Suppressing argyrodite oxidation by tuning the host structure for high-areal-capacity all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Argyrodite (Li6PS5Cl) is a promising electrolyte for high-performance solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries (SSSBs), which operate on the reversible conversion of S↔Li2S. However, argyrodite is electrochemically decomposed above 2.5 V versus Li+/Li on charge, because free S2- ions in the lattice are oxidized to sulfur at a similar potential as Li2S. Here we demonstrate that creating a strong interaction between the Li ions in argyrodite and the sulfur host synergistically suppresses the oxidation of argyrodite by inhibiting the extraction of Li+ in the initial step. A carbon nitride/N-doped graphene host serves as a proof of concept to demonstrate this effect. Additionally, its moderate electron transport enables SSSB operation and constrains electron mobility at the argyrodite interface. Consequently, SSSBs utilizing this host deliver excellent rate capability and stable long-term cycling compared with non-polar carbon materials. An areal capacity of 2 mAh cm-2 was achieved over 230 cycles at room temperature, whereas a high capacity of 11.3 mAh cm-2 was obtained with 90% retention at 60 °C. The descriptors presented here could enrich the understanding of solid electrolyte redox activities and guide interface and materials design in SSSBs.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J. & Tarascon, J.-M. Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage. Nat. Mater. 11, 19–29 (2012).10.1038/nmat3191 ↗
2. Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S. H., Zu, C. & Su, Y. S. Rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Rev. 114, 11751–11787 (2014).10.1021/cr500062v ↗
3. Gu, J. et al. Advances in sulfide-based all-solid-state lithium-sulfur battery: materials, composite electrodes and electrochemo-mechanical effects. Chem. Eng J. 454, 139923 (2023).10.1016/j.cej.2022.139923 ↗
4. Phuc, N. H. H., Hikima, K., Muto, H. & Matsuda, A. Recent developments in materials design for all-solid-state Li–S batteries. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 47, 283–308 (2021).10.1080/10408436.2021.1886045 ↗
5. Liu, J. et al. The interface between Li6.5La3Zr1.5Ta0.5O12 and liquid electrolyte. Joule 4, 101–108 (2020).10.1016/j.joule.2019.10.001 ↗
6. Xu, S. et al. A high capacity all solid‐state Li‐sulfur battery enabled by conversion‐intercalation hybrid cathode architecture. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2004239 (2020).10.1002/adfm.202004239 ↗
7. Adeli, P. et al. Boosting solid-state diffusivity and conductivity in lithium superionic argyrodites by halide substitution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 8681–8686 (2019).10.1002/anie.201814222 ↗
8. Zhou, L., Minafra, N., Zeier, W. G. & Nazar, L. F. Innovative approaches to Li-argyrodite solid electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 2717–2728 (2021).10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00874 ↗
9. Ohno, S. & Zeier, W. G. Toward practical solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries: challenges and perspectives. Acc. Mater. Res. 2, 869–880 (2021).10.1021/accountsmr.1c00116 ↗
10. Ohno, S., Rosenbach, C., Dewald, G. F., Janek, J. & Zeier, W. G. Linking solid electrolyte degradation to charge carrier transport in the thiophosphate-based composite cathode toward solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2010620 (2021).10.1002/adfm.202010620 ↗
11. Zhu, Y., He, X. & Mo, Y. Origin of outstanding stability in the lithium solid electrolyte materials: insights from thermodynamic analyses based on first-principles calculations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 23685–23693 (2015).10.1021/acsami.5b07517 ↗
12. Nagao, M. et al. All-solid-state Li–sulfur batteries with mesoporous electrode and thio-LISICON solid electrolyte. J. Power Sources 222, 237–242 (2013).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.041 ↗
13. Ji, X., Lee, K. T. & Nazar, L. F. A highly ordered nanostructured carbon-sulphur cathode for lithium-sulphur batteries. Nat. Mater. 8, 500–506 (2009).10.1038/nmat2460 ↗
14. Shao, B., Huang, Y. & Han, F. Electronic conductivity of lithium solid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2204098 (2023).10.1002/aenm.202204098 ↗
15. Zhou, L. et al. High areal capacity, long cycle life 4 V ceramic all-solid-state Li-ion batteries enabled by chloride solid electrolytes. Nat. Energy 7, 83–93 (2022).10.1038/s41560-021-00952-0 ↗
16. Yin, Y.-C. et al. A LaCl3-based lithium superionic conductor compatible with lithium metal. Nature 616, 77–83 (2023).10.1038/s41586-023-05899-8 ↗
17. Schwietert, T. K. et al. Clarifying the relationship between redox activity and electrochemical stability in solid electrolytes. Nat. Mater. 19, 428–435 (2020).10.1038/s41563-019-0576-0 ↗
18. Zhang, L. et al. Single nickel atoms on nitrogen-doped graphene enabling enhanced kinetics of lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 31, e1903955 (2019).10.1002/adma.201903955 ↗
19. Zhao, M. et al. Electrochemical phase evolution of metal-based pre-catalysts for high-rate polysulfide conversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 9011–9017 (2020).10.1002/anie.202003136 ↗
20. Shen, Z. et al. Rational design of a Ni3N0.85 electrocatalyst to accelerate polysulfide conversion in lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Nano 14, 6673–6682 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.9b09371 ↗
21. Tang, C. et al. Nitrogen-doped aligned carbon nanotube/graphene sandwiches: facile catalytic growth on bifunctional natural catalysts and their applications as scaffolds for high-rate lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 26, 6100–6105 (2014).10.1002/adma.201401243 ↗
22. Zhang, Z. et al. Tantalum-based electrocatalyst for polysulfide catalysis and retention for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Matter 3, 920–934 (2020).10.1016/j.matt.2020.06.002 ↗
23. Xiang, M. et al. A flexible 3D multifunctional MgO-decorated carbon foam@CNTs hybrid as self-supported cathode for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1702573 (2017).10.1002/adfm.201702573 ↗
24. Fretz, S. J., Pal, U., Girard, G. M. A., Howlett, P. C. & Palmqvist, A. E. C. Lithium sulfonate functionalization of carbon cathodes as a substitute for lithium nitrate in the electrolyte of lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2002485 (2020).10.1002/adfm.202002485 ↗
25. Liu, L. et al. Confinement and electrocatalysis of cerium fluoride nanocages to boost the lithium–sulfur batteries performance. Small Struct. 3, 2200050 (2022).10.1002/sstr.202200050 ↗
26. Pang, Q. & Nazar, L. F. Long-life and high-areal-capacity Li–S batteries enabled by a light-weight polar host with intrinsic polysulfide adsorption. ACS Nano 10, 4111–4118 (2016).10.1021/acsnano.5b07347 ↗
27. Pang, Q., Liang, X., Kwok, C. Y., Kulisch, J. & Nazar, L. F. A comprehensive approach toward stable lithium–sulfur batteries with high volumetric energy density. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1601630 (2016).10.1002/aenm.201601630 ↗
28. Zuo, T. T. et al. Impact of the chlorination of lithium argyrodites on the electrolyte/cathode interface in solid-state batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202213228 (2023).10.1002/anie.202213228 ↗
29. Wang, C. et al. All-solid-state lithium batteries enabled by sulfide electrolytes: from fundamental research to practical engineering design. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 2577–2619 (2021).10.1039/D1EE00551K ↗
30. Tan, D. H. S. et al. Elucidating reversible electrochemical redox of Li6PS5Cl solid electrolyte. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 2418–2427 (2019).10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01693 ↗
31. Walther, F. et al. Visualization of the interfacial decomposition of composite cathodes in argyrodite-based all-solid-state batteries using time-of-flight secondary-ion mass spectrometry. Chem. Mater. 31, 3745–3755 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00770 ↗
32. Peng, H.-J. et al. Strongly coupled interfaces between a heterogeneous carbon host and a sulfur-containing guest for highly stable lithium-sulfur batteries: mechanistic insight into capacity degradation. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 1, 1400227 (2014).10.1002/admi.201400227 ↗
33. Song, J., Yu, Z., Gordin, M. L. & Wang, D. Advanced sulfur cathode enabled by highly crumpled nitrogen-doped graphene sheets for high-energy-density lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Lett. 16, 864–870 (2016).10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03217 ↗
34. Pang, Q. et al. A nitrogen and sulfur dual-doped carbon derived from polyrhodanine@cellulose for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 27, 6021–6028 (2015).10.1002/adma.201502467 ↗
35. Liu, J. et al. A graphene-like oxygenated carbon nitride material for improved cycle-life lithium/sulfur batteries. Nano Lett. 15, 5137–5142 (2015).10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01919 ↗
36. Guo, Y. et al. An autotransferable g-C3N4 Li+-modulating layer toward stable lithium anodes. Adv. Mater. 31, 1900342 (2019).10.1002/adma.201900342 ↗
37. Yu, W., Yu, Z., Cui, Y. & Bao, Z. Degradation and speciation of Li salts during XPS analysis for battery research. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 3270–3275 (2022).10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01587 ↗
38. Sharma, J., Gora, T., Rimstidt, J. D. & Staley, R. X-ray photoelectron spectra of the alkali azides. Chem. Phys. Lett. 15, 232–235 (1972).10.1016/0009-2614(72)80156-8 ↗
39. Zhang, J. et al. Microemulsion assisted assembly of 3D porous S/graphene@g-C3N4 hybrid sponge as free-standing cathodes for high energy density Li–S batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1702839 (2018).10.1002/aenm.201702839 ↗
40. Jin, Y. et al. High-energy-density solid-electrolyte-based liquid Li-S and Li-Se batteries. Joule 4, 262–274 (2020).10.1016/j.joule.2019.09.003 ↗
41. Zhou, J. et al. Healable and conductive sulfur iodide for solid-state Li–S batteries. Nature 627, 301–305 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07101-z ↗
42. Zhao, L. et al. Taming metal–solid electrolyte interface instability via metal strain hardening. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2300679 (2023).10.1002/aenm.202300679 ↗
43. Pan, H. et al. Carbon-free and binder-free Li-Al alloy anode enabling an all-solid-state Li-S battery with high energy and stability. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn4372 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.abn4372 ↗
44. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
45. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
46. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
47. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
48. Ong, S. P. et al. Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
49. Tkatchenko, A. & Scheffler, M. Accurate molecular van der Waals interactions from ground-state electron density and free-atom reference data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 073005 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.073005 ↗
50. Zvereva, E., Caliste, D. & Pochet, P. Interface identification of the solid electrolyte interphase on graphite. Carbon 111, 789–795 (2017).10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.063 ↗