Adaptive peptide dispersions enable drying-induced biomolecule encapsulation
Source abstract
Abstract
Peptides are promising building blocks of designer materials with wide-ranging applications. These materials are stabilized by directional hydrogen-bonding patterns, giving rise to one-dimensional or two-dimensional assembly. It remains a challenge to mimic biology’s context-adaptive and flexible structures. Here we introduce minimalistic tripeptide sequences that form highly soluble dynamic ensembles through multivalent side-chain interactions. We observe these supramolecular dispersions undergo drying-induced sequential liquid–liquid phase separation followed by solidification, resulting in the formation of films of stiff, densely packed and porous peptide microparticles that can be instantaneously redispersed upon the re-introduction of water. Air-drying of peptide dispersions in the presence of proteins or small-molecule payloads results in efficient encapsulation and the retention of protein stability after redispersion, showing promise for the emulsification, encapsulation, protection and storage of biomacromolecules. The mechanism resembles the protective strategies in natural systems during desiccation, which rely on liquid–liquid phase separation to survive extreme conditions. Here the authors design tripeptides that form dynamic soluble dispersions and undergo phase separation upon drying to assemble into porous particles. This evaporation-driven emulsification can be harnessed to encapsulate and stabilize biomolecules.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials · Chemical Synthesis and Analysis · Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Aida, T., Meijer, E. W. & Stupp, S. I. Functional supramolecular polymers. Science 335, 813–818 (2012).10.1126/science.1205962 ↗
2. Zhang, S. Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular self-assembly. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1171–1178 (2003).10.1038/nbt874 ↗
3. Ghadiri, M. R., Granja, J. R., Milligan, R. A., McRee, D. E. & Khazanovich, N. Correction: self-assembling organic nanotubes based on a cyclic peptide architecture. Nature 366, 324–327 (1993).10.1038/366324a0 ↗
4. Freeman, R. et al. Reversible self-assembly of superstructured networks. Science 362, 808–813 (2018).10.1126/science.aat6141 ↗
5. Kaygisiz, K. et al. Context dependence in assembly code for supramolecular peptide materials and systems. Nat. Rev. Mater. 10, 449–472 (2025).10.1038/s41578-025-00782-6 ↗
6. Du, X., Zhou, J., Shi, J. & Xu, B. Supramolecular hydrogelators and hydrogels: from soft matter to molecular biomaterials. Chem. Rev. 115, 13165–13307 (2015).10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00299 ↗
7. Bianco, S. et al. Mechanical release of homogenous proteins from supramolecular gels. Nature 631, 544–548 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07580-0 ↗
8. Berisha, N. et al. Directed discovery of high-loading nanoaggregates enabled by drug-matched oligo-peptide excipients. Chem 11, 102404 (2025).10.1016/j.chempr.2024.102404 ↗
9. Levin, A. et al. Biomimetic peptide self-assembly for functional materials. Nat. Rev. Chem. 4, 615–634 (2020).10.1038/s41570-020-0215-y ↗
10. Woolfson, D. N. A brief history of de novo protein design: minimal, rational, and computational. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 167160 (2021).10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167160 ↗
11. DeGrado, W. F. & Korendovych, I. V. De novo protein design, a retrospective. Q. Rev. Biophys. 53, e3 (2020).10.1017/S0033583519000131 ↗
12. Hulgan, S. A. H. & Hartgerink, J. D. Recent advances in collagen mimetic peptide structure and design. Biomacromolecules 23, 1475–1489 (2022).10.1021/acs.biomac.2c00028 ↗
13. Omenetto, F. G. & Kaplan, D. L. New opportunities for an ancient material. Science 329, 528–531 (2010).10.1126/science.1188936 ↗
14. Yuan, C. et al. Hierarchically oriented organization in supramolecular peptide crystals. Nat. Rev. Chem. 3, 567–588 (2019).10.1038/s41570-019-0129-8 ↗
15. Gallego, L., Woods, J. F. & Rickhaus, M. Recent concepts for supramolecular 2D materials. Org. Mater. 4, 137–145 (2022).10.1055/a-1932-0463 ↗
16. Magnotti, E. L. et al. Self-assembly of an α‑helical peptide into a crystalline two- dimensional nanoporous framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 16274–16282 (2016).10.1021/jacs.6b06592 ↗
17. Ganatra, P. et al. Diverse proteomimetic frameworks via rational design of π-stacking peptide tectons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 22236–22246 (2024).10.1021/jacs.4c03094 ↗
18. Reches, M. & Gazit, E. Casting metal nanowires within discrete self-assembled peptide nanotubes. Science 300, 625–627 (2003).10.1126/science.1082387 ↗
19. Chakraborty, P. et al. Co‐assembly between Fmoc diphenylalanine and diphenylalanine within a 3D fibrous viscous network confers atypical curvature and branching. Angew. Chem. 132, 23939–23947 (2020).10.1002/ange.202009488 ↗
20. Azuri, I., Adler-Abramovich, L., Gazit, E., Hod, O. & Kronik, L. Why are diphenylalanine-based peptide nanostructures so rigid? Insights from first principles calculations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 963–969 (2014).10.1021/ja408713x ↗
21. Bera, S. et al. Rigid helical-like assemblies from a self-aggregating tripeptide. Nat. Mater. 18, 503–509 (2019).10.1038/s41563-019-0343-2 ↗
22. Garcia, AnaM. et al. Chirality effects on peptide self-assembly unraveled from molecules to materials. Chem 4, 1862–1876 (2018).10.1016/j.chempr.2018.05.016 ↗
23. Frederix, P. W. J. M. et al. Exploring the sequence space for (tri-)peptide self-assembly to design and discover new hydrogels. Nat. Chem. 7, 30–37 (2015).10.1038/nchem.2122 ↗
24. Perry, S. L. Phase separation: bridging polymer physics and biology. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 39, 86–97 (2019).10.1016/j.cocis.2019.01.007 ↗
25. Abbas, M., Lipiński, W. P., Wang, J. & Spruijt, E. Peptide-based coacervates as biomimetic protocells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 3690–3705 (2021).10.1039/D0CS00307G ↗
26. Leshem, A. B. et al. Biomolecular condensates formed by designer minimalistic peptides. Nat. Commun. 14, 421 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-36060-8 ↗
27. Gabryelczyk, B. et al. Hydrogen bond guidance and aromatic stacking drive liquid-liquid phase separation of intrinsically disordered histidine-rich peptides. Nat. Commun. 10, 5465 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-13469-8 ↗
28. Abbas, M., Lipiński, W. P., Nakashima, K. K., Huck, W. T. S. & Spruijt, E. A short peptide synthon for liquid–liquid phase separation. Nat. Chem. 13, 1046–1054 (2021).10.1038/s41557-021-00788-x ↗
29. Xing, R., Yuan, C., Fan, W., Ren, X. & Yan, X. Biomolecular glass with amino acid and peptide nanoarchitectonics. Sci. Adv. 9, eadd8105 (2023).10.1126/sciadv.add8105 ↗
30. Finkelstein-Zuta, G. et al. A self-healing multispectral transparent adhesive peptide glass. Nature 630, 368–374 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07408-x ↗
31. Panganiban, B. et al. Random heteropolymers preserve protein function in foreign environments. Science 359, 1239–1243 (2018).10.1126/science.aao0335 ↗
32. Ruan, Z. et al. Population-based heteropolymer design to mimic protein mixtures. Nature 615, 251–258 (2023).10.1038/s41586-022-05675-0 ↗
33. Lampel, A. et al. Polymeric peptide pigments with sequence-encoded properties. Science 356, 1064–1068 (2017).10.1126/science.aal5005 ↗
34. Khemaissa, S., Sagan, S. & Walrant, A. Tryptophan, an amino-acid endowed with unique properties and its many roles in membrane proteins. Crystals 11, 1032 (2021).10.3390/cryst11091032 ↗
35. Scott, G. G., McKnight, P. J., Tuttle, T. & Ulijn, R. V. Tripeptide emulsifiers. Adv. Mater. 28, 1381–1386 (2016).10.1002/adma.201504697 ↗
36. Scheiner, S., Kar, T. & Pattanayak, J. Comparison of various types of hydrogen bonds involving aromatic amino acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 13257–13264 (2002).10.1021/ja027200q ↗
37. Vivian, J. T. & Callis, P. R. Mechanisms of tryptophan fluorescence shifts in proteins. Biophys. J. 80, 2093–2109 (2001).10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76183-8 ↗
38. Kwok, A. et al. A thermodynamic model for interpreting tryptophan excitation-energy-dependent fluorescence spectra provides insight into protein conformational sampling and stability. Front. Mol. Biosci. 8, 778244 (2021).10.3389/fmolb.2021.778244 ↗
39. Liu, H., Zhang, H. & Jin, B. Fluorescence of tryptophan in aqueous solution. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 106, 54–59 (2013).10.1016/j.saa.2012.12.065 ↗
40. Stollar, E. J. et al. Unconventional interactions between water and heterocyclic nitrogens in protein structures. Proteins 57, 1–8 (2004).10.1002/prot.20216 ↗
41. Moon, B. U. et al. Evaporation-driven water-in-water droplet formation. Langmuir 36, 14333–14341 (2020).10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02683 ↗
42. Shaw, M., Bella, A. & Ryadnov, M. G. CREIM: coffee ring effect imaging model for monitoring protein self-assembly in situ. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 4846–4851 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02147 ↗
43. Cohen-Gerassi, D. et al. Phase transition and crystallization kinetics of a supramolecular system in a microfluidic platform. Chem. Mater. 32, 8342–8349 (2020).10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02187 ↗
44. Maldonado-Valderrama, J., Wege, H. A., Rodríguez-Valverde, M. A., Gálvez-Ruiz, M. J. & Cabrerizo-Vílchez, M. A. Comparative study of adsorbed and spread β-casein monolayers at the water–air interface with the pendant drop technique. Langmuir 19, 8436–8442 (2003).10.1021/la034242z ↗
45. Olgenblum, G. I., Hutcheson, B. O., Pielak, G. J. & Harries, D. Protecting proteins from desiccation stress using molecular glasses and gels. Chem. Rev. 124, 5668–5694 (2024).10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00752 ↗
46. Kumar, M. et al. In situ, noncovalent labeling and stimulated emission depletion-based super-resolution imaging of supramolecular peptide nanostructures. ACS Nano 14, 15056–15063 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.0c05029 ↗
47. Kapelner, R. A. & Obermeyer, A. C. Ionic polypeptide tags for protein phase separation. Chem. Sci. 10, 2700–2707 (2019).10.1039/C8SC04253E ↗
48. Cummings, C. S. & Obermeyer, A. C. Phase separation behavior of supercharged proteins and polyelectrolytes. Biochemistry 57, 314–323 (2018).10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00990 ↗
49. Ahn, S. Y. & Obermeyer, A. C. Selectivity of complex coacervation in multiprotein mixtures. JACS Au 4, 3800–3812 (2024).10.1021/jacsau.4c00399 ↗
50. Khemaissa, S., Walrant, A. & Sagan, S. Tryptophan, more than just an interfacial amino acid in the membrane activity of cationic cell-penetrating and antimicrobial peptides. Q. Rev. Biophys. 55, e10 (2022).10.1017/S0033583522000105 ↗
51. Andersen, O. S., Greathouse, D. V., Providence, L. L., Becker, M. D. & Koeppe, R. E. Importance of tryptophan dipoles for protein function: F-fluorination of tryptophans in gramicidin a channels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 5142–5146 (1998).10.1021/ja980182l ↗
52. Lim, S. et al. Tardigrade secretory proteins protect biological structures from desiccation. Commun. Biol. 7, 633 (2024).10.1038/s42003-024-06336-w ↗
53. Hanwell, M. D. et al. Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. J. Cheminformatics 4, 17 (2012).10.1186/1758-2946-4-17 ↗
54. Jorgensen, W. L., Maxwell, D. S. & Tirado-Rives, J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 11225–11236 (1996).10.1021/ja9621760 ↗
55. Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1998).10.1063/1.445869 ↗
56. Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2, 19–25 (2015).10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 ↗
57. Hess, B. P-LINCS: a parallel linear constraint solver for molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 116–122 (2007).10.1021/ct700200b ↗
58. Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).10.1063/1.2408420 ↗
59. Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1998).10.1063/1.328693 ↗
60. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗