journal article·2026-05

Revealing key structures for reversible sulfur redox in amorphous polymeric sulfur

Nan Wang, Shen Wang, Yu Zheng, Dacheng Kuai, Seungmin Lee, Sha Tan, Dean Yen, Hui Zhong, Sanjit Ghose, Yonghua Du, Perla Balbuena, Ping Liu, Enyuan Hu

Nature Materials· Volume 25· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Amorphous polymeric sulfur cathodes, such as sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN), enable high-energy lithium-sulfur batteries without cobalt or nickel, leveraging abundant sulfur. However, the limited in situ understanding of their synthesis and electrochemistry has impeded targeted optimization. Here we integrate operando high-energy total scattering with sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy to monitor SPAN's formation and cycling in real time. Our results show that S-C bond formation halts further fusion of cyclized polyacrylonitrile, fostering π-π stacking and a transition from long-chain to short-chain sulfur-critical for reversible sulfur redox. These features synergistically minimize polysulfide dissolution and charge-transfer resistance, enabling optimized SPAN to achieve high capacity retention over 1,000 cycles. Operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy reveals that residual protons drive thiol-thione tautomerism, with lithium replacement during the first discharge causing ~20% irreversible capacity loss. To enhance performance, minimizing -NH groups and expanding pyridine networks are key. These findings transform SPAN optimization from empirical tuning to mechanism‑guided engineering and point the way towards sulfur loadings and energy densities competitive with state‑of‑the‑art Li‑ion cathodes.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Smith, R. D. L. et al. Photochemical route for accessing amorphous metal oxide materials for water oxidation catalysis. Science 340, 60–63 (2013).10.1126/science.1233638 ↗
2. Kamiya, T. & Hosono, H. Material characteristics and applications of transparent amorphous oxide semiconductors. NPG Asia Mater. 2, 15–22 (2010).10.1038/asiamat.2010.5 ↗
3. Salleo, A. et al. Laser-driven formation of a high-pressure phase in amorphous silica. Nat. Mater. 2, 796–800 (2003).10.1038/nmat1013 ↗
4. Irisarri, E., Ponrouch, A. & Palacin, M. R. Review—hard carbon negative electrode materials for sodium-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A2476–A2482 (2015).10.1149/2.0091514jes ↗
5. Tan, S. et al. Structural and interphasial stabilities of sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) cathode. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 2496–2504 (2023).10.1021/acsenergylett.3c00281 ↗
6. Berthier, L. & Biroli, G. Theoretical perspective on the glass transition and amorphous materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 587–645 (2011).10.1103/RevModPhys.83.587 ↗
7. Kamaya, N. et al. A lithium superionic conductor. Nat. Mater. 10, 682–686 (2011).10.1038/nmat3066 ↗
8. Zhang, Z. Z. et al. New horizons for inorganic solid state ion conductors. Energ. Environ. Sci. 11, 1945–1976 (2018).10.1039/C8EE01053F ↗
9. Kudu, ÖU. et al. Structural details in Li3PS4: variety in thiophosphate building blocks and correlation to ion transport. Energy Storage Mater. 44, 168–179 (2022).10.1016/j.ensm.2021.10.021 ↗
10. Arora, P. & Zhang, Z. M. Battery separators. Chem. Rev. 104, 4419–4462 (2004).10.1021/cr020738u ↗
11. Alvin, S. et al. Revealing sodium ion storage mechanism in hard carbon. Carbon 145, 67–81 (2019).10.1016/j.carbon.2018.12.112 ↗
12. Dou, X. W. et al. Hard carbons for sodium-ion batteries: structure, analysis, sustainability, and electrochemistry. Mater. Today 23, 87–104 (2019).10.1016/j.mattod.2018.12.040 ↗
13. Manthiram, A., Fu, Y. Z. & Su, Y. S. Challenges and prospects of lithium–sulfur batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1125–1134 (2013).10.1021/ar300179v ↗
14. Chen, Y. et al. Advances in lithium–sulfur batteries: from academic research to commercial viability. Adv. Mater. 33, 2003666 (2021).10.1002/adma.202003666 ↗
15. Ji, X. L., Lee, K. T. & Nazar, L. F. A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat. Mater. 8, 500–506 (2009).10.1038/nmat2460 ↗
16. Wang, J. L., Yang, J., Xie, J. Y. & Xu, N. X. A novel conductive polymer–sulfur composite cathode material for rechargeable lithium batteries. Adv. Mater. 14, 963–965 (2002).10.1002/1521-4095(20020705)14:13/14<963::AID-ADMA963>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
17. Huang, C. J. et al. Origin of shuttle-free sulfurized polyacrylonitrile in lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Power Sources 492, 229508 (2021).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229508 ↗
18. Liu, H. et al. Ultrahigh Coulombic efficiency electrolyte enables Li||SPAN batteries with superior cycling performance. Mater. Today 42, 17–28 (2021).10.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.035 ↗
19. Wang, S. et al. Structural transformation in a sulfurized polymer cathode to enable long-life rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 9624–9633 (2023).10.1021/jacs.3c00628 ↗
20. Wu, Z. et al. The role of ion transport in the failure of high areal capacity Li metal batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 2701–2710 (2022).10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01114 ↗
21. Liu, J. et al. Roles of the polymer backbone for sulfurized polyacrylonitrile cathodes in rechargeable lithium batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 426–435 (2025).10.1021/jacs.4c11216 ↗
22. Embrechts, H. et al. Elucidation of the formation mechanism of metal–organic frameworks via in-situ Raman and FTIR spectroscopy under solvothermal conditions. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 12267–12278 (2018).10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02484 ↗
23. Xiao, L. et al. Molecular structures of polymer/sulfur composites for lithium–sulfur batteries with long cycle life. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 9517–9526 (2013).10.1039/c3ta10865a ↗
24. Weret, M. A. et al. Mechanistic understanding of the sulfurized-poly(acrylonitrile) cathode for lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 26, 483–493 (2020).10.1016/j.ensm.2019.11.022 ↗
25. Zhuo, S. et al. Visualizing interfacial collective reaction behaviour of Li–S batteries. Nature 621, 75–81 (2023).10.1038/s41586-023-06326-8 ↗
26. Liu, R. et al. Establishing reaction networks in the 16-electron sulfur reduction reaction. Nature 626, 98–104 (2024).10.1038/s41586-023-06918-4 ↗
27. Wang, X. L., Tan, S., Yang, X. Q. & Hu, E. Y. Pair distribution function analysis: fundamentals and application to battery materials. Chin. Phys. B 29, 028802 (2020).10.1088/1674-1056/ab6656 ↗
28. Billinge, S. J. L. & Levin, I. The problem with determining atomic structure at the nanoscale. Science 316, 561–565 (2007).10.1126/science.1135080 ↗
29. Rahman, M. M. et al. Spatial progression of polysulfide reactivity with lithium nitrate in Li–sulfur batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 9, 2024–20230 (2024).10.1021/acsenergylett.4c00453 ↗
30. Luo, C. et al. A chemically stabilized sulfur cathode for lean electrolyte lithium sulfur batteries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 14712–14720 (2020).10.1073/pnas.2006301117 ↗
31. Tang, M. et al. Tailoring π-conjugated systems: from π–π stacking to high-rate-performance organic cathodes. Chem 4, 2600–2614 (2018).10.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.014 ↗
32. Jagtap, S. P. et al. Closely stacked oligo(phenylene ethynylene)s: effect of π-stacking on the electronic properties of conjugated chromophores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 7176–7185 (2012).10.1021/ja3019065 ↗
33. Son, S. Y. et al. Exploiting π–π stacking for stretchable semiconducting polymers. Macromolecules 51, 2572–2579 (2018).10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00093 ↗
34. Guilbert, A. A. Y. et al. Influence of bridging atom and side chains on the structure and crystallinity of cyclopentadithiophene-benzothiadiazole polymers. Chem. Mater. 26, 1226–1233 (2014).10.1021/cm403410w ↗
35. David, W. I. F., Ibberson, R. M., Cox, S. F. J. & Wood, P. T. Order-disorder transition in monoclinic sulfur: a precise structural study by high-resolution neutron powder diffraction. Acta Crystallogr. B 62, 953–959 (2006).10.1107/S0108768106039309 ↗
36. Kimura, H. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and polysulfide (H2Sn) signaling: the first 25 years. Biomolecules 11, 896 (2021).10.3390/biom11060896 ↗
37. Liu, H., Radford, M. N., Yang, C. T., Chen, W. & Xian, M. Inorganic hydrogen polysulfides: chemistry, chemical biology and detection. Br. J. Pharmacol. 176, 616–627 (2019).10.1111/bph.14330 ↗
38. De Santis, F., Allegrini, I., Bellagotti, R., Vichi, F. & Zona, D. Development and field evaluation of a new diffusive sampler for hydrogen sulphide in the ambient air. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 384, 897–901 (2006).10.1007/s00216-005-0141-3 ↗
39. Bajaj, P. & Roopanwal, A. K. Thermal stabilization of acrylic precursors for the production of carbon fibers: an overview. J. Macromol. Sci. C 37, 97–147 (1997).10.1080/15321799708014734 ↗
40. Kopec, M. et al. Polyacrylonitrile-derived nanostructured carbon materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 92, 89–134 (2019).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.02.003 ↗
41. Lu, A. H., Li, W. C., Salabas, E. L., Spliethoff, B. & Schüth, F. Low temperature catalytic pyrolysis for the synthesis of high surface area, nanostructured graphitic carbon. Chem. Mater. 18, 2086–2094 (2006).10.1021/cm060135p ↗
42. Dahn, J. R., Zheng, T., Liu, Y. H. & Xue, J. S. Mechanisms for lithium insertion in carbonaceous materials. Science 270, 590–593 (1995).10.1126/science.270.5236.590 ↗
43. Xiao, J. et al. Following the transient reactions in lithium–sulfur batteries using an in situ nuclear magnetic resonance technique. Nano Lett. 15, 3309–3316 (2015).10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00521 ↗
44. Shadike, Z. et al. Review on organosulfur materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Mater. Horiz. 8, 471–500 (2021).10.1039/D0MH01364A ↗
45. Zheng, Y. H. et al. Superior electrochemical performance of sodium-ion full-cell using poplar wood derived hard carbon anode. Energy Storage Mater. 18, 269–279 (2019).10.1016/j.ensm.2018.09.002 ↗
46. Yang, H. J., Chen, J. H., Yang, J., Nuli, Y. N. & Wang, J. L. Dense and high loading sulfurized pyrolyzed poly (acrylonitrile)(S@pPAN) cathode for rechargeable lithium batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 31, 187–194 (2020).10.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.003 ↗
47. Wan, T. H., Saccoccio, M., Chen, C. & Ciucci, F. Influence of the discretization methods on the distribution of relaxation times deconvolution: implementing radial basis functions with DRTtools. Electrochim. Acta 184, 483–499 (2015).10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.097 ↗
48. Prescher, C. & Prakapenka, V. B. Dioptas: a program for reduction of two-dimensional X-ray diffraction data and data exploration. High Press. Res. 35, 223–230 (2015).10.1080/08957959.2015.1059835 ↗
49. Juhás, P., Davis, T., Farrow, C. L. & Billinge, S. J. L. PDFgetX3: a rapid and highly automated program for processing powder diffraction data into total scattering pair distribution functions. J. Appl. Cryst. 46, 560–566 (2013).10.1107/S0021889813005190 ↗
50. Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 537–541 (2005).10.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
51. Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 16, Revision C.01 (Gaussian, 2016).