Instant assembly of collagen for tissue engineering and bioprinting
Source abstract
Abstract
Engineering functional cellular tissue components holds great promise in regenerative medicine. Collagen I, a key scaffolding material in bodily tissues, presents challenges in controlling its assembly kinetics in a biocompatible manner in vitro, restricting its use as a primary scaffold or adhesive in cellular biofabrication. Here we report a collagen fabrication method termed as tunable rapid assembly of collagenous elements that leverages macromolecular crowding to achieve the instant assembly of unmodified collagen. By applying an inert crowder to accelerate the liquid-gel transition of collagen, our method enables the high-throughput creation of physiological collagen constructs across length scales-from micro to macro-and facilitates cell self-assembly and morphogenesis through the generation of tunable multiscale architectural cues. With high biocompatibility and rapid gelation kinetics, the tunable rapid assembly of collagenous elements method also offers a versatile bioprinting approach for collagen over a wide concentration range, enabling the direct printing of cellular tissues using pH-neutral, bioactive collagen bioinks and achieving both structural complexity and biofunctionality. This work broadens the scope of controllable multiscale biofabrication for tissues across various organ systems using unmodified collagen.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Caliari, S. R. & Burdick, J. A. A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture. Nat. Methods 13, 405–414 (2016).10.1038/nmeth.3839 ↗
2. Dong, C. & Lv, Y. Application of collagen scaffold in tissue engineering: recent advances and new perspectives. Polymers 8, 42 (2016).10.3390/polym8020042 ↗
3. Brown, R. A. In the beginning there were soft collagen-cell gels: towards better 3D connective tissue models? Exp. Cell. Res. 319, 2460–2469 (2013).10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.07.001 ↗
4. Hong, H. et al. Multi-scale fabrication techniques of collagen hydrogel for developing physiological 3D in vitro barrier model. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 23, 227–254 (2022).10.1007/s12541-021-00615-w ↗
5. Tran-Ba, K.-H., Lee, D. J., Zhu, J., Paeng, K. & Kaufman, L. J. Confocal rheology probes the structure and mechanics of collagen through the sol-gel transition. Biophys. J. 113, 1882–1892 (2017).10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.025 ↗
6. Holder, A. J. et al. Control of collagen gel mechanical properties through manipulation of gelation conditions near the sol–gel transition. Soft Matter 14, 574–580 (2018).10.1039/C7SM01933E ↗
7. Yaari, A., Schilt, Y., Tamburu, C., Raviv, U. & Shoseyov, O. Wet spinning and drawing of human recombinant collagen. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2, 349–360 (2016).10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00461 ↗
8. Mailand, E. et al. Tissue engineering with mechanically induced solid-fluid transitions. Adv. Mater. 34, 2106149 (2022).10.1002/adma.202106149 ↗
9. Kajave, N. S., Schmitt, T., Nguyen, T.-U. & Kishore, V. Dual crosslinking strategy to generate mechanically viable cell-laden printable constructs using methacrylated collagen bioinks. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 107, 110290 (2020).10.1016/j.msec.2019.110290 ↗
10. Lee, A. et al. 3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart. Science 365, 482–487 (2019).10.1126/science.aav9051 ↗
11. Wolf, K. et al. Physical limits of cell migration: control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J. Cell Biol. 201, 1069–1084 (2013).10.1083/jcb.201210152 ↗
12. Murphy, C. M., Haugh, M. G. & O’Brien, F. J. The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31, 461–466 (2010).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063 ↗
13. Zhang, Y. et al. 3D printed collagen structures at low concentrations supported by jammed microgels. Bioprinting 21, e00121 (2021).10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00121 ↗
14. Hofer, M. & Lutolf, M. P. Engineering organoids. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 402–420 (2021).10.1038/s41578-021-00279-y ↗
15. Seo, B. R. et al. Collagen microarchitecture mechanically controls myofibroblast differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11387–11398 (2020).10.1073/pnas.1919394117 ↗
16. Li, Y., Asadi, A., Monroe, M. R. & Douglas, E. P. pH effects on collagen fibrillogenesis in vitro: electrostatic interactions and phosphate binding. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 29, 1643–1649 (2009).10.1016/j.msec.2009.01.001 ↗
17. Oh, S., Nguyen, Q. D., Chung, K.-H. & Lee, H. Bundling of collagen fibrils using sodium sulfate for biomimetic cell culturing. ACS Omega 5, 3444–3452 (2020).10.1021/acsomega.9b03704 ↗
18. Santos, M. I. et al. Endothelial cell colonization and angiogenic potential of combined nano- and micro-fibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 29, 4306–4313 (2008).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.033 ↗
19. Dessalles, C. A., Leclech, C., Castagnino, A. & Barakat, A. I. Integration of substrate- and flow-derived stresses in endothelial cell mechanobiology. Commun. Biol. 4, 764 (2021).10.1038/s42003-021-02285-w ↗
20. Miller, J. S. et al. Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nat. Mater. 11, 768–774 (2012).10.1038/nmat3357 ↗
21. Daly, A. C., Davidson, M. D. & Burdick, J. A. 3D bioprinting of high cell-density heterogeneous tissue models through spheroid fusion within self-healing hydrogels. Nat. Commun. 12, 753 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-21029-2 ↗
22. Bernal, P. N. et al. Volumetric bioprinting of organoids and optically tuned hydrogels to build liver-like metabolic biofactories. Adv. Mater. 34, 2110054 (2022).10.1002/adma.202110054 ↗
23. Nikolaev, M. et al. Homeostatic mini-intestines through scaffold-guided organoid morphogenesis. Nature 585, 574–578 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2724-8 ↗
24. Lawlor, K. T. et al. Cellular extrusion bioprinting improves kidney organoid reproducibility and conformation. Nat. Mater. 20, 260–271 (2021).10.1038/s41563-020-00853-9 ↗
25. Kang, H.-W. et al. A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 312–319 (2016).10.1038/nbt.3413 ↗
26. Brassard, J. A., Nikolaev, M., Hübscher, T., Hofer, M. & Lutolf, M. P. Recapitulating macro-scale tissue self-organization through organoid bioprinting. Nat. Mater. 20, 22–29 (2021).10.1038/s41563-020-00803-5 ↗
27. Lorenzo-Martín, L. F. et al. Spatiotemporally resolved colorectal oncogenesis in mini-colons ex vivo. Nature 629, 450–457 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07330-2 ↗
28. Spence, J. R. et al. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into intestinal tissue in vitro. Nature 470, 105–109 (2011).10.1038/nature09691 ↗
29. Lancaster, M. A. et al. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature 501, 373–379 (2013).10.1038/nature12517 ↗
30. Buehler, M. J. Nature designs tough collagen: explaining the nanostructure of collagen fibrils. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12285–12290 (2006).10.1073/pnas.0603216103 ↗
31. Connizzo, B. K., Yannascoli, S. M. & Soslowsky, L. J. Structure–function relationships of postnatal tendon development: a parallel to healing. Matrix Biol. 32, 106–116 (2013).10.1016/j.matbio.2013.01.007 ↗
32. Salvatore, L. et al. Mimicking the hierarchical organization of natural collagen: toward the development of ideal scaffolding material for tissue regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 644595 (2021).10.3389/fbioe.2021.644595 ↗
33. Moxon, S. R. et al. Suspended manufacture of biological structures. Adv. Mater. 29, 1605594 (2017).10.1002/adma.201605594 ↗
34. Hinton, T. J. et al. Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500758 (2015).10.1126/sciadv.1500758 ↗
35. Osidak, E. O., Kozhukhov, V. I., Osidak, M. S. & Domogatsky, S. P. Collagen as bioink for bioprinting: a comprehensive review. Int. J. Bioprinting 6, 270 (2020).10.18063/ijb.v6i3.270 ↗
36. Lei, I. M. et al. Soft hydrogel shapeability via supportive bath matching in embedded 3D printing. Adv. Mater. Technol. 8, 2300001 (2023).10.1002/admt.202300001 ↗
37. Li, Q. et al. Regulable supporting baths for embedded printing of soft biomaterials with variable stiffness. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 41695–41711 (2022).10.1021/acsami.2c09221 ↗
38. Zhao, Y. et al. A platform for generation of chamber-specific cardiac tissues and disease modeling. Cell 176, 913–927.e18 (2019).10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.042 ↗
39. Skylar-Scott, M. A. et al. Biomanufacturing of organ-specific tissues with high cellular density and embedded vascular channels. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw2459 (2019).10.1126/sciadv.aaw2459 ↗
40. Lavrador, P., Moura, B. S., Almeida-Pinto, J., Gaspar, V. M. & Mano, J. F. Engineered nascent living human tissues with unit programmability. Nat. Mater. 24, 143–154 (2024).10.1038/s41563-024-01958-1 ↗
41. Choi, S. et al. Fibre-infused gel scaffolds guide cardiomyocyte alignment in 3D-printed ventricles. Nat. Mater. 22, 1039–1046 (2023).10.1038/s41563-023-01611-3 ↗
42. Fang, Y. et al. Expanding embedded 3D bioprinting capability for engineering complex organs with freeform vascular networks. Adv. Mater. 35, 2205082 (2023).10.1002/adma.202205082 ↗
43. Johnson, T. D. et al. Quantification of decellularized human myocardial matrix: a comparison of six patients. Prot. Clin. Appl. 10, 75–83 (2016).10.1002/prca.201500048 ↗
44. Hata, Y., Sawada, T. & Serizawa, T. Macromolecular crowding for materials-directed controlled self-assembly. J. Mater. Chem. B 6, 6344–6359 (2018).10.1039/C8TB02201A ↗
45. Saeidi, N. et al. Molecular crowding of collagen: a pathway to produce highly-organized collagenous structures. Biomaterials 33, 7366–7374 (2012).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.041 ↗
46. Ng, W. L., Goh, M. H., Yeong, W. Y. & Naing, M. W. Applying macromolecular crowding to 3D bioprinting: fabrication of 3D hierarchical porous collagen-based hydrogel constructs. Biomater. Sci. 6, 562–574 (2018).10.1039/C7BM01015J ↗
47. Magno, V. et al. Macromolecular crowding for tailoring tissue-derived fibrillated matrices. Acta Biomater. 55, 109–119 (2017).10.1016/j.actbio.2017.04.018 ↗
48. Dewavrin, J.-Y., Hamzavi, N., Shim, V. P. W. & Raghunath, M. Tuning the architecture of three-dimensional collagen hydrogels by physiological macromolecular crowding. Acta Biomater. 10, 4351–4359 (2014).10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.006 ↗
49. Ranamukhaarachchi, S. K. et al. Macromolecular crowding tunes 3D collagen architecture and cell morphogenesis. Biomater. Sci. 7, 618–633 (2019).10.1039/C8BM01188E ↗
50. Doube, M. et al. BoneJ: free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. Bone 47, 1076–1079 (2010).10.1016/j.bone.2010.08.023 ↗
51. Duraivel, S. et al. A silicone-based support material eliminates interfacial instabilities in 3D silicone printing. Science 379, 1248–1252 (2023).10.1126/science.ade4441 ↗