Synthetic pores with reactive signal amplifiers as artificial tongues
Source abstract
Abstract
The sensation of taste is mediated by activation or deactivation of transmembrane pores. Artificial stimulus-responsive pores are enormously appealing as sensor components because changes in their activity are readily detectable in many different ways. However, the detection of multiple components in complex matrices (such as foods) with one pore sensor has so far remained elusive because the specificity necessary for sensing a target compound in complex mixtures is incompatible with the broad applicability needed for the detection of multiple components. Here, we present synthetic pores that, like our tongues, can sense flavours in food and in addition make them visibly detectable. Differential sensing and pattern recognition are solutions based on empirical and biomimetic approaches. They have been explored with synthetic receptor arrays and electronic tongues. In contrast, our approach is non-empirical as it exploits reactive amplifiers that covalently capture elusive analytes after enzymatic signal generation and drag them into synthetic pores for blockage. Reactive amplification proved to be highly sensitive and adaptable to various analytes and pores. Moreover, it can be combined with reactive filtration for minimizing interference. The system was tested on real food samples for detection of sucrose, lactose, lactate, acetate, citrate and glutamate to demonstrate the feasibility of these synthetic pores as universal sensors.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies · Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques · Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Chandrashekar, J., Hoon, M. A., Ryba, N. J. & Zuker, C. S. The receptors and cells for mammalian taste. Nature 444, 288–294 (2006).10.1038/nature05401 ↗
2. Macpherson, L. J. et al. Noxious compounds activate TRPA1 ion channels through covalent modification of cysteines. Nature 445, 541–545 (2007).10.1038/nature05544 ↗
3. Cornell, R. A. et al. A biosensor that uses ion channel switches. Nature 387, 580–583 (1997).10.1038/42432 ↗
4. Terrettaz, S., Ulrich, W. P., Guerrini, R., Verdini, A. & Vogel, H. Immunosensing by a synthetic ligand-gated ion channel. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 41, 1740–1743 (2001).10.1002/1521-3773(20010504)40:9<1740::AID-ANIE17400>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
5. Gu, L.-Q., Braha, O., Conlan, S., Cheley, S. & Bayley, H. Stochastic sensing of organic analytes by a pore-forming protein containing a molecular adapter. Nature 398, 686–690 (1999).10.1038/19491 ↗
6. Deamer, D. W. & Branton, D. Characterization of nucleic acids by nanopore analysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 817–825 (2002).10.1021/ar000138m ↗
7. Kasianowicz, J. J., Henrickson, S. E., Weetall, H. H. & Robertson, B. Simultaneous multianalyte detection with a nanometer-scale pore. Anal. Chem. 73, 2268–2272 (2001).10.1021/ac000958c ↗
8. Choi, Y., Baker, L. A., Hillebrenner, H. & Martin, C. R. Biosensing with conically shaped nanopores and nanotubes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 4976–4988 (2006).10.1039/b607360c ↗
9. Das, G., Talukdar, P. & Matile, S. Fluorometric detection of enzyme activity with synthetic supramolecular pores. Science 298, 1600–1602 (2002).10.1126/science.1077353 ↗
10. Tanaka, H. et al. Synthetic pores with sticky π-clamps. Org. Biomol. Chem. 5, 1369–1380 (2007).10.1039/B702255G ↗
11. Lavigne, J. J. & Anslyn, E. V. Sensing a paradigm shift in the field of molecular recognition: From selective to differential receptors. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 40, 3118–3130 (2001).10.1002/1521-3773(20010903)40:17<3118::AID-ANIE3118>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
12. Wright, A. T. & Anslyn, E. V. Differential receptor arrays and assays for solution-based molecular recognition. Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 14–28 (2006).10.1039/B505518K ↗
13. Zhang, C. & Suslick, K. S. Colorimetric sensor array for soft drink analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55, 237–242 (2007).10.1021/jf0624695 ↗
14. Rissin, D. M. & Walt, D. R. Digital readout of target binding with attomole detection limits via enzyme amplification in femtoliter arrays. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 6286–6287 (2006).10.1021/ja058425e ↗
15. Buryak, A. & Severin, K. A chemosensor array for the colorimetric identification of 20 natural amino acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 3700–3701 (2005).10.1021/ja042363v ↗
16. Toko, K. Electronic tongue. Biosens. Bioelectron. 13, 701–709 (1998).10.1016/S0956-5663(98)00025-6 ↗
17. Sanz Alaejos, M. & García Montelongo, F. J. Application of amperometric biosensors to the determination of vitamins and α-amino acids. Chem. Rev. 104, 3239–3265 (2004).10.1021/cr0304471 ↗
18. Tamaru, S., Kiyonaka, S. & Hamachi, I. Three distinct read-out modes for enzyme activity can operate in a semi-wet supramolecular hydrogel. Chem. Eur. J. 11, 7294–7304 (2005).10.1002/chem.200500666 ↗
19. Guarise, C., Pasquato, L., De Filippis, V. & Scrimin, P. Gold nanoparticles-based protease assay. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3978–3982 (2006).10.1073/pnas.0509372103 ↗
20. Marquette, C. A., Degiuli, A. & Blum, L. J. Electrochemiluminescent biosensors array for the concomitant detection of choline, glucose, glutamate, lactate, lysine and urate. Biosens. Bioelectron. 19, 433–439 (2004).10.1016/S0956-5663(03)00225-2 ↗
21. Campanella, L., Bonanni, A., Finotti, E. & Tomassetti, M. Biosensors for determination of total and natural antioxidant capacity of red and white wines: Comparison with other spectrophotometric and fluorimetric methods. Biosens. Bioelectron. 19, 641–651 (2004).10.1016/S0956-5663(03)00276-8 ↗
22. Litvinchuk, S., Sordé, N. & Matile, S. Sugar sensing with synthetic multifunctional pores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 9316–9317 (2005).10.1021/ja052134o ↗
23. Sakai, N., Mareda, J. & Matile, S. Rigid-rod molecules in biomembrane models: From hydrogen-bonded chains to synthetic multifunctional pores. Acc. Chem. Res 38, 79–87 (2005).10.1021/ar0400802 ↗
24. Bardelmeijer, H. A. et al. Pre-, on- and post-column derivatization in capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 18, 2214–2227 (1997).10.1002/elps.1150181212 ↗
25. Som, A. & Matile, S. Rigid-rod β-barrels with internal “Cascade Blue” cofactors—catalysis of amide, carbonate and ester hydrolysis. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 3874–3883 (2002).10.1002/1099-0690(200211)2002:22<3874::AID-EJOC3874>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
26. Corbett, P. T. et al. Dynamic combinatorial chemistry. Chem. Rev. 106, 3652–3711 (2006).10.1021/cr020452p ↗
27. Levrand, B., Ruff, Y., Lehn, J.-M. & Herrmann, A. Controlled release of volatile aldehydes and ketones by reversible hydrazone formation—“classical” profragances are getting dynamic. Chem. Commun. 41, 2965–2967 (2006).10.1039/B602312F ↗
28. Yamaguchi, S. & Ninomiya, K. Umami and food palatability. J. Nutr. 130, 921S–926S (2000).10.1093/jn/130.4.921S ↗
29. Tanaka, H. et al. Adhesive π-clamping within synthetic multifunctional pores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 16000–16001 (2006).10.1021/ja066886+ ↗
30. Tanaka, H. et al. Synthetic pores with sticky π-clamps. Org. Biomol. Chem. 5,doi:10.1039/b701082f (2007).10.1039/b701082f ↗
31. Chen, C.-W. & Whitlock, H. W. Jr. Molecular tweezers: A simple model of bifunctional intercalation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, 4921–4922 (1978).10.1021/ja00483a063 ↗
32. Zimmerman, S. C. & VanZyl, C. M. Rigid molecular tweezers: Synthesis, characterization, and complexation chemistry of a diacridine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 7894–7896 (1987).10.1021/ja00259a055 ↗
33. Klärner, F. G. & Kahlert, B. Molecular tweezers and clips as synthetic receptors. Molecular recognition and dynamics in receptor–substrate complexes. Acc. Chem. Res. 36, 919–932 (2003).10.1021/ar0200448 ↗
34. Butterfield, S. M. & Waters, M. L. A designed β-hairpin peptide for molecular recognition of ATP in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 9580–9581 (2003).10.1021/ja0359254 ↗
35. Lokey, R. S. & Iverson, B. L. Synthetic molecules that fold into pleated secondary structure in solution. Nature 375, 303–305 (1995).10.1038/375303a0 ↗
36. Miyatake, T., Nishihara, M. & Matile, S. A cost-effective method for the optical transduction of chemical reactions. Application to hyaluronidase inhibitor screening with polyarginine–counteranion complexes in lipid bilayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 12420–12421 (2006).10.1021/ja064732o ↗