journal article·2020-02-28

Magnetic Isolation of Cancer-Derived Exosomes Using Fe/Au Magnetic Nanowires

Zohreh Nemati, Joseph Um, Mohammad Reza Zamani Kouhpanji, Fang Zhou, Thomas Gage, Daniel Shore, Kelly Makielski, Alicia Donnelly, Javier Alonso

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 3· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Isolating tumor exosomes (TEX) secreted by cancer cells can provide valuable information about the state of a tumor. Here, we present a method to rapidly isolate TEX using magnetic nanowires (MNWs). Specifically, two sets of Fe/Au segmented MNWs were used to isolate TEX released by canine osteosarcoma cell lines (OSCA 8, 32, and 40). These MNWs were prepared by electrodeposition showcasing similar length (2.2(1) μm) and diameter (36(3) nm) but different Fe/Au segment thickness: 120(20)/30(6) nm (sample A) and 28(7)/3(1) nm (sample B). Magnetic measurements indicate that we can effectively tune the magnetic response of the MNWs by changing their segment thickness, obtaining a more anisotropic behavior for sample A. The internalization of these MNWs by OSCA cells as a function of their concentration has been followed by fluorescence microscopy, and a concentration around 25 μg of Fe/Au MNWs per 3 × 105 cells has been defined as optimal. Electron microscopy images have revealed that, once internalized, these MNWs end up residing within lysosomes inside the cancer cells, where they tend to be degraded (especially the Fe segments) and fragmented into smaller pieces. Lower degradation for sample B has been observed and related to differences in the synthesis/functionalization process of both samples. We have hypothesized that these fragments of Fe/Au MNWs are packaged into TEX released to the medium which can then be isolated via a magnetic stand. This has been tested by carrying out TEX isolation experiments on the OSCA cell and comparing the magnetically isolated TEX with those isolated by using conventional methods based on centrifugation. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NanoSight) has confirmed that the TEX isolated with MNWs have a comparable size distribution and yield to those obtained by using conventional methods, indicating that our magnetic isolation method can consistently provide relatively high TEX yields in a low-cost and fast way.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Extracellular vesicles in disease · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States

Animal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, United States

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States

Shepherd Laboratories, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States

Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States

Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, United States

Departamento de CITIMAC, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander 39005, Spain

Funding

Morris Animal Foundation · Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad · University of Minnesota · Skippy Frank Fund for Life Sciences and Translational Research

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.11.01410.1016/j.copbio.2013.11.014 ↗
2. 10.1080/20013078.2017.132947610.1080/20013078.2017.1329476 ↗
3. 10.2217/nnm.15.21010.2217/nnm.15.210 ↗
4. 10.3390/cancers901000810.3390/cancers9010008 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature1458110.1038/nature14581 ↗
6. Javeed N. · J. Biomed. Res. · 2017 · 31 · 38610.7555/JBR.30.20150162 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.02.00610.1016/j.semcancer.2017.02.006 ↗
8. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.1410.1038/nrclinonc.2017.14 ↗
9. 10.1002/jcp.2573910.1002/jcp.25739 ↗
10. 10.7150/thno.1813310.7150/thno.18133 ↗
11. 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-81710.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-817 ↗
12. Kamran S. · Chem. Methodol. · 2017 · 2 · 23
13. 10.1007/s12633-018-0034-710.1007/s12633-018-0034-7 ↗
14. 10.1109/TMAG.2014.232335410.1109/TMAG.2014.2323354 ↗
15. 10.1038/nmat149410.1038/nmat1494 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.05.08010.1016/j.jmmm.2016.05.080 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.05.02810.1016/j.ejmech.2015.05.028 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.08.04610.1016/j.jcis.2019.08.046 ↗
19. 10.3390/s1801025710.3390/s18010257 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0732110.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07321 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1125510.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11255 ↗
22. 10.3390/magnetochemistry601000410.3390/magnetochemistry6010004 ↗
23. 10.1021/nn204524610.1021/nn2045246 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.07610.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.076 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0693910.1021/acsnano.5b06939 ↗
26. 10.1186/s12951-018-0433-310.1186/s12951-018-0433-3 ↗
27. 10.1371/journal.pone.019943810.1371/journal.pone.0199438 ↗
28. 10.1155/2018/363456310.1155/2018/3634563 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.138976510.1063/1.1389765 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.36986810.1063/1.369868 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.155867210.1063/1.1558672 ↗
32. 10.1073/pnas.130834511010.1073/pnas.1308345110 ↗
33. 10.1038/nnano.2007.7010.1038/nnano.2007.70 ↗
34. 10.3390/cancers1112195610.3390/cancers11121956 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.490830010.1063/1.4908300 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.496040610.1063/1.4960406 ↗
37. 10.1039/C6CC06991F10.1039/C6CC06991F ↗
38. 10.1039/C7TB00574A10.1039/C7TB00574A ↗
39. 10.1109/TMAG.2004.83040610.1109/TMAG.2004.830406 ↗
40. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/10/10510710.1088/0957-4484/21/10/105107 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.10110.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.101 ↗
42. 10.1002/smll.20110190910.1002/smll.201101909 ↗
43. American Cancer Society Osteosarcoma Tests; https://www.cancer.org/cancer/osteosarcoma/detection-diagnosis-staging/how-diagnosed.html.
44. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/13/13510210.1088/0957-4484/26/13/135102 ↗
45. 10.1109/TMAG.2012.222464710.1109/TMAG.2012.2224647 ↗
46. 10.1039/C6CC06991F10.1039/C6CC06991F ↗
47. 10.1002/anie.20060513610.1002/anie.200605136 ↗
48. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/36/36570110.1088/0957-4484/19/36/365701 ↗
49. Carr, B.; Malloy, A. NanoParticle Tracking Analysis - The NANOSIGHT System; http://www.ankersmid.co.ro/AutoFiles/doc/3253_NanoSight_NTA_Technology-Paper_July_2006.pdf, 2007.
50. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-26310.1186/1556-276X-8-263 ↗
51. Wang D.-S. · Materials · 2019 · 12 · 390810.3390/ma12233908 ↗
52. 10.3762/bjnano.6.16710.3762/bjnano.6.167 ↗
53. 10.1002/smll.20050000610.1002/smll.200500006 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0287610.1021/acsnano.6b02876 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.01210.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012 ↗
56. 10.1186/1477-3155-4-910.1186/1477-3155-4-9 ↗
57. 10.1038/srep1009110.1038/srep10091 ↗
58. 10.1186/s11671-018-2728-610.1186/s11671-018-2728-6 ↗
59. 10.1021/nn201121e10.1021/nn201121e ↗
60. 10.1016/j.toxrep.2016.03.00410.1016/j.toxrep.2016.03.004 ↗
61. 10.1073/pnas.181679211610.1073/pnas.1816792116 ↗
62. 10.1128/AEM.02865-1710.1128/AEM.02865-17 ↗
63. 10.1515/bmt-2015-004310.1515/bmt-2015-0043 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.01810.1016/j.addr.2008.03.018 ↗
65. ExoQuick overview; System Biosciences Inc. https://www.systembio.com/microrna-research/exoquick-exosomes/overview.
66. Nanosight. Applications of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) in Nanoparticle Research, 2009.
67. 10.1080/20013078.2017.134408710.1080/20013078.2017.1344087 ↗
68. 10.1371/journal.pone.011749510.1371/journal.pone.0117495 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.07.00410.1016/j.tranon.2018.07.004 ↗
70. 10.1371/journal.pone.019882010.1371/journal.pone.0198820 ↗