Taxanes convert regions of perturbed microtubule growth into rescue sites
Source abstract
Abstract
Microtubules are polymers of tubulin dimers, and conformational transitions in the microtubule lattice drive microtubule dynamic instability and affect various aspects of microtubule function. The exact nature of these transitions and their modulation by anticancer drugs such as Taxol and epothilone, which can stabilize microtubules but also perturb their growth, are poorly understood. Here, we directly visualize the action of fluorescent Taxol and epothilone derivatives and show that microtubules can transition to a state that triggers cooperative drug binding to form regions with altered lattice conformation. Such regions emerge at growing microtubule ends that are in a pre-catastrophe state, and inhibit microtubule growth and shortening. Electron microscopy and in vitro dynamics data indicate that taxane accumulation zones represent incomplete tubes that can persist, incorporate tubulin dimers and repeatedly induce microtubule rescues. Thus, taxanes modulate the material properties of microtubules by converting destabilized growing microtubule ends into regions resistant to depolymerization.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microtubule and mitosis dynamics · Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology · 14-3-3 protein interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Desai, A. & Mitchison, T. J. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13, 83–117 (1997).10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.83 ↗
2. Cross, R. A. Microtubule lattice plasticity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 56, 88–93 (2018).10.1016/j.ceb.2018.10.004 ↗
3. Kueh, H. Y. & Mitchison, T. J. Structural plasticity in actin and tubulin polymer dynamics. Science 325, 960–963 (2009).10.1126/science.1168823 ↗
4. Brouhard, G. J. & Rice, L. M. Microtubule dynamics: an interplay of biochemistry and mechanics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 451–463 (2018).10.1038/s41580-018-0009-y ↗
5. Dumontet, C. & Jordan, M. A. Microtubule-binding agents: a dynamic field of cancer therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 790–803 (2010).10.1038/nrd3253 ↗
6. Yang, C. H. & Horwitz, S. B. Taxol((R)): the first microtubule stabilizing agent. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, E1733 (2017).10.3390/ijms18081733 ↗
7. Steinmetz, M. O. & Prota, A. E. Microtubule-targeting agents: strategies to hijack the cytoskeleton. Trends Cell Biol. 28, 776–792 (2018).10.1016/j.tcb.2018.05.001 ↗
8. Nogales, E. & Kellogg, E. H. Challenges and opportunities in the high-resolution cryo-EM visualization of microtubules and their binding partners. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 46, 65–70 (2017).10.1016/j.sbi.2017.06.003 ↗
9. Elie-Caille, C. et al. Straight GDP-tubulin protofilaments form in the presence of taxol. Curr. Biol. 17, 1765–1770 (2007).10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.063 ↗
10. Alushin, G. M. et al. High-resolution microtubule structures reveal the structural transitions in alphabeta-tubulin upon GTP hydrolysis. Cell 157, 1117–1129 (2014).10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.053 ↗
11. Zhang, R., Alushin, G. M., Brown, A. & Nogales, E. Mechanistic origin of microtubule dynamic instability and its modulation by EB proteins. Cell 162, 849–859 (2015).10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.012 ↗
12. Kellogg, E. H. et al. Near-atomic model of microtubule–tau interactions. Science 360, 1242–1246 (2018).10.1126/science.aat1780 ↗
13. Prota, A. E. et al. Molecular mechanism of action of microtubule-stabilizing anticancer agents. Science 339, 587–590 (2013).10.1126/science.1230582 ↗
14. Prota, A. E. et al. Structural basis of microtubule stabilization by discodermolide. Chembiochem 18, 905–909 (2017).10.1002/cbic.201600696 ↗
15. Wang, Y. et al. Mechanism of microtubule stabilization by taccalonolide AJ. Nat. Commun. 8, 15787 (2017).
16. Manka, S. W. & Moores, C. A. The role of tubulin-tubulin lattice contacts in the mechanism of microtubule dynamic instability. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 607–615 (2018).10.1038/s41594-018-0087-8 ↗
17. Brown, T. et al. A phase I trial of taxol given by a 6-hour intravenous infusion. J. Clin. Oncol. 9, 1261–1267 (1991).10.1200/JCO.1991.9.7.1261 ↗
18. Weaver, B. A. How Taxol/paclitaxel kills cancer cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 2677–2681 (2014).10.1091/mbc.e14-04-0916 ↗
19. Gianni, L. et al. Nonlinear pharmacokinetics and metabolism of paclitaxel and its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships in humans. J. Clin. Oncol. 13, 180–190 (1995).10.1200/JCO.1995.13.1.180 ↗
20. Spratlin, J. & Sawyer, M. B. Pharmacogenetics of paclitaxel metabolism. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 61, 222–229 (2007).10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.09.006 ↗
21. Mohan, R. et al. End-binding proteins sensitize microtubules to the action of microtubule-targeting agents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8900–8905 (2013).10.1073/pnas.1300395110 ↗
22. Bouchet, B. P. et al. Mesenchymal cell invasion requires cooperative regulation of persistent microtubule growth by SLAIN2 and CLASP1. Dev. Cell 39, 708–723 (2016).10.1016/j.devcel.2016.11.009 ↗
23. Photiou, A., Shah, P., Leong, L. K., Moss, J. & Retsas, S. In vitro synergy of paclitaxel (Taxol) and vinorelbine (navelbine) against human melanoma cell lines. Eur. J. Cancer 33, 463–470 (1997).10.1016/S0959-8049(97)89023-5 ↗
24. Diaz, J. F., Strobe, R., Engelborghs, Y., Souto, A. A. & Andreu, J. M. Molecular recognition of Taxol by microtubules. Kinetics and thermodynamics of binding of fluorescent taxol derivatives to an exposed site. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 26265–26276 (2000).10.1074/jbc.M003120200 ↗
25. Li, X., Barasoain, I., Matesanz, R., Diaz, J. F. & Fang, W. S. Synthesis and biological activities of high affinity taxane-based fluorescent probes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19, 751–754 (2009).10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.12.018 ↗
26. Bieling, P. et al. Reconstitution of a microtubule plus-end tracking system in vitro. Nature 450, 1100–1105 (2007).10.1038/nature06386 ↗
27. Akhmanova, A. & Steinmetz, M. O. Control of microtubule organization and dynamics: two ends in the limelight. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 711–726 (2015).10.1038/nrm4084 ↗
28. Duellberg, C., Cade, N. I., Holmes, D. & Surrey, T. The size of the EB cap determines instantaneous microtubule stability. eLife 5, e13470 (2016).10.7554/eLife.13470 ↗
29. Montenegro Gouveia, S. et al. In vitro reconstitution of the functional interplay between MCAK and EB3 at microtubule plus ends. Curr. Biol. 20, 1717–1722 (2010).10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.020 ↗
30. Gigant, B. et al. Structural basis for the regulation of tubulin by vinblastine. Nature 435, 519–522 (2005).10.1038/nature03566 ↗
31. Friel, C. T. & Welburn, J. P. Parts list for a microtubule depolymerising kinesin. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 46, 1665–1672 (2018).10.1042/BST20180350 ↗
32. Diaz, J. F., Barasoain, I. & Andreu, J. M. Fast kinetics of Taxol binding to microtubules. Effects of solution variables and microtubule-associated proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 8407–8419 (2003).10.1074/jbc.M211163200 ↗
33. Zhang, R., LaFrance, B. & Nogales, E. Separating the effects of nucleotide and EB binding on microtubule structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6191–E6200 (2018).
34. Kellogg, E. H. et al. Insights into the distinct mechanisms of action of taxane and non-taxane microtubule stabilizers from cryo-EM structures. J. Mol. Biol. 429, 633–646 (2017).10.1016/j.jmb.2017.01.001 ↗
35. Mitra, A. & Sept, D. Taxol allosterically alters the dynamics of the tubulin dimer and increases the flexibility of microtubules. Biophys. J. 95, 3252–3258 (2008).10.1529/biophysj.108.133884 ↗
36. Kikumoto, M., Kurachi, M., Tosa, V. & Tashiro, H. Flexural rigidity of individual microtubules measured by a buckling force with optical traps. Biophys. J. 90, 1687–1696 (2006).10.1529/biophysj.104.055483 ↗
37. Atherton, J. et al. A structural model for microtubule minus-end recognition and protection by CAMSAP proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 931–943 (2017).10.1038/nsmb.3483 ↗
38. Jiang, K. et al. Microtubule minus-end stabilization by polymerization-driven CAMSAP deposition. Dev. Cell 28, 295–309 (2014).10.1016/j.devcel.2014.01.001 ↗
39. Arnal, I. & Wade, R. H. How does Taxol stabilize microtubules? Curr. Biol. 5, 900–908 (1995).10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00180-1 ↗
40. Castle, B. T. et al. Mechanisms of kinetic stabilization by the drugs paclitaxel and vinblastine. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 1238–1257 (2017).10.1091/mbc.e16-08-0567 ↗
41. Schaedel, L. et al. Microtubules self-repair in response to mechanical stress. Nat. Mater. 14, 1156–1163 (2015).10.1038/nmat4396 ↗
42. Aumeier, C. et al. Self-repair promotes microtubule rescue. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 1054–1064 (2016).10.1038/ncb3406 ↗
43. Vemu, A. et al. Severing enzymes amplify microtubule arrays through lattice GTP-tubulin incorporation. Science 361, eaau1504 (2018).10.1126/science.aau1504 ↗
44. Shima, T. et al. Kinesin-binding-triggered conformation switching of microtubules contributes to polarized transport. J. Cell Biol. 217, 4164–4183 (2018).10.1083/jcb.201711178 ↗
45. Jordan, M. A. & Wilson, L. Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 253–265 (2004).10.1038/nrc1317 ↗
46. Diaz, J. F. & Andreu, J. M. Assembly of purified GDP-tubulin into microtubules induced by Taxol and Taxotere: reversibility, ligand stoichiometry, and competition. Biochemistry 32, 2747–2755 (1993).10.1021/bi00062a003 ↗
47. Aher, A. et al. CLASP suppresses microtubule catastrophes through a single TOG domain. Dev. Cell 46, 40–58 e48 (2018).10.1016/j.devcel.2018.05.032 ↗
48. Gell, C. et al. Microtubule dynamics reconstituted in vitro and imaged by single-molecule fluorescence microscopy. Methods Cell Biol. 95, 221–245 (2010).10.1016/S0091-679X(10)95013-9 ↗
49. Maurer, S. P., Fourniol, F. J., Bohner, G., Moores, C. A. & Surrey, T. EBs recognize a nucleotide-dependent structural cap at growing microtubule ends. Cell 149, 371–382 (2012).10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.049 ↗
50. Sugiyama, T. et al. Quick shear-flow alignment of biological filaments for X-ray fiber diffraction facilitated by methylcellulose. Biophys. J. 97, 3132–3138 (2009).10.1016/j.bpj.2009.09.041 ↗
51. Kamimura, S., Fujita, Y., Wada, Y., Yagi, T. & Iwamoto, H. X-ray fiber diffraction analysis shows dynamic changes in axial tubulin repeats in native microtubules depending on paclitaxel content, temperature and GTP-hydrolysis. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 73, 131–144 (2016).10.1002/cm.21283 ↗
52. Tinevez, J. Y. et al. TrackMate: an open and extensible platform for single-particle tracking. Methods 115, 80–90 (2017).10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016 ↗
53. Michaelis, L., Menten, M. L., Johnson, K. A. & Goody, R. S. The original Michaelis constant: translation of the 1913 Michaelis–Menten paper. Biochemistry 50, 8264–8269 (2011).10.1021/bi201284u ↗