Bond-centric modular design of protein assemblies
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Directional interactions that generate regular coordination geometries are a powerful means of guiding molecular and colloidal self-assembly, but implementing such high-level interactions with proteins remains challenging due to their complex shapes and intricate interface properties. Here we describe a modular approach to protein nanomaterial design inspired by the rich chemical diversity that can be generated from the small number of atomic valencies. We design protein building blocks using deep learning-based generative tools, incorporating regular coordination geometries and tailorable bonding interactions that enable the assembly of diverse closed and open architectures guided by simple geometric principles. Experimental characterization confirms the successful formation of more than 20 multicomponent polyhedral protein cages, two-dimensional arrays and three-dimensional protein lattices, with a high (10%–50%) success rate and electron microscopy data closely matching the corresponding design models. Due to modularity, individual building blocks can assemble with different partners to generate distinct regular assemblies, resulting in an economy of parts and enabling the construction of reconfigurable networks for designer nanomaterials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Protein Structure and Dynamics · Enzyme Structure and Function · Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Pauling, L. The nature of the chemical bond. Application of results obtained from the quantum mechanics and from a theory of paramagnetic susceptibility to the structure of molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 53, 1367–1400 (1931).10.1021/ja01355a027 ↗
2. Corey, E. J. The logic of chemical synthesis: multistep synthesis of complex carbogenic molecules (Nobel lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 30, 455–465 (1991).10.1002/anie.199104553 ↗
3. Lehn, J. Supramolecular chemistry—scope and perspectives molecules, supermolecules, and molecular devices (Nobel lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 27, 89–112 (1988).10.1002/anie.198800891 ↗
4. Ma, X. & Zhao, Y. Biomedical applications of supramolecular systems based on host–guest interactions. Chem. Rev. 115, 7794–7839 (2015).10.1021/cr500392w ↗
5. Cook, T. R., Zheng, Y.-R. & Stang, P. J. Metal–organic frameworks and self-assembled supramolecular coordination complexes: comparing and contrasting the design, synthesis, and functionality of metal–organic materials. Chem. Rev. 113, 734–777 (2013).10.1021/cr3002824 ↗
6. Jones, M. R., Seeman, N. C. & Mirkin, C. A. Programmable materials and the nature of the DNA bond. Science 347, 1260901 (2015).10.1126/science.1260901 ↗
7. King, N. P. et al. Computational design of self-assembling protein nanomaterials with atomic level accuracy. Science 336, 1171–1174 (2012).10.1126/science.1219364 ↗
8. Lai, Y.-T., Cascio, D. & Yeates, T. O. Structure of a 16-nm cage designed by using protein oligomers. Science 336, 1129 (2012).10.1126/science.1219351 ↗
9. Evans, R. et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 (2021).10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 ↗
10. Zhu, W., Shenoy, A., Kundrotas, P. & Elofsson, A. Evaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes. Bioinformatics 39, btad424 (2023).10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424 ↗
11. Watson, J. L. et al. De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion. Nature 620, 1089–1100 (2023).10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 ↗
12. Ingraham, J. B. et al. Illuminating protein space with a programmable generative model. Nature 623, 1070–1078 (2023).10.1038/s41586-023-06728-8 ↗
13. Wicky, B. I. M. et al. Hallucinating symmetric protein assemblies. Science 378, 56–61 (2022).10.1126/science.add1964 ↗
14. Lanci, C. J. et al. Computational design of a protein crystal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7304–7309 (2012).10.1073/pnas.1112595109 ↗
15. Gonen, S., DiMaio, F., Gonen, T. & Baker, D. Design of ordered two-dimensional arrays mediated by noncovalent protein-protein interfaces. Science 348, 1365–1368 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa9897 ↗
16. Ben-Sasson, A. J. et al. Design of biologically active binary protein 2D materials. Nature 589, 468–473 (2021).10.1038/s41586-020-03120-8 ↗
17. Li, Z. et al. Accurate computational design of three-dimensional protein crystals. Nat. Mater. 22, 1556–1563 (2023).10.1038/s41563-023-01683-1 ↗
18. Hsia, Y. et al. Design of multi-scale protein complexes by hierarchical building block fusion. Nat. Commun. 12, 2294 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-22276-z ↗
19. Huddy, T. F. et al. Blueprinting extendable nanomaterials with standardized protein blocks. Nature 627, 898–904 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07188-4 ↗
20. Sahtoe, D. D. et al. Reconfigurable asymmetric protein assemblies through implicit negative design. Science 375, eabj7662 (2022).10.1126/science.abj7662 ↗
21. Laniado, J. & Yeates, T. O. A complete rule set for designing symmetry combination materials from protein molecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 31817–31823 (2020).10.1073/pnas.2015183117 ↗
22. Mout, R. et al. De novo design of modular protein hydrogels with programmable intra- and extracellular viscoelasticity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2309457121 (2024).10.1073/pnas.2309457121 ↗
23. Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 ↗
24. Hudmon, A. & Schulman, H. Neuronal Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II: the role of structure and autoregulation in cellular function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 473–510 (2002).10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135410 ↗
25. Hardwick, J. M. & Soane, L. Multiple functions of BCL-2 family proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a008722 (2013).10.1101/cshperspect.a008722 ↗
26. Furukawa, H., Cordova, K. E., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 341, 1230444 (2013).10.1126/science.1230444 ↗
27. Sheffler, W. et al. Fast and versatile sequence-independent protein docking for nanomaterials design using RPXDock. PLoS Comput. Biol. 19, e1010680 (2023).10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010680 ↗
28. Kibler, R. D. et al. Design of pseudosymmetric protein hetero-oligomers. Nat. Comm. 15, 10684 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-54913-8 ↗
29. Johnson, J. E. & Speir, J. A. Quasi-equivalent viruses: a paradigm for protein assemblies. J. Mol. Biol. 269, 665–675 (1997).10.1006/jmbi.1997.1068 ↗
30. Hess, H. & Ross, J. L. Non-equilibrium assembly of microtubules: from molecules to autonomous chemical robots. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 5570–5587 (2017).10.1039/C7CS00030H ↗
31. Rankovic, S. et al. Computational design of bifaceted protein nanomaterials with tailorable properties. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.18.619149 (2024).10.1101/2024.10.18.619149 ↗
32. Linghu, C. et al. Recording of cellular physiological histories along optically readable self-assembling protein chains. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 640–651 (2023).10.1038/s41587-022-01586-7 ↗
33. Chen, Z. et al. De novo design of protein logic gates. Science 368, 78–84 (2020).10.1126/science.aay2790 ↗
34. Seeman, N. C. & Sleiman, H. F. DNA nanotechnology. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 17068 (2017).10.1038/natrevmats.2017.68 ↗
35. Adleman, L. M. Molecular computation of solutions to combinatorial problems. Science 266, 1021–1024 (1994).10.1126/science.7973651 ↗
36. Boyken, S. E. et al. De novo design of protein homo-oligomers with modular hydrogen-bond network–mediated specificity. Science 352, 680–687 (2016).10.1126/science.aad8865 ↗
37. Fallas, J. A. et al. Computational design of self-assembling cyclic protein homo-oligomers. Nat. Chem. 9, 353–360 (2017).10.1038/nchem.2673 ↗
38. Boyken, S. E. et al. De novo design of tunable, pH-driven conformational changes. Science 364, 658–664 (2019).10.1126/science.aav7897 ↗
39. Edman, N. I. et al. Modulation of FGF pathway signaling and vascular differentiation using designed oligomeric assemblies. Cell 187, 3726–3740.e43 (2024).10.1016/j.cell.2024.05.025 ↗
40. Dauparas, J. et al. Robust deep learning–based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN. Science 378, 49–56 (2022).10.1126/science.add2187 ↗
41. Fleishman, S. J. et al. RosettaScripts: a scripting language interface to the rosetta macromolecular modeling suite. PLoS ONE 6, e20161 (2011).10.1371/journal.pone.0020161 ↗
42. Suloway, C. et al. Automated molecular microscopy: the new Leginon system. J. Struct. Biol. 151, 41–60 (2005).10.1016/j.jsb.2005.03.010 ↗
43. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).10.1038/nmeth.4169 ↗
44. Bepler, T. et al. Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs. Nat. Methods 16, 1153–1160 (2019).10.1038/s41592-019-0575-8 ↗
45. Punjani, A., Zhang, H. & Fleet, D. J. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Methods 17, 1214–1221 (2020).10.1038/s41592-020-00990-8 ↗
46. Tan, Y. Z. et al. Addressing preferred specimen orientation in single-particle cryo-EM through tilting. Nat. Methods 14, 793–796 (2017).10.1038/nmeth.4347 ↗
47. Huang, C. C., Couch, G. S., Pettersen, E. F. & Ferrin, T. E. Chimera: an extensible molecular modeling application constructed using standard components. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 1, 724–733 (1996).
48. Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Cryst. D75, 861–877 (2019).
49. Hansen, S. Calculation of small-angle scattering profiles using Monte Carlo simulation. J. Appl. Cryst. 23, 344–346 (1990).10.1107/S0021889890002801 ↗
50. Olds, D. P. & Duxbury, P. M. Efficient algorithms for calculating small-angle scattering from large model structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 47, 1077–1086 (2014).10.1107/S1600576714005925 ↗
51. Henke, B. L., Gullikson, E. M. & Davis, J. C. X-ray interactions: photoabsorption, scattering, transmission, and reflection at E = 50–30,000 eV, Z = 1–92. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 54, 181–342 (1993).10.1006/adnd.1993.1013 ↗
52. Wang, S. Protein assemblies design models. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14537927 (2024).10.5281/zenodo.14537927 ↗