Cytoplasmic anillin and Ect2 promote RhoA/myosin II-dependent confined migration and invasion
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Cell migration in mechanically confined environments is a crucial step of metastatic cancer progression. Nonetheless, the molecular components and processes mediating such behaviour are still not fully understood. Here we demonstrate that a pool of the scaffolding protein anillin and its cofactor Ect2, which are both predominantly nuclear proteins and critical mediators of cytokinesis, is present in the cytoplasm of multiple interphase cell types that promote confined cell migration. Confined migration in biomimetic microfluidic models triggers the actomyosin-binding-dependent recruitment of anillin to the plasma membrane at the poles of migrating cells in a manner that scales with microenvironmental stiffness and confinement. The guanine nucleotide exchange activity of Ect2 is required for its RhoA-GTPase-mediated activation of myosin II at the cell poles, enhancing invasion, bleb-based migration and extravasation. Confinement-induced nuclear envelope rupture further amplifies this process due to the release of further anillin and Ect2 into the cytoplasm. Overall, these results show how Ect2 and anillin cooperate to mediate RhoA/ROCK/myosin II-dependent mechanoadaptation and invasive cancer progression.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Microtubule and mitosis dynamics · Nuclear Structure and Function
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Paul, C. D., Mistriotis, P. & Konstantopoulos, K. Cancer cell motility: lessons from migration in confined spaces. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 131–140 (2017).10.1038/nrc.2016.123 ↗
2. Weigelin, B., Bakker, G.-J. & Friedl, P. Intravital third harmonic generation microscopy of collective melanoma cell invasion. IntraVital 1, 32–43 (2012).10.4161/intv.21223 ↗
3. Hashizume, H. et al. Openings between defective endothelial cells explain tumor vessel leakiness. Am. J. Pathol. 156, 1363–1380 (2000).10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65006-7 ↗
4. van Helvert, S., Storm, C. & Friedl, P. Mechanoreciprocity in cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 8–20 (2018).10.1038/s41556-017-0012-0 ↗
5. Fritz, G., Just, I. & Kaina, B. Rho GTPases are over-expressed in human tumors. Int. J. Cancer 81, 682–687 (1999).10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990531)81:5<682::AID-IJC2>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
6. Petrie, R. J. & Yamada, K. M. Multiple mechanisms of 3D migration: the origins of plasticity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 42, 7–12 (2016).10.1016/j.ceb.2016.03.025 ↗
7. Charras, G. & Paluch, E. Blebs lead the way: how to migrate without lamellipodia. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 730–736 (2008).10.1038/nrm2453 ↗
8. Sahai, E. & Marshall, C. J. Differing modes of tumour cell invasion have distinct requirements for Rho/ROCK signalling and extracellular proteolysis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 711–719 (2003).10.1038/ncb1019 ↗
9. Liu, Y.-J. et al. Confinement and low adhesion induce fast amoeboid migration of slow mesenchymal cells. Cell 160, 659–672 (2015).10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.007 ↗
10. Petrie, R. J., Koo, H. & Yamada, K. M. Generation of compartmentalized pressure by a nuclear piston governs cell motility in a 3D matrix. Science 345, 1062–1065 (2014).10.1126/science.1256965 ↗
11. Wisniewski, E. O. et al. Dorsoventral polarity directs cell responses to migration track geometries. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba6505 (2020).10.1126/sciadv.aba6505 ↗
12. Hetmanski, J. H. R. et al. Membrane tension orchestrates rear retraction in matrix-directed cell migration. Dev. Cell 51, 460–475.e410 (2019).10.1016/j.devcel.2019.09.006 ↗
13. Basant, A. & Glotzer, M. Spatiotemporal regulation of RhoA during cytokinesis. Curr. Biol. 28, R570–R580 (2018).10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.045 ↗
14. Tatsumoto, T., Xie, X., Blumenthal, R., Okamoto, I. & Miki, T. Human ECT2 Is an exchange factor for Rho GTPases, phosphorylated in G2/M phases, and involved in cytokinesis. J. Cell Biol. 147, 921–928 (1999).10.1083/jcb.147.5.921 ↗
15. Frenette, P. et al. An anillin-Ect2 complex stabilizes central spindle microtubules at the cortex during cytokinesis. PLoS ONE 7, e34888 (2012).10.1371/journal.pone.0034888 ↗
16. Piekny, A. J. & Glotzer, M. Anillin is a scaffold protein that links RhoA, actin, and myosin during cytokinesis. Curr. Biol. 18, 30–36 (2008).10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.068 ↗
17. Mistriotis, P. et al. Confinement hinders motility by inducing RhoA-mediated nuclear influx, volume expansion, and blebbing. J. Cell Biol. 218, 4093–4111 (2019).10.1083/jcb.201902057 ↗
18. Tuan, N. M. & Lee, C. H. Role of anillin in tumour: from a prognostic biomarker to a novel target. Cancers 12, 1600 (2020).10.3390/cancers12061600 ↗
19. Cook, D. R. et al. Aberrant expression and subcellular localization of ECT2 drives colorectal cancer progression and growth. Cancer Res. 82, 90–104 (2022).10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-4218 ↗
20. Wang, D., Naydenov, N. G., Dozmorov, M. G., Koblinski, J. E. & Ivanov, A. I. Anillin regulates breast cancer cell migration, growth, and metastasis by non-canonical mechanisms involving control of cell stemness and differentiation. Breast Cancer Res. 22, 3 (2020).10.1186/s13058-019-1241-x ↗
21. Fritz, R. D. et al. A versatile toolkit to produce sensitive FRET biosensors to visualize signaling in time and space. Sci. Signal. 6, rs12 (2013).10.1126/scisignal.2004135 ↗
22. Denais, C. M. et al. Nuclear envelope rupture and repair during cancer cell migration. Science 352, 353–358 (2016).10.1126/science.aad7297 ↗
23. Raab, M. et al. ESCRT III repairs nuclear envelope ruptures during cell migration to limit DNA damage and cell death. Science 352, 359–362 (2016).10.1126/science.aad7611 ↗
24. Chen, A., Akhshi, T. K., Lavoie, B. D. & Wilde, A. Importin β2 mediates the spatio-temporal regulation of anillin through a noncanonical nuclear localization signal. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 13500–13509 (2015).10.1074/jbc.M115.649160 ↗
25. Budnar, S. et al. Anillin promotes cell contractility by cyclic resetting of RhoA residence kinetics. Dev. Cell 49, 894–906 e812 (2019).10.1016/j.devcel.2019.04.031 ↗
26. Beaudet, D., Pham, N., Skaik, N. & Piekny, A. Importin binding mediates the intramolecular regulation of anillin during cytokinesis. Mol. Biol. Cell 31, 1124–1139 (2020).10.1091/mbc.E20-01-0006 ↗
27. Soderholm, J. F. et al. Importazole, a small molecule inhibitor of the transport receptor importin-beta. ACS Chem. Biol. 6, 700–708 (2011).10.1021/cb2000296 ↗
28. Mistriotis, P., Wisniewski, E. O., Si, B. R., Kalab, P. & Konstantopoulos, K. Coordinated in confined migration: crosstalk between the nucleus and ion channel-mediated mechanosensation. Trends Cell Biol. 34, 809–825 (2024).10.1016/j.tcb.2024.01.001 ↗
29. Cantwell, H. & Dey, G. Nuclear size and shape control. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 130, 90–97 (2022).10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.10.013 ↗
30. Apraiz, A., Mitxelena, J. & Zubiaga, A. Studying cell cycle-regulated gene expression by two complementary cell synchronization protocols. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/55745 (2017).10.3791/55745 ↗
31. Afthinos, A. et al. Migration and 3D traction force measurements inside compliant microchannels. Nano Lett. 22, 7318–7327 (2022).10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01261 ↗
32. Cox, T. R. & Erler, J. T. Remodeling and homeostasis of the extracellular matrix: implications for fibrotic diseases and cancer. Dis. Model Mech. 4, 165–178 (2011).10.1242/dmm.004077 ↗
33. Wolf, K. et al. Collagen-based cell migration models in vitro and in vivo. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 931–941 (2009).10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.08.005 ↗
34. Chaudhuri, O. et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat. Mater. 15, 326–334 (2016).10.1038/nmat4489 ↗
35. Haeger, A. et al. Collective cancer invasion forms an integrin-dependent radioresistant niche. J. Exp. Med. 217, e20181184 (2020).10.1084/jem.20181184 ↗
36. Kammoun, M. et al. Development of a novel multiphysical approach for the characterization of mechanical properties of musculotendinous tissues. Sci. Rep. 9, 7733 (2019).10.1038/s41598-019-44053-1 ↗
37. Wang, N. et al. Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 282, C606–C616 (2002).10.1152/ajpcell.00269.2001 ↗
38. Van Rijssel, J. et al. The Rho-GEF Trio regulates a novel pro-inflammatory pathway through the transcription factor Ets2. Biol. Open 2, 569–579 (2013).10.1242/bio.20134382 ↗
39. Kazanietz, M. G., Barrio-Real, L., Casado-Medrano, V., Baker, M. J. & Lopez-Haber, C. The P-Rex1/Rac signaling pathway as a point of convergence for HER/ErbB receptor and GPCR responses. Small GTPases 9, 297–303 (2018).10.1080/21541248.2016.1221273 ↗
40. Huff, L. P. et al. The role of Ect2 nuclear RhoGEF activity in ovarian cancer cell transformation. Genes Cancer 4, 460–475 (2013).10.1177/1947601913514851 ↗
41. Piekny, A. J. & Maddox, A. S. The myriad roles of anillin during cytokinesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 881–891 (2010).10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.08.002 ↗
42. Bera, K. et al. Extracellular fluid viscosity enhances cell migration and cancer dissemination. Nature 611, 365–373 (2022).10.1038/s41586-022-05394-6 ↗
43. Zhang, Y. et al. Polarized NHE1 and SWELL1 regulate migration direction, efficiency and metastasis. Nat. Commun. 13, 6128 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-33683-1 ↗
44. Lomakin, A. J. et al. The nucleus acts as a ruler tailoring cell responses to spatial constraints. Science 370, eaba2894 (2020).10.1126/science.aba2894 ↗
45. Venturini, V. et al. The nucleus measures shape changes for cellular proprioception to control dynamic cell behavior. Science 370, eaba2644 (2020).10.1126/science.aba2644 ↗
46. Yankaskas, C. L. et al. The fluid shear stress sensor TRPM7 regulates tumor cell intravasation. Sci. Adv. 7, eabh3457 (2021).10.1126/sciadv.abh3457 ↗
47. Leong, H. S. et al. Invadopodia are required for cancer cell extravasation and are a therapeutic target for metastasis. Cell Rep. 8, 1558–1570 (2014).10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.050 ↗
48. Stoletov, K. et al. Quantitative in vivo whole genome motility screen reveals novel therapeutic targets to block cancer metastasis. Nat. Commun. 9, 2343 (2018).10.1038/s41467-018-04743-2 ↗
49. Sun, L. et al. Mechanistic insights into the anchorage of the contractile ring by anillin and Mid1. Dev. Cell 33, 413–426 (2015).10.1016/j.devcel.2015.03.003 ↗
50. Xia, Y. et al. Nuclear rupture at sites of high curvature compromises retention of DNA repair factors. J. Cell Biol. 217, 3796–3808 (2018).10.1083/jcb.201711161 ↗
51. Rodriguez-Hernandez, I., Cantelli, G., Bruce, F. & Sanz-Moreno, V. Rho, ROCK and actomyosin contractility in metastasis as drug targets. F1000Res. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7909.1 (2016).10.12688/f1000research.7909.1 ↗
52. Wong, B. S. et al. A direct podocalyxin-dynamin-2 interaction regulates cytoskeletal dynamics to promote migration and metastasis in pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 79, 2878–2891 (2019).10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3369 ↗
53. Yankaskas, C. L. et al. A microfluidic assay for the quantification of the metastatic propensity of breast cancer specimens. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 452–465 (2019).10.1038/s41551-019-0400-9 ↗
54. Zhao, R. et al. Cell sensing and decision-making in confinement: the role of TRPM7 in a tug of war between hydraulic pressure and cross-sectional area. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw7243 (2019).10.1126/sciadv.aaw7243 ↗
55. Wu, P. H. DeepBioVision: cell in channel analysis. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15178932 (2025).10.5281/zenodo.15178932 ↗
56. Wu, P. H. et al. Single-cell morphology encodes metastatic potential. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaw6938 (2020).10.1126/sciadv.aaw6938 ↗
57. Wu, P. H. et al. Evolution of cellular morpho-phenotypes in cancer metastasis. Sci. Rep. 5, 18437 (2015).10.1038/srep18437 ↗
58. Balzer, E. M. et al. Physical confinement alters tumor cell adhesion and migration phenotypes. FASEB J. 26, 4045–4056 (2012).10.1096/fj.12-211441 ↗
59. Willetts, L., Bond, D., Stoletov, K. & Lewis, J. D. Quantitative analysis of human cancer cell extravasation using intravital imaging. Methods Mol. Biol. 1458, 27–37 (2016).10.1007/978-1-4939-3801-8_3 ↗