Hybrid hydrogel–extracellular matrix scaffolds identify biochemical and mechanical signatures of cardiac ageing
Source abstract
Abstract
Extracellular matrix remodelling of cardiac tissue is a key contributor to age-related cardiovascular disease and dysfunction. Such remodelling is multifaceted including changes to the biochemical composition, architecture and mechanics, clouding our understanding of how and which extracellular matrix properties contribute to a dysfunctional state. Here we describe a decellularized extracellular matrix-synthetic hydrogel hybrid scaffold that independently confers two distinct matrix properties-ligand presentation and stiffness-to cultured cells in vitro, allowing for the identification of their specific roles in cardiac ageing. The hybrid scaffold maintains native matrix composition and organization of young or aged murine cardiac tissue, whereas its mechanical properties can be independently tuned to mimic young or aged tissue stiffness. Seeding these scaffolds with murine primary cardiac fibroblasts, we identify distinct age- and matrix-dependent mechanisms of cardiac fibroblast activation, matrix remodelling and senescence. Importantly, we show that the ligand presentation of a young extracellular matrix can outweigh the profibrotic stiffness cues typically present in an aged extracellular matrix in maintaining or driving cardiac fibroblast quiescence. Ultimately, these tunable scaffolds can enable the discovery of specific extracellular targets to prevent ageing dysfunction and promote rejuvenation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. Nance, M. E. et al. Attenuated sarcomere lengthening of the aged murine left ventricle observed using two-photon fluorescence microscopy. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 309, H918–H925 (2015).10.1152/ajpheart.00315.2015 ↗
2. Ozcebe, S. G., Bahcecioglu, G., Yue, X. S. & Zorlutuna, P. Effect of cellular and ECM aging on human iPSC-derived cardiomyocyte performance, maturity and senescence. Biomaterials 268, 120554 (2021).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120554 ↗
3. Meschiari, C. A., Ero, O. K., Pan, H., Finkel, T. & Lindsey, M. L. The impact of aging on cardiac extracellular matrix. Geroscience 39, 7–18 (2017).10.1007/s11357-017-9959-9 ↗
4. Antia, M., Baneyx, G., Kubow, K. E. & Vogel, V. Fibronectin in aging extracellular matrix fibrils is progressively unfolded by cells and elicits an enhanced rigidity response. Faraday Discuss. 139, 229–249 (2008).10.1039/b718714a ↗
5. Yokota, T. et al. Type V collagen in scar tissue regulates the size of scar after heart injury. Cell 182, 545–562 (2020).10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.030 ↗
6. Herum, K. M., Choppe, J., Kumar, A., Engler, A. J. & McCulloch, A. D. Mechanical regulation of cardiac fibroblast profibrotic phenotypes. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 1871–1882 (2017).10.1091/mbc.e17-01-0014 ↗
7. Wang, Z. et al. Snake venom-defined fibrin architecture dictates fibroblast survival and differentiation. Nat. Commun. 14, 1029 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-36437-9 ↗
8. Tomasek, J. J., Gabbiani, G., Hinz, B., Chaponnier, C. & Brown, R. A. Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Bio. 3, 349–363 (2002).10.1038/nrm809 ↗
9. Talman, V. & Ruskoaho, H. Cardiac fibrosis in myocardial infarction—from repair and remodeling to regeneration. Cell Tissue Res. 365, 563–581 (2016).10.1007/s00441-016-2431-9 ↗
10. Angelini, A., Trial, J., Ortiz-Urbina, J. & Cieslik, K. A. Mechanosensing dysregulation in the fibroblast: a hallmark of the aging heart. Ageing Res. Rev. 63, 101150 (2020).10.1016/j.arr.2020.101150 ↗
11. Weber, K. T., Sun, Y., Bhattacharya, S. K., Ahokas, R. A. & Gerling, I. C. Myofibroblast-mediated mechanisms of pathological remodelling of the heart. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 10, 15–26 (2013).10.1038/nrcardio.2012.158 ↗
12. Cieslik, K. A., Trial, J., Carlson, S., Taffet, G. E. & Entman, M. L. Aberrant differentiation of fibroblast progenitors contributes to fibrosis in the aged murine heart: role of elevated circulating insulin levels. Faseb J. 27, 1761–1771 (2013).10.1096/fj.12-220145 ↗
13. Chen, Z. et al. Intrafibrillar crosslinking enables decoupling of mechanical properties and structure of a composite fibrous hydrogel. Adv. Mater. 36, e2305964 (2023).10.1002/adma.202305964 ↗
14. Cunha, C. Bda et al. Influence of the stiffness of three-dimensional alginate/collagen-I interpenetrating networks on fibroblast biology. Biomaterials 35, 8927–8936 (2014).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.047 ↗
15. Berger, A. J., Linsmeier, K. M., Kreeger, P. K. & Masters, K. S. Decoupling the effects of stiffness and fiber density on cellular behaviors via an interpenetrating network of gelatin-methacrylate and collagen. Biomaterials 141, 125–135 (2017).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.039 ↗
16. Chung, K. et al. Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems. Nature 497, 332–337 (2013).10.1038/nature12107 ↗
17. Tse, J. R. & Engler, A. J. Preparation of hydrogel substrates with tunable mechanical properties. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 47, 10.16.1–10.16.16 (2010).10.1002/0471143030.cb1016s47 ↗
18. Crapo, P. M., Gilbert, T. W. & Badylak, S. F. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials 32, 3233–3243 (2011).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057 ↗
19. Großkopf, H. et al. Identification of intracellular glycosaminoglycan-interacting proteins by affinity purification mass spectrometry. Biol. Chem. 402, 1427–1440 (2021).10.1515/hsz-2021-0167 ↗
20. Wershof, E. et al. A FIJI macro for quantifying pattern in extracellular matrix. Life Sci. Alliance 4, e202000880 (2021).10.26508/lsa.202000880 ↗
21. Chaudhuri, O., Cooper-White, J., Janmey, P. A., Mooney, D. J. & Shenoy, V. B. Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour. Nature 584, 535–546 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2612-2 ↗
22. Ma, Y. et al. Viscoelastic cell microenvironment: hydrogel‐based strategy for recapitulating dynamic ECM mechanics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2100848 (2021).10.1002/adfm.202100848 ↗
23. Bovio, S., Long, Y. & Monéger, F. Use of atomic force microscopy to measure mechanical properties and turgor pressure of plant cells and plant tissues. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/59674 (2019).10.3791/59674 ↗
24. Nakayama, K. H., Batchelder, C. A., Lee, C. I. & Tarantal, A. F. Decellularized rhesus monkey kidney as a three-dimensional scaffold for renal tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. A 16, 2207–2216 (2010).10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0602 ↗
25. Fathi, I. et al. Decellularized whole-organ pre-vascularization: a novel approach for organogenesis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 756755 (2021).10.3389/fbioe.2021.756755 ↗
26. Sun, A. R., Hengst, R. M. & Young, J. L. All the small things: nanoscale matrix alterations in aging tissues. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 87, 102322 (2024).10.1016/j.ceb.2024.102322 ↗
27. Jeong, D. et al. Matricellular protein CCN5 reverses established cardiac fibrosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 67, 1556–1568 (2016).10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.030 ↗
28. Chen, M. S., Lee, R. T. & Garbern, J. C. Senescence mechanisms and targets in the heart. Cardiovasc. Res. 118, 1173–1187 (2021).10.1093/cvr/cvab161 ↗
29. Pesce, M. et al. Cardiac fibroblasts and mechanosensation in heart development, health and disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 20, 309–324 (2022).10.1038/s41569-022-00799-2 ↗
30. Sun, S.-N. et al. G-MDSCs promote aging-related cardiac fibrosis by activating myofibroblasts and preventing senescence. Cell Death Dis. 12, 594 (2021).10.1038/s41419-021-03874-7 ↗
31. Zhang, Y. et al. Cellinker: a platform of ligand–receptor interactions for intercellular communication analysis. Bioinformatics 37, 2025–2032 (2021).10.1093/bioinformatics/btab036 ↗
32. Kanchanawong, P. & Calderwood, D. A. Organization, dynamics and mechanoregulation of integrin-mediated cell–ECM adhesions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 142–161 (2022).10.1038/s41580-022-00531-5 ↗
33. He, J., Fang, B., Shan, S. & Li, Q. Mechanical stiffness promotes skin fibrosis through piezo1-mediated arginine and proline metabolism. Cell Death Discov. 9, 354 (2023).10.1038/s41420-023-01656-y ↗
34. Rao, L.-Z. et al. IL-24 deficiency protects mice against bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by repressing IL-4-induced M2 program in macrophages. Cell Death Differ. 28, 1270–1283 (2021).10.1038/s41418-020-00650-6 ↗
35. Goldsmith, E. C., Bradshaw, A. D., Zile, M. R. & Spinale, F. G. Myocardial fibroblast–matrix interactions and potential therapeutic targets. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 70, 92–99 (2014).10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.01.008 ↗
36. Li, R. & Frangogiannis, N. G. Integrins in cardiac fibrosis. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 172, 1–13 (2022).10.1016/j.yjmcc.2022.07.006 ↗
37. Roca-Cusachs, P., Gauthier, N. C., Rio, Adel & Sheetz, M. P. Clustering of α5β1 integrins determines adhesion strength whereas αvβ3 and talin enable mechanotransduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16245–16250 (2009).10.1073/pnas.0902818106 ↗
38. Schiller, H. B. et al. β1- and αv-class integrins cooperate to regulate myosin II during rigidity sensing of fibronectin-based microenvironments. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 625–636 (2013).10.1038/ncb2747 ↗
39. Stanton, A. E., Tong, X. & Yang, F. Extracellular matrix type modulates mechanotransduction of stem cells. Acta Biomater. 96, 310–320 (2019).10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.048 ↗
40. Ma, Y., Iyer, R. P., Jung, M., Czubryt, M. P. & Lindsey, M. L. Cardiac fibroblast activation post-myocardial infarction: current knowledge gaps. Trends Pharm. Sci. 38, 448–458 (2017).10.1016/j.tips.2017.03.001 ↗
41. Bugg, D. et al. Infarct collagen topography regulates fibroblast fate via p38-yes-associated protein transcriptional enhanced associate domain signals. Circ. Res. 127, 1306–1322 (2020).10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.316162 ↗
42. Ozcebe, S. G. & Zorlutuna, P. In need of age‐appropriate cardiac models: impact of cell age on extracellular matrix therapy outcomes. Aging Cell 22, e13966 (2023).10.1111/acel.13966 ↗
43. Cho, S., Discher, D. E., Leong, K. W., Vunjak-Novakovic, G. & Wu, J. C. Challenges and opportunities for the next generation of cardiovascular tissue engineering. Nat. Methods 19, 1064–1071 (2022).10.1038/s41592-022-01591-3 ↗
44. Klein, J. et al. Proteasix: a tool for automated and large‐scale prediction of proteases involved in naturally occurring peptide generation. Proteomics 13, 1077–1082 (2013).
45. Devarasou, S., Kang, M., Kwon, T. Y., Cho, Y. & Shin, J. H. Fibrous matrix architecture-dependent activation of fibroblasts with a cancer-associated fibroblast-like phenotype. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 9, 280–291 (2023).10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00694 ↗
46. DeLeon-Pennell, K. Y., Meschiari, C. A., Jung, M. & Lindsey, M. L. Chapter two—matrix metalloproteinases in myocardial infarction and heart failure. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 147, 75–100 (2017).10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.02.001 ↗
47. Mizuno, T., Yau, T. M., Weisel, R. D., Kiani, C. G. & Li, R.-K. Elastin stabilizes an infarct and preserves ventricular function. Circulation 112, I81–I88 (2005).10.1161/01.CIRCULATIONAHA.105.523795 ↗
48. Meyer, K., Hodwin, B., Ramanujam, D., Engelhardt, S. & Sarikas, A. Essential role for premature senescence of myofibroblasts in myocardial fibrosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 67, 2018–2028 (2016).10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.047 ↗
49. Zhu, F. et al. Senescent cardiac fibroblast is critical for cardiac fibrosis after myocardial infarction. PLoS ONE 8, e74535 (2013).10.1371/journal.pone.0074535 ↗
50. Coppé, J.-P., Desprez, P.-Y., Krtolica, A. & Campisi, J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 5, 99–118 (2010).10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144 ↗
51. DePalma, S. J. et al. Matrix architecture and mechanics regulate myofibril organization, costamere assembly, and contractility in engineered myocardial microtissues. Adv. Sci. 11, 2309740 (2024).10.1002/advs.202309740 ↗
52. Basara, G., Ozcebe, S. G., Ellis, B. W. & Zorlutuna, P. Tunable human myocardium derived decellularized extracellular matrix for 3D bioprinting and cardiac tissue engineering. Gels 7, 70 (2021).10.3390/gels7020070 ↗
53. Kim, H. et al. Light‐activated decellularized extracellular matrix‐based bioinks for volumetric tissue analogs at the centimeter scale. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2011252 (2021).10.1002/adfm.202011252 ↗
54. Spang, M. T. et al. Intravascularly infused extracellular matrix as a biomaterial for targeting and treating inflamed tissues. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 7, 94–109 (2023).10.1038/s41551-022-00964-5 ↗
55. Umehara, T. et al. Female reproductive life span is extended by targeted removal of fibrotic collagen from the mouse ovary. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn4564 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.abn4564 ↗
56. Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L. & Discher, D. E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677–689 (2006).10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
57. Hadden, W. J. et al. Stem cell migration and mechanotransduction on linear stiffness gradient hydrogels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5647–5652 (2017).10.1073/pnas.1618239114 ↗
58. Iskratsch, T., Wolfenson, H. & Sheetz, M. P. Appreciating force and shape—the rise of mechanotransduction in cell biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 825–833 (2014).10.1038/nrm3903 ↗
59. Min, S. et al. Versatile human cardiac tissues engineered with perfusable heart extracellular microenvironment for biomedical applications. Nat. Commun. 15, 2564 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-46928-y ↗
60. Russo, J. D. et al. Integrin α5β1 nano-presentation regulates collective keratinocyte migration independent of substrate rigidity. eLife 10, e69861 (2021).10.7554/eLife.69861 ↗
61. Trappmann, B. et al. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat. Mater. 11, 642–649 (2012).10.1038/nmat3339 ↗
62. Young, J. L. & Engler, A. J. Hydrogels with time-dependent material properties enhance cardiomyocyte differentiation in vitro. Biomaterials 32, 1002–1009 (2011).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.020 ↗
63. Walker, C. J. et al. Nuclear mechanosensing drives chromatin remodelling in persistently activated fibroblasts. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 1485–1499 (2021).10.1038/s41551-021-00709-w ↗
64. Hwang, J. et al. Molecular assessment of collagen denaturation in decellularized tissues using a collagen hybridizing peptide. Acta Biomater. 53, 268–278 (2017).10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.079 ↗
65. Aper, S. J. A. et al. Colorful protein-based fluorescent probes for collagen imaging. PLoS ONE 9, e114983 (2014).10.1371/journal.pone.0114983 ↗
66. Ackers-Johnson, M. & Foo, R. S. Langendorff-free isolation and propagation of adult mouse cardiomyocytes. Methods Mol. Biol. 1940, 193–204 (2019).10.1007/978-1-4939-9086-3_14 ↗
67. Bolte, S. & Cordelières, F. P. A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy. J. Microsc. 224, 213–232 (2006).10.1111/j.1365-2818.2006.01706.x ↗
68. Chen, C. et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 13, 1194–1202 (2020).10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009 ↗
69. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 ↗
70. Wu, T. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation 2, 100141 (2021).
71. Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y. & He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287 (2012).10.1089/omi.2011.0118 ↗
72. Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).10.1006/meth.2001.1262 ↗
73. Ting, O. H. Hybrid hydrogel-extracellular matrix scaffolds identify biochemical and mechanical signatures of cardiac aging. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15080541 (2025).10.5281/zenodo.15080541 ↗