Stress-relaxing granular bioprinting materials enable complex and uniform organoid self-organization
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Complex and robust tissue self-organization requires defined initial conditions and dynamic boundaries—neighbouring tissues and extracellular matrix that actively evolve to guide morphogenesis. A major challenge in tissue engineering is identifying material properties that are compatible with controlling initial culture conditions while mimicking dynamic tissue boundaries. Here we describe a highly tunable granular biomaterial, MAGIC matrix, that supports both long-term bioprinting and gold-standard tissue self-organization. We identify that significant stress relaxation at the long timescales and large deformation magnitudes relevant to self-organization is required for optimal morphogenesis. We apply optimized MAGIC matrices toward precise extrusion bioprinting of saturated cell suspensions directly into three-dimensional culture. Carefully controlling initial conditions for tissue growth yields dramatic increases in organoid reproducibility and complexity across multiple tissue types, enabling high-throughput generation of organoid arrays and perfusable three-dimensional microphysiological systems. Our results identify key biomaterial parameters for optimal organoid morphogenesis and lay the foundation for fabricating more complex and reproducible self-organized tissues.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Cancer Cells and Metastasis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Hofer, M. & Lutolf, M. P. Engineering organoids. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 402–420 (2021).10.1038/s41578-021-00279-y ↗
2. Beck, L. E. et al. Systematically quantifying morphological features reveals constraints on organoid phenotypes. Cell Syst. 13, 547–560.e3 (2022).10.1016/j.cels.2022.05.008 ↗
3. Huycke, T. R. et al. Patterning and folding of intestinal villi by active mesenchymal dewetting. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.039 (2024).10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.039 ↗
4. Trentesaux, C., Yamada, T., Klein, O. D. & Lim, W. A. Harnessing synthetic biology to engineer organoids and tissues. Cell Stem Cell 30, 10–19 (2023).10.1016/j.stem.2022.12.013 ↗
5. Gjorevski, N. et al. Designer matrices for intestinal stem cell and organoid culture. Nature 539, 560–564 (2016).10.1038/nature20168 ↗
6. Gjorevski, N. et al. Tissue geometry drives deterministic organoid patterning. Science 375, eaaw9021 (2022).10.1126/science.aaw9021 ↗
7. Chaudhuri, O., Cooper-White, J., Janmey, P. A., Mooney, D. J. & Shenoy, V. B. Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour. Nature 584, 535–546 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2612-2 ↗
8. Kratochvil, M. J. et al. Engineered materials for organoid systems. Nat. Rev. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-019-0129-9 (2019).10.1038/s41578-019-0129-9 ↗
9. Chrisnandy, A., Blondel, D., Rezakhani, S., Broguiere, N. & Lutolf, M. P. Synthetic dynamic hydrogels promote degradation-independent in vitro organogenesis. Nat. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-01136-7 (2021).10.1038/s41563-021-01136-7 ↗
10. Chrisnandy, A. & Lutolf, M. P. An extracellular matrix niche secreted by epithelial cells drives intestinal organoid formation. Dev. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2025.06.026 (2025).10.1016/j.devcel.2025.06.026 ↗
11. Yavitt, F. M. et al. In situ modulation of intestinal organoid epithelial curvature through photoinduced viscoelasticity directs crypt morphogenesis. Sci. Adv. 9, eadd5668 (2023).10.1126/sciadv.add5668 ↗
12. Cruz-Acuña, R. et al. Synthetic hydrogels for human intestinal organoid generation and colonic wound repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 1326–1335 (2017).10.1038/ncb3632 ↗
13. Hushka, E. A. et al. Fully synthetic hydrogels promote robust crypt formation in intestinal organoids. Adv. Mater. 37, e09672 (2025).10.1002/adma.202509672 ↗
14. Nikolaev, M. et al. Homeostatic mini-intestines through scaffold-guided organoid morphogenesis. Nature 585, 574–578 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2724-8 ↗
15. Sockell, A. et al. A microwell platform for high-throughput longitudinal phenotyping and selective retrieval of organoids. Cell Syst. 14, 764–776.e6 (2023).10.1016/j.cels.2023.08.002 ↗
16. Brandenberg, N. et al. High-throughput automated organoid culture via stem-cell aggregation in microcavity arrays. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 863–874 (2020).10.1038/s41551-020-0565-2 ↗
17. Brassard, J. A., Nikolaev, M., Hübscher, T., Hofer, M. & Lutolf, M. P. Recapitulating macro-scale tissue self-organization through organoid bioprinting. Nat. Mater. 20, 22–29 (2021).10.1038/s41563-020-00803-5 ↗
18. Hinton, T. J. et al. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500758 (2015).10.1126/sciadv.1500758 ↗
19. Lawlor, K. T. et al. Cellular extrusion bioprinting improves kidney organoid reproducibility and conformation. Nat. Mater. 20, 260–271 (2021).10.1038/s41563-020-00853-9 ↗
20. Urciuolo, A. et al. Hydrogel-in-hydrogel live bioprinting for guidance and control of organoids and organotypic cultures. Nat. Commun. 14, 3128 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-37953-4 ↗
21. Caprio, N. D., Hughes, A. J. & Burdick, J. A. Programmed shape transformations in cell-laden granular composites. Sci. Adv. 11, eadq5011 (2025).10.1126/sciadv.adq5011 ↗
22. Claxton, N. L., Luse, M. A., Isakson, B. E. & Highley, C. B. Engineering granular hydrogels without interparticle cross-linking to support multicellular organization. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 10, 7594–7605 (2024).10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01563 ↗
23. Bhattacharjee, T. et al. Writing in the granular gel medium. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500655 (2015).10.1126/sciadv.1500655 ↗
24. Morley, C. D. et al. Quantitative characterization of 3D bioprinted structural elements under cell generated forces. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10919-1 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-10919-1 ↗
25. Morley, C. D., Tordoff, J., O’Bryan, C. S., Weiss, R. & Angelini, T. E. 3D aggregation of cells in packed microgel media. Soft Matter 16, 6572–6581 (2020).10.1039/D0SM00517G ↗
26. Kajtez, J. et al. Embedded 3D printing in self-healing annealable composites for precise patterning of functionally mature human neural constructs. Adv. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202201392 (2022).10.1002/advs.202201392 ↗
27. Reynolds, D. S. et al. Microporogen-structured collagen matrices for embedded bioprinting of tumor models for immuno-oncology. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202210748 (2023).10.1002/adma.202210748 ↗
28. Brunel, L. G. et al. Embedded 3D bioprinting of collagen inks into microgel baths to control hydrogel microstructure and cell spreading. Adv. Healthc. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202303325 (2024).10.1002/adhm.202303325 ↗
29. Elosegui-Artola, A. et al. Matrix viscoelasticity controls spatiotemporal tissue organization. Nat. Mater. 22, 117–127 (2023).10.1038/s41563-022-01400-4 ↗
30. Muir, V. G. et al. Influence of microgel and interstitial matrix compositions on granular hydrogel composite properties. Adv. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202206117 (2023).10.1002/advs.202206117 ↗
31. Pérez-González, C. et al. Mechanical compartmentalization of the intestinal organoid enables crypt folding and collective cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 745–757 (2021).10.1038/s41556-021-00699-6 ↗
32. Yang, Q. et al. Cell fate coordinates mechano-osmotic forces in intestinal crypt formation. Nat. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-021-00700-2 (2021).10.1038/s41556-021-00700-2 ↗
33. Tallapragada, N. P. et al. Inflation-collapse dynamics drive patterning and morphogenesis in intestinal organoids. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1516–1532.e14 (2021).10.1016/j.stem.2021.04.002 ↗
34. Chaudhuri, O. et al. Substrate stress relaxation regulates cell spreading. Nat. Commun. 6, 6365 (2015).10.1038/ncomms7365 ↗
35. Nam, S., Stowers, R., Lou, J., Xia, Y. & Chaudhuri, O. Varying PEG density to control stress relaxation in alginate-PEG hydrogels for 3D cell culture studies. Biomaterials 200, 15–24 (2019).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.02.004 ↗
36. Borelli, A. N. et al. Stress relaxation and composition of hydrazone-crosslinked hybrid biopolymer-synthetic hydrogels determine spreading and secretory properties of mscs. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 11, e2200393 (2022).10.1002/adhm.202200393 ↗
37. Fan, W. et al. Matrix viscoelasticity promotes liver cancer progression in the pre-cirrhotic liver. Nature 626, 635–642 (2024).10.1038/s41586-023-06991-9 ↗
38. Indana, D., Agarwal, P., Bhutani, N. & Chaudhuri, O. Viscoelasticity and adhesion signaling in biomaterials control human pluripotent stem cell morphogenesis in 3D culture. Adv. Mater. 33, e2101966 (2021).10.1002/adma.202101966 ↗
39. Roth, J. G. et al. Tunable hydrogel viscoelasticity modulates human neural maturation. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh8313 (2023).10.1126/sciadv.adh8313 ↗
40. Nerger, B. A. et al. 3D hydrogel encapsulation regulates nephrogenesis in kidney organoids. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202308325 (2024).10.1002/adma.202308325 ↗
41. Reyes, E. A. et al. Epithelial TNF controls cell differentiation and CFTR activity to maintain intestinal mucin homeostasis. J. Clin. Investig. 133, e163591 (2023).10.1172/JCI163591 ↗
42. Todhunter, M. E. et al. Programmed synthesis of three-dimensional tissues. Nat. Methods 12, 975–981 (2015).10.1038/nmeth.3553 ↗
43. Srivastava, V. et al. Configurational entropy is an intrinsic driver of tissue structural heterogeneity. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.01.546933 (2023).10.1101/2023.07.01.546933 ↗
44. Ho, D. L. L. et al. Large-scale production of wholly cellular bioinks via the optimization of human induced pluripotent stem cell aggregate culture in automated bioreactors. Adv. Healthc. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202201138 (2022).10.1002/adhm.202201138 ↗
45. Shin, W. et al. Spatiotemporal gradient and instability of Wnt induce heterogeneous growth and differentiation of human intestinal organoids. iScience 23, 101372 (2020).10.1016/j.isci.2020.101372 ↗
46. Cabral, K. A. et al. Programming the self-organization of endothelial cells into perfusable microvasculature. Tissue Eng. A 29, 80–92 (2023).10.1089/ten.tea.2022.0072 ↗
47. Viragova, S. et al. Inverse agonists of retinoic acid receptor/retinoid X receptor signaling as lineage-specific antitumor agents against human adenoid cystic carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 115, 838–852 (2023).10.1093/jnci/djad062 ↗
48. Shin, D. et al. Thalamocortical organoids enable in vitro modeling of 22q11.2 microdeletion associated with neuropsychiatric disorders. Cell Stem Cell 31, 421–432.e8 (2024).10.1016/j.stem.2024.01.010 ↗
49. Lancaster, M. A. & Knoblich, J. A. Generation of cerebral organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2329–2340 (2014).10.1038/nprot.2014.158 ↗
50. Montes-Olivas, S. et al. In-silico and in-vitro morphometric analysis of intestinal organoids. PLoS Comput. Biol. 19, e1011386 (2023).10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011386 ↗
51. McKinley, K. L. et al. Cellular aspect ratio and cell division mechanics underlie the patterning of cell progeny in diverse mammalian epithelia. eLife 7, e36739 (2018).10.7554/eLife.36739 ↗
52. Chevalier, N. R. Physical organogenesis of the gut. Development 149, dev200765 (2022).10.1242/dev.200765 ↗
53. Nam, S., Lee, J., Brownfield, D. G. & Chaudhuri, O. Viscoplasticity enables mechanical remodeling of matrix by cells. Biophys. J. 111, 2296–2308 (2016).10.1016/j.bpj.2016.10.002 ↗
54. Serra, D. et al. Self-organization and symmetry breaking in intestinal organoid development. Nature 569, 66–72 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1146-y ↗
55. Cazares, O., Haque, A. S. & Klein, O. D. Salivary gland: a budding genius. Dev. Cell 56, 2271–2272 (2021).10.1016/j.devcel.2021.08.001 ↗
56. Khoo, M. W. L. & Gómez-Sjöberg, R. czbiohub-sf/matlab-organoid-printer: v1.0.1. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18331666 (2025).10.5281/zenodo.18331666 ↗