journal article·2026-04

Cell viscosity influences haematogenous dissemination and metastatic extravasation of tumour cells

Valentin Gensbittel, Zeynep Yesilata, Louis Bochler, Gautier Follain, Laurie Nemoz-Billet, Olivier Lefebvre, Klemens Uhlmann, Annabel Larnicol, Giulia E. M. Ammirati, Sébastien Harlepp, Ruchi Goswami, Salvatore Girardo, Laetitia Paulen, Vincent Hyenne, Vincent Mittelheisser, Tristan Stemmelen, Anne Molitor, Raphael Carapito, Guillaume Belthier, Julie Pannequin, Martin Kräter, Daniel J. Müller, Daniel Balzani, Jochen Guck, Naël Osmani, Jacky G. Goetz

Nature Materials· Volume 25· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Metastases arise from a multistep process during which tumour cells face several microenvironmental mechanical challenges, which influence metastatic success. However, how circulating tumour cells (CTCs) adapt their mechanics to such microenvironments is not fully understood. Here we report that the deformability of CTCs affects their haematogenous dissemination and identify mechanical phenotypes that favour metastatic extravasation. Combining intravital microscopy with CTC-mimicking elastic beads, mechanical tuning in tumour lines and profiling of tumour-patient-derived cells, we demonstrate that the inherent mechanical properties of circulating objects dictate their ability to enter constraining vessels. We identify cellular viscosity as a rheostat of CTC circulation and arrest, and show that cellular viscosity is crucial for efficient extravasation. Moreover, we find that mechanical properties that favour extravasation and subsequent metastatic outgrowth can be opposite. Altogether, our results establish CTC viscosity as a key biomechanical parameter that shapes several steps of metastasis.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Cancer Cells and Metastasis · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Steeg, P. S. Targeting metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 201–218 (2016).10.1038/nrc.2016.25 ↗
2. Follain, G. et al. Fluids and their mechanics in tumour transit: shaping metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 107–124 (2020).10.1038/s41568-019-0221-x ↗
3. Stylianopoulos, T. et al. Causes, consequences, and remedies for growth-induced solid stress in murine and human tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 15101–15108 (2012).10.1073/pnas.1213353109 ↗
4. Regmi, S., Fu, A. & Luo, K. Q. High shear stresses under exercise condition destroy circulating tumor cells in a microfluidic system. Sci. Rep. 7, 39975 (2017).10.1038/srep39975 ↗
5. Wirtz, D., Konstantopoulos, K. & Searson, P. C. The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 512–522 (2011).10.1038/nrc3080 ↗
6. Matthews, H. K. et al. Oncogenic signaling alters cell shape and mechanics to facilitate cell division under confinement. Dev. Cell 52, 563–573.e3 (2020).10.1016/j.devcel.2020.01.004 ↗
7. Moose, D. L. et al. Cancer cells resist mechanical destruction in circulation via rhoa/actomyosin-dependent mechano-adaptation. Cell Rep. 30, 3864–3874.e6 (2020).10.1016/j.celrep.2020.02.080 ↗
8. Guck, J. et al. Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. Biophys. J. 88, 3689–3698 (2005).10.1529/biophysj.104.045476 ↗
9. Swaminathan, V. et al. Mechanical stiffness grades metastatic potential in patient tumor cells and in cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 71, 5075–5080 (2011).10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0247 ↗
10. Alibert, C., Goud, B. & Manneville, J.-B. Are cancer cells really softer than normal cells?. Biol Cell 109, 167–189 (2017).10.1111/boc.201600078 ↗
11. Gensbittel, V. et al. Mechanical adaptability of tumor cells in metastasis. Dev. Cell 56, 164–179 (2021).10.1016/j.devcel.2020.10.011 ↗
12. Gassmann, P., Hemping-Bovenkerk, A., Mees, S. T. & Haier, J. Metastatic tumor cell arrest in the liver-lumen occlusion and specific adhesion are not exclusive. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 24, 851–858 (2009).10.1007/s00384-009-0694-2 ↗
13. Osmani, N. et al. Metastatic tumor cells exploit their adhesion repertoire to counteract shear forces during intravascular arrest. Cell Rep. 28, 2491–2500.e5 (2019).10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.102 ↗
14. Kienast, Y. et al. Real-time imaging reveals the single steps of brain metastasis formation. Nat. Med. 16, 116–122 (2010).10.1038/nm.2072 ↗
15. Follain, G. et al. Hemodynamic forces tune the arrest, adhesion, and extravasation of circulating tumor cells. Dev. Cell 45, 33–52.e12 (2018).10.1016/j.devcel.2018.02.015 ↗
16. Paul, C. D. et al. Tissue architectural cues drive organ targeting of tumor cells in zebrafish. Cell Syst. 9, 187–206.e16 (2019).10.1016/j.cels.2019.07.005 ↗
17. Tietze, S. et al. Spheroid culture of mesenchymal stromal cells results in morphorheological properties appropriate for improved microcirculation. Adv. Sci. 6, 1802104 (2019).10.1002/advs.201802104 ↗
18. Chen, J. et al. Efficient extravasation of tumor-repopulating cells depends on cell deformability. Sci. Rep. 6, 19304 (2016).10.1038/srep19304 ↗
19. Cao, X. et al. A chemomechanical model for nuclear morphology and stresses during cell transendothelial migration. Biophys. J. 111, 1541–1552 (2016).10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.011 ↗
20. Roberts, A. B. et al. Tumor cell nuclei soften during transendothelial migration. J. Biomech. 121, 110400 (2021).10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110400 ↗
21. Allen, T. A. et al. Circulating tumor cells exit circulation while maintaining multicellularity, augmenting metastatic potential. J. Cell Sci. 132, jcs231563 (2019).10.1242/jcs.231563 ↗
22. Karreman, M. A. et al. Active remodeling of capillary endothelium via cancer cell-derived MMP9 promotes metastatic brain colonization. Cancer Res. 83, 1299–1314 (2023).10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-3964 ↗
23. Headley, M. B. et al. Visualization of immediate immune responses to pioneer metastatic cells in the lung. Nature 531, 513–517 (2016).10.1038/nature16985 ↗
24. Girardo, S. et al. Standardized microgel beads as elastic cell mechanical probes. J. Mater. Chem. B 6, 6245–6261 (2018).10.1039/C8TB01421C ↗
25. Träber, N. et al. Polyacrylamide bead sensors for in vivo quantification of cell-scale stress in zebrafish development. Sci. Rep. 9, 17031 (2019).10.1038/s41598-019-53425-6 ↗
26. Guo, M. et al. Probing the stochastic, motor-driven properties of the cytoplasm using force spectrum microscopy. Cell 158, 822–832 (2014).10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.051 ↗
27. Girard, C. A. et al. A feed-forward mechanosignaling loop confers resistance to therapies targeting the MAPK pathway in BRAF-mutant melanoma. Cancer Res. 80, 1927–1941 (2020).10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2914 ↗
28. Grillet, F. et al. Circulating tumour cells from patients with colorectal cancer have cancer stem cell hallmarks in ex vivo culture. Gut 66, 1802–1810 (2017).10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311447 ↗
29. Dessard, M., Manneville, J.-B. & Berret, J.-F. Cytoplasmic viscosity is a potential biomarker for metastatic breast cancer cells. Nanoscale Adv. 6, 1727–1738 (2024).10.1039/D4NA00003J ↗
30. Follain, G. et al. Impairing flow-mediated endothelial remodeling reduces extravasation of tumor cells. Sci. Rep. 11, 13144 (2021).10.1038/s41598-021-92515-2 ↗
31. Peralta, M. et al. Endothelial calcium firing mediates the extravasation of metastatic tumor cells. iScience 28, 111690 (2025).10.1016/j.isci.2024.111690 ↗
32. Lei, K. et al. Cancer-cell stiffening via cholesterol depletion enhances adoptive T-cell immunotherapy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 1411–1425 (2021).10.1038/s41551-021-00826-6 ↗
33. Tello-Lafoz, M. et al. Cytotoxic lymphocytes target characteristic biophysical vulnerabilities in cancer. Immunity 54, 1037–1054.e7 (2021).10.1016/j.immuni.2021.02.020 ↗
34. Mittelheisser, V. et al. Evidence and therapeutic implications of biomechanically regulated immunosurveillance in cancer and other diseases. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 281–297 (2024).10.1038/s41565-023-01535-8 ↗
35. Lorenz, C., Forsting, J., Style, R. W., Klumpp, S. & Köster, S. Keratin filament mechanics and energy dissipation are determined by metal-like plasticity. Matter 6, 2019–2033 (2023).10.1016/j.matt.2023.04.014 ↗
36. Yu, M. et al. Circulating breast tumor cells exhibit dynamic changes in epithelial and mesenchymal composition. Science 339, 580–584 (2013).10.1126/science.1228522 ↗
37. Padmanaban, V. et al. E-cadherin is required for metastasis in multiple models of breast cancer. Nature 573, 439–444 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1526-3 ↗
38. Youssef, K. K. et al. Two distinct epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition programs control invasion and inflammation in segregated tumor cell populations. Nat. Cancer 5, 1660–1680 (2024).10.1038/s43018-024-00839-5 ↗
39. Grasset, E. M. et al. Mapping the breast tumor microenvironment: proximity analysis reveals spatial relationships between macrophage subtypes and metastasis-initiating cancer cells. Oncogene 43, 2927–2937 (2024).10.1038/s41388-024-03127-9 ↗
40. Goetz, J. G. et al. Endothelial cilia mediate low flow sensing during zebrafish vascular development. Cell Rep. 6, 799–808 (2014).10.1016/j.celrep.2014.01.032 ↗
41. Hyenne, V. et al. Studying the fate of tumor extracellular vesicles at high spatiotemporal resolution using the zebrafish embryo. Dev. Cell 48, 554–572.e7 (2019).10.1016/j.devcel.2019.01.014 ↗
42. Rosendahl, P. et al. Real-time fluorescence and deformability cytometry. Nat. Methods 15, 355–358 (2018).10.1038/nmeth.4639 ↗
43. Stoletov, K. et al. Visualizing extravasation dynamics of metastatic tumor cells. J. Cell Sci. 123, 2332–2341 (2010).10.1242/jcs.069443 ↗
44. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).10.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
45. Guevorkian, K., Colbert, M.-J., Durth, M., Dufour, S. & Brochard-Wyart, F. Aspiration of biological viscoelastic drops. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 218101 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.218101 ↗
46. Diel, E. E., Lichtman, J. W. & Richardson, D. S. Tutorial: avoiding and correcting sample-induced spherical aberration artifacts in 3D fluorescence microscopy. Nat. Protoc. 15, 2773–2784 (2020).10.1038/s41596-020-0360-2 ↗