Resonant osmotic diodes for voltage-induced water filtration across composite membranes
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanofluidics have led to the discovery of unconventional properties for water and ion transport at the nanoscale, but key challenges remain in their large-scale implementation. Here we report an osmotic resonance across macroscopic composite membranes made by the assembly of microporous and mesoporous layers, taking root from the rectified osmotic transport in nanopores. This osmotic diode induces ionic sieving and continuous fast macroscopic electro-osmotic transport. This is the basis for a versatile approach for water purification, by which fresh water is driven across a composite material under an a.c. electric field. Water flow is driven within the mesoporous layer, while selectivity is achieved within the microporous layer. The maximal rectified, diode-like water flow is found to be in the hertz range. Building on analytical predictions, we show that a conversion factor of up to ~15 equivalent bars per applied volt can be reached using appropriate materials.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Bocquet, L. Nanofluidics coming of age. Nat. Mater. 19, 254–256 (2020).10.1038/s41563-020-0625-8 ↗
2. Aluru, N. R. et al. Fluids and electrolytes under confinement in single-digit nanopores. Chem. Rev. 123, 2737–2831 (2023).10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00155 ↗
3. Deshmukh, A. et al. Membrane distillation at the water-energy nexus: limits, opportunities, and challenges. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 1177–1196 (2018).10.1039/C8EE00291F ↗
4. Li, Z., Siddiqi, A., Anadon, L. D. & Narayanamurti, V. Towards sustainability in water-energy nexus: ocean energy for seawater desalination. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 3833–3847 (2018).10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.087 ↗
5. Esfandiar, A. et al. Size effect in ion transport through angstrom-scale slits. Science 358, 511–513 (2017).10.1126/science.aan5275 ↗
6. Prakash, S., Pinti, M. & Bhushan, B. Theory, fabrication and applications of microfluidic and nanofluidic biosensors. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 2269–2303 (2012).10.1098/rsta.2011.0498 ↗
7. Piruska, A., Gong, M., Sweedler, J. V. & Bohn, P. W. Nanofluidics in chemical analysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1060–1072 (2010).10.1039/B900409M ↗
8. Ries, L. et al. Enhanced sieving from exfoliated MoS2 membranes via covalent functionalization. Nat. Mater. 18, 1112–1117 (2019).10.1038/s41563-019-0464-7 ↗
9. Li, X. et al. Nature gives the best solution for desalination: aquaporin-based hollow fiber composite membrane with superior performance. J. Membr. Sci. 494, 68–77 (2015).10.1016/j.memsci.2015.07.040 ↗
10. Törnroth-Horsefield, S. et al. Structural mechanism of plant aquaporin gating. Nature 439, 688–694 (2006).10.1038/nature04316 ↗
11. Emmerich, T. et al. Enhanced nanofluidic transport in activated carbon nanoconduits. Nat. Mater. 21, 696–702 (2022).10.1038/s41563-022-01229-x ↗
12. Robin, P. et al. Long-term memory and synapse-like dynamics in two-dimensional nanofluidic channels. Science 379, 161–167 (2023).10.1126/science.adc9931 ↗
13. Xu, Y. Nanofluidics: a new arena for materials science. Adv. Mater. 30, 1702419 (2018).
14. Herman, A., Ager, J. W., Ardo, S. & Segev, G. Ratchet-based ion pumps for selective ion separations. PRX Energy 2, 023001 (2023).10.1103/PRXEnergy.2.023001 ↗
15. Huang, X., Kong, X., Wen, L. & Jiang, L. Bioinspired ionic diodes: from unipolar to bipolar. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1801079 (2018).10.1002/adfm.201801079 ↗
16. Karnik, R., Duan, C., Castelino, K., Daiguji, H. & Majumdar, A. Rectification of ionic current in a nanofluidic diode. Nano Lett. 7, 547–551 (2007).10.1021/nl062806o ↗
17. Cheng, L.-J. & Guo, L. J. Nanofluidic diodes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 923–938 (2010).10.1039/B822554K ↗
18. Poggioli, A. R., Siria, A. & Bocquet, L. Beyond the tradeoff: dynamic selectivity in ionic transport and current rectification. J. Phys. Chem. B 123, 1171–1185 (2019).10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b11202 ↗
19. Montes de Oca, J. M., Dhanasekaran, J., Córdoba, A., Darling, S. B. & de Pablo, J. J. Ionic transport in electrostatic Janus membranes. An explicit solvent molecular dynamic simulation. ACS Nano 16, 3768–3775 (2022).10.1021/acsnano.1c07706 ↗
20. Picallo, C. B., Gravelle, S., Joly, L., Charlaix, E. & Bocquet, L. Nanofluidic osmotic diodes: theory and molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 244501 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.244501 ↗
21. Ratschow, A. D., Pandey, D., Liebchen, B., Bhattacharyya, S. & Hardt, S. Resonant nanopumps: ac gate voltages in conical nanopores induce directed electrolyte flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 264501 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.264501 ↗
22. Laohakunakorn, N. et al. A Landau–Squire nanojet. Nano Lett. 13, 5141–5146 (2013).10.1021/nl402350a ↗
23. Wu, X., Ramiah Rajasekaran, P. & Martin, C. R. An alternating current electroosmotic pump based on conical nanopore membranes. ACS Nano 10, 4637–4643 (2016).10.1021/acsnano.6b00939 ↗
24. Alizadeh, A., Hsu, W., Wang, M. & Daiguji, H. Electroosmotic flow: from microfluidics to nanofluidics. Electrophoresis 42, 834–868 (2021).10.1002/elps.202000313 ↗
25. Wen, Q. et al. Electric‐field‐induced ionic sieving at planar graphene oxide heterojunctions for miniaturized water desalination. Adv. Mater. 32, 1903954 (2020).
26. Joshi, R. K. et al. Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes. Science 343, 752–754 (2014).10.1126/science.1245711 ↗
27. Mi, B. Scaling up nanoporous graphene membranes. Science 364, 1033–1034 (2019).10.1126/science.aax3103 ↗
28. Lee, B., Wang, L., Wang, Z., Cooper, N. J. & Elimelech, M. Directing the research agenda on water and energy technologies with process and economic analysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 714–722 (2023).10.1039/D2EE03271F ↗
29. Marbach, S. & Bocquet, L. Osmosis, from molecular insights to large-scale applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 3102–3144 (2019).10.1039/C8CS00420J ↗
30. Devasenathipathy, S. & Santiago, J. G. in Microscale Diagnostic Techniques (ed. Breuer, K. S.) 113–154 (Springer, 2005); https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26449-3_310.1007/3-540-26449-3_3 ↗
31. Huisman, I. Electroviscous effects, streaming potential, and zeta potential in polycarbonate track-etched membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 178, 79–92 (2000).10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00485-3 ↗
32. Van Der Heyden, F. H. J., Stein, D. & Dekker, C. Streaming currents in a single nanofluidic channel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 116104 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.116104 ↗
33. Jia, F. et al. Advances in graphene oxide membranes for water treatment. Nano Res. 15, 6636–6654 (2022).10.1007/s12274-022-4273-y ↗
34. Yang, Q. et al. Ultrathin graphene-based membrane with precise molecular sieving and ultrafast solvent permeation. Nat. Mater. 16, 1198–1202 (2017).10.1038/nmat5025 ↗
35. Béguin, F., Presser, V., Balducci, A. & Frackowiak, E. Carbons and electrolytes for advanced supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 26, 2219–2251 (2014).10.1002/adma.201304137 ↗
36. Suss, M. E. & Presser, V. Water desalination with energy storage electrode materials. Joule 2, 10–15 (2018).10.1016/j.joule.2017.12.010 ↗
37. Park, H. B., Kamcev, J., Robeson, L. M., Elimelech, M. & Freeman, B. D. Maximizing the right stuff: the trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Science 356, eaab0530 (2017).
38. Geise, G. M., Park, H. B., Sagle, A. C., Freeman, B. D. & McGrath, J. E. Water permeability and water/salt selectivity tradeoff in polymers for desalination. J. Membr. Sci. 369, 130–138 (2011).10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.054 ↗
39. Ober, P. et al. Liquid flow reversibly creates a macroscopic surface charge gradient. Nat. Commun. 12, 4102 (2021).
40. Werkhoven, B. L., Everts, J. C., Samin, S. & van Roij, R. Flow-induced surface charge heterogeneity in electrokinetics due to Stern-layer conductance coupled to reaction kinetics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 264502 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.264502 ↗
41. Biesheuvel, P. M., Porada, S., Elimelech, M. & Dykstra, J. E. Tutorial review of reverse osmosis and electrodialysis. J. Membr. Sci. 647, 120221 (2022).10.1016/j.memsci.2021.120221 ↗
42. Wang, L. et al. Water transport in reverse osmosis membranes is governed by pore flow, not a solution-diffusion mechanism. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf8488 (2023).10.1126/sciadv.adf8488 ↗
43. Biesheuvel, P. M., Rutten, S. B., Ryzhkov, I. I., Porada, S. & Elimelech, M. Theory for salt transport in charged reverse osmosis membranes: novel analytical equations for desalination performance and experimental validation. Desalination 557, 116580 (2023).10.1016/j.desal.2023.116580 ↗
44. Abdelghani-Idrissi, S. Dataset for the manuscript entitled ‘Resonant osmotic diodes for voltage-induced water filtration across composite membranes’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15277891 (2025).10.5281/ZENODO.15277891 ↗