Dynamic flow control through active matter programming language
Source abstract
Abstract
Cells use 'active' energy-consuming motor and filament protein networks to control micrometre-scale transport and fluid flows. Biological active materials could be used in dynamically programmable devices that achieve spatial and temporal resolution that exceeds current microfluidic technologies. However, reconstituted motor-microtubule systems generate chaotic flows and cannot be directly harnessed for engineering applications. Here we develop a light-controlled programming strategy for biological active matter to construct micrometre-scale fluid flow fields for transport, separation and mixing. We circumvent nonlinear dynamic effects within the active fluids by limiting hydrodynamic interactions between contracting motor-filament networks patterned with light. Using a predictive model, we design and apply flow fields to accomplish canonical microfluidic tasks such as transporting and separating cell clusters, probing the extensional rheology of polymers and giant lipid vesicles and generating mixing flows at low Reynolds numbers. Our findings provide a framework for programming dynamic flows and demonstrate the potential of active matter systems as an engineering technology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Micro and Nano Robotics · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Stone, H. A., Stroock, A. D. & Ajdari, A. Engineering flows in small devices: microfluidics toward a lab-on-a-chip. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 381–411 (2004).10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122124 ↗
2. Whitesides, G. M. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442, 368–373 (2006).10.1038/nature05058 ↗
3. Gilpin, W., Prakash, V. N. & Prakash, M. Vortex arrays and ciliary tangles underlie the feeding–swimming trade-off in starfish larvae. Nat. Phys. 13, 380–386 (2017).10.1038/nphys3981 ↗
4. Kamiya, N. Physical and chemical basis of cytoplasmic streaming. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 32, 205–236 (1981).10.1146/annurev.pp.32.060181.001225 ↗
5. Glotzer, J. B., Saffrich, R., Glotzer, M. & Ephrussi, A. Cytoplasmic flows localize injected oskar RNA in Drosophila oocytes. Curr. Biol. 7, 326–337 (1997).10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00156-4 ↗
6. Forrest, K. M. & Gavis, E. R. Live imaging of endogenous RNA reveals a diffusion and entrapment mechanism for nanos mRNA localization in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 13, 1159–1168 (2003).10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00451-2 ↗
7. Needleman, D. & Shelley, M. J. The stormy fluid dynamics of the living cell. Phys. Today 72, 32–38 (2019).10.1063/PT.3.4292 ↗
8. Stein, D. B., De Canio, G., Lauga, E., Shelley, M. J. & Goldstein, R. E. Swirling instability of the microtubule cytoskeleton. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 028103 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.028103 ↗
9. Suzuki, K., Miyazaki, M., Takagi, J., Itabashi, T. & Ishiwata, S. Spatial confinement of active microtubule networks induces large-scale rotational cytoplasmic flow. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2922–2927 (2017).10.1073/pnas.1616001114 ↗
10. Wu, K. T. et al. Transition from turbulent to coherent flows in confined three-dimensional active fluids. Science 355, eaal1979 (2017).10.1126/science.aal1979 ↗
11. Ross, T. D. et al. Controlling organization and forces in active matter through optically defined boundaries. Nature 572, 224–229 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1447-1 ↗
12. Mathijssen, A. J. T. M., Culver, J., Bhamla, M. S. & Prakash, M. Collective intercellular communication through ultra-fast hydrodynamic trigger waves. Nature 571, 560–564 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1387-9 ↗
13. Leal, L. G. Advanced Transport Phenomena (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).10.1017/CBO9780511800245 ↗
14. Marchetti, M. C. et al. Hydrodynamics of soft active matter. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143–1189 (2013).10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1143 ↗
15. Guntas, G., Hallett, R. A., Zimmerman, S. P. & Kuhlman, B. Engineering an improved light-induced dimer (iLID) for controlling the localization and activity of signaling proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 112–117 (2015).10.1073/pnas.1417910112 ↗
16. Squires, T. M. & Mason, T. G. Fluid mechanics of microrheology. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 413–438 (2010).10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145608 ↗
17. Schroeder, C. M. Single polymer dynamics for molecular rheology. J. Rheol. 62, 371–403 (2018).10.1122/1.5013246 ↗
18. Perkins, T. T., Smith, D. E. & Chu, S. Single polymer dynamics in an elongational flow. Science 276, 2016–2021 (1997).10.1126/science.276.5321.2016 ↗
19. Foster, K. M., Papavassiliou, D. V. & O’Rear, E. A. Elongational stresses and cells. Cells 10, 2352 (2021).10.3390/cells10092352 ↗
20. Ober, T. J., Haward, S. J., Pipe, C. J., Soulages, J. & Mckinley, G. H. Microfluidic extensional rheometry using a hyperbolic contraction geometry. Rheol. Acta 52, 529–546 (2013).10.1007/s00397-013-0701-y ↗
21. Mancuso, J. E. & Ristenpart, W. D. Stretching of red blood cells at high strain rates. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 101101 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.101101 ↗
22. Taylor, G. I. The formation of emulsions in definable fields of flow. Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. 146, 501–523 (1934).
23. Walde, P., Cosentino, K., Engel, H. & Stano, P. Giant vesicles: preparations and applications. ChemBioChem 11, 848–865 (2010).10.1002/cbic.201000010 ↗
24. Miele, Y., Holló, G., Lagzi, I. & Rossi, F. Shape deformation, budding and division of giant vesicles and artificial cells: a review. Life 12, 841–865 (2022).10.3390/life12060841 ↗
25. Šegota, S. Spontaneous formation of vesicles. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 121, 51–75 (2006).10.1016/j.cis.2006.01.002 ↗
26. Giuliano, C. B., Cvjetan, N., Ayache, J. & Walde, P. Multivesicular vesicles: preparation and applications. ChemBioChem 3, e2000049 (2021).
27. Shields, C. W. IV, Reyes, C. D. & López, G. P. Microfluidic cell sorting: a review of the advances in the separation of cells from debulking to rare cell isolation. Lab Chip 15, 1230–1249 (2015).10.1039/C4LC01246A ↗
28. Benoit, M., Gabriel, D., Gerisch, G. & Gau, H. E. Discrete interactions in cell adhesion measured by single-molecule force spectroscopy. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 313–317 (2000).10.1038/35014000 ↗
29. Chu, Y. S. et al. Force measurements in E-cadherin–mediated cell doublets reveal rapid adhesion strengthened by actin cytoskeleton remodeling through Rac and Cdc42. J. Cell Biol. 167, 1183–1194 (2004).10.1083/jcb.200403043 ↗
30. Maître, J. et al. Adhesion functions in cell sorting by mechanically coupling the cortices of adhering cells. Science 338, 253–256 (2012).10.1126/science.1225399 ↗
31. Tözeren, A. et al. Micromanipulation of adhesion of a Jurkat cell to a planar bilayer membrane containing lymphocyte function-associated antigen 3 molecules. J. Cell Biol. 116, 997–1006 (1992).10.1083/jcb.116.4.997 ↗
32. Zhao, L., Fu, X., Zhang, L. & Ye, Z. Effect of mechanical properties of Jurkat cell on adhesion properties of Jurkat integrin and VCAM-1: an AFM study. Colloids Surf. B 218, 112784 (2022).10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112784 ↗
33. van der Merwe, P. A. & Barclay, A. N. Transient intercellular adhesion: the importance of weak protein-protein interactions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 354–358 (1994).10.1016/0968-0004(94)90109-0 ↗
34. Beri, P. et al. Cell adhesiveness serves as a biophysical marker for metastatic potential. Cancer Res. 80, 901–911 (2020).10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-1794 ↗
35. Stroock, A. D. et al. Chaotic mixer for microchannels. Science 295, 647–651 (2002).10.1126/science.1066238 ↗
36. Thiffeault, J.-L. Using multiscale norms to quantify mixing and transport. Nonlinearity 25, R1–R44 (2012).10.1088/0951-7715/25/2/R1 ↗
37. Lee, C. Y., Chang, C. L., Wang, Y. N. & Fu, L. M. Microfluidic mixing: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12, 3263–3287 (2011).10.3390/ijms12053263 ↗
38. Omar, A. K., Wu, Y., Wang, Z.-G. & Brady, J. F. Swimming to stability: structural and dynamical control via active doping. ACS Nano 13, 560–572 (2019).10.1021/acsnano.8b07421 ↗
39. Mittasch, M. et al. Non-invasive perturbations of intracellular flow reveal physical principles of cell organization. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 344–351 (2018).10.1038/s41556-017-0032-9 ↗
40. Wang, W. et al. Cilia metasurfaces for electronically programmable microfluidic manipulation. Nature 605, 681–686 (2022).10.1038/s41586-022-04645-w ↗
41. Lau, A. W. C., Prasad, A. & Dogic, Z. Condensation of isolated semi-flexible filaments driven by depletion interactions. EPL 87, 48006 (2009).10.1209/0295-5075/87/48006 ↗
42. Noireaux, V. & Libchaber, A. A vesicle bioreactor as a step toward an artificial cell assembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17669–17674 (2004).10.1073/pnas.0408236101 ↗
43. Thielicke, W. & Stamhuis, E. J. PIVlab – towards user-friendly, affordable and accurate digital particle image velocimetry in MATLAB. J. Open Res. Softw. 2, e30 (2014).10.5334/jors.bl ↗
44. Thielicke, W. & Sonntag, R. Particle image velocimetry for MATLAB: accuracy and enhanced algorithms in PIVlab. J. Open Res. Softw. 9, 12 (2021).10.5334/jors.334 ↗
45. Lac, E., Barthés-Biesel, D., Pelekasis, N. A. & Tsamopoulos, J. Spherical capsules in three-dimensional unbounded Stokes flows: effect of the membrane constitutive law and onset of buckling. J. Fluid Mech. 516, 303–334 (2004).10.1017/S002211200400062X ↗
46. Hsu, A. S. & Leal, L. G. Deformation of a viscoelastic drop in planar extensional flows of a Newtonian fluid. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. 160, 176–180 (2009).10.1016/j.jnnfm.2009.03.004 ↗
47. de Loubens, C. et al. Mechanical characterization of cross-linked serum albumin microcapsules. Soft Matter 10, 4561–4568 (2014).10.1039/c4sm00349g ↗
48. Gagnon, D. A. et al. Shear-induced gelation of self-yielding active networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 178003 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.178003 ↗