A lightweight strain glass alloy showing nearly temperature-independent low modulus and high strength
Source abstract
Abstract
Fast development of space technologies poses a strong challenge for elastic materials, which need to be not only lightweight, strong and compliant, but also able to maintain stable elasticity over a wide temperature range1-4. Here we report a lightweight magnesium-scandium strain glass alloy (Mg with 21.3 at.% Sc) that meets this challenge. This alloy is as light (density ~2 g cm-3) and compliant as organic-based materials5-7 like bones and glass fibre reinforced plastics, but in contrast with those materials, it possesses a nearly temperature-independent (or Elinvar-type), ultralow Young's modulus (~20-23 GPa) over a wide temperature range from room temperature down to 123 K; a higher yield strength of ~200-270 MPa; and a long fatigue life of over one million cycles. As a result, it exhibits a relatively high, temperature-independent elastic energy density of ~0.5 kJ kg-1 among known materials at a moderate stress level of 200 MPa. We show that its exceptional properties stem from a strain glass transition, and the Elinvar-type elasticity originates from its moderate elastic softening effect cancelling out the ever-present elastic hardening. Our findings provide insight into designing materials that possess unconventional and technologically important elastic properties.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Applications · Material Science and Thermodynamics · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Xia, J. et al. Iron-based superelastic alloys with near-constant critical stress temperature dependence. Science 369, 855–858 (2020).10.1126/science.abc1590 ↗
2. Scott, A. S. & Sherwood, B. Out of This World: The New Field of Space Architecture (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009).
3. Lesser, D. H., Logan, G. & Christopher, K. W. Active optical correctors for large inflatable telescopes. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 9, 409–416 (2019).10.1109/TTHZ.2019.2918553 ↗
4. NASA Science. Solar System Exploration http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/resources/925/solar-systemand-beyond-poster-set/ (2019).
5. Tagliaferri, V., Caprino, G. & Diterlizzi, A. Effect of drilling parameters on the finish and mechanical properties of GFRP composites. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Man. 30, 77–84 (1990).10.1016/0890-6955(90)90043-I ↗
6. Ramesh, M., Palanikumar, K. & Reddy, K. H. Mechanical property evaluation of sisal–jute–glass fiber reinforced polyester composites. Compos. B Eng. 48, 1–9 (2013).10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.12.004 ↗
7. Chen, Q. & Thouas, G. A. Metallic implant biomaterials. Mat. Sci. Eng. R 87, 1–57 (2015).10.1016/j.mser.2014.10.001 ↗
8. Ashby, M. F. Materials Selection in Mechanical Design 4th edn (Elsevier, 2011).10.1016/B978-1-85617-663-7.00005-9 ↗
9. Lecce, L. & Concilio, A. (eds) Shape Memory Alloy Engineering: for Aerospace, Structural and Biomedical Applications (Elsevier, 2015).
10. Suh, B. C., Shim, M. S., Shin, K. S. & Kim, N. J. Current issues in magnesium sheet alloys: where do we go from here? Scr. Mater. 84–85, 1–6 (2014).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.04.017 ↗
11. Huang, X., Suzuki, K., Chino, Y. & Mabuchi, M. Texture and stretch formability of AZ61 and AM60 magnesium alloy sheets processed by high-temperature rolling. J. Alloy Compd. 632, 94–102 (2015).10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.148 ↗
12. Bian, M. Z. et al. A heat-treatable Mg–Al–Ca–Mn–Zn sheet alloy with good room temperature formability. Scr. Mater. 138, 151–155 (2017).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.05.034 ↗
13. Bhattacharjee, T. et al. High strength and formable Mg–6.2Zn–0.5Zr–0.2Ca alloy sheet processed by twin roll casting. Mat. Sci. Eng. A 609, 154–160 (2014).10.1016/j.msea.2014.04.058 ↗
14. Yuasa, M., Miyazawa, N., Hayashi, M., Mabuchi, M. & Chino, Y. Effects of group II elements on the cold stretch formability of Mg–Zn alloys. Acta Mater. 83, 294–303 (2015).10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.005 ↗
15. Huang, X., Suzuki, K., Chino, Y. & Mabuchi, M. Influence of aluminum content on the texture and sheet formability of AM series magnesium alloys. Mat. Sci. Eng. A 633, 144–153 (2015).10.1016/j.msea.2015.03.018 ↗
16. Zou, Y. et al. Texture evolution and their effects on the mechanical properties of duplex Mg–Li alloy. J. Alloy Compd. 669, 72–78 (2016).10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.174 ↗
17. Zou, Y. et al. Deformation mode transition of Mg3Li alloy: an in situ neutron diffraction study. J. Alloy Compd. 685, 331–336 (2016).10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.310 ↗
18. Askariani, S. A. & Pishbin, S. M. H. Hot deformation behavior of Mg-4Li-1Al alloy via hot compression tests. J. Alloy Compd. 688, 1058–1065 (2016).10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.049 ↗
19. Kada, S. R. et al. In-situ X-ray diffraction studies of slip and twinning in the presence of precipitates in AZ91 alloy. Acta Mater. 119, 145–156 (2016).10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.022 ↗
20. Agnew, S. R., Yoo, M. H. & Tomé, C. N. Application of texture simulation to understanding mechanical behavior of Mg and solid solution alloys containing Li or Y. Acta Mater. 49, 4277–4289 (2011).10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00297-X ↗
21. Barnett, M. R. et al. Influence of grain size on the compressive deformation of wrought Mg–3Al–1Zn. Acta Mater. 52, 5093–5103 (2004).10.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.015 ↗
22. Bohlen, J. et al. The texture and anisotropy of magnesium–zinc–rare earth alloy sheets. Acta Mater. 55, 2101–2112 (2007).10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.013 ↗
23. Newnham, R. E. Properties of Materials: Anisotropy, Symmetry, Structure (Oxford Univ. Press, 2004).10.1093/oso/9780198520757.003.0005 ↗
24. Ogawa, Y., Ando, D., Sutou, Y. & Koike, J. A lightweight shape-memory magnesium alloy. Science 353, 368–370 (2016).10.1126/science.aaf6524 ↗
25. Otsuka, K. & Wayman, C. M. Shape Memory Materials (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998).
26. Saito, T. et al. Multifunctional alloys obtained via a dislocation-free plastic deformation mechanism. Science 300, 464–467 (2003).10.1126/science.1081957 ↗
27. Zhu, J. et al. Making metals linear super-elastic with ultralow modulus and nearly zero hysteresis. Mater. Horiz. 6, 515–523 (2019).10.1039/C8MH01141A ↗
28. Herbert, E. G., Pharr, G. M., Oliver, W. C., Lucas, B. N. & Hay, J. L. On the measurement of stress–strain curves by spherical indentation. Thin Solid Films 398, 331–335 (2001).10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01439-0 ↗
29. Guo, Y., Xie, J., Zheng, W. & Li, J. Effects of steel slag as fine aggregate on static and impact behaviours of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 192, 194–201 (2018).10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.129 ↗
30. Henry S. D. et al. Fatigue Data Book: Light Structural Alloys (ASM International, 1995).
31. Ferdous, W. et al. Testing and modelling the fatigue behaviour of GFRP composites – effect of stress level, stress concentration and frequency. Eng. Sci. Technol. 23, 1223–1232 (2020).
32. Merati, A. A study of nucleation and fatigue behavior of an aerospace aluminum alloy 2024-T3. Int. J. Fatigue 27, 33–44 (2005).10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.06.010 ↗
33. Guillaume, C. E. Discovery of the anomaly. Proc. Phys. Soc. 32, 374–404 (1920).
34. Liu, C., Ji, Y. & Ren, X. Strain glass and novel properties. Shape Mem. Superelasticity 5, 299–312 (2019).10.1007/s40830-019-00252-3 ↗
35. Zhou, Y. et al. Direct evidence for local symmetry breaking during a strain glass transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 025701 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.025701 ↗
36. Wang, Y. et al. Strain glass transition in a multifunctional β-type Ti alloy. Sci. Rep. 4, 3995 (2014).10.1038/srep03995 ↗
37. Ogawa, Y., Ando, D., Sutou, Y., Somekawa, H. & Koike, J. Martensitic transformation in a β-type Mg–Sc alloy. Shape Mem. Superelasticity 4, 167–173 (2018).10.1007/s40830-017-0143-y ↗
38. Zhang, L., Wang, D. & Ren, X. A new mechanism for low and temperature-independent elastic modulus. Sci. Rep. 5, 11477 (2015).10.1038/srep11477 ↗
39. Zeng, Z. et al. Magnesium extrusion alloys: a review of developments and prospects. Int. Mater. Rev. 64, 27–62 (2019).10.1080/09506608.2017.1421439 ↗
40. Lord, J. D. & Morrell, R. M. Elastic modulus measurement—obtaining reliable data from the tensile test. Metrologia 47, S41 (2010).10.1088/0026-1394/47/2/S05 ↗
41. Hao, Y. L. et al. Elastic deformation behaviour of Ti–24Nb–4Zr–7.9Sn for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 3, 277–286 (2007).10.1016/j.actbio.2006.11.002 ↗