Topographic control of lipid-raft reconstitution in model membranes
Source abstract
Abstract
Liquid-ordered (L(O)) domains reconstituted in model membranes have provided a useful platform for in vitro studies of the lipid-raft model, in which signalling membrane molecules are thought to be compartmentalized in sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich domains. These in vitro studies, however, have relied on an uncontrolled phase-separation process that gives a random distribution of L(O) domains. Obviously, a precise control of the size and spatial distribution of the L(O) domains would enable a more systematic large-scale in vitro study of the lipid-raft model. The prerequisite for such capability would be the generation of a well-defined energy landscape for reconstituting the L(O) domain without disrupting the two-dimensional (2D) fluidity of the model membrane. Here we report controlling the reconstitution of the L(O) domains in a spatially selective manner by predefining a landscape of energy barriers using topographic surface modifications. We show that the selective reconstitution spontaneously arises from the 2D brownian motion of nanoscale L(O) domains and signalling molecules captured in these nanodomains, which in turn produce a prescribed, concentrated downstream biochemical process. Our approach opens up the possibility of engineering model biological membranes by taking advantage of the intrinsic 2D fluidity. Moreover, our results indicate that the topographic configuration of cellular membranes could be an important machinery for controlling the lipid raft in vivo.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Dietrich, C. et al. Lipid rafts reconstituted in model membranes. Biophys. J. 80, 1417–1428 (2001).10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76114-0 ↗
2. Dietrich, C., Volovyk, Z. N., Levi, M., Thompson, N. L. & Jacobson, K. Partitioning of Thy-1, GM1, and cross-linked phospholipids analogs into lipid rafts reconstituted in supported model membrane monolayers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10642–10647 (2001).10.1073/pnas.191168698 ↗
3. Veatch, S. L. & Keller, S. L. Organization in lipid membranes containing cholesterol. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 268101 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.268101 ↗
4. Baumgart, T., Hess, S. T. & Webb, W. W. Imaging coexisting fluid domains in biomembrane models coupling curvature and line tension. Nature 425, 821–824 (2003).10.1038/nature02013 ↗
5. Roux, A. et al. Role of curvature and phase separation in lipid sorting and fission of membrane tubules. EMBO J. 24, 1537–1545 (2005).10.1038/sj.emboj.7600631 ↗
6. Bacia, K., Schwille, P. & Kurzchalia, T. Sterol structure determines the separation of phases and the curvature of the liquid-ordered phase in model membranes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3272–3277 (2005).10.1073/pnas.0408215102 ↗
7. Simons, K. & Toomre, D. Lipid rafts and signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1, 31–41 (2000).10.1038/35036052 ↗
8. Brown, D. A. & London, E. Structure and function of sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich membrane rafts. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17221–17224 (2000).10.1074/jbc.R000005200 ↗
9. Anderson, R. G. W. & Jacobson, K. A role for lipid shells in targeting proteins to caveolae, rafts, and other lipid domains. Science 296, 1821–1825 (2002).10.1126/science.1068886 ↗
10. Sackmann, E. Supported membranes: scientific and practical applications. Science 271, 43–48 (1996).10.1126/science.271.5245.43 ↗
11. Kaizuka, Y. & Groves, J. T. Structure and dynamics of supported intermembrane junctions. Biophys. J. 86, 905–912 (2004).10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74166-1 ↗
12. McConnell, H. M. & Radhakrishnan, A. Condensed complexes of cholesterol and phospholipids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1610, 159–173 (2003).10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00015-4 ↗
13. Safran, S. A. Statistical Thermodynamics of Surfaces, Interfaces, and Membranes (Addison-Wesley, New York, USA, 1994).
14. Seifert, U. & Lipowsky, R. Adhesion of vesicles. Phys. Rev. A 42, 4768–4771 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevA.42.4768 ↗
15. Helfrich, W. Elastic properties of lipid bilayers: theory and possible experiments. Z. Naturforsch. C 28, 693–703 (1973).10.1515/znc-1973-11-1209 ↗
16. Chen, Z. & Rand, R. P. The influence of cholesterol on phospholipid membrane curvature and bending elasticity. Biophys. J. 73, 267–276 (1997).10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78067-6 ↗
17. Keller, C. A., Glasmästar, K., Zhdanov, V. P. & Kasemo, B. Formation of supported membranes from vesicles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5443–5446 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5443 ↗
18. Axelrod, D., Koppel, D. E., Schlessinger, J., Elson, E. & Webb, W. W. Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys. J. 16, 1055–1069 (1976).10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85755-4 ↗
19. Merritt, E. A. et al. Crystal structure of cholera toxin B-pentamer bound to receptor GM1 pentasaccharide. Protein Sci. 3, 166–175 (1994).10.1002/pro.5560030202 ↗
20. Lin, J. & Shaw, A. S. Getting downstream without a raft. Cell 121, 815–816 (2006).10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.001 ↗
21. McMahon, H. T. & Gallop, J. L. Membrane curvature and mechanisms of dynamic cell membrane remodelling. Nature 438, 590–596 (2005).10.1038/nature04396 ↗
22. Braun, D. & Fromherz, P. Fluorescence interferometry of neuronal cell adhesion on microstructured silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5241–5244 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5241 ↗
23. Buboltz, J. T. & Feigenson, G. W. A novel strategy for the preparation of liposomes: rapid solvent exchange. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1417, 232–245 (1999).10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00006-1 ↗