journal article·2004-05-01

A negative surface energy for alumina

Zbigniew Łodziana, Nan-Yu Topsøe, Jens K. Nørskov

Nature Materials· Volume 3· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

The surface energy of a solid measures the energy cost of increasing the surface area. All normal solids therefore have a positive surface energy-if it had been negative, the solid would disintegrate. For this reason it is also generally believed that when certain ceramics can be found in a highly porous form, this is a metastable state, which will eventually sinter into the bulk solid at high temperatures. We present theoretical evidence suggesting that for theta-alumina, the surface energy is strongly dependent on the size of the crystallites, and that for some facets it is negative for thicknesses larger than approximately 1 nm. This suggests a completely new picture of porous alumina in which the high-surface-area, nanocrystalline form is the thermodynamic ground state. The negative surface energy is found to be related to a particularly strongly adsorbed state of dissociated water on some alumina surfaces. We also present new experimental evidence based on infrared spectroscopy, in conjunction with X-ray diffraction and surface-area measurements, that theta-alumina has indeed very stable surface OH groups at high temperatures, and that this form of alumina does not sinter even at temperatures up to 1,300 K.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Somorjai, G.A. Introduction to Surface Chemistry and Catalysis 275; 292 (Wiley, New York, 1994).
2. Garvle, R.C. Stabilization of the tetragonal structure in zirconia microcrystals. J. Phys. Chem. 82, 218–224 (1978).10.1021/j100491a016 ↗
3. Rande, M.R. et al. Energetics of nanocrystalline TiO2 . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 6476–6481 (2002).10.1073/pnas.251534898 ↗
4. McHale, J.M., Auroux, A., Perrota, A.J. & Navrotsky, A. Surface energies and thermodynamics phase stability in nanocrystaline aluminas. Science 277, 788–791 (1997).10.1126/science.277.5327.788 ↗
5. Wefers, K. & Misra, C. Oxides and Hydroxides of Aluminium (Alcoa Technical Paper No 19. (Revised), Alcoa Laboratories, 1987).
6. Wolverton, C. & Hass, K. Phase stability and structure of spinel-based transition aluminas. Phys. Rev. B 63, 24102 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevB.63.024102 ↗
7. Zhou, R.-S. & Snyder, R.T. Structures and transformation mechanisms of the η, γ and θ transition aluminas. Acta. Crystallogr. B 47, 617–630 (1991).10.1107/S0108768191002719 ↗
8. Mo, S.-D. & Ching, W.Y. Electronic and optical properties of θ-Al2O3 and comparison to α-Al2O3 . Phys. Rev. B 57, 15219–15228 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.57.15219 ↗
9. Verdozzi, C., Jennison, D.R., Schultz, P.A. & Sears, M.P. Sapphire (0001) Surface, clean and with d-metal overlayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 799–802 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.799 ↗
10. Ruberto, C., Yourdshahyan, Y. & Lundqvist, B.I. Surface properties of metastable alumina: A comparative study of κ- and α-Al2O3 . Phys. Rev. B 67, 195412 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevB.67.195412 ↗
11. Hass, K.C., Schneider, W.F., Curioni, A. & Andreoni, W. The chemistry of water on alumina surfaces: Reaction dynamics from first principles. Science 282, 265–268 (1998).10.1126/science.282.5387.265 ↗
12. Łodziana, L.Z., Nørskov, J.K. & Stoltze, P. The stability of the hydroxylated (0001) surface of α-Al2O3 . J. Chem. Phys. 118, 11179 (2003).10.1063/1.1574798 ↗
13. Digne, M., Sautet, P., Raybaud, P., Euzen, P. & Toulhoat, H. Hydroxyl groups on γ-alumina surfaces: A DFT study. J. Catalys. 211, 1–5 (2002).10.1016/S0021-9517(02)93741-3 ↗
14. Cai, S.H., Rashkeev, S.N., Pantelides, S.T. & Sohlberg, K. Atomic scale mechanism of the transformation of γ-alumina to θ-alumina. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 235501 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.235501 ↗
15. Yourdshahyan, Y. et al. Theoretical structure determination of a complex material: κ-Al2O3 . J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, 1365 (1999).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01926.x ↗
16. Tasker, P.W. The stability of ionic crystal surfaces. J. Phys. C 12, 4977–4984 (1979).10.1088/0022-3719/12/22/036 ↗
17. Sakashita, Y., Araki, Y. & Shimada, H. Effects of surface orientation of alumina supports on the catalytic functionality of molybdenium sulfide catalysts. Appl. Catal. A 215, 101–110 (2001).10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00524-5 ↗
18. Nortier, P., Fourre, P., Mohammed Saad, A.B., Saur, O. & Lavalley, J.C. Effects of crystallinity and morphology on the surface properties of alumina. Appl. Catal. 61, 141–160 (1990).10.1016/S0166-9834(00)82140-5 ↗
19. Beaufils, J.P. & Barbaux, J. Determination, par diffraction differentielle de neutrons, des faces cristallines exposees par des supports de catalyseurs en poudre. J. Chim. Phys. 78, 347–352 (1981).10.1051/jcp/1981780347 ↗
20. Knözniger, H. & Ratnasamy, P. Catalytic aluminas: Surface models and characterization of surface sites. Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 17, 31–70 (1978).10.1080/03602457808080878 ↗
21. Eng, P.J. et al. Structure of the hydrated α-Al2O3 (0001) surface. Science 288, 1029–1033 (2000).10.1126/science.288.5468.1029 ↗
22. Kitayama, M. & Gleaser, A.M. The Wulff shape of alumina: III, undoped alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85, 611–622 (2002).10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00140.x ↗
23. Wang, X.G., Chaka, A. & Scheffler, M. Effect of the environment on α-Al2O3 (0001) surface structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3650–3653 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3650 ↗
24. Okada, K., Nagashima, T., Kameshima, Y. & Yasumori, A. Effect of crystallite size on the thermal phase change and porous properties of Boehmite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 248, 111–115 (2002).10.1006/jcis.2001.8183 ↗
25. Chuah, G.K., Jaenicke, S. & Xu, T.H. The effect of digestion on the surface area and porosity of alumina. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 37, 345–353 (2000).10.1016/S1387-1811(99)00277-2 ↗
26. Rohrer, G.S., Rohrer, C.L. & Mullins, W.W. Nucleation energy barriers for volume-conserving shape changes of crystals with nonequilibrium morphologies. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84, 2099–2104 (2001).10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00965.x ↗
27. Hartford, J. Interface energy and electron structure for Fe/VN. Phys. Rev. B 61, 2221–2229 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevB.61.2221 ↗
28. Perdew, J.P. et al. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671–6687 (1992).10.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗