Helical peptide structure improves conductivity and stability of solid electrolytes
Source abstract
Abstract
Ion transport is essential to energy storage, cellular signalling and desalination. Polymers have been explored for decades as solid-state electrolytes by either adding salt to polar polymers or tethering ions to the backbone to create less flammable and more robust systems. New design paradigms are needed to advance the performance of solid polymer electrolytes beyond conventional systems. Here the role of a helical secondary structure is shown to greatly enhance the conductivity of solvent-free polymer electrolytes using cationic polypeptides with a mobile anion. Longer helices lead to higher conductivity, and random coil peptides show substantially lower conductivity. The macrodipole of the helix increases with peptide length, leading to larger dielectric constants. The hydrogen bonding of the helix also imparts thermal and electrochemical stability, while allowing for facile dissolution back to monomer in acid. Peptide polymer electrolytes present a promising platform for the design of next-generation ion-transporting materials.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Sun, H. T. et al. Hierarchical 3D electrodes for electrochemical energy storage. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 45–60 (2019).10.1038/s41578-018-0069-9 ↗
2. Sun, Y. L., Liu, B., Liu, L. Y. & Yan, X. B. Ions transport in electrochemical energy storage devices at low temperatures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2109568 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202109568 ↗
3. Xiao, K., Jiang, L. & Antonietti, M. Ion transport in nanofluidic devices for energy harvesting. Joule 3, 2364–2380 (2019).10.1016/j.joule.2019.09.005 ↗
4. Chen, J. et al. Localized electrons enhanced ion transport for ultrafast electrochemical energy storage. Adv. Mater. 32, e1905578 (2020).10.1002/adma.201905578 ↗
5. Yan, C. et al. Engineering 2D nanofluidic Li-ion transport channels for superior electrochemical energy storage. Adv. Mater. 29, 1703909 (2017).10.1002/adma.201703909 ↗
6. Lin, P. & Yan, F. Organic thin-film transistors for chemical and biological sensing. Adv. Mater. 24, 34–51 (2012).10.1002/adma.201103334 ↗
7. Jentsch, T. J. VRACs and other ion channels and transporters in the regulation of cell volume and beyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 293–307 (2016).10.1038/nrm.2016.29 ↗
8. Ratner, M. A. & Shriver, D. F. Ion-transport in solvent-free polymers. Chem. Rev. 88, 109–124 (1988).10.1021/cr00083a006 ↗
9. Armand, M. & Tarascon, J. M. Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652–657 (2008).10.1038/451652a ↗
10. Shen, C. T., Zhao, Q. J., Shan, N. S., Jing, B. B. & Evans, C. M. Conductivity–modulus–Tg relationships in solvent‐free, single lithium ion conducting network electrolytes. J. Polym. Sci. 58, 2376–2388 (2020).10.1002/pol.20200302 ↗
11. Bouchet, R. et al. Single-ion BAB triblock copolymers as highly efficient electrolytes for lithium-metal batteries. Nat. Mater. 12, 452–457 (2013).10.1038/nmat3602 ↗
12. Sun, C. G. et al. Fast lithium ion transport in solid polymer electrolytes from polysulfide-bridged copolymers. Nano Energy 75, 104976 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104976 ↗
13. Sharon, D. et al. Intrinsic ion transport properties of block copolymer electrolytes. ACS Nano 14, 8902–8914 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.0c03713 ↗
14. Liu, D. et al. Enhancing ionic conductivity in tablet–bottlebrush block copolymer electrolytes with well-aligned nanostructures via solvent vapor annealing. J. Mater. Chem. C. 10, 4247–4256 (2022).10.1039/D1TC05731F ↗
15. Jia, D. et al. Multifunctional polymer bottlebrush-based gel polymer electrolytes for lithium metal batteries. Mater. Today Nano 15, 100128 (2021).10.1016/j.mtnano.2021.100128 ↗
16. Deng, C. T. et al. Role of molecular architecture on ion transport in ethylene oxide-based polymer electrolytes. Macromolecules 54, 2266–2276 (2021).10.1021/acs.macromol.0c02424 ↗
17. Evans, C. M., Bridges, C. R., Sanoja, G. E., Bartels, J. & Segalman, R. A. Role of tethered ion placement on polymerized ionic liquid structure and conductivity: pendant versus backbone charge placement. ACS Macro Lett. 5, 925–930 (2016).10.1021/acsmacrolett.6b00534 ↗
18. Sangoro, J. R. et al. Decoupling of ionic conductivity from structural dynamics in polymerized ionic liquids. Soft Matter 10, 3536–3540 (2014).10.1039/C3SM53202J ↗
19. Jones, S. D. et al. Design of polymeric zwitterionic solid electrolytes with superionic lithium transport. ACS Cent. Sci. 8, 169–175 (2022).10.1021/acscentsci.1c01260 ↗
20. Leigh, T. & Fernandez-Trillo, P. Helical polymers for biological and medical applications. Nat. Rev. Chem. 4, 291–310 (2020).10.1038/s41570-020-0180-5 ↗
21. Ekladious, I., Colson, Y. L. & Grinstaff, M. W. Polymer–drug conjugate therapeutics: advances, insights and prospects. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18, 273–294 (2019).10.1038/s41573-018-0005-0 ↗
22. Gao, Y. et al. Winding-locked carbon nanotubes/polymer nanofibers helical yarn for ultrastretchable conductor and strain sensor. ACS Nano 14, 3442–3450 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.9b09533 ↗
23. Wang, M. X. et al. Conductance-stable and integrated helical fiber electrodes toward stretchy energy storage and self-powered sensing utilization. Chem. Eng. J. 457, 141164 (2023).10.1016/j.cej.2022.141164 ↗
24. Liu, Y. S. et al. Controllable synthesis of Co@CoOx/helical nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes toward oxygen reduction reaction as binder-free cathodes for Al–air batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 16512–16520 (2020).10.1021/acsami.0c01603 ↗
25. Zhao, M. Q. et al. Hierarchical vine-tree-like carbon nanotube architectures: in-situ CVD self-assembly and their use as robust scaffolds for lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 26, 7051–7058 (2014).10.1002/adma.201402488 ↗
26. Jiang, Y. J. et al. ‘Metaphilic’ cell-penetrating polypeptide–vancomycin conjugate efficiently eradicates intracellular bacteria via a dual mechanism. ACS Cent. Sci. 6, 2267–2276 (2020).10.1021/acscentsci.0c00893 ↗
27. Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., Song, Z., Tan, Z. & Cheng, J. Recent advances in design of antimicrobial peptides and polypeptides toward clinical translation. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 170, 261–280 (2021).10.1016/j.addr.2020.12.016 ↗
28. Nguyen, T. P. et al. Polypeptide organic radical batteries. Nature 593, 61–66 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03399-1 ↗
29. Lightfoot, P., Mehta, M. A. & Bruce, P. G. Crystal structure of the polymer electrolyte poly(ethylene oxide)3:LiCF3SO3. Science 262, 883–885 (1993).10.1126/science.262.5135.883 ↗
30. Ma, Y. A., Shen, Y. & Li, Z. B. Different cell behaviors induced by stereochemistry on polypeptide brush grafted surfaces. Mater. Chem. Front. 1, 846–851 (2017).10.1039/C6QM00200E ↗
31. Papadopoulos, P., Floudas, G., Klok, H. A., Schnell, I. & Pakula, T. Self-assembly and dynamics of poly(γ-benzyl-l-glutamate) peptides. Biomacromolecules 5, 81–91 (2004).10.1021/bm034291q ↗
32. Kricheldorf, H. R. & Mueller, D. Secondary structure of peptides. 3. Carbon-13 NMR cross polarization/magic angle spinning spectroscopic characterization of solid polypeptides. Macromolecules 16, 615–623 (1983).10.1021/ma00238a025 ↗
33. Tsutsumi, A. et al. Relaxation phenomena of poly-γ-benzyl-l-glutamate, poly-γ-methyl-l-glutamate, and copoly(γ-methyl-l-glutamate, γ-benzyl-l-glutamate). J. Macromol. Sci., B 8, 413–430 (1973).10.1080/00222347308201629 ↗
34. Evans, C. M., Sanoja, G. E., Popere, B. C. & Segalrnan, R. A. Anhydrous proton transport in polymerized ionic liquid block copolymers: roles of block length, ionic content, and confinement. Macromolecules 49, 395–404 (2016).10.1021/acs.macromol.5b02202 ↗
35. Drozd-Rzoska, A., Rzoska, S. J. & Starzonek, S. New paradigm for configurational entropy in glass-forming systems. Sci. Rep. 12, 3058 (2022).10.1038/s41598-022-05897-2 ↗
36. Heres, M. et al. Ion transport in glassy polymerized ionic liquids: unraveling the impact of the molecular structure. Macromolecules 52, 88–95 (2019).10.1021/acs.macromol.8b01273 ↗
37. Cheng, S. J. et al. Ionic aggregation in random copolymers containing phosphonium ionic liquid monomers. J. Polym. Sci. A1 50, 166–173 (2012).10.1002/pola.25022 ↗
38. Hemp, S. T. et al. Comparing ammonium and phosphonium polymerized ionic liquids: thermal analysis, conductivity, and morphology. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 214, 2099–2107 (2013).10.1002/macp.201300322 ↗
39. Xia, Y. C. et al. Accelerated polymerization of N-carboxyanhydrides catalyzed by crown ether. Nat. Commun. 12, 732 (2021).10.1038/s41467-020-20724-w ↗
40. Fan, F. et al. Effect of molecular weight on the ion transport mechanism in polymerized ionic liquids. Macromolecules 49, 4557–4570 (2016).10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00714 ↗
41. Zhao, Q. J. & Evans, C. M. Effect of molecular weight on viscosity scaling and ion transport in linear polymerized ionic liquids. Macromolecules 54, 3395–3404 (2021).10.1021/acs.macromol.0c02801 ↗
42. Keith, J. R., Mogurampelly, S., Aldukhi, F., Wheatle, B. K. & Ganesan, V. Influence of molecular weight on ion-transport properties of polymeric ionic liquids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 29134–29145 (2017).10.1039/C7CP05489K ↗
43. Timachova, K., Watanabe, H. & Balsara, N. P. Effect of molecular weight and salt concentration on ion transport and the transference number in polymer electrolytes. Macromolecules 48, 7882–7888 (2015).10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01724 ↗
44. Han, S. et al. Sequencing polymers to enable solid-state lithium batteries. Nat. Mater. 22, 1515–1522 (2023).10.1038/s41563-023-01693-z ↗
45. Wada, A. Dielectric properties of polypeptide solutions. II. Relation between the electric dipole moment and the molecular weight of α helix. J. Chem. Phys. 30, 328–329 (1959).10.1063/1.1729911 ↗
46. Choi, U. H. et al. Role of chain polarity on ion and polymer dynamics: molecular volume-based analysis of the dielectric constant for polymerized norbornene-based ionic liquids. Macromolecules 53, 10561–10573 (2020).10.1021/acs.macromol.0c02100 ↗
47. Wilcox, K. G., Dingle, M. E., Saha, A., Hore, M. J. A. & Morozova, S. Persistence length of α-helical poly-l-lysine. Soft Matter 18, 6550–6560 (2022).10.1039/D2SM00921H ↗
48. Choe, S. & Sun, S. X. The elasticity of α-helices. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 244912 (2005).10.1063/1.1940048 ↗
49. Papadopoulos, P. et al. Thermodynamic confinement and α-helix persistence length in poly(γ-benzyl-l-glutamate)-b-poly(dimethyl siloxane)-b-poly(γ-benzyl-l-glutamate) triblock copolymers. Biomacromolecules 7, 618–626 (2006).10.1021/bm050772t ↗
50. Zhao, Q. J., Bennington, P., Nealey, P. F., Patel, S. N. & Evans, C. M. Ion specific, thin film confinement effects on conductivity in polymerized ionic liquids. Macromolecules 54, 10520–10528 (2021).10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01820 ↗