Imaging orbital-selective quasiparticles in the Hund’s metal state of FeSe
Source abstract
Abstract
Strong electronic correlations, emerging from the parent Mott insulator phase, are key to copper-based high-temperature superconductivity. By contrast, the parent phase of an iron-based high-temperature superconductor is never a correlated insulator. However, this distinction may be deceptive because Fe has five actived d orbitals while Cu has only one. In theory, such orbital multiplicity can generate a Hund's metal state, in which alignment of the Fe spins suppresses inter-orbital fluctuations, producing orbitally selective strong correlations. The spectral weights Zm of quasiparticles associated with different Fe orbitals m should then be radically different. Here we use quasiparticle scattering interference resolved by orbital content to explore these predictions in FeSe. Signatures of strong, orbitally selective differences of quasiparticle Zm appear on all detectable bands over a wide energy range. Further, the quasiparticle interference amplitudes reveal that [Formula: see text], consistent with earlier orbital-selective Cooper pairing studies. Thus, orbital-selective strong correlations dominate the parent state of iron-based high-temperature superconductivity in FeSe.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron-based superconductors research · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Rare-earth and actinide compounds
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Dagotto, E. Correlated electrons in high-temperature superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 763 (1994).10.1103/RevModPhys.66.763 ↗
2. Georges, A., Kotliar, G., Krauth, W. & Rozenberg, M. J. Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996).10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13 ↗
3. Paglione, J. & Greene, R. L. High-temperature superconductivity in iron-based materials. Nat. Phys. 6, 645–658 (2010).10.1038/nphys1759 ↗
4. Wang, F. & Lee, D. H. The electron-pairing mechanism of iron-based superconductors. Science 332, 200–204 (2011).10.1126/science.1200182 ↗
5. Haule, K. & Kotliar, G. Coherence–incoherence crossover in the normal state of iron oxypnictides and importance of Hund’s rule coupling. New J. Phys. 11, 025021 (2009).10.1088/1367-2630/11/2/025021 ↗
6. Yin, Z. P., Haule, K. & Kotliar, G. Kinetic frustration and the nature of the magnetic and paramagnetic states in iron pnictides and iron chalcogenides. Nat. Mater. 10, 932–935 (2011).10.1038/nmat3120 ↗
7. de’ Medici, L., Mravlje, J. & Georges, A. Janus-faced influence of Hund’s rule coupling in strongly correlated materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 256401 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.256401 ↗
8. Lanata, N. et al. Orbital selectivity in Hund’s metals: the iron chalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 87, 045122 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.87.045122 ↗
9. Georges, A., de’ Medici, L. & Mravlje, J. Strong correlations from Hund’s coupling. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 137–178 (2013).10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125045 ↗
10. de’ Medici, L., Giovannetti, G. & Capone, M. Selective Mott physics as a key to iron superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 177001 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.177001 ↗
11. Fanfarillo, L. & Bascones, E. Electronic correlations in Hund metals. Phys. Rev. B 92, 075136 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.075136 ↗
12. de’ Medici, L. & Capone, M. in F. Mancini, R. Citro (eds) The Iron Pnictide Superconductors. Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences 186 (Springer, Cham, 2017).
13. de’ Medici, L. in The Physics of Correlated Insulators, Metals, and Superconductors (Modeling and Simulation Vol. 7) (eds Pavarini, E., Koch, E., Scalettar, R. & Martin, R.) 377–398 (Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, 2017).
14. de’ Medici, L., Hassan, S. R., Capone, M. & Dai, X. Orbital-selective Mott transition out of band degeneracy lifting. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 126401 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.126401 ↗
15. Aichhorn, M., Biermann, S., Miyake, T., Georges, A. & Imada, M. Theoretical evidence for strong correlations and incoherent metallic state in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 82, 064504 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.82.064504 ↗
16. Yu, R. & Si, Q. Mott transition in multiorbital models for iron pnictides. Phys. Rev. B 84, 235115 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.84.235115 ↗
17. Yu, R., Zhu, J.-X. & Si, Q. Orbital selectivity enhanced by nematic order in FeSe. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01733 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.227003 ↗
18. Sprau, P. O. et al. Discovery of orbital-selective Cooper pairing in FeSe. Science 357, 75–80 (2017).10.1126/science.aal1575 ↗
19. Kreisel, A. et al. Orbital selective pairing and gap structures of iron-based superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 95, 174504 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.95.174504 ↗
20. Arakawa, N. & Ogata, M. Orbital-selective superconductivity and the effect of lattice distortion in iron-based superconductors. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, 074704 (2011).10.1143/JPSJ.80.074704 ↗
21. Yu, R., Zhu, J. X. & Si, Q. Orbital-selective superconductivity, gap anisotropy, and spin resonance excitations in a multiorbital t-J 1-J 2 model for iron pnictides. Phys. Rev. B 89, 024509 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.024509 ↗
22. Yi, M., Zhang, Y., Shen, Z.-X. & Lu, D. Role of the orbital degree of freedom in iron-based superconductors. npj Quantum Mater. 2, 57 (2017).10.1038/s41535-017-0059-y ↗
23. Suzuki, Y. et al. Momentum-dependent sign inversion of orbital order in superconducting FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 92, 205117 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.205117 ↗
24. Watson, M. D. et al. Evidence for unidirectional nematic bond ordering in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 94, 201107 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.201107 ↗
25. Watson, M. D., Haghighirad, A. A., Rhodes, L. C., Hoesch, M. & Kim, T. K. Electronic anisotropies revealed by detwinned ARPES measurements of FeSe. New J. Phys. 19, 103021 (2017).10.1088/1367-2630/aa8a04 ↗
26. Terashima, T. et al. Anomalous Fermi surface in FeSe seen by Shubnikov–de Haas oscillation measurements. Phys. Rev. B 90, 144517 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.90.144517 ↗
27. Watson, M. D. et al. Emergence of the nematic electronic state in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 91, 155106 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.155106 ↗
28. Coldea, A. I. & Watson, M. D. The key ingredients of the electronic structure of FeSe. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 9, 125–146 (2018).10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-033117-054137 ↗
29. Capriotti, L., Scalapino, D. J. & Sedgewick, R. D. Wave-vector power spectrum of the local tunneling density of states: ripples in a d-wave sea. Phys. Rev. B 68, 014508 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevB.68.014508 ↗
30. Yuan, T., Figgins, J. & Morr, D. K. Hidden order transition in URu2Si2: evidence for the emergence of a coherent Anderson lattice from scanning tunneling spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 86, 035129 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevB.86.035129 ↗
31. Lee, J. et al. Heavy d-electron quasiparticle interference and real-space electronic structure of Sr3Ru2O7. Nat. Phys. 5, 800–804 (2009).10.1038/nphys1397 ↗
32. Schmidt, A. R. et al. Imaging the Fano lattice to ‘hidden order’ transition in URu2Si2. Nature 465, 570–576 (2010).10.1038/nature09073 ↗
33. Allan, M. P. et al. Imaging Cooper pairing of heavy fermions in CeCoIn5. Nat. Phys. 9, 468–473 (2013).10.1038/nphys2671 ↗
34. Kasahara, S. et al. Field-induced superconducting phase of FeSe in the BCS–BEC cross-over. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16309 (2014).10.1073/pnas.1413477111 ↗
35. Watashige, T. et al. Evidence for time-reversal symmetry breaking of the superconducting state near twin-boundary interfaces in FeSe revealed by scanning tunneling spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031022 (2015).