journal article·2015-09Open access

Fractal heterogeneity in minimal matrix models of scars modulates stiff-niche stem-cell responses via nuclear exit of a mechanorepressor

P. C. Dave P. Dingal, Andrew M. Bradshaw, Sangkyun Cho, Matthew Raab, Amnon Buxboim, Joe Swift, Dennis E. Discher

Nature Materials· Volume 14· Issue 9

Abstract

Scarring is a long-lasting problem in higher animals, and reductionist approaches could aid in developing treatments. Here, we show that copolymerization of collagen I with polyacrylamide produces minimal matrix models of scars (MMMS), in which fractal-fibre bundles segregate heterogeneously to the hydrogel subsurface. Matrix stiffens locally-as in scars-while allowing separate control over adhesive-ligand density. The MMMS elicits scar-like phenotypes from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs): cells spread and polarize quickly, increasing nucleoskeletal lamin-A yet expressing the 'scar marker' smooth muscle actin (SMA) more slowly. Surprisingly, expression responses to MMMS exhibit less cell-to-cell noise than homogeneously stiff gels. Such differences from bulk-average responses arise because a strong SMA repressor, NKX2.5, slowly exits the nucleus on rigid matrices. NKX2.5 overexpression overrides rigid phenotypes, inhibiting SMA and cell spreading, whereas cytoplasm-localized NKX2.5 mutants degrade in well-spread cells. MSCs thus form a 'mechanical memory' of rigidity by progressively suppressing NKX2.5, thereby elevating SMA in a scar-like state.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Collagen: Extraction and Characterization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Gurtner, G. C., Werner, S., Barrandon, Y. & Longaker, M. T. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 453, 314–321 (2008).10.1038/nature07039 ↗
2. Georges, P. C. et al. Increased stiffness of the rat liver precedes matrix deposition: Implications for fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. 293, G1147–G1154 (2007).
3. Liu, F. et al. Feedback amplification of fibrosis through matrix stiffening and COX-2 suppression. J. Cell Biol. 190, 693–706 (2010).10.1083/jcb.201004082 ↗
4. Berry, M. F. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance. Am. J. Physiol. 290, H2196–H2203 (2006).
5. Engler, A. J., Rehfeldt, F., Sen, S. & Discher, D. E. Microtissue elasticity: Measurements by atomic force microscopy and its influence on cell differentiation. Methods Cell Biol. 83, 521–545 (2007).10.1016/S0091-679X(07)83022-6 ↗
6. Discher, D. E., Janmey, P. & Wang, Y. L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310, 1139–1143 (2005).10.1126/science.1116995 ↗
7. Khorasani, H. et al. A quantitative approach to scar analysis. Am. J. Pathol. 178, 621–628 (2011).10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.10.019 ↗
8. Martin, P. Wound healing–aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science 276, 75–81 (1997).10.1126/science.276.5309.75 ↗
9. Bakay, M., Zhao, P., Chen, J. & Hoffman, E. P. A web-accessible complete transcriptome of normal human and DMD muscle. Neuromuscul. Disord. 12 (suppl. 1), S125–S141 (2002).10.1016/S0960-8966(02)00093-7 ↗
10. Hinz, B. Formation and function of the myofibroblast during tissue repair. J. Invest. Dermatol. 127, 526–537 (2007).10.1038/sj.jid.5700613 ↗
11. Willems, I. E. M. G., Havenith, M. G., Demey, J. G. R. & Daemen, M. J. A. P. The alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive cells in healing human myocardial scars. Am. J. Pathol. 145, 868–875 (1994).
12. Swift, J. et al. Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science 341, 1240104 (2013).10.1126/science.1240104 ↗
13. Kasahara, H., Bartunkova, S., Schinke, M., Tanaka, M. & Izumo, S. Cardiac and extracardiac expression of Csx/Nkx2.5 homeodomain protein. Circ. Res. 82, 936–946 (1998).10.1161/01.RES.82.9.936 ↗
14. Pittenger, M. F. et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284, 143–147 (1999).10.1126/science.284.5411.143 ↗
15. Hare, J. M. et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of intravenous adult human mesenchymal stem cells (prochymal) after acute myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 54, 2277–2286 (2009).10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.055 ↗
16. Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L. & Discher, D. E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677–689 (2006).10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
17. Shin, J. W. et al. Contractile forces sustain and polarize hematopoiesis from stem and progenitor cells. Cell Stem Cell 14, 81–93 (2014).10.1016/j.stem.2013.10.009 ↗
18. Gregory, C. A., Ylostalo, J. & Prockop, D. J. Adult bone marrow stem/progenitor cells (MSCs) are preconditioned by microenvironmental “niches” in culture: A two-stage hypothesis for regulation of MSC fate. Science STKE 2005, pe37 (2005).10.1126/stke.2942005pe37 ↗
19. Barberi, T., Willis, L. M., Socci, N. D. & Studer, L. Derivation of multipotent mesenchymal precursors from human embryonic stem cells. PLoS Med 2, 554–560 (2005).10.1371/journal.pmed.0020161 ↗
20. Wong, S., Guo, W. H., Hoffecker, I. & Wang, Y. L. Preparation of a micropatterned rigid-soft composite substrate for probing cellular rigidity sensing. Methods Cell Biol. 121, 3–15 (2014).10.1016/B978-0-12-800281-0.00001-4 ↗
21. Benoit, D. S., Schwartz, M. P., Durney, A. R. & Anseth, K. S. Small functional groups for controlled differentiation of hydrogel-encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells. Nature Mater. 7, 816–823 (2008).10.1038/nmat2269 ↗
22. Huebsch, N. et al. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nature Mater. 9, 518–526 (2010).10.1038/nmat2732 ↗
23. Khetan, S. et al. Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels. Nature Mater. 12, 458–465 (2013).10.1038/nmat3586 ↗
24. Trappmann, B. et al. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nature Mater. 11, 642–649 (2012).10.1038/nmat3339 ↗
25. Dalby, M. J., Gadegaard, N. & Oreffo, R. O. Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. Nature Mater. 13, 558–569 (2014).10.1038/nmat3980 ↗
26. Corr, D. T., Gallant-Behm, C. L., Shrive, N. G. & Hart, D. A. Biomechanical behavior of scar tissue and uninjured skin in a porcine model. Wound Repair Regen. 17, 250–259 (2009).10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00463.x ↗
27. Achterberg, V. F. et al. The nano-scale mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix regulate dermal fibroblast function. J. Invest. Dermatol. 134, 1862–1872 (2014).10.1038/jid.2014.90 ↗
28. MacQueen, L., Sun, Y. & Simmons, C. A. Mesenchymal stem cell mechanobiology and emerging experimental platforms. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20130179 (2013).10.1098/rsif.2013.0179 ↗
29. Dembo, M. & Wang, Y. L. Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. Biophys. J. 76, 2307–2316 (1999).10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77386-8 ↗
30. Storm, C., Pastore, J. J., MacKintosh, F. C., Lubensky, T. C. & Janmey, P. A. Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels. Nature 435, 191–194 (2005).10.1038/nature03521 ↗
31. Vader, D., Kabla, A., Weitz, D. & Mahadevan, L. Strain-induced alignment in collagen gels. PLoS ONE 4, e5902 (2009).10.1371/journal.pone.0005902 ↗
32. Buxboim, A., Rajagopal, K., Brown, A. E. & Discher, D. E. How deeply cells feel: Methods for thin gels. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 194116 (2010).10.1088/0953-8984/22/19/194116 ↗
33. Engler, A. et al. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys. J. 86, 617–628 (2004).10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74140-5 ↗
34. Mann, C. J. et al. Aberrant repair and fibrosis development in skeletal muscle. Skeletal Muscle 1, 21 (2011).10.1186/2044-5040-1-21 ↗
35. Raab, M. et al. Crawling from soft to stiff matrix polarizes the cytoskeleton and phosphoregulates myosin-II heavy chain. J. Cell Biol. 199, 669–683 (2012).10.1083/jcb.201205056 ↗
36. Zemel, A., Rehfeldt, F., Brown, A. E. X., Discher, D. E. & Safran, S. A. Cell shape, spreading symmetry, and the polarization of stress-fibers in cells. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 194110 (2010).10.1088/0953-8984/22/19/194110 ↗
37. Schmiedel, J. M. et al. MicroRNA control of protein expression noise. Science 348, 128–132 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa1738 ↗
38. Rinkevich, Y. et al. Skin fibrosis. Identification and isolation of a dermal lineage with intrinsic fibrogenic potential. Science 348, aaa2151 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa2151 ↗
39. Miralles, F., Posern, G., Zaromytidou, A. I. & Treisman, R. Actin dynamics control SRF activity by regulation of its coactivator MAL. Cell 113, 329–342 (2003).10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00278-2 ↗
40. Dupont, S. et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 474, U179–U212 (2011).10.1038/nature10137 ↗
41. Sullivan, K. E., Quinn, K. P., Tang, K. M., Georgakoudi, I. & Black, L. D. Extracellular matrix remodeling following myocardial infarction influences the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Theory 5, 14 (2014).10.1186/scrt403 ↗
42. Couzin-Frankel, J. The elusive heart fix. Science 345, 252–257 (2014).10.1126/science.345.6194.252 ↗
43. Dingal, P. C. & Discher, D. E. Systems mechanobiology: Tension-inhibited protein turnover is sufficient to physically control gene circuits. Biophys. J. 107, 2734–2743 (2014).10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.042 ↗
44. Kasahara, H. & Izumo, S. Identification of the in vivo casein kinase II phosphorylation site within the homeodomain of the cardiac tissue-specifying homeobox gene product Csx/Nkx2.5. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 526–536 (1999).10.1128/MCB.19.1.526 ↗
45. Ryan, T. et al. Myosin phosphatase modulates the cardiac cell fate by regulating the subcellular localization of Nkx2.5 in a Wnt/Rho-associated protein kinase-dependent pathway. Circ. Res. 112, 257–266 (2013).10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.275818 ↗
46. Yang, C., Tibbitt, M. W., Basta, L. & Anseth, K. S. Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate. Nature Mater. 13, 645–652 (2014).10.1038/nmat3889 ↗
47. Costa, M. W. et al. Complex SUMO-1 regulation of cardiac transcription factor Nkx2-5. PLoS ONE 6, e24812 (2011).10.1371/journal.pone.0024812 ↗
48. Breitbach, M. et al. Potential risks of bone marrow cell transplantation into infarcted hearts. Blood 110, 1362–1369 (2007).10.1182/blood-2006-12-063412 ↗
49. Rehfeldt, F. et al. Hyaluronic acid matrices show matrix stiffness in 2D and 3D dictates cytoskeletal order and myosin-II phosphorylation within stem cells. Integr. Biol. 4, 422–430 (2012).10.1039/c2ib00150k ↗
50. Addis, R. C. et al. Optimization of direct fibroblast reprogramming to cardiomyocytes using calcium activity as a functional measure of success. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 60, 97–106 (2013).10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.04.004 ↗
51. Lo, C. M. et al. Nonmuscle myosin IIb is involved in the guidance of fibroblast migration. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 982–989 (2004).10.1091/mbc.e03-06-0359 ↗
52. Domke, J. & Radmacher, M. Measuring the elastic properties of thin polymer films with the atomic force microscope. Langmuir 14, 3320–3325 (1998).10.1021/la9713006 ↗