Double-network-inspired mechanical metamaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
Mechanical metamaterials can achieve high stiffness and strength at low densities, but often at the expense of low ductility and stretchability-a persistent trade-off in materials. In contrast, double-network hydrogels feature interpenetrating compliant and stiff polymer networks, and exhibit unprecedented combinations of high stiffness and stretchability, resulting in exceptional toughness. Here we present double-network-inspired metamaterials by integrating monolithic truss (stiff) and woven (compliant) components into a metamaterial architecture, which achieves a tenfold increase in stiffness and stretchability compared to its pure counterparts. Nonlinear computational mechanics models elucidate that enhanced energy dissipation in these double-network-inspired metamaterials stems from increased frictional dissipation due to entanglements between networks. Through introduction of internal defects, which typically degrade mechanical properties, we demonstrate a threefold increase in energy dissipation for these metamaterials via failure delocalization. This work opens avenues for developing metamaterials in a high-compliance regime inspired by polymer network topologies.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Bauer, J. et al. Nanolattices: an emerging class of mechanical metamaterials. Adv. Mater. 29, 1701850 (2017).10.1002/adma.201701850 ↗
2. Surjadi, J. U. et al. Mechanical metamaterials and their engineering applications. Adv. Eng. Mater. 21, 1800864 (2019).10.1002/adem.201800864 ↗
3. Greer, J. R. & Deshpande, V. S. Three-dimensional architected materials and structures: design, fabrication, and mechanical behavior. MRS Bull. 44, 750–757 (2019).10.1557/mrs.2019.232 ↗
4. Schwaiger, R., Meza, L. & Li, X. The extreme mechanics of micro-and nanoarchitected materials. MRS Bull. 44, 758–765 (2019).10.1557/mrs.2019.230 ↗
5. Meza, L. R., Das, S. & Greer, J. R. Strong, lightweight, and recoverable three-dimensional ceramic nanolattices. Science 345, 1322–1326 (2014).10.1126/science.1255908 ↗
6. Zheng, X. et al. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science 344, 1373–1377 (2014).10.1126/science.1252291 ↗
7. Shaikeea, A. J. D., Cui, H., O’Masta, M., Zheng, X. R. & Deshpande, V. S. The toughness of mechanical metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 21, 297–304 (2022).10.1038/s41563-021-01182-1 ↗
8. Berger, J., Wadley, H. & McMeeking, R. Mechanical metamaterials at the theoretical limit of isotropic elastic stiffness. Nature 543, 533–537 (2017).10.1038/nature21075 ↗
9. Tancogne-Dejean, T., Diamantopoulou, M., Gorji, M. B., Bonatti, C. & Mohr, D. 3D plate-lattices: an emerging class of low-density metamaterial exhibiting optimal isotropic stiffness. Adv. Mater. 30, 1803334 (2018).10.1002/adma.201803334 ↗
10. Crook, C. et al. Plate-nanolattices at the theoretical limit of stiffness and strength. Nat. Commun. 11, 1579 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-15434-2 ↗
11. White, B. C., Garland, A., Alberdi, R. & Boyce, B. L. Interpenetrating lattices with enhanced mechanical functionality. Addit. Manuf. 38, 101741 (2021).
12. White, B. C., Garland, A. & Boyce, B. L. Toughening by interpenetrating lattices. Matter 6, 570–582 (2023).10.1016/j.matt.2022.11.025 ↗
13. Taylor, S., Moustafa, A. R. & Cordero, Z. C. Interpenetrating lattices with tailorable energy absorption in tension. Acta Mater. 216, 117115 (2021).10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117115 ↗
14. Indurkar, P. P. et al. The coupled strength and toughness of interconnected and interpenetrating multi-material gyroids. MRS Bull. 47, 461–473 (2022).10.1557/s43577-021-00249-3 ↗
15. Yan, D. et al. Soft three-dimensional network materials with rational bio-mimetic designs. Nat. Commun. 11, 1180 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-14996-5 ↗
16. Moestopo, W. P., Mateos, A. J., Fuller, R. M., Greer, J. R. & Portela, C. M. Pushing and pulling on ropes: hierarchical woven materials. Adv. Sci. 7, 2001271 (2020).10.1002/advs.202001271 ↗
17. Moestopo, W. P., Shaker, S., Deng, W. & Greer, J. R. Knots are not for naught: design, properties, and topology of hierarchical intertwined microarchitected materials. Sci. Adv. 9, eade6725 (2023).10.1126/sciadv.ade6725 ↗
18. Gong, J. P., Katsuyama, Y., Kurokawa, T. & Osada, Y. Double-network hydrogels with extremely high mechanical strength. Adv. Mater. 15, 1155–1158 (2003).10.1002/adma.200304907 ↗
19. Nakayama, A. et al. High mechanical strength double-network hydrogel with bacterial cellulose. Adv. Funct. Mater. 14, 1124–1128 (2004).10.1002/adfm.200305197 ↗
20. Sun, J.-Y. et al. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 489, 133–136 (2012).10.1038/nature11409 ↗
21. Matsuda, T., Kawakami, R., Namba, R., Nakajima, T. & Gong, J. P. Mechanoresponsive self-growing hydrogels inspired by muscle training. Science 363, 504–508 (2019).10.1126/science.aau9533 ↗
22. Gong, J. P. Why are double network hydrogels so tough? Soft Matter 6, 2583–2590 (2010).10.1039/b924290b ↗
23. Kim, J., Zhang, G., Shi, M. & Suo, Z. Fracture, fatigue, and friction of polymers in which entanglements greatly outnumber cross-links. Science 374, 212–216 (2021).10.1126/science.abg6320 ↗
24. Chen, Q., Chen, H., Zhu, L. & Zheng, J. Fundamentals of double network hydrogels. J. Mater. Chem. B 3, 3654–3676 (2015).10.1039/C5TB00123D ↗
25. Nishimura, T. et al. Spatial analysis of the damage zone in double network hydrogel using the microelectrode technique. Macromolecules 57, 1502–1508 (2024).10.1021/acs.macromol.3c02500 ↗
26. Brown, H. R. A model of the fracture of double network gels. Macromolecules 40, 3815–3818 (2007).10.1021/ma062642y ↗
27. Yu, Q. M., Tanaka, Y., Furukawa, H., Kurokawa, T. & Gong, J. P. Direct observation of damage zone around crack tips in double-network gels. Macromolecules 42, 3852–3855 (2009).10.1021/ma900622s ↗
28. Zhao, X. A theory for large deformation and damage of interpenetrating polymer networks. J. Mech. Phys. Sol. 60, 319–332 (2012).10.1016/j.jmps.2011.10.005 ↗
29. Xu, C. et al. Mechanical regulation of polymer gels. Chem. Rev. 124, 10435–10508 (2024).10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00498 ↗
30. Li, X. & Gong, J. P. Design principles for strong and tough hydrogels. Nat. Rev. Mater. 9, 380–398 (2024).10.1038/s41578-024-00672-3 ↗
31. Zheng, X. et al. Multiscale metallic metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 15, 1100–1106 (2016).10.1038/nmat4694 ↗
32. Jiang, Z. & Pikul, J. H. Centimetre-scale crack-free self-assembly for ultra-high tensile strength metallic nanolattices. Nat. Mater. 20, 1512–1518 (2021).10.1038/s41563-021-01039-7 ↗
33. Mateos, A. J., Huang, W., Zhang, Y.-W. & Greer, J. R. Discrete-continuum duality of architected materials: failure, flaws, and fracture. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1806772 (2019).10.1002/adfm.201806772 ↗
34. Bauer, J. et al. Push-to-pull tensile testing of ultra-strong nanoscale ceramic–polymer composites made by additive manufacturing. Extreme Mech. Lett. 3, 105–112 (2015).10.1016/j.eml.2015.03.006 ↗
35. Montemayor, L., Wong, W., Zhang, Y.-W. & Greer, J. Insensitivity to flaws leads to damage tolerance in brittle architected meta-materials. Sci. Rep. 6, 20570 (2016).10.1038/srep20570 ↗
36. Glaesener, R. et al. Predicting the influence of geometric imperfections on the mechanical response of 2D and 3D periodic trusses. Acta Mater. 254, 118918 (2023).10.1016/j.actamat.2023.118918 ↗
37. Rivlin, R. S. & Thomas, A. G. Rupture of rubber. I. characteristic energy for tearing. J. Polym. Sci. 10, 291–318 (1953).10.1002/pol.1953.120100303 ↗
38. Zhao, X. Multi-scale multi-mechanism design of tough hydrogels: building dissipation into stretchy networks. Soft Matter 10, 672–687 (2014).10.1039/C3SM52272E ↗
39. Zhang, T., Lin, S., Yuk, H. & Zhao, X. Predicting fracture energies and crack-tip fields of soft tough materials. Extreme Mech. Lett. 4, 1–8 (2015).10.1016/j.eml.2015.07.007 ↗
40. Zheng, Y. et al. How chain dynamics affects crack initiation in double-network gels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2111880118 (2021).10.1073/pnas.2111880118 ↗
41. Liu, Q. et al. 3D printable strong and tough composite organo-hydrogels inspired by natural hierarchical composite design principles. Nat. Commun. 15, 3237 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-47597-7 ↗
42. Zheng, Y. et al. Unique stick–slip crack dynamics of double-network hydrogels under pure-shear loading. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2322437121 (2024).10.1073/pnas.2322437121 ↗
43. Li, C., Wei, X., Wang, M., Adda-Bedia, M. & Kolinski, J. M. Crack tip kinematics reveal the process zone structure in brittle hydrogel fracture. J. Mech. Phys. Sol. 178, 105330 (2023).10.1016/j.jmps.2023.105330 ↗
44. Butcher, D. T., Alliston, T. & Weaver, V. M. A tense situation: forcing tumour progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 108–122 (2009).10.1038/nrc2544 ↗
45. Wang, Y. et al. Bioinspired stretchable helical nanofiber yarn scaffold for locomotive tissue dynamic regeneration. Matter 5, 4480–4501 (2022).10.1016/j.matt.2022.09.011 ↗
46. Luo, Y. et al. Technology roadmap for flexible sensors. ACS Nano 17, 5211–5295 (2023).10.1021/acsnano.2c12606 ↗
47. Gu, Y., Zhao, J. & Johnson, J. A. A (macro) molecular-level understanding of polymer network topology. Trends Chem. 1, 318–334 (2019).10.1016/j.trechm.2019.02.017 ↗
48. Hu, Q., Lu, G. & Tse, K. M. Compressive and tensile behaviours of 3D hybrid auxetic–honeycomb lattice structures. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 263, 108767 (2024).10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108767 ↗
49. Spurr, R. The friction of polymers. Wear 79, 301–310 (1982).10.1016/0043-1648(82)90320-9 ↗
50. Bouissou, S., Petit, J. & Barquins, M. Normal load, slip rate and roughness influence on the polymethylmethacrylate dynamics of sliding 1. Stable sliding to stick–slip transition. Wear 214, 156–164 (1998).10.1016/S0043-1648(97)00242-1 ↗