Viscous dissipation in the rupture of cell–cell contacts
Source abstract
Abstract
Cell-cell adhesions mediated by adherens junctions, structures connecting cells to each other and to the cortical cytoskeleton, are essential for epithelial physical and biological integrity. Nonetheless, how such structures resist mechanical stimuli that prompt cell-cell rupture is still not fully understood. Here we challenge the conventional views on cell-cell adhesion stability, highlighting the importance of viscous dissipation at the cellular level. Using microdevices to measure the rupture energy of cell-cell junctions and synthetic cadherins to discriminate cadherin binding energy from downstream cytoskeletal regulation, we demonstrate that the balance between cortical tension and cell shape recovery time determines a transition from ductile to brittle fracture in cell-cell contact. These findings suggest that junction toughness, defined as the junction disruption energy, is a more accurate measure of junctional stability, challenging the current emphasis on bond energy and tension. Overall, our results highlight the role and the regulation of energy dissipation through the cytoskeleton during junction deformation for epithelial integrity.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Blood properties and coagulation · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Turner, J. R. Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 799–809 (2009).10.1038/nri2653 ↗
2. Duszyc, K. & Viasnoff, V. Mechanosensing and mechanotransduction at cell–cell junctions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 10, a028761 (2018).10.1101/cshperspect.a028761 ↗
3. Vasquez, C. G. & Martin, A. C. Force transmission in epithelial tissues. Dev. Dyn. 245, 361–371 (2016).10.1002/dvdy.24384 ↗
4. Roan, E. & Waters, C. M. What do we know about mechanical strain in lung alveoli? Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 301, L625–L635 (2011).10.1152/ajplung.00105.2011 ↗
5. Foty, R. A. & Steinberg, M. S. The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation. Dev. Biol. 278, 255–263 (2005).10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.012 ↗
6. Honig, B. & Shapiro, L. Adhesion protein structure, molecular affinities, and principles of cell–cell recognition. Cell 181, 520–535 (2020).10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.010 ↗
7. Brodland, G. W. The differential interfacial tension hypothesis (DITH): a comprehensive theory for the self-rearrangement of embryonic cells and tissues. J. Biomech. Eng. 124, 188–197 (2002).10.1115/1.1449491 ↗
8. Maître, J.-L. et al. Adhesion functions in cell sorting by mechanically coupling the cortices of adhering cells. Science 338, 253–256 (2012).10.1126/science.1225399 ↗
9. Winklbauer, R. Cell adhesion strength from cortical tension—an integration of concepts. J. Cell Sci. 128, 3687–3693 (2015).10.1242/jcs.174623 ↗
10. Chu, Y.-S. et al. Force measurements in E-cadherin-mediated cell doublets reveal rapid adhesion strengthened by actin cytoskeleton remodeling through Rac and Cdc42. J. Cell Biol. 167, 1183–1194 (2004).10.1083/jcb.200403043 ↗
11. Atakhani, A., Bogdziewiez, L. & Verger, S. Characterising the mechanics of cell–cell adhesion in plants. Quant. Plant Biol. 3, e2 (2022).10.1017/qpb.2021.16 ↗
12. Sun, J.-Y. et al. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 489, 133–136 (2012).10.1038/nature11409 ↗
13. Yuk, H., Zhang, T., Lin, S., Parada, G. A. & Zhao, X. Tough bonding of hydrogels to diverse non-porous surfaces. Nat. Mater. 15, 190–196 (2016).10.1038/nmat4463 ↗
14. Fedor-Chaiken, M., Hein, P. W., Stewart, J. C., Brackenbury, R. & Kinch, M. S. E-cadherin binding modulates EGF receptor activation. Cell Commun. Adhes. 10, 105–118 (2003).10.1080/cac.10.2.105.118 ↗
15. Engl, W., Arasi, B., Yap, L., Thiery, J. & Viasnoff, V. Actin dynamics modulate mechanosensitive immobilization of E-cadherin at adherens junctions. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 584–591 (2014).10.1038/ncb2973 ↗
16. Muhamed, I. et al. E-cadherin-mediated force transduction signals regulate global cell mechanics. J. Cell Sci. 129, 1843–1854 (2016).10.1242/jcs.185447 ↗
17. Fu, C., Arora, A., Engl, W., Sheetz, M. & Viasnoff, V. Cooperative regulation of adherens junction expansion through epidermal growth factor receptor activation. J. Cell Sci. 135, jcs258929 (2022).10.1242/jcs.258929 ↗
18. Fukata, M. & Kaibuchi, K. Rho-family GTPases in cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesion. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 887–897 (2001).10.1038/35103068 ↗
19. Padmanabhan, A., Ong, H. T. & Zaidel-Bar, R. Non-junctional E-cadherin clusters regulate the actomyosin cortex in the C. elegans zygote. Curr. Biol. 27, 103–112 (2017).10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.032 ↗
20. Hong, S., Troyanovsky, R. B. & Troyanovsky, S. M. Spontaneous assembly and active disassembly balance adherens junction homeostasis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3528–3533 (2010).10.1073/pnas.0911027107 ↗
21. Engl, W., Arasi, B., Yap, L. L., Thiery, J. P. & Viasnoff, V. Actin dynamics modulate mechanosensitive immobilization of E-cadherin at adherens junctions. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 587–594 (2014).10.1038/ncb2973 ↗
22. Krendel, M., Zenke, F. T. & Bokoch, G. M. Nucleotide exchange factor GEF-H1 mediates cross-talk between microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 294–301 (2002).10.1038/ncb773 ↗
23. Ramirez Moreno, M. & Bulgakova, N. A. The cross-talk between EGFR and E-cadherin. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 828673 (2021).10.3389/fcell.2021.828673 ↗
24. Proux-Gillardeaux, V. et al. Identification of a new regulation pathway of EGFR and E-cadherin dynamics. Sci. Rep. 11, 22705 (2021).10.1038/s41598-021-02042-3 ↗
25. Zuker, M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3406–3415 (2003).10.1093/nar/gkg595 ↗
26. Seifert, U. Rupture of multiple parallel molecular bonds under dynamic loading. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2750–2753 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2750 ↗
27. Tong, J., Li, L., Ballermann, B. & Wang, Z. Phosphorylation and activation of RhoA by ERK in response to epidermal growth factor stimulation. PLoS ONE 11, e0147103 (2016).10.1371/journal.pone.0147103 ↗
28. Kurokawa, K., Itoh, R. E., Yoshizaki, H., Nakamura, Y. O. T. & Matsuda, M. Coactivation of Rac1 and Cdc42 at lamellipodia and membrane ruffles induced by epidermal growth factor. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 1003–1010 (2004).10.1091/mbc.e03-08-0609 ↗
29. Ho, H.-Y. H. et al. Toca-1 mediates Cdc42-dependent actin nucleation by activating the N-WASP-WIP complex. Cell 118, 203–216 (2004).10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.027 ↗