journal article·2024-11Open access

Ion-mediated condensation controls the mechanics of mitotic chromosomes

Hannes Witt, Janni Harju, Emma M. J. Chameau, Charlotte M. A. Bruinsma, Tinka V. M. Clement, Christian F. Nielsen, Ian D. Hickson, Erwin J. G. Peterman, Chase P. Broedersz, Gijs J. L. Wuite

Nature Materials· Volume 23· Issue 11

Abstract

During mitosis in eukaryotic cells, mechanical forces generated by the mitotic spindle pull the sister chromatids into the nascent daughter cells. How do mitotic chromosomes achieve the necessary mechanical stiffness and stability to maintain their integrity under these forces? Here we use optical tweezers to show that ions involved in physiological chromosome condensation are crucial for chromosomal stability, stiffness and viscous dissipation. We combine these experiments with high-salt histone depletion and theory to show that chromosomal elasticity originates from the chromatin fibre behaving as a flexible polymer, whereas energy dissipation can be explained by modelling chromatin loops as an entangled polymer solution. Taken together, we show how collective properties of mitotic chromosomes, a biomaterial of incredible complexity, emerge from molecular properties, and how they are controlled by the physico-chemical environment. The physical mechanisms that govern chromosomal viscoelasticity remain elusive. Here the authors combine single-chromosome manipulation and computational methods to show that their collective properties are controlled by the physico-chemical environment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microtubule and mitosis dynamics · Plant Molecular Biology Research · Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Paulson, J. R., Hudson, D. F., Cisneros-Soberanis, F. & Earnshaw, W. C. Mitotic chromosomes. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 117, 7–29 (2021).10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.03.014 ↗
2. Paulson, J. R. & Laemmli, U. The structure of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes. Cell 12, 817–828 (1977).10.1016/0092-8674(77)90280-X ↗
3. Gibcus, J. H. et al. A pathway for mitotic chromosome formation. Science 359, eaao6135 (2018).10.1126/science.aao6135 ↗
4. Walther, N. et al. A quantitative map of human condensins provides new insights into mitotic chromosome architecture. J. Cell Biol. 217, 2309–2328 (2018).10.1083/jcb.201801048 ↗
5. Mora-Bermúdez, F., Gerlich, D. & Ellenberg, J. Maximal chromosome compaction occurs by axial shortening in anaphase and depends on Aurora kinase. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 822–831 (2007).10.1038/ncb1606 ↗
6. Llères, D., James, J., Swift, S., Norman, D. G. & Lamond, A. I. Quantitative analysis of chromatin compaction in living cells using FLIM-FRET. J. Cell Biol. 187, 481–496 (2009).10.1083/jcb.200907029 ↗
7. Samejima, K. et al. Functional analysis after rapid degradation of condensins and 3D-EM reveals chromatin volume is uncoupled from chromosome architecture in mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 131, jcs210187 (2018).10.1242/jcs.210187 ↗
8. Wilkins, B. J. et al. A cascade of histone modifications induces chromatin condensation in mitosis. Science 343, 77–80 (2014).10.1126/science.1244508 ↗
9. Schneider, M. W. G. et al. A mitotic chromatin phase transition prevents perforation by microtubules. Nature 609, 183–190 (2022).10.1038/s41586-022-05027-y ↗
10. Phengchat, R. et al. Calcium ions function as a booster of chromosome condensation. Sci. Rep. 6, 38281 (2016).10.1038/srep38281 ↗
11. Poirier, M. G., Monhait, T. & Marko, J. F. Reversible hypercondensation and decondensation of mitotic chromosomes studied using combined chemical–micromechanical techniques. J. Cell. Biochem. 85, 422–434 (2002).10.1002/jcb.10132 ↗
12. Maeshima, K. et al. A transient rise in free Mg2+ ions released from ATP-Mg hydrolysis contributes to mitotic chromosome condensation. Curr. Biol. 28, 444–451 (2018).10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.035 ↗
13. Beel, A. J., Azubel, M., Matteï, P.-J. & Kornberg, R. D. Structure of mitotic chromosomes. Mol. Cell 81, 4369–4376 (2021).10.1016/j.molcel.2021.08.020 ↗
14. Sunkara, P. S., Chang, C. C. & Prakash, N. J. Role of polyamines during chromosome condensation of mammalian cells. Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 7, 455–465 (1983).10.1016/0309-1651(83)90135-2 ↗
15. Korolev, N., Allahverdi, A., Lyubartsev, A. P. & Nordenskiöld, L. The polyelectrolyte properties of chromatin. Soft Matter 8, 9322–9333 (2012).10.1039/c2sm25662b ↗
16. Pfosser, M., Königshofer, H. & Kandeler, R. Free, conjugated, and bound polyamines during the cell cycle of synchronized cell suspension cultures of Nicotiana tabacum. J. Plant Physiol. 136, 574–579 (1990).10.1016/S0176-1617(11)80216-6 ↗
17. Dumont, S. & Mitchison, T. J. Force and length in the mitotic spindle. Curr. Biol. 19, R749–R761 (2009).10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.028 ↗
18. Man, T., Witt, H., Peterman, E. J. & Wuite, G. J. The mechanics of mitotic chromosomes. Q. Rev. Biophys. 54, e10 (2021).10.1017/S0033583521000081 ↗
19. Batty, P. & Gerlich, D. W. Mitotic chromosome mechanics: how cells segregate their genome. Trends Cell Biol. 29, 717–726 (2019).10.1016/j.tcb.2019.05.007 ↗
20. Poirier, M., Eroglu, S., Chatenay, D. & Marko, J. F. Reversible and irreversible unfolding of mitotic newt chromosomes by applied force. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 269–276 (2000).10.1091/mbc.11.1.269 ↗
21. Poirier, M. G. & Marko, J. F. Mitotic chromosomes are chromatin networks without a mechanically contiguous protein scaffold. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15393–15397 (2002).10.1073/pnas.232442599 ↗
22. Meijering, A. E. et al. Nonlinear mechanics of human mitotic chromosomes. Nature 605, 545–550 (2022).10.1038/s41586-022-04666-5 ↗
23. Gardel, M. et al. Elastic behavior of cross-linked and bundled actin networks. Science 304, 1301–1305 (2004).10.1126/science.1095087 ↗
24. Lin, Y.-C. et al. Origins of elasticity in intermediate filament networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 058101 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.058101 ↗
25. Colby, R. H. Structure and linear viscoelasticity of flexible polymer solutions: comparison of polyelectrolyte and neutral polymer solutions. Rheol. Acta 49, 425–442 (2010).10.1007/s00397-009-0413-5 ↗
26. Beel, A. J., Matteï, P.-J. & Kornberg, R. D. Mitotic chromosome condensation driven by a volume phase transition. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.30.454418 (2021).10.1101/2021.07.30.454418 ↗
27. Besteman, K., Van Eijk, K. & Lemay, S. Charge inversion accompanies DNA condensation by multivalent ions. Nat. Phys. 3, 641–644 (2007).10.1038/nphys697 ↗
28. Dai, L., Mu, Y., Nordenskiöld, L. & van der Maarel, J. R. Molecular dynamics simulation of multivalent-ion mediated attraction between DNA molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 118301 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.118301 ↗
29. Qiu, X., Andresen, K., Lamb, J. S., Kwok, L. W. & Pollack, L. Abrupt transition from a free, repulsive to a condensed, attractive DNA phase, induced by multivalent polyamine cations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 228101 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.228101 ↗
30. Van den Broek, B. et al. Visualizing the formation and collapse of DNA toroids. Biophys. J. 98, 1902–1910 (2010).10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4334 ↗
31. Ricka, J. & Tanaka, T. Swelling of ionic gels: quantitative performance of the Donnan theory. Macromolecules 17, 2916–2921 (1984).10.1021/ma00142a081 ↗
32. Horkay, F., Tasaki, I. & Basser, P. J. Effect of monovalent–divalent cation exchange on the swelling of polyacrylate hydrogels in physiological salt solutions. Biomacromolecules 2, 195–199 (2001).10.1021/bm0056153 ↗
33. Tanaka, T. Collapse of gels and the critical endpoint. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 820–823 (1978).10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.820 ↗
34. Rau, D. C. & Parsegian, V. A. Direct measurement of the intermolecular forces between counterion-condensed DNA double helices. Evidence for long range attractive hydration forces. Biophys. J. 61, 246–259 (1992).10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81831-3 ↗
35. Saminathan, M. et al. Ionic and structural specificity effects of natural and synthetic polyamines on the aggregation and resolubilization of single-, double-, and triple-stranded DNA. Biochemistry 38, 3821–3830 (1999).10.1021/bi9825753 ↗
36. Yu, J. et al. Structure of polyelectrolyte brushes in the presence of multivalent counterions. Macromolecules 49, 5609–5617 (2016).10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01064 ↗
37. Adolph, K. W., Cheng, S., Paulson, J. & Laemmli, U. Isolation of a protein scaffold from mitotic HeLa cell chromosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74, 4937–4941 (1977).10.1073/pnas.74.11.4937 ↗
38. Shintomi, K. et al. Mitotic chromosome assembly despite nucleosome depletion in Xenopus egg extracts. Science 356, 1284–1287 (2017).10.1126/science.aam9702 ↗
39. Manning, G. S. The persistence length of DNA is reached from the persistence length of its null isomer through an internal electrostatic stretching force. Biophys. J. 91, 3607–3616 (2006).10.1529/biophysj.106.089029 ↗
40. Berezney, J. P. & Saleh, O. A. Electrostatic effects on the conformation and elasticity of hyaluronic acid, a moderately flexible polyelectrolyte. Macromolecules 50, 1085–1089 (2017).10.1021/acs.macromol.6b02166 ↗
41. Marko, J. F. & Siggia, E. D. Stretching DNA. Macromolecules 28, 8759–8770 (1995).10.1021/ma00130a008 ↗
42. MacKintosh, F., Käs, J. & Janmey, P. Elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4425–4428 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4425 ↗
43. Broedersz, C. P. & MacKintosh, F. C. Modeling semiflexible polymer networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 995–1036 (2014).10.1103/RevModPhys.86.995 ↗
44. Tassieri, M. Microrheology with optical tweezers: peaks & troughs. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 43, 39–51 (2019).10.1016/j.cocis.2019.02.006 ↗
45. Wei, M., Gao, Y., Li, X. & Serpe, M. J. Stimuli-responsive polymers and their applications. Polym. Chem. 8, 127–143 (2017).10.1039/C6PY01585A ↗
46. Poirier, M. G., Nemani, A., Gupta, P., Eroglu, S. & Marko, J. F. Probing chromosome structure with dynamic force relaxation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 360–363 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.360 ↗
47. Poirier, M. G. & Marko, J. F. Effect of internal friction on biofilament dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 228103 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.228103 ↗
48. Doi, M. & Edwards, S. F. The Theory of Polymer Dynamics Vol. 73 (Clarendon Press, 1988)
49. de Gennes, P. G. Remarks on entanglements and rubber elasticity. J. Phys. Lett. 35, 133–134 (1974).10.1051/jphyslet:01974003509013300 ↗
50. Huang, Q., Hengeller, L., Alvarez, N. J. & Hassager, O. Bridging the gap between polymer melts and solutions in extensional rheology. Macromolecules 48, 4158–4163 (2015).10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00849 ↗
51. Shahid, T., Huang, Q., Oosterlinck, F., Clasen, C. & van Ruymbeke, E. Dynamic dilution exponent in monodisperse entangled polymer solutions. Soft Matter 13, 269–282 (2016).10.1039/C6SM01083K ↗
52. Müller, M. T., Yan, X., Lee, S., Perry, S. S. & Spencer, N. D. Preferential solvation and its effect on the lubrication properties of a surface-bound, brushlike copolymer. Macromolecules 38, 3861–3866 (2005).10.1021/ma047468x ↗
53. Limpoco, F., Advincula, R. C. & Perry, S. S. Solvent dependent friction force response of polystyrene brushes prepared by surface initiated polymerization. Langmuir 23, 12196–12201 (2007).10.1021/la701272a ↗
54. Zhulina, E. B. & Rubinstein, M. Lubrication by polyelectrolyte brushes. Macromolecules 47, 5825–5838 (2014).10.1021/ma500772a ↗
55. Meijering, A. E. et al. in Optical Tweezers: Methods and Protocols 2nd edn, Vol. 2478 (ed. Gennerich, A.) 75–100 (Springer, 2022).
56. Harris, C. R. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357–362 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 ↗
57. Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
58. Waskom, M. L. seaborn: statistical data visualization. J. Open Source Softw. 6, 3021 (2021).10.21105/joss.03021 ↗
59. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).10.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
60. Vanlier, J. et al. lumicks/pylake: v1.5.2. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/12807170 (2024).
61. Witt, H. Data for the manuscript ‘Ion-mediated condensation controls the mechanics of mitotic chromosomes’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7801755 (2023).10.5281/zenodo.7801755 ↗