DataVXNature MaterialsPaper
journal article·2026-02

Grain boundary zirconia-modified garnet solid-state electrolyte

Vikalp Raj, Yixian Wang, Min Feng, Kaustubh G. Naik, Manish Jain, Bairav S. Vishnugopi, Shimao Deng, Noah B. Schorr, Martin Salazar, Alexander M. Heusser, Xiaojing Huang, Andrew Scott Manning, Sergiy Kalnaus, Yijin Liu, John Watt, Josefine D. McBrayer, Brad L. Boyce, Hong Fang, Puru Jena, Partha P. Mukherjee, Yue Qi, David Mitlin

Nature Materials· Volume 25· Issue 2
Publisher page
Source abstract

Abstract

We report a method for promoting electrochemical stability in garnet Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12 solid-state electrolyte based on a composite two-phase oxide-oxide microstructure. Grain boundary precipitation of the controlled distribution of amorphous zirconium oxide microparticles is achieved through the addition of reactive tantalum carbide. During ambient-atmosphere sintering, the carbide decomposes through an in situ reaction, the 'extra' Ta substituting for Zr within the Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12 lattice. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations identify a thermodynamically favourable reaction path and show how substituting Ta5+ at Zr4+ sites affects the crystal structure as well as bulk ionic and electronic conductivities. Quantitative stereology highlights that zirconia also acts as a sintering aid, reducing compact porosity. Cryogenic focused-ion-beam scanning electron microscopy and fractography analysis of cycled solid-state electrolytes illustrates that near-universally observed intergranular Li-metal dendrite propagation is suppressed by the two-phase microstructure, favouring transgranular dendrites instead. Importantly, DFT demonstrates that compared with the Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12 surface, the zirconium oxide surface per se is less electronically conductive and does not trap excess electrons to reduce Li ions. This is a key reason for the substantial improvement in the electrochemical properties over the single-phase baseline.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

Energy storageCeramics & glassesComposites

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Samson, A. J., Hofstetter, K., Bag, S. & Thangadurai, V. A bird’s-eye view of Li-stuffed garnet-type Li7La3Zr2O12 ceramic electrolytes for advanced all-solid-state Li batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 2957–2975 (2019).10.1039/C9EE01548E ↗
2. Bachman, J. C. et al. Inorganic solid-state electrolytes for lithium batteries: mechanisms and properties governing ion conduction. Chem. Rev. 116, 140–162 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00563 ↗
3. Thangadurai, V., Narayanan, S. & Pinzaru, D. Garnet-type solid-state fast Li ion conductors for Li batteries: critical review. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 4714–4727 (2014).10.1039/c4cs00020j ↗
4. Allen, J. L., Wolfenstine, J., Rangasamy, E. & Sakamoto, J. Effect of substitution (Ta, Al, Ga) on the conductivity of Li7La3Zr2O12. J. Power Sources 206, 315–319 (2012).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.131 ↗
5. David, I. N., Thompson, T., Wolfenstine, J., Allen, J. L. & Sakamoto, J. Microstructure and Li-ion conductivity of hot-pressed cubic Li7La3Zr2O12. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 98, 1209–1214 (2015).10.1111/jace.13455 ↗
6. Baek, S. W., Lee, J. M., Kim, T. Y., Song, M. S. & Park, Y. Garnet related lithium ion conductor processed by spark plasma sintering for all solid state batteries. J. Power Sources 249, 197–206 (2014).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.089 ↗
7. Wu, Y. et al. Rapid processing of uniform, thin, robust, and large-area garnet solid electrolyte by atmospheric plasma spraying. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2300809 (2023).10.1002/aenm.202300809 ↗
8. Alexander, G. V., Shi, C., O’Neill, J. & Wachsman, E. D. Extreme lithium-metal cycling enabled by a mixed ion- and electron-conducting garnet three-dimensional architecture. Nat. Mater. 22, 1136–1143 (2023).10.1038/s41563-023-01627-9 ↗
9. Pfenninger, R., Struzik, M., Garbayo, I., Stilp, E. & Rupp, J. L. M. A low ride on processing temperature for fast lithium conduction in garnet solid-state battery films. Nat. Energy 4, 475–483 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0384-4 ↗
10. Albertus, P., Babinec, S., Litzelman, S. & Newman, A. Status and challenges in enabling the lithium metal electrode for high-energy and low-cost rechargeable batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 16–21 (2018).10.1038/s41560-017-0047-2 ↗
11. Raj, V., Aetukuri, N. P. B. & Nanda, J. Solid state lithium metal batteries—issues and challenges at the lithium-solid electrolyte interface. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 26, 100999 (2022).10.1016/j.cossms.2022.100999 ↗
12. Wang, Y. et al. Stable anode-free all-solid-state lithium battery through tuned metal wetting on the copper current collector. Adv. Mater. 35, 2206762 (2023).10.1002/adma.202206762 ↗
13. Kasemchainan, J. et al. Critical stripping current leads to dendrite formation on plating in lithium anode solid electrolyte cells. Nat. Mater. 18, 1105–1111 (2019).10.1038/s41563-019-0438-9 ↗
14. Lewis, J. A. et al. Linking void and interphase evolution to electrochemistry in solid-state batteries using operando X-ray tomography. Nat. Mater. 20, 503–510 (2021).10.1038/s41563-020-00903-2 ↗
15. Cheng, L. et al. Effect of surface microstructure on electrochemical performance of garnet solid electrolytes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 2073–2081 (2015).10.1021/am508111r ↗
16. Raj, V. et al. Dendrite growth—microstructure—stress—interrelations in garnet solid-state electrolyte. Adv. Energy Mater. 14, 2303062 (2024).10.1002/aenm.202303062 ↗
17. Tian, H.-K., Liu, Z., Ji, Y., Chen, L.-Q. & Qi, Y. Interfacial electronic properties dictate Li dendrite growth in solid electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 31, 7351–7359 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01967 ↗
18. Raj, V. et al. Direct correlation between void formation and lithium dendrite growth in solid-state electrolytes with interlayers. Nat. Mater. 21, 1050–1056 (2022).10.1038/s41563-022-01264-8 ↗
19. Klinsmann, M., Hildebrand, F. E., Ganser, M. & McMeeking, R. M. Dendritic cracking in solid electrolytes driven by lithium insertion. J. Power Sources 442, 227226 (2019).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227226 ↗
20. Liu, X. et al. Local electronic structure variation resulting in Li ‘filament’ formation within solid electrolytes. Nat. Mater. 20, 1485–1490 (2021).10.1038/s41563-021-01019-x ↗
21. Feng, M., Pan, J. & Qi, Y. Impact of electronic properties of grain boundaries on the solid electrolyte interphases (SEIs) in Li-ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 15821–15829 (2021).10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03186 ↗
22. Albertus, P. et al. Challenges for and pathways toward Li-metal-based all-solid-state batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 1399–1404 (2021).10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00445 ↗
23. Kalnaus, S., Dudney, N. J., Westover, A. S., Herbert, E. & Hackney, S. Solid-state batteries: the critical role of mechanics. Science 381, eabg5998 (2023).10.1126/science.abg5998 ↗
24. Barai, P., Higa, K., Ngo, A. T., Curtiss, L. A. & Srinivasan, V. Mechanical stress induced current focusing and fracture in grain boundaries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, A1752 (2019).10.1149/2.0321910jes ↗
25. Vishnugopi, B. S. et al. Asymmetric contact loss dynamics during plating and stripping in solid-state batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2203671 (2023).10.1002/aenm.202203671 ↗
26. Han, X. et al. Negating interfacial impedance in garnet-based solid-state Li metal batteries. Nat. Mater. 16, 572–579 (2017).10.1038/nmat4821 ↗
27. Xu, Y. et al. Improved Li-ion conduction and (electro)chemical stability at garnet-polymer interface through metal-nitrogen bonding. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2204377 (2023).10.1002/aenm.202204377 ↗
28. Tsai, C. L. et al. Li7La3Zr2O12 interface modification for Li dendrite prevention. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 10617–10626 (2016).10.1021/acsami.6b00831 ↗
29. Fu, K. et al. Flexible, solid-state, ion-conducting membrane with 3D garnet nanofiber networks for lithium batteries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7094–7099 (2016).10.1073/pnas.1600422113 ↗
30. Lee, C. et al. Stack pressure measurements to probe the evolution of the lithium–solid-state electrolyte interface. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 3261–3269 (2021).10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01395 ↗
31. Campanella, D. et al. Gram-scale carbothermic control of LLZO garnet solid electrolyte particle size. Chem. Eng. J. 457, 141349 (2023).10.1016/j.cej.2023.141349 ↗
32. Li, Y., Han, J. T., Wang, C. A., Xie, H. & Goodenough, J. B. Optimizing Li+ conductivity in a garnet framework. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 15357–15361 (2012).10.1039/c2jm31413d ↗
33. Hannink, R. H. J., Kelly, P. M. & Muddle, B. C. Transformation toughening in zirconia-containing ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83, 461–487 (2000).10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01221.x ↗
34. Wang, J. & Stevens, R. Zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA) ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. 24, 3421–3440 (1989).10.1007/BF02385721 ↗
35. Bach, J. P. & Thevenot, F. Fabrication and characterization of zirconia-toughened alumina obtained by inorganic and organic precursors. J. Mater. Sci. 24, 2711–2721 (1989).10.1007/BF02385615 ↗
36. He, X., Zhu, Y. & Mo, Y. Origin of fast ion diffusion in super-ionic conductors. Nat. Commun. 8, 15893 (2017).10.1038/ncomms15893 ↗
37. Han, F. et al. High electronic conductivity as the origin of lithium dendrite formation within solid electrolytes. Nat. Energy 4, 187–196 (2019).10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z ↗
38. Klimpel, M., Zhang, H., Kovalenko, M. V. & Kravchyk, K. V. Standardizing critical current density measurements in lithium garnets. Commun. Chem. 6, 192 (2023).10.1038/s42004-023-01002-4 ↗
39. Jelitto, H. & Schneider, G. A. A geometric model for the fracture toughness of porous materials. Acta Mater. 151, 443–453 (2018).10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.018 ↗
40. Ashby, M. F. & Gibson, L. J. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997).
41. Raj, R. & Wolfenstine, J. Current limit diagrams for dendrite formation in solid-state electrolytes for Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 343, 119–126 (2017).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.037 ↗
42. Newman, J. C. Stress-intensity factors and crack-opening displacements for round compact specimens. Int. J. Fract. 17, 567–578 (1981).10.1007/BF00681557 ↗
43. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
44. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
45. Blöchl, P. E. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
46. Blöchl, P. E., Jepsen, O. & Andersen, O. K. Improved tetrahedron method for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 49, 16223–16233 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.49.16223 ↗
47. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
48. Tian, H.-K., Xu, B. & Qi, Y. Computational study of lithium nucleation tendency in Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO) and rational design of interlayer materials to prevent lithium dendrites. J. Power Sources 392, 79–86 (2018).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.098 ↗