journal article·2026-06Open access

Multiscale-structured miniaturized 3D force sensors

Guolin Yun, Zesheng Chen, Zhuo Chen, Jinrui Chen, Binghan Zhou, Mingfei Xiao, Michael Stevens, Manish Chhowalla, Tawfique Hasan

Nature Materials· Volume 25· Issue 6

Abstract

Abstract Flexible tactile sensors are pivotal for advancing neuroprosthetics, human–machine interactions and intelligent robotics. However, achieving highly sensitive tactile sensing to differentiate normal and tangential forces, particularly in mimicking the high-resolution multidimensional haptics of human fingers, remains a challenge. Here we propose a triaxial force microsensor array made from graphene–liquid-metal composites. Using anisotropic particle networks in microporous composites with pyramid geometries, we achieve normal–tangential force decoupling through multiscale structuring. Our approach offers exceptional sensitivity of 110 kPa −1 over a 500 kPa linear range ( R 2 > 0.998), with <2° force direction measurement deviation. The sensor array demonstrates force decoupling and slip detection via self-adjusted grasping of unknown objects. Our microsensor improves on the state of the art by an order of magnitude in size and detection limit, enabling 3D force sensing in micromanipulators and microrobots and unlocking advanced robotic dexterity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Dielectric materials and actuators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Flavin, M. T. et al. Bioelastic state recovery for haptic sensory substitution. Nature 635, 345–352 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-08155-9 ↗
2. Tee, B. C. K. et al. A skin-inspired organic digital mechanoreceptor. Science 350, 313–316 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa9306 ↗
3. Yan, Y. et al. Soft magnetic skin for super-resolution tactile sensing with force self-decoupling. Sci. Robot. 6, eabc8801 (2021).10.1126/scirobotics.abc8801 ↗
4. Liu, Z. et al. A three-dimensionally architected electronic skin mimicking human mechanosensation. Science 384, 987–994 (2024).10.1126/science.adk5556 ↗
5. Chun, S. et al. An artificial neural tactile sensing system. Nat. Electron. 4, 429–438 (2021).10.1038/s41928-021-00585-x ↗
6. Chortos, A., Liu, J. & Bao, Z. Pursuing prosthetic electronic skin. Nat. Mater. 15, 937–950 (2016).10.1038/nmat4671 ↗
7. Lee, W. W. et al. A neuro-inspired artificial peripheral nervous system for scalable electronic skins. Sci. Robot. 4, eaax2198 (2019).10.1126/scirobotics.aax2198 ↗
8. Johnson, K. O. The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 455–461 (2001).10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00234-8 ↗
9. Sundaram, S. How to improve robotic touch. Science 370, 768–769 (2020).10.1126/science.abd3643 ↗
10. Bartolozzi, C., Natale, L., Nori, F. & Metta, G. Robots with a sense of touch. Nat. Mater. 15, 921–925 (2016).10.1038/nmat4731 ↗
11. Pyo, S., Lee, J., Bae, K., Sim, S. & Kim, J. Recent progress in flexible tactile sensors for human-interactive systems: from sensors to advanced applications. Adv. Mater. 33, 2005902 (2021).10.1002/adma.202005902 ↗
12. Xu, J. et al. Recent progress of tactile and force sensors for human–machine interaction. Sensors 23, 1868 (2023).10.3390/s23041868 ↗
13. Templeman, J. O., Sheil, B. B. & Sun, T. Multi-axis force sensors: a state-of-the-art review. Sens. Actuators A 304, 111772 (2020).10.1016/j.sna.2019.111772 ↗
14. Chen, Y.-W., Pancham, P. P., Mukherjee, A., Martincic, E. & Lo, C.-Y. Recent advances in flexible force sensors and their applications: a review. Flex. Print. Electron. 7, 033002 (2022).10.1088/2058-8585/ac8be1 ↗
15. Won, S. M. et al. Multimodal sensing with a three-dimensional piezoresistive structure. ACS Nano 13, 10972–10979 (2019).10.1021/acsnano.9b02030 ↗
16. Zhang, J. et al. Highly sensitive flexible three-axis tactile sensors based on the interface contact resistance of microstructured graphene. Nanoscale 10, 7387–7395 (2018).10.1039/C7NR09149D ↗
17. Boutry, C. M. et al. A hierarchically patterned, bioinspired e-skin able to detect the direction of applied pressure for robotics. Sci. Robot. 3, eaau6914 (2018).10.1126/scirobotics.aau6914 ↗
18. Gu, Y. et al. A new force-decoupling triaxial tactile sensor based on elastic microcones for accurately grasping feedback. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5, 2200321 (2023).10.1002/aisy.202200321 ↗
19. Wang, Z. et al. Multidimensional force sensors based on triboelectric nanogenerators for electronic skin. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 56320–56328 (2021).10.1021/acsami.1c17506 ↗
20. Le Signor, T., Dupré, N., Didden, J., Lomakin, E. & Close, G. Mass-manufacturable 3D magnetic force sensor for robotic grasping and slip detection. Sensors 23, 3031 (2023).10.3390/s23063031 ↗
21. Yan, Y., Zermane, A., Pan, J. & Kheddar, A. A soft skin with self-decoupled three-axis force-sensing taxels. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 1284–1295 (2024).10.1038/s42256-024-00904-9 ↗
22. Kim, G. & Hwang, D. BaroTac: barometric three-axis tactile sensor with slip detection capability. Sensors 23, 428 (2023).10.3390/s23010428 ↗
23. Son, C. et al. Behavioral biometric optical tactile sensor for instantaneous decoupling of dynamic touch signals in real time. Nat. Commun. 15, 8003 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-52331-4 ↗
24. Wang, H. et al. An optical-based multipoint 3-axis pressure sensor with a flexible thin-film form. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi2445 (2023).10.1126/sciadv.adi2445 ↗
25. Cao, M. Y., Laws, S. & Rodriguez y Baena, F. Six-axis force/torque sensors for robotics applications: a review. IEEE Sens. J. 21, 27238–27251 (2021).10.1109/JSEN.2021.3123638 ↗
26. Palli, G., Moriello, L., Scarcia, U. & Melchiorri, C. Development of an optoelectronic 6-axis force/torque sensor for robotic applications. Sens. Actuators A 220, 333–346 (2014).10.1016/j.sna.2014.09.023 ↗
27. Kanno, H., Nakamoto, H., Kobayashi, F., Kojima, F. & Fukui, W. Slip detection using robot fingertip with 6-axis force/torque sensor. In Proc. 2013 IEEE Workshop on Robotic Intelligence in Informationally Structured Space (RiiSS) 1–6 (IEEE, 2013).10.1109/RiiSS.2013.6607921 ↗
28. Bai, N. et al. A robotic sensory system with high spatiotemporal resolution for texture recognition. Nat. Commun. 14, 7121 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-42722-4 ↗
29. Yuan, W., Dong, S. & Adelson, E. H. GelSight: high-resolution robot tactile sensors for estimating geometry and force. Sensors 17, 2762 (2017).10.3390/s17122762 ↗
30. Chen, W., Khamis, H., Birznieks, I., Lepora, N. F. & Redmond, S. J. Tactile sensors for friction estimation and incipient slip detection—toward dexterous robotic manipulation: a review. IEEE Sens. J. 18, 9049–9064 (2018).10.1109/JSEN.2018.2868340 ↗
31. Li, S. et al. Bioinspired robot skin with mechanically gated electron channels for sliding tactile perception. Sci. Adv. 8, eade0720 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.ade0720 ↗
32. Stassi, S., Cauda, V., Canavese, G. & Pirri, C. F. Flexible tactile sensing based on piezoresistive composites: a review. Sensors 14, 5296–5332 (2014).10.3390/s140305296 ↗
33. Mu, C. et al. Flexible normal-tangential force sensor with opposite resistance responding for highly sensitive artificial skin. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1707503 (2018).10.1002/adfm.201707503 ↗
34. Song, Y. et al. Carbon nanotube-modified fabric for wearable smart electronic-skin with exclusive normal-tangential force sensing ability. Adv. Mater. Technol. 4, 1800680 (2019).10.1002/admt.201800680 ↗
35. Liu, Y. et al. Centrosymmetric- and axisymmetric-patterned flexible tactile sensor for roughness and slip intelligent recognition. Adv. Intell. Syst. 4, 2100072 (2022).10.1002/aisy.202100072 ↗
36. Lee, H.-K., Chung, J., Chang, S.-I. & Yoon, E. Real-time measurement of the three-axis contact force distribution using a flexible capacitive polymer tactile sensor. J. Micromech. Microeng. 21, 035010 (2011).10.1088/0960-1317/21/3/035010 ↗
37. Lin, Y., Genzer, J. & Dickey, M. D. Attributes, fabrication, and applications of gallium-based liquid metal particles. Adv. Sci. 7, 2000192 (2020).10.1002/advs.202000192 ↗
38. Tang, S.-Y., Tabor, C., Kalantar-Zadeh, K. & Dickey, M. D. Gallium liquid metal: the devil’s elixir. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 51, 381–408 (2021).10.1146/annurev-matsci-080819-125403 ↗
39. Stassi, S. & Canavese, G. Spiky nanostructured metal particles as filler of polymeric composites showing tunable electrical conductivity. J. Polym. Sci. B 50, 984–992 (2012).10.1002/polb.23091 ↗
40. Bloor, D., Donnelly, K., Hands, P. J., Laughlin, P. & Lussey, D. A metal–polymer composite with unusual properties. J. Phys. D 38, 2851–2860 (2005).10.1088/0022-3727/38/16/018 ↗
41. Lee, D. et al. Highly sensitive, transparent, and durable pressure sensors based on sea-urchin shaped metal nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 28, 9364–9369 (2016).10.1002/adma.201603526 ↗
42. Boland, C. S. et al. Sensitive electromechanical sensors using viscoelastic graphene–polymer nanocomposites. Science 354, 1257–1260 (2016).10.1126/science.aag2879 ↗
43. Yun, G. et al. Liquid metal-filled magnetorheological elastomer with positive piezoconductivity. Nat. Commun. 10, 1300 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-09325-4 ↗
44. Yun, G. et al. Liquid metal composites with anisotropic and unconventional piezoconductivity. Matter 3, 824–841 (2020).10.1016/j.matt.2020.05.022 ↗
45. Maeno, T., Kobayashi, K. & Yamazaki, N. Relationship between the structure of human finger tissue and the location of tactile receptors. JSME Int. J. Ser. C 41, 94–100 (1998).10.1299/jsmec.41.94 ↗
46. Choong, C.-L. et al. Highly stretchable resistive pressure sensors using a conductive elastomeric composite on a micropyramid array. Adv. Mater. 26, 3451–3458 (2014).10.1002/adma.201305182 ↗
47. Yang, J. C. et al. Microstructured porous pyramid-based ultrahigh sensitive pressure sensor insensitive to strain and temperature. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 19472–19480 (2019).10.1021/acsami.9b03261 ↗
48. Jung, M. et al. Transparent and flexible Mayan-pyramid-based pressure sensor using facile-transferred indium tin oxide for bimodal sensor applications. Sci. Rep. 9, 14040 (2019).10.1038/s41598-019-50247-4 ↗
49. Ma, C. et al. Robust flexible pressure sensors made from conductive micropyramids for manipulation tasks. ACS Nano 14, 12866–12876 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.0c03659 ↗
50. Dahiya, R. S. & Valle, M. in Robotic Tactile Sensing: Technologies and System 19–41 (Springer, 2013).10.1007/978-94-007-0579-1_3 ↗
51. Blau, P. J. The significance and use of the friction coefficient. Tribol. Int. 34, 585–591 (2001).10.1016/S0301-679X(01)00050-0 ↗
52. Yun, G. & Chen, Z. Research data supporting “Multiscale-structured miniaturised 3D force sensors”. Apollo—University of Cambridge Repository https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.124842 (2026).10.17863/CAM.124842 ↗