Self-repair protects microtubules from destruction by molecular motors
Source abstract
Abstract
Microtubule instability stems from the low energy of tubulin dimer interactions, which sets the growing polymer close to its disassembly conditions. Molecular motors use ATP hydrolysis to produce mechanical work and move on microtubules. This raises the possibility that the mechanical work produced by walking motors can break dimer interactions and trigger microtubule disassembly. We tested this hypothesis by studying the interplay between microtubules and moving molecular motors in vitro. Our results show that molecular motors can remove tubulin dimers from the lattice and rapidly destroy microtubules. We also found that dimer removal by motors was compensated for by the insertion of free tubulin dimers into the microtubule lattice. This self-repair mechanism allows microtubules to survive the damage induced by molecular motors as they move along their tracks. Our study reveals the existence of coupling between the motion of molecular motors and the renewal of the microtubule lattice.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microtubule and mitosis dynamics · Micro and Nano Robotics · Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Drummond, D. R. Regulation of microtubule dynamics by kinesins. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 927–934 (2011).10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.09.021 ↗
2. Hibbel, A. et al. Kinesin Kip2 enhances microtubule growth in vitro through length-dependent feedback on polymerization and catastrophe. Elife 4, e10542 (2015).10.7554/eLife.10542 ↗
3. Laan, L. et al. Cortical dynein controls microtubule dynamics to generate pulling forces that position microtubule asters. Cell 148, 502–514 (2012).10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.007 ↗
4. Hunter, A. W. et al. The kinesin-related protein MCAK is a microtubule depolymerase that forms an ATP-hydrolyzing complex at microtubule ends. Mol. Cell 11, 445–457 (2003).10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00049-2 ↗
5. Arellano-Santoyo, H. et al. A tubulin binding switch underlies Kip3/kinesin-8 depolymerase activity. Dev. Cell 42, 37–51.e8 (2017).10.1016/j.devcel.2017.06.011 ↗
6. Schaedel, L. et al. Lattice defects induce microtubule self-renewal. Nat. Phys. 15, 830–838 (2019).10.1038/s41567-019-0542-4 ↗
7. Peet, D. R., Burroughs, N. J. & Cross, R. A. Kinesin expands and stabilizes the GDP-microtubule lattice. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 386–391 (2018).10.1038/s41565-018-0084-4 ↗
8. Shima, T. et al. Kinesin-binding–triggered conformation switching of microtubules contributes to polarized transport. J. Cell Biol. 217, 4164–4183 (2018).10.1083/jcb.201711178 ↗
9. Dumont, E. L. P., Do, C. & Hess, H. Molecular wear of microtubules propelled by surface-adhered kinesins. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 166–169 (2015).10.1038/nnano.2014.334 ↗
10. VanDelinder, V., Adams, P. G. & Bachand, G. D. Mechanical splitting of microtubules into protofilament bundles by surface-bound kinesin-1. Sci. Rep. 6, 39408 (2016).10.1038/srep39408 ↗
11. Howard, J., Hudspeth, A. J. & Vale, R. D. Movement of microtubules by single kinesin molecules. Nature 342, 154–158 (1989).10.1038/342154a0 ↗
12. Vale, R. D. et al. Direct observation of single kinesin molecules moving along microtubules. Nature 380, 451–453 (1996).10.1038/380451a0 ↗
13. Portran, D., Gaillard, J., Vantard, M. & Théry, M. Quantification of MAP and molecular motor activities on geometrically controlled microtubule networks. Cytoskeleton 70, 12–23 (2013).10.1002/cm.21081 ↗
14. Carazo-Salas, R. E., Antony, C. & Nurse, P. The kinesin Klp2 mediates polarization of interphase microtubules in fission yeast. Science 309, 297–300 (2005).10.1126/science.1113465 ↗
15. Braun, M., Drummond, D. R., Cross, R. A. & McAinsh, A. D. The kinesin-14 Klp2 organizes microtubules into parallel bundles by an ATP-dependent sorting mechanism. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 724–730 (2009).10.1038/ncb1878 ↗
16. Guo, H. et al. Mechanism and dynamics of breakage of fluorescent microtubules. Biophys. J. 90, 2093–2098 (2006).10.1529/biophysj.105.071209 ↗
17. Vigers, G. P., Coue, M. & McIntosh, J. R. Fluorescent microtubules break up under illumination. J. Cell Biol. 107, 1011–1024 (1988).10.1083/jcb.107.3.1011 ↗
18. Mahamdeh, M., Simmert, S., Luchniak, A., Schäffer, E. & Howard, J. Label-free high-speed wide-field imaging of single microtubules using interference reflection microscopy. J. Microsc. 272, 60–66 (2018).10.1111/jmi.12744 ↗
19. Lasek, R. J. & Brady, S. T. Attachment of transported vesicles to microtubules in axoplasm is facilitated by AMP-PNP. Nature 316, 645–647 (1985).10.1038/316645a0 ↗
20. Braun, M. et al. The human kinesin-14 HSET tracks the tips of growing microtubules in vitro. Cytoskeleton 70, 515–521 (2013).10.1002/cm.21133 ↗
21. Jonsson, E., Yamada, M., Vale, R. D. & Goshima, G. Clustering of a kinesin-14 motor enables processive retrograde microtubule-based transport in plants. Nat. Plants 1, 15087 (2015).10.1038/nplants.2015.87 ↗
22. DeSantis, M. E. et al. Lis1 has two opposing modes of regulating cytoplasmic dynein. Cell 170, 1197–1208.e12 (2017).10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.037 ↗
23. Reck-Peterson, S. L. et al. Single-molecule analysis of dynein processivity and stepping behavior. Cell 126, 335–348 (2006).10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.046 ↗
24. Block, S. M. Kinesin motor mechanics: binding, stepping, tracking, gating, and limping. Biophys. J. 92, 2986–2995 (2007).10.1529/biophysj.106.100677 ↗
25. Dye, R. B., Flicker, P. F., Lien, D. Y. & Williams, R. C. End-stabilized microtubules observed in vitro: stability, subunit, interchange, and breakage. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 21, 171–186 (1992).10.1002/cm.970210302 ↗
26. Schaedel, L. et al. Microtubules self-repair in response to mechanical stress. Nat. Mater. 14, 1156–1163 (2015).10.1038/nmat4396 ↗
27. Gennerich, A., Carter, A. P., Reck-Peterson, S. L. & Vale, R. D. Force-induced bidirectional stepping of cytoplasmic dynein. Cell 131, 952–965 (2007).10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.016 ↗
28. Dimitrov, A. et al. Detection of GTP-tubulin conformation in vivo reveals a role for GTP remnants in microtubule rescues. Science 322, 1353–1356 (2008).10.1126/science.1165401 ↗
29. de Forges, H. et al. Localized mechanical stress promotes microtubule rescue. Curr. Biol. 26, 3399–3406 (2016).10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.048 ↗
30. Aher, A. et al. CLASP mediates microtubule repair by restricting lattice damage and regulating tubulin incorporation. Curr. Biol. 30, 2175–2183.e6 (2020).10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.070 ↗
31. Nakata, T., Niwa, S., Okada, Y., Perez, F. & Hirokawa, N. Preferential binding of a kinesin-1 motor to GTP-tubulin-rich microtubules underlies polarized vesicle transport. J. Cell Biol. 194, 245–255 (2011).10.1083/jcb.201104034 ↗
32. Aumeier, C. et al. Self-repair promotes microtubule rescue. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 1054–1064 (2016).10.1038/ncb3406 ↗
33. Vemu, A. et al. Severing enzymes amplify microtubule arrays through lattice GTP-tubulin incorporation. Science 361, eaau1504 (2018).10.1126/science.aau1504 ↗