Low-oxidation-state Ru sites stabilized in carbon-doped RuO2 with low-temperature CO2 activation to yield methane
Source abstract
Abstract
The generation of methane fuel using surplus renewable energy with CO2 as the carbon source enables both the decarbonization and substitution of fossil fuel feedstocks. However, high temperatures are usually required for the efficient activation of CO2. Here we present a solid catalyst synthesized using a mild, green hydrothermal synthesis that involves interstitial carbon doped into ruthenium oxide, which enables the stabilization of Ru cations in a low oxidation state and a ruthenium oxycarbonate phase to form. The catalyst shows an activity and selectivity for the conversion of CO2 into methane at lower temperatures than those of conventional catalysts, with an excellent long-term stability. Furthermore, this catalyst is able to operate under intermittent power supply conditions, which couples very well with electricity production systems based on renewable energies. The structure of the catalyst and the nature of the ruthenium species were acutely characterized by combining advanced imaging and spectroscopic tools at the macro and atomic scales, which highlighted the low-oxidation-state Ru sites (Run+, 0 < n < 4) as responsible for the high catalytic activity. This catalyst suggests alternative perspectives for materials design using interstitial dopants.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysts for Methane Reforming · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Gary Grim, R. et al. Transforming the carbon economy: challenges and opportunities in the convergence of low-cost electricity and reductive CO2 utilization. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 472–494 (2020).10.1039/C9EE02410G ↗
2. Ghaib, K. & Ben-Fares, F. Z. Power-to-methane: a state-of-the-art review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 81, 433–446 (2018).10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.004 ↗
3. Eveloy, V. & Gebreegziabher, T. A review of projected power-to-gas deployment scenarios. Energies 11, 1824 (2018).10.3390/en11071824 ↗
4. Cored, J. et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of ruthenium nanoparticles with a metallic core and a ruthenium carbide shell for low-temperature activation of CO2 to methane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 19304 (2019).10.1021/jacs.9b07088 ↗
5. Yan, C. et al. Local built-in electric field enabled in carbon-doped Co3O4 nanocrystals for superior lithium-ion storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1705951 (2018).10.1002/adfm.201705951 ↗
6. Ruan, F. et al. Enhanced activity for aerobic oxidative of alcohols over manganese oxides stimulated with interstitial nitrogen doping. Green. Synth. Catal. 2, 38–44 (2021).10.1016/j.gresc.2020.12.003 ↗
7. Aroyo, M. I. et al. Crystallography online: Bilbao Crystallographic Server. Bulg. Chem. Commun. 43, 183–197 (2011).
8. Rutt, H. N. & Nicola, J. H. Raman spectra of carbonates of calcite structure. J. Phys. C 7, 4522–4528 (1974).10.1088/0022-3719/7/24/015 ↗
9. Buzgar, N. & Apopei, A. I. The Raman study of certain carbonates. Geologie 55, 97–112 (2009).
10. Planas, N. et al. Electronic structure of oxidized complexes derived from cis-[Ru-II(bpy) 2(H2 O)2]2+ and its photoisomerization mechanism. Inorg. Chem. 50, 11134–11142 (2011).10.1021/ic201686c ↗
11. Zhao, Z. et al. Effect of rutile content on the catalytic performance of Ru/TiO2 catalyst for low-temperature CO2 methanation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9, 14288–14296 (2021).10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05565 ↗
12. Lippi, R. et al. Highly active catalyst for CO2 methanation derived from a metal organic framework template. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 12990–12997 (2017).10.1039/C7TA00958E ↗
13. Li, X. et al. Controlling CO2 hydrogenation selectivity by metal-supported electron transfer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 19983–19989 (2020).10.1002/anie.202003847 ↗
14. Renda, S., Ricca, A. & Palma, V. Precursor salts influence in ruthenium catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to methane. Appl. Energy 279, 115767 (2020).10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115767 ↗
15. Liao, W. et al. Tuning activity and selectivity of CO2 hydrogenation via metal–oxide interfaces over ZnO-supported metal catalysts. J. Catal. 407, 126–140 (2022).10.1016/j.jcat.2022.01.037 ↗
16. Niu, Y. et al. Manipulating interstitial carbon atoms in the nickel octahedral site for highly efficient hydrogenation of alkyne. Nat. Commun. 11, 3324 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-17188-3 ↗
17. Tanuma, S., Powell, C. J. & Penn, D. R. Calculations of electron inelastic mean free paths. V. Data for 14 organic compounds over the 50–2000 eV range. Surf. Interf. Anal. 21, 165–176 (1994).10.1002/sia.740210302 ↗
18. Shinotsuka, H., Tanuma, S., Powell, C. J. & Penn, D. R. Calculations of electron inelastic mean free paths. X. Data for 41 elemental solids over the 50 eV to 200 keV range with the relativistic full Penn algorithm. Surf. Interf. Anal. 47, 871–888 (2015).10.1002/sia.5789 ↗
19. Morgan, D. J. Resolving ruthenium: XPS studies of common ruthenium materials. Surf. Interf. Anal. 47, 1072–1079 (2015).10.1002/sia.5852 ↗
20. Yeh, J. J. & Lindau, I. Atomic subshell photoionization cross-sections and asymmetry parameters: 1 ≤ Z ≤ 103. Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 32, 1–155 (1985).10.1016/0092-640X(85)90016-6 ↗
21. Simonelli, L. et al. CLÆSS: The hard X-ray absorption beamline of the ALBA CELLS synchrotron. Cogent Phys. 3, 1231987 (2016).10.1080/23311940.2016.1231987 ↗
22. Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12, 537–541 (2005).10.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
23. Newville, M. EXAFS analysis using FEFF and FEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 8, 96–100 (2001).10.1107/S0909049500016290 ↗
24. Rehr, J. J. & Albers, R. C. Theoretical approaches to X-ray absorption fine structure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 621–654 (2000).10.1103/RevModPhys.72.621 ↗
25. Robinson, D. K. & Bevington, P. R. Sample Programs for Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (McGraw-Hill, 1992).
26. Newville, M. Larch: an analysis package for XAFS and related spectroscopies. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 430, 012007 (2013).10.1088/1742-6596/430/1/012007 ↗
27. Faut, F. et al. The crystallography stations at the Alba synchrotron. Eur. Phys. J. 130, 160–173 (2015).
28. Favre-Nicolin, V. & Cerny, R. FOX, ‘free objects for crystallography’: a modular approach to ab initio structure determination from powder diffraction. J. Appl. Cryst. 35, 734–743 (2002).10.1107/S0021889802015236 ↗
29. Toby, B. & von Dreele, R. B. GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46, 544–549 (2013).10.1107/S0021889813003531 ↗
30. Roy, P., Rouzières, M., Qi, Z. & Chubar, O. The AILES Infrared Beamline on the third generation Synchrotron Radiation Facility SOLEIL. Infrared Phys. Technol. 49, 139–146 (2006).10.1016/j.infrared.2006.01.015 ↗
31. Faye, M. et al. Improved mid infrared detector for high spectral or spatial resolution and synchrotron radiation use. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 063119 (2016).10.1063/1.4954405 ↗