A formal FeIII/V redox couple in an intercalation electrode
Source abstract
Abstract
Iron redox cycling between low-valent oxidation states of FeII and FeIII drives crucial processes in nature. The FeII/III redox couple charge compensates the cycling of lithium iron phosphate, a positive electrode (cathode) for lithium-ion batteries. High-valent iron redox couples, involving formal oxidation higher than FeIII, could deliver higher electrochemical potentials and energy densities. However, because of the instability of high-valent Fe electrodes, they have proven difficult to probe and exploit in intercalation systems. Here we report and characterize a formal FeIII/V redox couple by revisiting the charge compensation mechanism of (de)lithiation in Li4FeSbO6. Valence-sensitive experimental and computational core-level spectroscopy reveal a direct transition from FeIII (3d5) to a negative-charge-transfer FeV (3d5L2) ground state on delithiation, without forming FeIV, or oxygen dimers. We identify that the cation ordering in Li4FeSbO6 drives a templated phase transition to stabilize the unique FeV species and demonstrate that disrupting cation ordering suppresses the FeIII/V redox couple. Exhibiting resistance to calendar aging, high operating potential and low voltage hysteresis, the FeIII/V redox couple in Li4FeSbO6 provides a framework for developing sustainable, Fe-based intercalation cathodes for high-voltage applications.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (82)
Show source-provided references
1. Kappler, A. et al. An evolving view on biogeochemical cycling of iron. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 360–374 (2021).10.1038/s41579-020-00502-7 ↗
2. Liu, J. et al. Metalloproteins containing cytochrome, iron–sulfur, or copper redox centers. Chem. Rev. 114, 4366–4469 (2014).10.1021/cr400479b ↗
3. Padhi, A. K., Nanjundaswamy, K. S., Masquelier, C., Okada, S. & Goodenough, J. B. Effect of structure on the Fe3+/Fe2+ redox couple in iron phosphates. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 1609–1613 (1997).10.1149/1.1837649 ↗
4. Gent, W. E., Abate, I. I., Yang, W., Nazar, L. F. & Chueh, W. C. Design rules for high-valent redox in intercalation electrodes. Joule 4, 1369–1397 (2020).10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.004 ↗
5. Bratsch, S. G. Standard electrode potentials and temperature coefficients in water at 298.15 K. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 18, 1–21 (1989).10.1063/1.555839 ↗
6. Kokarovtseva, I. G., Belyaev, I. N. & Semenyakova, L. V. Oxygen compounds of iron(vi, v, iv). Russ. Chem. Rev. 41, 929–937 (1972).10.1070/RC1972v041n11ABEH002104 ↗
7. Levason, W. & McAuliffe, C. A. Higher oxidation state chemistry of iron, cobalt, and nickel. Coord. Chem. Rev. 12, 151–184 (1974).10.1016/S0010-8545(00)82026-3 ↗
8. Hohenberger, J., Ray, K. & Meyer, K. The biology and chemistry of high-valent iron–oxo and iron–nitrido complexes. Nat. Commun. 3, 720 (2012).10.1038/ncomms1718 ↗
9. Hunter, B. M. et al. Trapping an iron(vi) water-splitting intermediate in nonaqueous media. Joule 2, 747–763 (2018).10.1016/j.joule.2018.01.008 ↗
10. Masese, T. et al. Crystal structural changes and charge compensation mechanism during two lithium extraction/insertion between Li2FeSiO4 and FeSiO4. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 10206–10211 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00362 ↗
11. Kobayashi, H. et al. Metastable cubic structure exceeds capacity limit of antifluorite Li5FeO4 cathode using small polarized oxygen redox. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2203441 (2023).10.1002/aenm.202203441 ↗
12. Matsuhara, T. et al. Synthesis and electrode performance of Li4MoO5-LiFeO2 binary system as positive electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Electrochemistry 84, 797–801 (2016).10.5796/electrochemistry.84.797 ↗
13. Li, B. et al. Correlating ligand-to-metal charge transfer with voltage hysteresis in a Li-rich rock-salt compound exhibiting anionic redox. Nat. Chem. 13, 1070–1080 (2021).10.1038/s41557-021-00775-2 ↗
14. Hirayama, M., Tomita, H., Kubota, K. & Kanno, R. Structure and electrode reactions of layered rocksalt LiFeO2 nanoparticles for lithium battery cathode. J. Power Sources 196, 6809–6814 (2011).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.009 ↗
15. Li, Y. et al. Iron migration and oxygen oxidation during sodium extraction from NaFeO2. Nano Energy 47, 519–526 (2018).10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.007 ↗
16. Zhan, C. et al. Enabling the high capacity of lithium-rich anti-fluorite lithium iron oxide by simultaneous anionic and cationic redox. Nat. Energy 2, 963–971 (2017).10.1038/s41560-017-0043-6 ↗
17. Lebens-Higgins, Z. et al. Electrochemical utilization of iron iv in the Li1.3Fe0.4Nb0.3O2 disordered rocksalt cathode. Batter. Supercaps 4, 771–777 (2021).10.1002/batt.202000318 ↗
18. Lee, E. et al. New insights into the performance degradation of Fe-based layered oxides in sodium-ion batteries: instability of Fe3⁺/Fe4⁺ redox in α-NaFeO2. Chem. Mater. 27, 6755–6764 (2015).10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02918 ↗
19. Kwok, C. Y. et al. Redox mechanisms and migration tendencies in earth-abundant 0.7Li2MnO3·0.3LiFeO2 cathodes: coupling spin-resolved X-ray absorption near edge and X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopies. Chem. Mater. 36, 300–312 (2024).10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02111 ↗
20. Dräger, C. et al. Observation of electrochemically active Fe3+/Fe4+ in LiCo0.8Fe0.2MnO4 by in situ Mössbauer spectroscopy and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 89–95 (2018).10.1039/C8CP06177G ↗
21. Shigemura, H. et al. Structure and electrochemical properties of LiFexMn2–xO4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5) spinel as 5 V electrode material for lithium batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 148, A730–A736 (2001).10.1149/1.1377593 ↗
22. Prado, G., Rougier, A., Fournès, L. & Delmas, C. Electrochemical behavior of iron-substituted lithium nickelate. J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 2880 (2000).10.1149/1.1393620 ↗
23. Boivin, E., House, R. A., Marie, J.-J. & Bruce, P. G. Controlling Iron versus oxygen redox in the layered cathode Na0.67Fe0.5Mn0.5O2: mitigating voltage and capacity fade by Mg substitution. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2200702 (2022).10.1002/aenm.202200702 ↗
24. Shevchenko, V. A. et al. Competition between the Ni and Fe redox in the O3-NaNi1/3Fe1/3Mn1/3O2 cathode material for Na-ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 35, 4015–4025 (2023).10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c00338 ↗
25. Wang, X., Liu, G., Iwao, T., Okubo, M. & Yamada, A. Role of ligand-to-metal charge transfer in O3-type NaFeO2–NaNiO2 solid solution for enhanced electrochemical properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 2970–2976 (2014).10.1021/jp411382r ↗
26. Walsh, A., Sokol, A. A., Buckeridge, J., Scanlon, D. O. & Catlow, C. R. A. Oxidation states and ionicity. Nat. Mater. 17, 958–964 (2018).10.1038/s41563-018-0165-7 ↗
27. Zaanen, J., Sawatzky, G. A. & Allen, J. W. Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 418–421 (1985).10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.418 ↗
28. Bisogni, V. et al. Ground-state oxygen holes and the metal–insulator transition in the negative charge-transfer rare-earth nickelates. Nat. Commun. 7, 13017 (2016).10.1038/ncomms13017 ↗
29. Abbate, M. et al. Controlled-valence properties of La1−xSrxFeO3 and La1−xSrxMnO3 studied by soft-X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 46, 4511–4519 (1992).10.1103/PhysRevB.46.4511 ↗
30. McCalla, E. et al. Understanding the roles of anionic redox and oxygen release during electrochemical cycling of lithium-rich layered Li4FeSbO6. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 4804–4814 (2015).10.1021/jacs.5b01424 ↗
31. Driscoll, L. L. et al. Under pressure: offering fundamental insight into structural changes on ball milling battery materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 5196–5209 (2023).10.1039/D3EE00249G ↗
32. Achkar, A. J. et al. Bulk sensitive X-ray absorption spectroscopy free of self-absorption effects. Phys. Rev. B 83, 81106 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.83.081106 ↗
33. Abate, I. I. et al. Coulombically-stabilized oxygen hole polarons enable fully reversible oxygen redox. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 4858–4867 (2021).10.1039/D1EE01037A ↗
34. House, R. A. et al. Delocalized electron holes on oxygen in a battery cathode. Nat. Energy 8, 351–360 (2023).10.1038/s41560-023-01211-0 ↗
35. Menil, F. Systematic trends of the 57Fe Mössbauer isomer shifts in (FeOn) and (FeFn) polyhedra. Evidence of a new correlation between the isomer shift and the inductive effect of the competing bond T-X (→Fe) (where X is O or F and T any element with a formal positive charge). J. Phys. Chem. Solids 46, 763–789 (1985).10.1016/0022-3697(85)90001-0 ↗
36. Miedema, P. S. & de Groot, F. M. F. The iron L edges: Fe2p X-ray absorption and electron energy loss spectroscopy. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 187, 32–48 (2013).10.1016/j.elspec.2013.03.005 ↗
37. Xiong, P. et al. Geometrical spin frustration of unusually high valence Fe5+ in the double perovskite La2LiFeO6. Inorg. Chem. 55, 6218–6222 (2016).10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00827 ↗
38. Gallagher, P. K., MacChesney, J. B. & Buchanan, D. N. E. Mössbauer effect in the system SrFeO2.5–3.0. J. Chem. Phys. 41, 2429–2434 (1964).10.1063/1.1726282 ↗
39. Martínez de Irujo-Labalde, X., Scrimshire, A., Bingham, P. A., Suard, E. & Hayward, M. A. Conversion of Li2FeSbO5 to the Fe(iii)/Fe(v) phase LiFeSbO5 via topochemical lithium extraction. Chem. Mater. 34, 2468–2475 (2022).10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00156 ↗
40. Romero, F. D. & Shimakawa, Y. Charge transitions in perovskite oxides containing unusually high-valent Fe. Chem. Commun. 55, 3690–3696 (2019).10.1039/C8CC10207D ↗
41. Shimakawa, Y. Crystal and magnetic structures of CaCu3Fe4O12 and LaCu3Fe4O12: distinct charge transitions of unusual high valence Fe. J. Phys. D 48, 504006 (2015).10.1088/0022-3727/48/50/504006 ↗
42. Vračar, M. et al. Jahn-Teller distortion around Fe4+ in Sr(FexTi1–x)O3–δ from X-ray absorption spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and vibrational spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 76, 174107 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.76.174107 ↗
43. Frati, F., Hunault, M. O. J. Y. & De Groot, F. M. F. Oxygen K-edge X-ray absorption spectra. Chem. Rev. 120, 4056–4110 (2020).10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00439 ↗
44. House, R. A. et al. Superstructure control of first-cycle voltage hysteresis in oxygen-redox cathodes. Nature 577, 502–508 (2020).10.1038/s41586-019-1854-3 ↗
45. Giannozzi, P. et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017).10.1088/1361-648X/aa8f79 ↗
46. Vinson, J. Advances in the OCEAN-3 spectroscopy package. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 12787–12803 (2022).10.1039/D2CP01030E ↗
47. Zvereva, E. A. et al. A new layered triangular antiferromagnet Li4FeSbO6: spin order, field-induced transitions and anomalous critical behavior. Dalton Trans. 42, 1550–1566 (2013).10.1039/C2DT31938A ↗
48. Kas, J. J., Vila, F. D., Pemmaraju, C. D., Tan, T. S. & Rehr, J. J. Advanced calculations of X-ray spectroscopies with FEFF10 and Corvus. J. Synchrotron Rad. 28, 1801–1810 (2021).10.1107/S1600577521008614 ↗
49. McCalla, E. et al. Novel complex stacking of fully-ordered transition metal layers in Li4FeSbO6 materials. Chem. Mater. 27, 1699–1708 (2015).10.1021/cm504500a ↗
50. Šepelák, V., Bégin-Colin, S. & Caër, G. L. Transformations in oxides induced by high-energy ball-milling. Dalton Trans. 41, 11927–11948 (2012).10.1039/c2dt30349c ↗
51. Dai, K. et al. High reversibility of lattice oxygen redox quantified by direct bulk probes of both anionic and cationic redox reactions. Joule 3, 518–541 (2019).10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.014 ↗
52. Demazeau, G. et al. Characterization of six-coordinated iron (V) in an oxide lattice. Mater. Res. Bull. 16, 1465–1472 (1981).10.1016/0025-5408(81)90067-2 ↗
53. Hong, J. et al. Metal–oxygen decoordination stabilizes anion redox in Li-rich oxides. Nat. Mater. 18, 256–265 (2019).10.1038/s41563-018-0276-1 ↗
54. Dai, K. et al. Negligible voltage hysteresis with strong anionic redox in conventional battery electrode. Nano Energy 74, 104831 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104831 ↗
55. Li, X. et al. Jahn–Teller assisted Na diffusion for high performance Na ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 28, 6575–6583 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02440 ↗
56. Goto, M., Oguchi, T. & Shimakawa, Y. Geometrical spin frustration and monoclinic-distortion-induced spin canting in the double perovskites Ln2LiFeO6 (Ln = La, Nd, Sm, and Eu) with unusually high valence Fe5+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 19207–19213 (2021).10.1021/jacs.1c09838 ↗
57. Stone, K. H. et al. Remote and automated high-throughput powder diffraction measurements enabled by a robotic sample changer at SSRL beamline 2-1. J. Appl Crystallogr 56, 1480–1484 (2023).10.1107/S1600576723007148 ↗
58. Coelho, A. A. TOPAS and TOPAS-Academic: an optimization program integrating computer algebra and crystallographic objects written in C++. J. Appl Cryst. 51, 210–218 (2018).10.1107/S1600576718000183 ↗
59. Park, J. et al. Fictitious phase separation in Li layered oxides driven by electro-autocatalysis. Nat. Mater. 20, 991–999 (2021).10.1038/s41563-021-00936-1 ↗
60. Ashiotis, G. et al. The fast azimuthal integration Python library: pyFAI. J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 510–519 (2015).10.1107/S1600576715004306 ↗
61. Calder, S. et al. A suite-level review of the neutron powder diffraction instruments at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 092701 (2018).10.1063/1.5033906 ↗
62. Neuefeind, J., Feygenson, M., Carruth, J., Hoffmann, R. & Chipley, K. K. The Nanoscale Ordered MAterials Diffractometer NOMAD at the Spallation Neutron Source SNS. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 287, 68–75 (2012).10.1016/j.nimb.2012.05.037 ↗
63. Ikeda, S. & Carpenter, J. M. Wide-energy-range, high-resolution measurements of neutron pulse shapes of polyethylene moderators. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 239, 536–544 (1985).10.1016/0168-9002(85)90033-6 ↗
64. Liu, J. et al. Anionic redox induced anomalous structural transition in Ni-rich cathodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 6441–6454 (2021).10.1039/D1EE02987H ↗
65. Zhang, Y., Liu, J. & Tucker, M. G. Lorentz factor for time-of-flight neutron Bragg and total scattering. Acta Cryst. A 79, 20–24 (2023).10.1107/S2053273322010427 ↗
66. Wu, J. et al. Elemental-sensitive detection of the chemistry in batteries through soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering. J. Vis. Exp. 2018, 57415 (2018).10.3791/57415-v ↗
67. Singh, R., Gupta, M., Phase, D. M. & Mukherjee, S. K. Phase growth analysis of sputtered TiO2 thin films at low oxygen partial pressures using XANES and XRR. Mater. Res. Express 6, 116449 (2019).10.1088/2053-1591/ab4e3f ↗
68. de Groot, F. M. F. et al. 1s2p resonant inelastic X-ray scattering of iron oxides. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 20751–20762 (2005).10.1021/jp054006s ↗
69. Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
70. Lagarec, K. & Rancourt, D. G. Recoil—Mössbauer Spectral Analysis Software (Univ. of Ottawa, 1998).
71. Grandjean, F. & Long, G. J. Best practices and protocols in Mössbauer spectroscopy. Chem. Mater. 33, 3878–3904 (2021).10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c00326 ↗
72. Hsu, K. H. khhsu0724/CTFAMultiplet: v1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15659552 (2025).10.5281/zenodo.15659552 ↗
73. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
74. Dudarev, S. L., Botton, G. A., Savrasov, S. Y., Humphreys, C. J. & Sutton, A. P. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U study. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505–1509 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505 ↗
75. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
76. Furness, J. W., Kaplan, A. D., Ning, J., Perdew, J. P. & Sun, J. Accurate and numerically efficient r2SCAN meta-generalized gradient approximation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 8208–8215 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02405 ↗
77. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
78. Anisimov, V. I., Zaanen, J. & Andersen, O. K. Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I. Phys. Rev. B 44, 943–954 (1991).10.1103/PhysRevB.44.943 ↗
79. Vinson, J., Rehr, J. J., Kas, J. J. & Shirley, E. L. Bethe-Salpeter equation calculations of core excitation spectra. Phys. Rev. B 83, 115106 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.83.115106 ↗
80. Hamann, D. R. Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.88.085117 ↗
81. Sit, P. H.-L., Car, R., Cohen, M. H. & Selloni, A. Simple, unambiguous theoretical approach to oxidation state determination via first-principles calculations. Inorg. Chem. 50, 10259–10267 (2011).10.1021/ic2013107 ↗
82. Mu, E., Ramachandran, H. & Lomeli, E. Data from: a formal FeIII/V redox couple in an intercalation electrode. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.x3ffbg7t2 (2025).10.5061/dryad.x3ffbg7t2 ↗