Mechanosensitive subcellular rheostasis drives emergent single-cell mechanical homeostasis
Source abstract
Abstract
Mechanical homeostasis-a fundamental process by which cells maintain stable states under environmental perturbations-is regulated by two subcellular mechanotransducers: cytoskeleton tension and integrin-mediated focal adhesions (FAs). Here, we show that single-cell mechanical homeostasis is collectively driven by the distinct, graduated dynamics (rheostasis) of subcellular cytoskeleton tension and FAs. Such rheostasis involves a mechanosensitive pattern wherein ground states of cytoskeleton tension and FA determine their distinct reactive paths through either relaxation or reinforcement. Pharmacological perturbations of the cytoskeleton and molecularly modulated integrin catch-slip bonds biased the rheostasis and induced non-homeostasis of FAs, but not of cytoskeleton tension, suggesting a unique sensitivity of FAs in regulating homeostasis. Theoretical modelling revealed myosin-mediated cytoskeleton contractility and catch-slip-bond-like behaviours in FAs and the cytoskeleton as sufficient and necessary mechanisms for quantitatively recapitulating mechanosensitive rheostasis. Our findings highlight the previously underappreciated physical nature of the mechanical homeostasis of cells.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang, N. et al. Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 282, C606–C616 (2002).10.1152/ajpcell.00269.2001 ↗
2. Paszek, M. J. et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 8, 241–254 (2005).10.1016/j.ccr.2005.08.010 ↗
3. Solon, J., Levental, I., Sengupta, K., Georges, P. C. & Janmey, P. A. Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys. J. 93, 4453–4461 (2007).10.1529/biophysj.106.101386 ↗
4. Rape, A. D., Guo, W.-H. & Wang, Y.-L. The regulation of traction force in relation to cell shape and focal adhesions. Biomaterials 32, 2043–2051 (2011).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.044 ↗
5. Webster, K. D., Ng, W. P. & Fletcher, D. A. Tensional homeostasis in single fibroblasts. Biophys. J. 107, 146–155 (2014).10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.051 ↗
6. Schwartz, M. W. et al. Cooperation between brain and islet in glucose homeostasis and diabetes. Nature 503, 59–66 (2013).10.1038/nature12709 ↗
7. Ritsma, L. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis revealed at single-stem-cell level by in vivo live imaging. Nature 507, 362–365 (2014).10.1038/nature12972 ↗
8. Maloy, K. J. & Powrie, F. Intestinal homeostasis and its breakdown in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 474, 298–306 (2011).10.1038/nature10208 ↗
9. Vermeulen, L. & Snippert, H. J. Stem cell dynamics in homeostasis and cancer of the intestine. Nature Rev. Cancer 14, 468–480 (2014).10.1038/nrc3744 ↗
10. Chen, C. S. Mechanotransduction—a field pulling together? J. Cell Sci. 121, 3285–3292 (2008).10.1242/jcs.023507 ↗
11. Vogel, V. & Sheetz, M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 265–275 (2006).10.1038/nrm1890 ↗
12. Deakin, N. O. & Turner, C. E. Paxillin comes of age. J. Cell Sci. 121, 2435–2444 (2008).10.1242/jcs.018044 ↗
13. Galbraith, C. G., Yamada, K. M. & Sheetz, M. P. The relationship between force and focal complex development. J. Cell Biol. 159, 695–705 (2002).10.1083/jcb.200204153 ↗
14. Oakes, P. W., Beckham, Y., Stricker, J. & Gardel, M. L. Tension is required but not sufficient for focal adhesion maturation without a stress fiber template. J. Cell Biol. 196, 363–374 (2012).10.1083/jcb.201107042 ↗
15. Chen, Y., Pasapera, A. M., Koretsky, A. P. & Waterman, C. M. Orientation-specific responses to sustained uniaxial stretching in focal adhesion growth and turnover. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E2352–E2361 (2013).10.1073/pnas.1221637110 ↗
16. Ezratty, E. J., Partridge, M. A. & Gundersen, G. G. Microtubule-induced focal adhesion disassembly is mediated by dynamin and focal adhesion kinase. Nature Cell Biol. 7, 581–590 (2005).10.1038/ncb1262 ↗
17. Allingham, J. S., Smith, R. & Rayment, I. The structural basis of blebbistatin inhibition and specificity for myosin II. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 378–379 (2005).10.1038/nsmb908 ↗
18. Holzinger, A. Jasplakinolide: an actin-specific reagent that promotes actin polymerization. Methods Mol. Biol. 586, 71–87 (2009).10.1007/978-1-60761-376-3_4 ↗
19. Flanagan, M. D. & Lin, S. Cytochalasins block actin filament elongation by binding to high affinity sites associated with F-actin. J. Biol. Chem. 255, 835–838 (1980).10.1016/S0021-9258(19)86105-7 ↗
20. Guo, B. & Guilford, W. H. Mechanics of actomyosin bonds in different nucleotide states are tuned to muscle contraction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9844–9849 (2006).10.1073/pnas.0601255103 ↗
21. Ferrer, J. M. et al. Measuring molecular rupture forces between single actin filaments and actin-binding proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9221–9226 (2008).10.1073/pnas.0706124105 ↗
22. del Rio, A. et al. Stretching single talin rod molecules activates vinculin binding. Science 323, 638–641 (2009).10.1126/science.1162912 ↗
23. Kong, F., García, A. J., Mould, A. P., Humphries, M. J. & Zhu, C. Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand. J. Cell Biol. 185, 1275–1284 (2009).10.1083/jcb.200810002 ↗
24. Luo, T. et al. Understanding the cooperative interaction between myosin II and actin cross-linkers mediated by actin filaments during mechanosensation. Biophys. J. 102, 238–247 (2012).10.1016/j.bpj.2011.12.020 ↗
25. Lee, C.-Y. et al. Actin depolymerization under force is governed by lysine 113:glutamic acid 195-mediated catch-slip bonds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 5022–5027 (2013).10.1073/pnas.1218407110 ↗
26. Luo, T., Mohan, K., Iglesias, P. A. & Robinson, D. N. Molecular mechanisms of cellular mechanosensing. Nature Mater. 12, 1064–1071 (2013).10.1038/nmat3772 ↗
27. Mitrossilis, D. et al. Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18243–18248 (2009).10.1073/pnas.0903994106 ↗
28. Chen, C. et al. Fluidization and resolidification of the human bladder smooth muscle cell in response to transient stretch. PLoS ONE 5, e12035 (2010).10.1371/journal.pone.0012035 ↗
29. Tondon, A., Hsu, H.-J. & Kaunas, R. Dependence of cyclic stretch-induced stress fiber reorientation on stretch waveform. J. Biomech. 45, 728–735 (2012).10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.11.012 ↗
30. Finer, J. T., Simmons, R. M. & Spudich, J. A. Single myosin molecule mechanics: piconewton forces and nanometre steps. Nature 368, 113–119 (1994).10.1038/368113a0 ↗
31. Veigel, C., Molloy, J. E., Schmitz, S. & Kendrick-Jones, J. Load-dependent kinetics of force production by smooth muscle myosin measured with optical tweezers. Nature Cell Biol. 5, 980–986 (2003).10.1038/ncb1060 ↗
32. Kumar, S. et al. Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. Biophys. J. 90, 3762–3773 (2006).10.1529/biophysj.105.071506 ↗
33. Lu, L., Oswald, S. J., Ngu, H. & Yin, F. C. P. Mechanical properties of actin stress fibers in living cells. Biophys. J. 95, 6060–6071 (2008).10.1529/biophysj.108.133462 ↗
34. Mann, J. M., Lam, R. H. W., Weng, S., Sun, Y. & Fu, J. A silicone-based stretchable micropost array membrane for monitoring live-cell subcellular cytoskeletal response. Lab Chip 12, 731–740 (2012).10.1039/C2LC20896B ↗
35. du Roure, O. Force mapping in epithelial cell migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2390–2395 (2005).10.1073/pnas.0408482102 ↗
36. Saez, A., Buguin, A., Silberzan, P. & Ladoux, B. Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? Biophys. J. 89, L52–L54 (2005).10.1529/biophysj.105.071217 ↗
37. Fu, J. et al. Mechanical regulation of cell function using geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates. Nature Methods 7, 733–736 (2010).10.1038/nmeth.1487 ↗
38. Yang, M. T., Fu, J., Wang, Y.-K., Desai, R. A. & Chen, C. S. Assaying stem cell mechanobiology on microfabricated elastomeric substrates with geometrically modulated rigidity. Nature Protoc. 6, 187–213 (2011).10.1038/nprot.2010.189 ↗
39. Alexandrova, A. Y. et al. Comparative dynamics of retrograde actin flow and focal adhesions: formation of nascent adhesions triggers transition from fast to slow flow. PLoS ONE 3, e3234 (2008).10.1371/journal.pone.0003234 ↗
40. Li, Y. et al. Age-associated increase of skin fibroblast-derived prostaglandin E2 contributes to reduced collagen levels in elderly human skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 135, 2181–2188 (2015).10.1038/jid.2015.157 ↗
41. Lu, S. et al. Decipher the dynamic coordination between enzymatic activity and structural modulation at focal adhesions in living cells. Sci. Rep. 4, 5756 (2014).10.1038/srep05756 ↗