 (2025).10.1126/sciadv.adq5011 ↗
22. Claxton, N. L., Luse, M. A., Isakson, B. E. & Highley, C. B. Engineering granular hydrogels without interparticle cross-linking to support multicellular organization. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 10, 7594–7605 (2024).10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01563 ↗
23. Bhattacharjee, T. et al. Writing in the granular gel medium. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500655 (2015).10.1126/sciadv.1500655 ↗
24. Morley, C. D. et al. Quantitative characterization of 3D bioprinted structural elements under cell generated forces. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10919-1 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-10919-1 ↗
25. Morley, C. D., Tordoff, J., O’Bryan, C. S., Weiss, R. & Angelini, T. E. 3D aggregation of cells in packed microgel media. Soft Matter 16, 6572–6581 (2020).10.1039/D0SM00517G ↗
26. Kajtez, J. et al. Embedded 3D printing in self-healing annealable composites for precise patterning of functionally mature human neural constructs. Adv. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202201392 (2022).10.1002/advs.202201392 ↗
27. Reynolds, D. S. et al. Microporogen-structured collagen matrices for embedded bioprinting of tumor models for immuno-oncology. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202210748 (2023).10.1002/adma.202210748 ↗
28. Brunel, L. G. et al. Embedded 3D bioprinting of collagen inks into microgel baths to control hydrogel microstructure and cell spreading. Adv. Healthc. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202303325 (2024).10.1002/adhm.202303325 ↗
29. Elosegui-Artola, A. et al. Matrix viscoelasticity controls spatiotemporal tissue organization. Nat. Mater. 22, 117–127 (2023).10.1038/s41563-022-01400-4 ↗
30. Muir, V. G. et al. Influence of microgel and interstitial matrix compositions on granular hydrogel composite properties. Adv. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202206117 (2023).10.1002/advs.202206117 ↗
31. Pérez-González, C. et al. Mechanical compartmentalization of the intestinal organoid enables crypt folding and collective cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 745–757 (2021).10.1038/s41556-021-00699-6 ↗
32. Yang, Q. et al. Cell fate coordinates mechano-osmotic forces in intestinal crypt formation. Nat. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-021-00700-2 (2021).10.1038/s41556-021-00700-2 ↗
33. Tallapragada, N. P. et al. Inflation-collapse dynamics drive patterning and morphogenesis in intestinal organoids. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1516–1532.e14 (2021).10.1016/j.stem.2021.04.002 ↗
34. Chaudhuri, O. et al. Substrate stress relaxation regulates cell spreading. Nat. Commun. 6, 6365 (2015).10.1038/ncomms7365 ↗
35. Nam, S., Stowers, R., Lou, J., Xia, Y. & Chaudhuri, O. Varying PEG density to control stress relaxation in alginate-PEG hydrogels for 3D cell culture studies. Biomaterials 200, 15–24 (2019).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.02.004 ↗
36. Borelli, A. N. et al. Stress relaxation and composition of hydrazone-crosslinked hybrid biopolymer-synthetic hydrogels determine spreading and secretory properties of mscs. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 11, e2200393 (2022).10.1002/adhm.202200393 ↗
37. Fan, W. et al. Matrix viscoelasticity promotes liver cancer progression in the pre-cirrhotic liver. Nature 626, 635–642 (2024).10.1038/s41586-023-06991-9 ↗
38. Indana, D., Agarwal, P., Bhutani, N. & Chaudhuri, O. Viscoelasticity and adhesion signaling in biomaterials control human pluripotent stem cell morphogenesis in 3D culture. Adv. Mater. 33, e2101966 (2021).10.1002/adma.202101966 ↗
39. Roth, J. G. et al. Tunable hydrogel viscoelasticity modulates human neural maturation. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh8313 (2023).10.1126/sciadv.adh8313 ↗
40. Nerger, B. A. et al. 3D hydrogel encapsulation regulates nephrogenesis in kidney organoids. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202308325 (2024).10.1002/adma.202308325 ↗
41. Reyes, E. A. et al. Epithelial TNF controls cell differentiation and CFTR activity to maintain intestinal mucin homeostasis. J. Clin. Investig. 133, e163591 (2023).10.1172/JCI163591 ↗
42. Todhunter, M. E. et al. Programmed synthesis of three-dimensional tissues. Nat. Methods 12, 975–981 (2015).10.1038/nmeth.3553 ↗
43. Srivastava, V. et al. Configurational entropy is an intrinsic driver of tissue structural heterogeneity. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.01.546933 (2023).10.1101/2023.07.01.546933 ↗
44. Ho, D. L. L. et al. Large-scale production of wholly cellular bioinks via the optimization of human induced pluripotent stem cell aggregate culture in automated bioreactors. Adv. Healthc. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202201138 (2022).10.1002/adhm.202201138 ↗
45. Shin, W. et al. Spatiotemporal gradient and instability of Wnt induce heterogeneous growth and differentiation of human intestinal organoids. iScience 23, 101372 (2020).10.1016/j.isci.2020.101372 ↗
46. Cabral, K. A. et al. Programming the self-organization of endothelial cells into perfusable microvasculature. Tissue Eng. A 29, 80–92 (2023).10.1089/ten.tea.2022.0072 ↗
47. Viragova, S. et al. Inverse agonists of retinoic acid receptor/retinoid X receptor signaling as lineage-specific antitumor agents against human adenoid cystic carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 115, 838–852 (2023).10.1093/jnci/djad062 ↗
48. Shin, D. et al. Thalamocortical organoids enable in vitro modeling of 22q11.2 microdeletion associated with neuropsychiatric disorders. Cell Stem Cell 31, 421–432.e8 (2024).10.1016/j.stem.2024.01.010 ↗
49. Lancaster, M. A. & Knoblich, J. A. Generation of cerebral organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2329–2340 (2014).10.1038/nprot.2014.158 ↗
50. Montes-Olivas, S. et al. In-silico and in-vitro morphometric analysis of intestinal organoids. PLoS Comput. Biol. 19, e1011386 (2023).10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011386 ↗
51. McKinley, K. L. et al. Cellular aspect ratio and cell division mechanics underlie the patterning of cell progeny in diverse mammalian epithelia. eLife 7, e36739 (2018).10.7554/eLife.36739 ↗
52. Chevalier, N. R. Physical organogenesis of the gut. Development 149, dev200765 (2022).10.1242/dev.200765 ↗
53. Nam, S., Lee, J., Brownfield, D. G. & Chaudhuri, O. Viscoplasticity enables mechanical remodeling of matrix by cells. Biophys. J. 111, 2296–2308 (2016).10.1016/j.bpj.2016.10.002 ↗
54. Serra, D. et al. Self-organization and symmetry breaking in intestinal organoid development. Nature 569, 66–72 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1146-y ↗
55. Cazares, O., Haque, A. S. & Klein, O. D. Salivary gland: a budding genius. Dev. Cell 56, 2271–2272 (2021).10.1016/j.devcel.2021.08.001 ↗
56. Khoo, M. W. L. & Gómez-Sjöberg, R. czbiohub-sf/matlab-organoid-printer: v1.0.1. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18331666 (2025).10.5281/zenodo.18331666 ↗