Revealing catalyst restructuring and composition during nitrate electroreduction through correlated operando microscopy and spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Electrocatalysts alter their structure and composition during reaction, which can in turn create new active/selective phases. Identifying these changes is crucial for determining how morphology controls catalytic properties but the mechanisms by which operating conditions shape the catalyst’s working state are not yet fully understood. In this study, we show using correlated operando microscopy and spectroscopy that as well-defined Cu 2 O cubes evolve under electrochemical nitrate reduction reaction conditions, distinct catalyst motifs are formed depending on the applied potential and the chemical environment. By further matching the timescales of morphological changes observed via electrochemical liquid cell transmission electron microscopy with time-resolved chemical state information obtained from operando transmission soft X-ray microscopy, hard X-ray absorption spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy, we reveal that Cu 2 O can be kinetically stabilized alongside metallic copper for extended durations under moderately reductive conditions due to surface hydroxide formation. Finally, we rationalize how the interaction between the electrolyte and the catalyst influences the ammonia selectivity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Gao, D., Arán-Ais, R. M., Jeon, H. S. & Roldan Cuenya, B. Rational catalyst and electrolyte design for CO2 electroreduction towards multicarbon products. Nat. Catal. 2, 198–210 (2019).10.1038/s41929-019-0235-5 ↗
2. Popović, S. et al. Stability and degradation mechanisms of copper-based catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 14736–14746 (2020).10.1002/anie.202000617 ↗
3. Yang, J. et al. Potential-driven restructuring of Cu single atoms to nanoparticles for boosting the electrochemical reduction of nitrate to ammonia. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 12062–12071 (2022).10.1021/jacs.2c02262 ↗
4. Hu, Q. et al. Reaction intermediate-mediated electrocatalyst synthesis favors specified facet and defect exposure for efficient nitrate–ammonia conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 4989–4997 (2021).10.1039/D1EE01731D ↗
5. Pourbaix, M. Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions (National Association of Corrosion Engineers, 1974).10.1007/978-1-4684-1806-4_4 ↗
6. Bergmann, A. & Roldan Cuenya, B. Operando insights into nanoparticle transformations during catalysis. ACS Catal. 9, 10020–10043 (2019).10.1021/acscatal.9b01831 ↗
7. Zhu, Y., Wang, J., Chu, H., Chu, Y.-C. & Chen, H. M. In situ/operando studies for designing next-generation electrocatalysts. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1281–1291 (2020).10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00305 ↗
8. Wang, Z., Richards, D. & Singh, N. Recent discoveries in the reaction mechanism of heterogeneous electrocatalytic nitrate reduction. Catal. Sci. Technol. 11, 705–725 (2021).10.1039/D0CY02025G ↗
9. Jiao, F. & Xu, B. Electrochemical ammonia synthesis and ammonia fuel cells. Adv. Mater. 31, 1805173 (2019).10.1002/adma.201805173 ↗
10. van Langevelde, P. H., Katsounaros, I. & Koper, M. T. M. Electrocatalytic nitrate reduction for sustainable ammonia production. Joule 5, 290–294 (2021).10.1016/j.joule.2020.12.025 ↗
11. Jung, W. & Hwang, Y. J. Material strategies in the electrochemical nitrate reduction reaction to ammonia production. Mater. Chem. Front. 5, 6803–6823 (2021).10.1039/D1QM00456E ↗
12. Valera-Medina, A., Xiao, H., Owen-Jones, M., David, W. I. F. & Bowen, P. J. Ammonia for power. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 69, 63–102 (2018).10.1016/j.pecs.2018.07.001 ↗
13. Chen, J. G. et al. Beyond fossil fuel–driven nitrogen transformations. Science 360, eaar6611 (2018).10.1126/science.aar6611 ↗
14. Bae, S. E., Stewart, K. L. & Gewirth, A. A. Nitrate adsorption and reduction on Cu(100) in acidic solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 10171–10180 (2007).10.1021/ja071330n ↗
15. Zhou, N. et al. Potential-induced synthesis and structural identification of oxide-derived Cu electrocatalysts for selective nitrate reduction to ammonia. ACS Catal. 13, 7529–7537 (2023).10.1021/acscatal.3c01315 ↗
16. Anastasiadou, D. et al. Morphology changes of Cu2O catalysts during nitrate electroreduction to ammonia. ChemCatChem 15, e202201503 (2023).10.1002/cctc.202201503 ↗
17. Costa, G. F. et al. Identifying the active site of Cu/Cu2O for electrocatalytic nitrate reduction reaction to ammonia. Chem. Catal. 4, 100850 (2024).10.1016/j.checat.2023.100850 ↗
18. Bai, L. et al. Electrocatalytic nitrate and nitrite reduction toward ammonia using Cu2O nanocubes: active species and reaction mechanisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 9665–9678 (2024).10.1021/jacs.3c13288 ↗
19. Wang, Y., Zhou, W., Jia, R., Yu, Y. & Zhang, B. Unveiling the activity origin of a copper-based electrocatalyst for selective nitrate reduction to ammonia. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 5350–5354 (2020).10.1002/anie.201915992 ↗
20. Celante, V. G. & Freitas, M. B. J. G. Electrodeposition of copper from spent Li-ion batteries by electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance and impedance spectroscopy techniques. J. Appl. Electrochem. 40, 233–239 (2010).10.1007/s10800-009-9996-x ↗
21. Puigdomenech, I. & Taxén, C. Thermodynamic Data for Copper. Implications for the Corrosion of Copper under Repository Conditions (Svensk Kärnbränslehantering, 2000).
22. Hoar, T. P. & Rothwell, G. P. The potential/pH diagram for a copper–water–ammonia system: its significance in the stress-corrosion cracking of brass in ammoniacal solutions. Electrochim. Acta 15, 1037–1045 (1970).10.1016/0013-4686(70)80043-3 ↗
23. Siegfried, M. J. & Choi, K.-S. Elucidating the effect of additives on the growth and stability of Cu2O surfaces via shape transformation of pre-grown crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 10356–10357 (2006).10.1021/ja063574y ↗
24. Luo, Q., Mackay, R. A. & Babu, S. V. Copper dissolution in aqueous ammonia-containing media during chemical mechanical polishing. Chem. Mater. 9, 2101–2106 (1997).10.1021/cm970168s ↗
25. Fu, X. et al. Alternative route for electrochemical ammonia synthesis by reduction of nitrate on copper nanosheets. Appl. Mater. Today 19, 100620 (2020).10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100620 ↗
26. Schroder, D., Schwarz, H., Wu, J. & Wesdemiotis, C. Long-lived dications of Cu(H2O)2+ and Cu(NH3)2+ do exist! Chem. Phys. Lett. 3343, 258–264 (2001).10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00672-8 ↗
27. Ducéré, J. M., Goursot, A. & Berthomieu, D. Comparative density functional theory study of the binding of ligands to Cu+ and Cu2+: influence of the coordination and oxidation state. J. Phys. Chem. A 109, 400–408 (2005).10.1021/jp047971b ↗
28. Grosse, P., Yoon, A., Rettenmaier, C., Chee, S. W. & Roldan Cuenya, B. Growth dynamics and processes governing the stability of electrodeposited size-controlled cubic Cu catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 26908–26915 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c09105 ↗
29. Grosse, P. et al. Dynamic transformation of cubic copper catalysts during CO2 electroreduction and its impact on catalytic selectivity. Nat. Commun. 12, 6736 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-26743-5 ↗
30. Li, Y. et al. Electrochemically scrambled nanocrystals are catalytically active for CO2-to-multicarbons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9194–9201 (2020).10.1073/pnas.1918602117 ↗
31. Yoon, A., Poon, J., Grosse, P., Chee, S. W. & Roldan Cuenya, B. Iodide-mediated Cu catalyst restructuring during CO2 electroreduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 10, 14041–14050 (2022).10.1039/D1TA11089F ↗
32. Velasco-Vélez, J. J. et al. On the activity/selectivity and phase stability of thermally grown copper oxides during the electrocatalytic reduction of CO2. ACS Catal. 10, 11510–11518 (2020).10.1021/acscatal.0c03484 ↗
33. Timoshenko, J. & Roldan Cuenya, B. In situ/operando electrocatalyst characterization by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 121, 882–961 (2021).10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00396 ↗
34. Nobial, M., Devos, O., Mattos, O. R. & Tribollet, B. The nitrate reduction process: a way for increasing interfacial pH. J. Electroanal. Chem. 600, 87–94 (2007).10.1016/j.jelechem.2006.03.003 ↗
35. Monteiro, M. C. O. & Koper, M. T. M. Measuring local pH in electrochemistry. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 25, 100649 (2021).10.1016/j.coelec.2020.100649 ↗
36. Johnson, A. R., McQueen, T. M. & Rodolfa, K. T. Species distribution diagrams in the copper–ammonia system: an updated and expanded demonstration illustrating complex equilibria. J. Chem. Educ. 82, 408–414 (2005).10.1021/ed082p408 ↗
37. Giannopoulou, I., Panias, D. & Paspaliaris, I. Electrochemical modeling and study of copper deposition from concentrated ammoniacal sulfate solutions. Hydrometallurgy 99, 58–66 (2009).10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.06.009 ↗
38. Deng, Y., Handoko, A. D., Du, Y., Xi, S. & Yeo, B. S. In situ Raman spectroscopy of copper and copper oxide surfaces during electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction: identification of CuIII oxides as catalytically active species. ACS Catal. 6, 2473–2481 (2016).10.1021/acscatal.6b00205 ↗
39. Niaura, G. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic observation of two kinds of adsorbed OH− ions at copper electrode. Electrochim. Acta 45, 3507–3519 (2000).10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00434-5 ↗
40. Chan, H. Y. H., Takoudis, C. G. & Weaver, M. J. Oxide film formation and oxygen adsorption on copper in aqueous media as probed by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 357–365 (1999).10.1021/jp983787c ↗
41. Bodappa, N. et al. Early stages of electrochemical oxidation of Cu(111) and polycrystalline Cu surfaces revealed by in situ Raman spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 12192–12196 (2019).10.1021/jacs.9b04638 ↗
42. Moura de Salles Pupo, M. & Kortlever, R. Electrolyte effects on the electrochemical reduction of CO2. ChemPhysChem 20, 2926–2935 (2019).10.1002/cphc.201900680 ↗
43. Marcandalli, G., Monteiro, M. C. O., Goyal, A. & Koper, M. T. M. Electrolyte effects on CO2 electrochemical reduction to CO. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 1900–1911 (2022).10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00080 ↗
44. Nitopi, S. et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 119, 7610–7672 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 ↗
45. Katsounaros, I. & Kyriacou, G. Influence of the concentration and the nature of the supporting electrolyte on the electrochemical reduction of nitrate on tin cathode. Electrochim. Acta 52, 6412–6420 (2007).10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.050 ↗
46. Arán-Ais, R. M. et al. Structure- and electrolyte-sensitivity in CO2 electroreduction. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 2906–2917 (2018).10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00360 ↗
47. Chee, S. W., Lunkenbein, T., Schlögl, R. & Roldán Cuenya, B. Operando electron microscopy of catalysts: the missing cornerstone in heterogeneous catalysis research? Chem. Rev. 123, 13374–13418 (2023).10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00352 ↗
48. Andersen, S. Z. et al. A rigorous electrochemical ammonia synthesis protocol with quantitative isotope measurements. Nature 570, 504–508 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1260-x ↗
49. Wang, Y., Wang, C., Li, M., Yu, Y. & Zhang, B. Nitrate electroreduction: mechanism insight, in situ characterization, performance evaluation, and challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 6720–6733 (2021).10.1039/D1CS00116G ↗
50. Jeon, H. S. et al. Selectivity control of Cu nanocrystals in a gas-fed flow cell through CO2 pulsed electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 7578–7587 (2021).10.1021/jacs.1c03443 ↗