journal article·2023-07

Ambipolar charge-transfer graphene plasmonic cavities

Brian S. Y. Kim, Aaron J. Sternbach, Min Sup Choi, Zhiyuan Sun, Francesco L. Ruta, Yinming Shao, Alexander S. McLeod, Lin Xiong, Yinan Dong, Ted S. Chung, Anjaly Rajendran, Song Liu, Ankur Nipane, Sang Hoon Chae, Amirali Zangiabadi, Xiaodong Xu, Andrew J. Millis, P. James Schuck, Cory. R. Dean, James C. Hone, D. N. Basov

Nature Materials· Volume 22· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Plasmon polaritons in van der Waals materials hold promise for various photonics applications1-4. The deterministic imprinting of spatial patterns of high carrier density in plasmonic cavities and nanoscale circuitry can enable the realization of advanced nonlinear nanophotonic5 and strong light-matter interaction platforms6. Here we demonstrate an oxidation-activated charge transfer strategy to program ambipolar low-loss graphene plasmonic structures. By covering graphene with transition-metal dichalcogenides and subsequently oxidizing the transition-metal dichalcogenides into transition-metal oxides, we activate charge transfer rooted in the dissimilar work functions between transition-metal oxides and graphene. Nano-infrared imaging reveals ambipolar low-loss plasmon polaritons at the transition-metal-oxide/graphene interfaces. Further, by inserting dielectric van der Waals spacers, we can precisely control the electron and hole densities induced by oxidation-activated charge transfer and achieve plasmons with a near-intrinsic quality factor. Using this strategy, we imprint plasmonic cavities with laterally abrupt doping profiles with nanoscale precision and demonstrate plasmonic whispering-gallery resonators based on suspended graphene encapsulated in transition-metal oxides.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Grigorenko, A. N., Polini, M. & Novoselov, K. S. Graphene plasmonics. Nat. Photon. 6, 749–758 (2012).10.1038/nphoton.2012.262 ↗
2. Basov, D. N., Fogler, M. M. & García de Abajo, F. J. Polaritons in van der Waals materials. Science 354, aag1992 (2016).10.1126/science.aag1992 ↗
3. Cox, J. D. & García de Abajo, F. J. Nonlinear graphene nanoplasmonics. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 2536–2547 (2019).10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00308 ↗
4. Zhang, Q. et al. Interface nano-optics with van der Waals polaritons. Nature 597, 187–195 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03581-5 ↗
5. Min, B. et al. High-Q surface-plasmon-polariton whispering-gallery microcavity. Nature 457, 455–458 (2009).10.1038/nature07627 ↗
6. Yoshie, T. et al. Vacuum Rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity. Nature 432, 200–203 (2004).10.1038/nature03119 ↗
7. Shalaev, M. I., Walasik, W., Tsukernik, A., Xu, Y. & Litchinitser, N. M. Robust topologically protected transport in photonic crystals at telecommunication wavelengths. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 31–34 (2019).10.1038/s41565-018-0297-6 ↗
8. Hübener, H. et al. Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities. Nat. Mater. 20, 438–442 (2021).10.1038/s41563-020-00801-7 ↗
9. Brar, V. W. et al. Highly confined tunable mid-infrared plasmonics in graphene nanoresonators. ACS Nano 13, 2541–2547 (2013).
10. Yan, H. et al. Damping pathways of mid-infrared plasmons in graphene nanostructures. Nat. Photon. 7, 394–399 (2013).10.1038/nphoton.2013.57 ↗
11. Nikitin, A. Y. et al. Real-space mapping of tailored sheet and edge plasmons in graphene nanoresonators. Nat. Photon. 10, 239–243 (2016).10.1038/nphoton.2016.44 ↗
12. Xiong, L. et al. Photonic crystal for graphene plasmons. Nat. Commun. 10, 4780 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-12778-2 ↗
13. Rizzo, D. J. et al. Charge-transfer plasmon polaritons at graphene/α-RuCl3 interfaces. Nano Lett. 20, 8438–8445 (2020).10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03466 ↗
14. Zhang, L. M. & Fogler, M. M. Nonlinear screening and ballistic transport in a graphene p–n junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116804 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.116804 ↗
15. Sheinfux, H. H. et al. Bound in the continuum modes in indirectly-patterned hyperbolic media. Preprint at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-385236/v1 (2021).10.21203/rs.3.rs-385236/v1 ↗
16. Choi, M. S. et al. High carrier mobility in graphene doped using a monolayer of tungsten oxyselenide. Nat. Electron. 4, 731–739 (2021).10.1038/s41928-021-00657-y ↗
17. Sen, H. S., Sahin, H., Peeters, F. M. & Durgun, E. Monolayers of MoS2 as an oxidation protective nanocoating material. J. Appl. Phys. 116, 083508 (2014).10.1063/1.4893790 ↗
18. Rietwyk, K. J. et al. Universal work function of metal oxides exposed to air. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 6, 1802058 (2019).10.1002/admi.201802058 ↗
19. Greiner, M. T. & Lu, Z.-H. Thin-film metal oxides in organic semiconductor devices: their electronic structures, work functions and interfaces. NPG Asia Mater. 5, e55 (2013).10.1038/am.2013.29 ↗
20. Ni, G. X. et al. Fundamental limits to graphene plasmonics. Nature 557, 530–533 (2018).10.1038/s41586-018-0136-9 ↗
21. Kim, K. et al. Band alignment in WSe2–graphene heterostructures. ACS Nano 9, 4527–4532 (2015).10.1021/acsnano.5b01114 ↗
22. Mews, M., Korte, L. & Rech, B. Oxygen vacancies in tungsten oxide and their influence on tungsten oxide/silicon heterojunction solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 158, 77–83 (2016).10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.042 ↗
23. Woessner, A. et al. Highly confined low-loss plasmons in graphene–boron nitride heterostructures. Nat. Mater. 14, 421–425 (2015).10.1038/nmat4169 ↗
24. Fei, Z. et al. Gate-tuning of graphene plasmons revealed by infrared nano-imaging. Nature 487, 82–85 (2012).10.1038/nature11253 ↗
25. Kechedzhi, K. & Das Sarma, S. Plasmon anomaly in the dynamical optical conductivity of graphene. Phys. Rev. B 88, 085403 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.88.085403 ↗
26. Hu, H. et al. Active control of micrometer plasmon propagation in suspended graphene. Nat. Commun. 13, 1465 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-28786-8 ↗
27. Miroshnichenko, A. E., Flach, S. & Kivshar, Y. S. Fano resonance in nanoscale structures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2257–2298 (2010).10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2257 ↗
28. Zhu, J. et al. On-chip single nanoparticle detection and sizing by mode splitting in an ultrahigh-Q microresonator. Nat. Photon. 4, 46–49 (2010).10.1038/nphoton.2009.237 ↗
29. Aspelmeyer, M. et al. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391–1452 (2014).10.1103/RevModPhys.86.1391 ↗
30. Zheng, Z. et al. A mid-infrared biaxial hyperbolic van der Waals crystal. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav8690 (2019).10.1126/sciadv.aav8690 ↗
31. Akinwande, D. et al. Graphene and two-dimensional materials for silicon technology. Nature 573, 507–518 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1573-9 ↗
32. Kayes, B. M. & Atwater, H. A. Comparison of the device physics principle of planar and radial p-n junction nanorod solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 114302 (2005).10.1063/1.1901835 ↗
33. Lundeberg, M. B. et al. Thermoelectric detection and imaging of propagating graphene plasmons. Nat. Mater. 16, 204–207 (2017).10.1038/nmat4755 ↗
34. Jing, R. et al. Terahertz response of monolayer and few-layer WTe2 at the nanoscale. Nat. Commun. 12, 5594 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-23933-z ↗