Network of cyano-p-aramid nanofibres creates ultrastiff and water-rich hydrospongels
Source abstract
Abstract
The structure-property paradox of biological tissues, in which water-rich porous structures efficiently transfer mass while remaining highly mechanically stiff, remains unsolved. Although hydrogel/sponge hybridization is the key to understanding this phenomenon, material incompatibility makes this a challenging task. Here we describe hydrogel/sponge hybrids (hydrospongels) that behave as both ultrastiff water-rich gels and reversibly squeezable sponges. The self-organizing network of cyano-p-aramid nanofibres holds approximately 5,000 times more water than its solid content. Hydrospongels, even at a water concentration exceeding 90 wt%, are hard as cartilage with an elastic modulus of 50-80 MPa, and are 10-1,000 times stiffer than typical hydrogels. They endure a compressive strain above 85% through poroelastic relaxation and hydrothermal pressure at 120 °C. This performance is produced by amphiphilic surfaces, high rigidity and an interfibrillar, interaction-driven percolating network of nanofibres. These features can inspire the development of future biofunctional materials.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Annabi, N. et al. 25th anniversary article: rational design and applications of hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv. Mater. 26, 85–124 (2014).10.1002/adma.201303233 ↗
2. Li, J. & Mooney, D. J. Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16071 (2016).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71 ↗
3. Zhang, X. et al. Direction-specific van der Waals attraction between rutile TiO2 nanocrystals. Science 356, 434–437 (2017).10.1126/science.aah6902 ↗
4. Hua, Y. et al. Ultrafast, tough, and adhesive hydrogel based on hybrid photocrosslinking for articular cartilage repair in water-filled arthroscopy. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg0628 (2021).10.1126/sciadv.abg0628 ↗
5. Cianchetti, M., Laschi, C., Menciassi, A. & Dario, P. Biomedical applications of soft robotics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 143–153 (2018).10.1038/s41578-018-0022-y ↗
6. Yang, C. & Suo, Z. Hydrogel ionotronics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 125–142 (2018).10.1038/s41578-018-0018-7 ↗
7. Chen, J., Peng, Q., Thundat, T. & Zeng, H. Stretchable, injectable, and self-healing conductive hydrogel enabled by multiple hydrogen bonding toward wearable electronics. Chem. Mater. 31, 4553–4563 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01239 ↗
8. Shin, S.-H. et al. Ion-conductive self-healing hydrogels based on an interpenetrating polymer network for a multimodal sensor. Chem. Eng. J. 371, 452–460 (2019).10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.077 ↗
9. Lee, Y., Song, W. & Sun, J.-Y. Hydrogel soft robotics. Mater. Today Phys. 15, 100258 (2020).10.1016/j.mtphys.2020.100258 ↗
10. Ohm, Y. et al. An electrically conductive silver–polyacrylamide–alginate hydrogel composite for soft electronics. Nat. Electron. 4, 185–192 (2021).10.1038/s41928-021-00545-5 ↗
11. Tringides, C. M. et al. Viscoelastic surface electrode arrays to interface with viscoelastic tissues. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1019–1029 (2021).10.1038/s41565-021-00926-z ↗
12. Balakrishnan, B. & Banerjee, R. Biopolymer-based hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Chem. Rev. 111, 4453–4474 (2011).10.1021/cr100123h ↗
13. Wang, W., Zhang, Y. & Liu, W. Bioinspired fabrication of high strength hydrogels from non-covalent interactions. Prog. Polym. Sci. 71, 1–25 (2017).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.04.001 ↗
14. Liu, J. et al. Fatigue-resistant adhesion of hydrogels. Nat. Commun. 11, 1071 (2020).
15. Obeid, E., Adams, M. & Newman, J. Mechanical properties of articular cartilage in knees with unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J. Bone Jt Surg. 76, 315–319 (1994).10.1302/0301-620X.76B2.8113301 ↗
16. Williamson, A. K., Chen, A. C., Masuda, K., Thonar, E. J. M. & Sah, R. L. Tensile mechanical properties of bovine articular cartilage: variations with growth and relationships to collagen network components. J. Orthop. Res. 21, 872–880 (2003).10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00030-5 ↗
17. Nakayama, A. et al. High mechanical strength double‐network hydrogel with bacterial cellulose. Adv. Funct. Mater. 14, 1124–1128 (2004).10.1002/adfm.200305197 ↗
18. Simha, N., Carlson, C. & Lewis, J. Evaluation of fracture toughness of cartilage by micropenetration. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 15, 631–639 (2004).10.1023/B:JMSM.0000026104.30607.c7 ↗
19. Sun, J.-Y. et al. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 489, 133–136 (2012).10.1038/nature11409 ↗
20. Yao, W., Geng, C., Han, D., Chen, F. & Fu, Q. Strong and conductive double-network graphene/PVA gel. RSC Adv. 4, 39588–39595 (2014).10.1039/C4RA02674H ↗
21. Zhuang, Y. et al. Alginate/graphene double-network nanocomposite hydrogel beads with low-swelling, enhanced mechanical properties, and enhanced adsorption capacity. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 10885–10892 (2016).10.1039/C6TA02738E ↗
22. Li, X. et al. Strong, tough and mechanically self-recoverable poly (vinyl alcohol)/alginate dual-physical double-network hydrogels with large cross-link density contrast. RSC Adv. 8, 16674–16689 (2018).10.1039/C8RA01302K ↗
23. Xu, L., Zhao, X., Xu, C. & Kotov, N. A. Water‐rich biomimetic composites with abiotic self‐organizing nanofiber network. Adv. Mater. 30, 1703343 (2018).10.1002/adma.201703343 ↗
24. Zhu, J. et al. Branched aramid nanofibers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 11744–11748 (2017).10.1002/anie.201703766 ↗
25. Zhao, Y., Li, X., Shen, J., Gao, C. & Van der Bruggen, B. The potential of Kevlar aramid nanofiber composite membranes. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 7548–7568 (2020).10.1039/D0TA01654C ↗
26. Xie, C., Guo, Z. X., Qiu, T. & Tuo, X. Construction of aramid engineering materials via polymerization‐induced para‐aramid nanofiber hydrogel. Adv. Mater. 33, 2101280 (2021).10.1002/adma.202101280 ↗
27. Hu, Y. & Suo, Z. Viscoelasticity and poroelasticity in elastomeric gels. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 25, 441–458 (2012).10.1016/S0894-9166(12)60039-1 ↗
28. Xu, Q., Wilen, L. A., Jensen, K. E., Style, R. W. & Dufresne, E. R. Viscoelastic and poroelastic relaxations of soft solid surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 238002 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.238002 ↗
29. Koo, J. M. et al. Nonstop monomer-to-aramid nanofiber synthesis with remarkable reinforcement ability. Macromolecules 52, 923–934 (2019).10.1021/acs.macromol.8b02391 ↗
30. Park, S.-A. et al. Aramid nanofiber templated in situ SNAr polymerization for maximizing the performance of all-organic nanocomposites. ACS Macro Lett. 9, 558–564 (2020).10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00156 ↗
31. Hanif, Z. et al. Butanol-mediated oven-drying of nanocellulose with enhanced dehydration rate and aqueous re-dispersion. J. Polym. Res. 25, 191 (2018).10.1007/s10965-017-1343-z ↗
32. Kim, H.-J., Roy, S. & Rhim, J.-W. Effects of various types of cellulose nanofibers on the physical properties of the CNF-based films. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9, 106043 (2021).10.1016/j.jece.2021.106043 ↗
33. Shin, S. H. et al. Malleable hydrogel embedded with micellar cargo‐expellers as a prompt transdermal patch. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9, 2000876 (2020).10.1002/adhm.202000876 ↗
34. Lin, S., Sangaj, N., Razafiarison, T., Zhang, C. & Varghese, S. Influence of physical properties of biomaterials on cellular behavior. Pharm. Res. 28, 1422–1430 (2011).10.1007/s11095-011-0378-9 ↗
35. Mori, Y. et al. Usefulness of agarose mold as a storage container for three-dimensional tissue-engineered cartilage. Mater. Sci. Appl. 4, 73–78 (2013).
36. Yang, C. H. et al. Strengthening alginate/polyacrylamide hydrogels using various multivalent cations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 10418–10422 (2013).10.1021/am403966x ↗
37. Yang, X., Abe, K., Biswas, S. K. & Yano, H. Extremely stiff and strong nanocomposite hydrogels with stretchable cellulose nanofiber/poly (vinyl alcohol) networks. Cellulose 25, 6571–6580 (2018).10.1007/s10570-018-2030-x ↗
38. Vecchio, D. A., Mahler, S. H., Hammig, M. D. & Kotov, N. A. Structural analysis of nanoscale network materials using graph theory. ACS Nano 15, 12847–12859 (2021).10.1021/acsnano.1c04711 ↗
39. Vecchio, D. A. et al. Spanning network gels from nanoparticles and graph theoretical analysis of their structure and properties. Adv. Mater. 34, e2201313 (2022).10.1002/adma.202201313 ↗
40. Kamata, H., Akagi, Y., Kayasuga-Kariya, Y., Chung, U.-I. & Sakai, T. “Nonswellable” hydrogel without mechanical hysteresis. Science 343, 873–875 (2014).10.1126/science.1247811 ↗
41. Kamata, H., Kushiro, K., Takai, M., Chung, U. I. & Sakai, T. Non‐osmotic hydrogels: a rational strategy for safely degradable hydrogels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 9282–9286 (2016).10.1002/anie.201602610 ↗
42. Dong, H., Snyder, J. F., Williams, K. S. & Andzelm, J. W. Cation-induced hydrogels of cellulose nanofibrils with tunable moduli. Biomacromolecules 14, 3338–3345 (2013).10.1021/bm400993f ↗
43. Junchao, H., Yi, Z. & Jie, C. Extremely strong and transparent chitin films: a high‐efficiency, energy‐saving, and “green” route using an aqueous KOH/urea solution. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1701100 (2017).10.1002/adfm.201701100 ↗
44. Caccavo, D., Cascone, S., Lamberti, G. & Barba, A. Hydrogels: experimental characterization and mathematical modelling of their mechanical and diffusive behaviour. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 2357–2373 (2018).10.1039/C7CS00638A ↗
45. Han, G., Hess, C., Eriten, M. & Henak, C. R. Uncoupled poroelastic and intrinsic viscoelastic dissipation in cartilage. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 84, 28–34 (2018).10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.024 ↗
46. Kalcioglu, Z. I., Mahmoodian, R., Hu, Y., Suo, Z. & Van Vliet, K. J. From macro-to microscale poroelastic characterization of polymeric hydrogels via indentation. Soft Matter 8, 3393–3398 (2012).10.1039/c2sm06825g ↗
47. Kim, H. et al. Remarkable elasticity and enzymatic degradation of bio-based poly (butylene adipate-co-furanoate): replacing terephthalate. Green Chem. 22, 7778–7787 (2020).10.1039/D0GC01688H ↗
48. Noda, I. & Ozaki, Y. Two-Dimensional Correlation Spectroscopy: Applications in Vibrational and Optical Spectroscopy (John Wiley & Sons, 2005).10.1002/0470012404 ↗
49. Eom, Y. et al. Mechano-responsive hydrogen-bonding array of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer captures both strength and self-healing. Nat. Commun. 12, 621 (2021).
50. Sun, Q. et al. Covalent organic frameworks as a decorating platform for utilization and affinity enhancement of chelating sites for radionuclide sequestration. Adv. Mater. 30, 1705479 (2018).10.1002/adma.201705479 ↗