journal article·2004-03-01

Dopants adsorbed as single atoms prevent degradation of catalysts

Sanwu Wang, Albina Y. Borisevich, Sergey N. Rashkeev, Michael V. Glazoff, Karl Sohlberg, Stephen J. Pennycook, Sokrates T. Pantelides

Nature Materials· Volume 3· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The design of catalysts with desired chemical and thermal properties is viewed as a grand challenge for scientists and engineers. For operation at high temperatures, stability against structural transformations is a key requirement. Although doping has been found to impede degradation, the lack of atomistic understanding of the pertinent mechanism has hindered optimization. For example, porous gamma-Al(2)O(3), a widely used catalyst and catalytic support, transforms to non-porous alpha-Al(2)O(3) at approximately 1,100 degrees C (refs 7-10). Doping with La raises the transformation temperature to approximately 1,250 degrees C, but it has not been possible to establish if La atoms enter the bulk, adsorb on surfaces as single atoms or clusters, or form surface compounds. Here, we use direct imaging by aberration-corrected Z-contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy coupled with extended X-ray absorption fine structure and first-principles calculations to demonstrate that, contrary to expectations, stabilization is achieved by isolated La atoms adsorbed on the surface. Strong binding and mutual repulsion of La atoms effectively pin the surface and inhibit both sintering and the transformation to alpha-Al(2)O(3). The results provide the first guidelines for the choice of dopants to prevent thermal degradation of catalysts and other porous materials.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Bell, A.T. The impact of nanoscience on heterogeneous catalysis. Science 299, 1688–1691 (2003).10.1126/science.1083671 ↗
2. Satterfield, C.N. Heterogeneous Catalysis in Practice (McGraw Hill, New York, 1980).
3. Knozinger, H. & Ratnasamy, P. Catalytic aluminas – surface models and characterization of the surface sites. Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 17, 31–69 (1978).10.1080/03602457808080878 ↗
4. Gates, B.C. Supported metal clusters: synthesis, structure, and catalysis. Chem. Rev. 95, 511–522 (1995).10.1021/cr00035a003 ↗
5. Xu, Z. et al. Size-dependent catalytic activity of supported metal clusters. Nature 372, 346–8 (1994).10.1038/372346a0 ↗
6. Lin, V.S.Y. et al. Oxidative polymerization of 1,4-diethynylbenzene into highly conjugated poly(phenylene butadiynylene) within the channels of surface-functionalized mesoporous silica and alumina materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 9040–9041 (2002).10.1021/ja025925o ↗
7. Wefers, K. & Misra, C. Oxides and hydroxides of aluminum. (Alcoa Technical Paper No.19, Alcoa Laboratories, Pittsburgh, 1987).
8. Arai, H. & Machida, M. Thermal stabilization of catalyst supports and their application to high-temperature catalytic combustion. Appl. Catal. A 138, 161–176 (1996).10.1016/0926-860X(95)00294-4 ↗
9. Church, J.S., Cant, N.W. & Trimm, D.L. Surface area stability and characterization of a novel sulfate-based alumina modified by rare earth and alkaline earth ions. Appl. Catal. A 107, 267–276 (1994).10.1016/0926-860X(94)85160-3 ↗
10. Glazov, M.V., Novak, J. & Hector, L.G. Stabilization of γ-alumina: how much lanthanum do we actually need? (Alcoa Technical Paper No. 99–168, Alcoa Technical Center, Pittsburgh, 1999).
11. Kumar, K.-N.P., Tranto, J., Kumar, J. & Engell, J.E. Pore-structure stability and phase transformation in pure and M-doped (M = La, Ce, Nd, Gd, Cu, Fe) alumina membranes and catalyst supports. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 15, 266–270 (1996).10.1007/BF00274471 ↗
12. Oudet, F., Courtine, P. & Vieux, A. Thermal stabilization of transition alumina by structural coherence with lanthanide aluminum oxide (LnAlO3, Ln = lanthanum, praseodymium, neodymium). J. Catal. 114, 112–120 (1988).10.1016/0021-9517(88)90013-9 ↗
13. Beguin, B., Garbowski, E. & Primet, M. Stabilization of alumina by addition of lanthanum. Appl. Catal. 75, 119–132 (1991).10.1016/S0166-9834(00)83128-0 ↗
14. Vazquez, A. et al. X-ray diffraction, FTIR, and NMR characterization of sol–gel alumina doped with lanthanum and cerium. J. Solid State Chem. 128, 161–168 (1997).10.1006/jssc.1996.7135 ↗
15. Yamamoto, T., Tanaka, T., Matsuyama, T., Funabiki, T. & Yoshida, S. Structural analysis of La/Al2O3 catalysts by La K-edge XAFS. J. Synchrotron Rad. 8, 634–636 (2001).10.1107/S0909049500017106 ↗
16. Batson, P.E., Dellby, N. & Krivanek, O.L. Sub-ångstrom resolution using aberration corrected electron optics. Nature 418, 617–620 (2002).10.1038/nature00972 ↗
17. Blonski, S. & Garofalini, S.H. Molecular dynamics simulations of γ-alumina and α-alumina surfaces. Surf. Sci. 295, 263–274 (1993).10.1016/0039-6028(93)90202-U ↗
18. Sohlberg, K., Pennycook, S.J. & Pantelides, S.T. Explanation of the observed dearth of three-coordinated Al on γ-alumina surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 10999–11001 (1999).10.1021/ja9926358 ↗
19. Pennycook, S.J. & Jesson, D.E. High-resolution incoherent imaging of crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 938–941 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.938 ↗
20. Kirkland, E.J. Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy (Plenum, New York, 1998).10.1007/978-1-4757-4406-4 ↗
21. Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Cryst. A 32, 751–767 (1976).10.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
22. Burtin, P., Brunelle, J.P., Pijolat, M. & Soustelle, M. Influence of surface area and additives on the thermal stability of transition alumina catalyst supports. I. Kinetic data. Appl. Catal. 34, 225–238 (1987).10.1016/S0166-9834(00)82458-6 ↗
23. Rashkeev, S.N. et al. Transition metal atoms on different alumina phases: The role of subsurface sites on catalytic activity. Phys. Rev. B 67, 115414 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevB.67.115414 ↗
24. Krivanek, O.L., Dellby, N. & Lupini, A.R. Towards sub-Å electron beams. Ultramicroscopy 78, 1–11 (1999).10.1016/S0304-3991(99)00013-3 ↗
25. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
26. Perdew, J.P. Density-functional approximation for the correlation energy of the inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. B 33, 8822–8824 (1986).10.1103/PhysRevB.33.8822 ↗
27. Becke, A.D. Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior. Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098–3100 (1988).10.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098 ↗
28. Vanderbilt, D. Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. Phys. Rev. B 41, 7892–7895 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892 ↗
29. Blöchl, P.E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
30. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗