How charge frustration causes ion ordering and microphase separation at surfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Ion interactions with charged surfaces are fundamental to electrochemical, geochemical and biological systems, yet the impact of charging on interfacial structure and dynamics is poorly understood. Here we investigate the adsorption and precipitation of multivalent ions on mica using molecularly resolved atomic force microscopy. Although divalent ions form continuous hydroxide monolayers in a manner consistent with classical models, trivalent ions adopt complex states associated with strong overcharging, including ordered ion networks, cluster arrays and microphase-separated films not predicted by those models. Monte Carlo simulations show that such states emerge from charge frustration arising when restrictions on repelling charges prevent the minimization of electrostatic forces. Due to their universal nature across cation types, the results provide general principles underlying charge-driven nanostructure formation and insights for using electric fields to direct materials synthesis.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Gonella, G. et al. Water at charged interfaces. Nat. Rev. Chem. 5, 466–485 (2021).10.1038/s41570-021-00293-2 ↗
2. Banuelos, J. L. et al. Oxide- and silicate-water interfaces and their roles in technology and the environment. Chem. Rev. 123, 6413–6544 (2023).10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00130 ↗
3. Wang, S., Walker-Gibbons, R., Watkins, B., Flynn, M. & Krishnan, M. A charge-dependent long-ranged force drives tailored assembly of matter in solution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 485–493 (2024).10.1038/s41565-024-01621-5 ↗
4. Okur, H. I., Tarun, O. B. & Roke, S. Chemistry of lipid membranes from models to living systems: a perspective of hydration, surface potential, curvature, confinement and heterogeneity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 12168–12181 (2019).10.1021/jacs.9b02820 ↗
5. Li, L., Salvador, P. A. & Rohrer, G. S. Photocatalysts with internal electric fields. Nanoscale 6, 24–42 (2014).10.1039/C3NR03998F ↗
6. Sambur, J. B. et al. Sub-particle reaction and photocurrent mapping to optimize catalyst-modified photoanodes. Nature 530, 77–80 (2016).10.1038/nature16534 ↗
7. Chao, D. et al. Roadmap for advanced aqueous batteries: from design of materials to applications. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba4098 (2020).10.1126/sciadv.aba4098 ↗
8. Gouy, M. Sur la constitution de la charge électrique à la surface d’un électrolyte. J. Phys. Theor. Appl. 9, 457–468 (1910).10.1051/jphystap:019100090045700 ↗
9. Chapman, D. L. A contribution to the theory of electrocapillarity. Philos. Mag. 25, 475–481 (1913).10.1080/14786440408634187 ↗
10. Legg, B. A., Voïtchovsky, K. & De Yoreo, J. J. Hydroxide films on mica form charge-stabilized microphases that circumvent nucleation barriers. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn7087 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.abn7087 ↗
11. Lyklema, J. Overcharging, charge reversal: chemistry or physics?. Colloids Surf. A 291, 3–12 (2006).10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.06.043 ↗
12. Besteman, K., Zevenbergen, M. A., Heering, H. A. & Lemay, S. G. Direct observation of charge inversion by multivalent ions as a universal electrostatic phenomenon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 170802 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.170802 ↗
13. James, R. O. & Healy, T. W. Adsorption of hydrolyzable metal ions at the oxide—water interface. II. Charge reversal of SiO2 and TiO2 colloids by adsorbed Co(II), La(III), and Th(IV) as model systems. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 40, 53–64 (1972).10.1016/0021-9797(72)90173-7 ↗
14. Grosberg, A. Y., Nguyen, T. T. & Shklovskii, B. I. Colloquium: the physics of charge inversion in chemical and biological systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 329–345 (2002).10.1103/RevModPhys.74.329 ↗
15. Jimenez, M. L., Delgado, A. V. & Lyklema, J. Hydrolysis versus ion correlation models in electrokinetic charge inversion: establishing application ranges. Langmuir 28, 6786–6793 (2012).10.1021/la3010773 ↗
16. Wang, W., Park, R. Y., Travesset, A. & Vaknin, D. Ion-specific induced charges at aqueous soft interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 056102 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.056102 ↗
17. Lee, S. S., Koishi, A., Bourg, I. C. & Fenter, P. Ion correlations drive charge overscreening and heterogeneous nucleation at solid–aqueous electrolyte interfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2105154118 (2021).10.1073/pnas.2105154118 ↗
18. Wang, J. et al. Ions adsorbed at amorphous solid/solution interfaces form Wigner crystal-like structures. ACS Nano 18, 1181–1194 (2024).10.1021/acsnano.3c11349 ↗
19. van der Heyden, F. H., Stein, D., Besteman, K., Lemay, S. G. & Dekker, C. Charge inversion at high ionic strength studied by streaming currents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 224502 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.224502 ↗
20. Legg, B. A. et al. Visualization of aluminum ions at the mica water interface links hydrolysis state-to-surface potential and particle adhesion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 6093–6102 (2020).10.1021/jacs.9b12530 ↗
21. Lee, S. S., Schmidt, M., Sturchio, N. C., Nagy, K. L. & Fenter, P. Effect of pH on the formation of gibbsite-layer films at the muscovite (001)–water interface. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 6560–6571 (2019).10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b12122 ↗
22. Stubbs, J. E. et al. Epitaxial growth of gibbsite sheets on the basal surface of muscovite mica. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 27615–27627 (2019).10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08219 ↗
23. Min, Y., Pesika, N., Zasadzinski, J. & Israelachvili, J. Studies of bilayers and vesicle adsorption to solid substrates: development of a miniature streaming potential apparatus (SPA). Langmuir 26, 8684–8689 (2010).10.1021/la904842v ↗
24. Fukuma, T. & Garcia, R. Atomic- and molecular-resolution mapping of solid-liquid interfaces by 3D atomic force microscopy. ACS Nano 12, 11785–11797 (2018).10.1021/acsnano.8b07216 ↗
25. Alberstein, R. G. et al. Discrete orientations of interfacial waters direct crystallization of mica-binding proteins. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 80–87 (2023).10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02948 ↗
26. Tuladhar, A. et al. Direct observation of the orientational anisotropy of buried hydroxyl groups inside muscovite mica. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 2135–2142 (2019).10.1021/jacs.8b12483 ↗
27. Sakuma, H. & Kawamura, K. Structure and dynamics of water on muscovite mica surfaces. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 4100–4110 (2009).10.1016/j.gca.2009.05.029 ↗
28. Lee, S. S. et al. Structural characterization of aluminum (oxy)hydroxide films at the muscovite (001)-water interface. Langmuir 32, 477–486 (2016).10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03346 ↗
29. Scales, P. J., Grieser, F. & Healy, T. W. Electrokinetics of the muscovite mica-aqueous solution interface. Langmuir 6, 582–589 (2002).10.1021/la00093a012 ↗
30. Kosmulski, M. pH-dependent surface charging and points of zero charge. IV. Update and new approach. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 337, 439–448 (2009).10.1016/j.jcis.2009.04.072 ↗
31. Martin-Jimenez, D., Chacon, E., Tarazona, P. & Garcia, R. Atomically resolved three-dimensional structures of electrolyte aqueous solutions near a solid surface. Nat. Commun. 7, 12164 (2016).10.1038/ncomms12164 ↗
32. Zhang, M. et al. A molecular view of peptoid-induced acceleration of calcite growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2412358121 (2024).10.1073/pnas.2412358121 ↗
33. Su, S. et al. Nanometer-resolved operando photo-response of faceted BiVO4 semiconductor nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 2248–2256 (2024).10.1021/jacs.3c12666 ↗
34. Deem, M. W. & Chandler, D. Charge-frustrated model of bicontinuous phases. Phys. Rev. E 49, 4268–4275 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevE.49.4268 ↗
35. Pekalski, J., Ciach, A. & Almarza, N. G. Periodic ordering of clusters and stripes in a two-dimensional lattice model. I. Ground state, mean-field phase diagram and structure of the disordered phases. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 114701 (2014).10.1063/1.4868001 ↗
36. Almarza, N. G., Pekalski, J. & Ciach, A. Periodic ordering of clusters and stripes in a two-dimensional lattice model. II. Results of Monte Carlo simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 164708 (2014).10.1063/1.4871901 ↗
37. Frink, C. R. & Peech, M. Hydrolysis of the aluminum ion in dilute aqueous solutions. Inorg. Chem. 2, 473–478 (1963).10.1021/ic50007a011 ↗
38. Deželić, N., Bilinski, H. & Wolf, R. H. H. Precipitation and hydrolysis of metallic ions—IV: studies on the solubility of aluminum hydroxide in aqueous solution. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 33, 791–798 (1971).10.1016/0022-1902(71)80479-7 ↗
39. Stefánsson, A. Iron(III) hydrolysis and solubility at 25 °C. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 6117–6123 (2007).10.1021/es070174h ↗
40. Baes, C. F. & Mesmer, R. E. The Hydrolysis of Cations (Wiley, 1976).
41. Henry, M., Jolivet, J. P. & Livage, J. in Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Applications of Sol-Gel Glasses (eds R. Reisfeld & C. K. Jjørgensen) 153–206 (Springer, 1992).
42. James, R. O. & Healy, T. W. Adsorption of hydrolyzable metal ions at the oxide–water interface. III. A thermodynamic model of adsorption. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 40, 65–81 (1972).10.1016/0021-9797(72)90174-9 ↗
43. James, R. O. & Healy, T. W. Adsorption of hydrolyzable metal ions at the oxide–water interface. I. Co(II) adsorption on SiO2 and TiO2 as model systems. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 40, 42–52 (1972).10.1016/0021-9797(72)90172-5 ↗
44. De Yoreo, J. J. & Vekilov, P. G. Principles of crystal nucleation and growth. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 54, 57–93 (2003).10.2113/0540057 ↗
45. Pouvreau, M., Greathouse, J. A., Cygan, R. T. & Kalinichev, A. G. Structure of hydrated gibbsite and brucite edge surfaces: DFT results and further development of the ClayFF classical force field with metal–O–H angle bending terms. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 14757–14771 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05362 ↗
46. Nečas, D. & Klapetek, P. Gwyddion: an open-source software for SPM data analysis. Open Phys. 10, 181–188 (2012).10.2478/s11534-011-0096-2 ↗
47. Scales, P. J., Grieser, F., Healy, T. W., White, L. R. & Chan, D. Y. C. Electrokinetics of the silica-solution interface: a flat plate streaming potential study. Langmuir 8, 965–974 (1992).10.1021/la00039a037 ↗
48. Walker, S. L., Bhattacharjee, S., Hoek, E. M. V. & Elimelech, M. A novel asymmetric clamping cell for measuring streaming potential of flat surfaces. Langmuir 18, 2193–2198 (2002).10.1021/la011284j ↗
49. Payam, A. F., Martin-Jimenez, D. & Garcia, R. Force reconstruction from tapping mode force microscopy experiments. Nanotechnology 26, 185706 (2015).10.1088/0957-4484/26/18/185706 ↗