Ambipolar charge-transfer graphene plasmonic cavities
Source abstract
Abstract
Plasmon polaritons in van der Waals materials hold promise for various photonics applications1-4. The deterministic imprinting of spatial patterns of high carrier density in plasmonic cavities and nanoscale circuitry can enable the realization of advanced nonlinear nanophotonic5 and strong light-matter interaction platforms6. Here we demonstrate an oxidation-activated charge transfer strategy to program ambipolar low-loss graphene plasmonic structures. By covering graphene with transition-metal dichalcogenides and subsequently oxidizing the transition-metal dichalcogenides into transition-metal oxides, we activate charge transfer rooted in the dissimilar work functions between transition-metal oxides and graphene. Nano-infrared imaging reveals ambipolar low-loss plasmon polaritons at the transition-metal-oxide/graphene interfaces. Further, by inserting dielectric van der Waals spacers, we can precisely control the electron and hole densities induced by oxidation-activated charge transfer and achieve plasmons with a near-intrinsic quality factor. Using this strategy, we imprint plasmonic cavities with laterally abrupt doping profiles with nanoscale precision and demonstrate plasmonic whispering-gallery resonators based on suspended graphene encapsulated in transition-metal oxides.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Grigorenko, A. N., Polini, M. & Novoselov, K. S. Graphene plasmonics. Nat. Photon. 6, 749–758 (2012).10.1038/nphoton.2012.262 ↗
2. Basov, D. N., Fogler, M. M. & García de Abajo, F. J. Polaritons in van der Waals materials. Science 354, aag1992 (2016).10.1126/science.aag1992 ↗
3. Cox, J. D. & García de Abajo, F. J. Nonlinear graphene nanoplasmonics. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 2536–2547 (2019).10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00308 ↗
4. Zhang, Q. et al. Interface nano-optics with van der Waals polaritons. Nature 597, 187–195 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03581-5 ↗
5. Min, B. et al. High-Q surface-plasmon-polariton whispering-gallery microcavity. Nature 457, 455–458 (2009).10.1038/nature07627 ↗
6. Yoshie, T. et al. Vacuum Rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity. Nature 432, 200–203 (2004).10.1038/nature03119 ↗
7. Shalaev, M. I., Walasik, W., Tsukernik, A., Xu, Y. & Litchinitser, N. M. Robust topologically protected transport in photonic crystals at telecommunication wavelengths. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 31–34 (2019).10.1038/s41565-018-0297-6 ↗
8. Hübener, H. et al. Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities. Nat. Mater. 20, 438–442 (2021).10.1038/s41563-020-00801-7 ↗
9. Brar, V. W. et al. Highly confined tunable mid-infrared plasmonics in graphene nanoresonators. ACS Nano 13, 2541–2547 (2013).
10. Yan, H. et al. Damping pathways of mid-infrared plasmons in graphene nanostructures. Nat. Photon. 7, 394–399 (2013).10.1038/nphoton.2013.57 ↗
11. Nikitin, A. Y. et al. Real-space mapping of tailored sheet and edge plasmons in graphene nanoresonators. Nat. Photon. 10, 239–243 (2016).10.1038/nphoton.2016.44 ↗
12. Xiong, L. et al. Photonic crystal for graphene plasmons. Nat. Commun. 10, 4780 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-12778-2 ↗
13. Rizzo, D. J. et al. Charge-transfer plasmon polaritons at graphene/α-RuCl3 interfaces. Nano Lett. 20, 8438–8445 (2020).10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03466 ↗
14. Zhang, L. M. & Fogler, M. M. Nonlinear screening and ballistic transport in a graphene p–n junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116804 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.116804 ↗
15. Sheinfux, H. H. et al. Bound in the continuum modes in indirectly-patterned hyperbolic media. Preprint at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-385236/v1 (2021).10.21203/rs.3.rs-385236/v1 ↗
16. Choi, M. S. et al. High carrier mobility in graphene doped using a monolayer of tungsten oxyselenide. Nat. Electron. 4, 731–739 (2021).10.1038/s41928-021-00657-y ↗
17. Sen, H. S., Sahin, H., Peeters, F. M. & Durgun, E. Monolayers of MoS2 as an oxidation protective nanocoating material. J. Appl. Phys. 116, 083508 (2014).10.1063/1.4893790 ↗
18. Rietwyk, K. J. et al. Universal work function of metal oxides exposed to air. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 6, 1802058 (2019).10.1002/admi.201802058 ↗
19. Greiner, M. T. & Lu, Z.-H. Thin-film metal oxides in organic semiconductor devices: their electronic structures, work functions and interfaces. NPG Asia Mater. 5, e55 (2013).10.1038/am.2013.29 ↗
20. Ni, G. X. et al. Fundamental limits to graphene plasmonics. Nature 557, 530–533 (2018).10.1038/s41586-018-0136-9 ↗
21. Kim, K. et al. Band alignment in WSe2–graphene heterostructures. ACS Nano 9, 4527–4532 (2015).10.1021/acsnano.5b01114 ↗
22. Mews, M., Korte, L. & Rech, B. Oxygen vacancies in tungsten oxide and their influence on tungsten oxide/silicon heterojunction solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 158, 77–83 (2016).10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.042 ↗
23. Woessner, A. et al. Highly confined low-loss plasmons in graphene–boron nitride heterostructures. Nat. Mater. 14, 421–425 (2015).10.1038/nmat4169 ↗
24. Fei, Z. et al. Gate-tuning of graphene plasmons revealed by infrared nano-imaging. Nature 487, 82–85 (2012).10.1038/nature11253 ↗
25. Kechedzhi, K. & Das Sarma, S. Plasmon anomaly in the dynamical optical conductivity of graphene. Phys. Rev. B 88, 085403 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.88.085403 ↗
26. Hu, H. et al. Active control of micrometer plasmon propagation in suspended graphene. Nat. Commun. 13, 1465 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-28786-8 ↗
27. Miroshnichenko, A. E., Flach, S. & Kivshar, Y. S. Fano resonance in nanoscale structures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2257–2298 (2010).10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2257 ↗
28. Zhu, J. et al. On-chip single nanoparticle detection and sizing by mode splitting in an ultrahigh-Q microresonator. Nat. Photon. 4, 46–49 (2010).10.1038/nphoton.2009.237 ↗
29. Aspelmeyer, M. et al. Cavity optomechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391–1452 (2014).10.1103/RevModPhys.86.1391 ↗
30. Zheng, Z. et al. A mid-infrared biaxial hyperbolic van der Waals crystal. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav8690 (2019).10.1126/sciadv.aav8690 ↗
31. Akinwande, D. et al. Graphene and two-dimensional materials for silicon technology. Nature 573, 507–518 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1573-9 ↗
32. Kayes, B. M. & Atwater, H. A. Comparison of the device physics principle of planar and radial p-n junction nanorod solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 114302 (2005).10.1063/1.1901835 ↗
33. Lundeberg, M. B. et al. Thermoelectric detection and imaging of propagating graphene plasmons. Nat. Mater. 16, 204–207 (2017).10.1038/nmat4755 ↗
34. Jing, R. et al. Terahertz response of monolayer and few-layer WTe2 at the nanoscale. Nat. Commun. 12, 5594 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-23933-z ↗