journal article·2024-03Open access

Electrochemical and chemical cycle for high-efficiency decoupled water splitting in a near-neutral electrolyte

Ilya Slobodkin, Elena Davydova, Matan Sananis, Anna Breytus, Avner Rothschild

Nature Materials· Volume 23· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract Green hydrogen produced by water splitting using renewable electricity is essential to achieve net-zero carbon emissions. Present water electrolysis technologies are uncompetitive with low-cost grey hydrogen produced from fossil fuels, limiting their scale-up potential. Disruptive processes that decouple the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions and produce them in separate cells or different stages emerge as a prospective route to reduce system cost by enabling operation without expensive membranes and sealing components. Some of these processes divide the hydrogen or oxygen evolution reactions into electrochemical and chemical sub-reactions, enabling them to achieve high efficiency. However, high efficiency has been demonstrated only in a batch process with thermal swings that present operational challenges. This work introduces a breakthrough process that produces hydrogen and oxygen in separate cells and supports continuous operation in a membraneless system. We demonstrate high faradaic and electrolytic efficiency and high rate operation in a near-neutral electrolyte of NaBr in water, whereby bromide is electro-oxidized to bromate concurrent with hydrogen evolution in one cell, and bromate is chemically reduced to bromide in a catalytic reaction that evolves oxygen in another cell. This process may lead the way to high-efficiency membraneless water electrolysis that overcomes the limitations of century-old membrane electrolysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Krishnan, S. et al. Present and future cost of alkaline and PEM electrolyser stacks. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48, 32313–32330 (2023).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.031 ↗
2. McHugh, P. J., Stergiou, A. D. & Symes, M. D. Decoupled electrochemical water splitting: from fundamentals to applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2002453 (2020).10.1002/aenm.202002453 ↗
3. Ifkovits, Z. P., Evans, J. M., Meier, M. C., Papadantonakis, K. M. & Lewis, N. S. Decoupled electrochemical water-splitting systems: a review and perspective. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 4740–4759 (2021).10.1039/D1EE01226F ↗
4. Landman, A., Rothschild, A. & Grader, G. S. in Electrochemical Power Sources: Fundamentals, Systems, and Applications, Hydrogen Production by Water Electrolysis (eds Smolinka, T. & Garche, J.) Ch. 12, 407–454 (Elsevier, 2021).10.1016/B978-0-12-819424-9.00012-4 ↗
5. Chen, L., Dong, X., Wang, Y. & Xia, Y. Separating hydrogen and oxygen evolution in alkaline water electrolysis using nickel hydroxide. Nat. Commun. 7, 11741 (2016).10.1038/ncomms11741 ↗
6. Landman, A. et al. Photoelectrochemical water splitting in separate oxygen and hydrogen cells. Nat. Mater. 16, 646–651 (2017).10.1038/nmat4876 ↗
7. Dotan, H. et al. Decoupled hydrogen and oxygen evolution by a two-step electrochemical–chemical cycle for efficient overall water splitting. Nat. Energy 4, 786–795 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0462-7 ↗
8. Wang, J. et al. Decoupling half-reactions of electrolytic water splitting by integrating a polyaniline electrode. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 13149–13153 (2019).10.1039/C9TA03285A ↗
9. Symes, M. D. & Cronin, L. Decoupling hydrogen and oxygen evolution during electrolytic water splitting using an electron-coupled-proton buffer. Nat. Chem. 5, 403–409 (2013).10.1038/nchem.1621 ↗
10. Rausch, B., Symes, M. D. & Cronin, L. A bio-inspired, small molecule electron-coupled-proton buffer for decoupling the half-reactions of electrolytic water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 13656–13659 (2013).10.1021/ja4071893 ↗
11. Kirkaldy, N., Chisholm, G., Chen, J. J. & Cronin, L. A practical, organic-mediated, hybrid electrolyser that decouples hydrogen production at high current densities. Chem. Sci. 9, 1621–1626 (2018).10.1039/C7SC05388F ↗
12. Chisholm, G., Cronin, L. & Symes, M. D. Decoupled electrolysis using a silicotungstic acid electron-coupled-proton buffer in a proton exchange membrane cell. Electrochim. Acta 331, 135255 (2020).10.1016/j.electacta.2019.135255 ↗
13. Li, W. et al. Electrolyzer design for flexible decoupled water splitting and organic upgrading with electron reservoirs. Chem 4, 637–649 (2018).10.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.019 ↗
14. Amstutz, V. et al. Renewable hydrogen generation from a dual-circuit redox flow battery. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2350–2358 (2014).10.1039/C4EE00098F ↗
15. Zhang, F. et al. Decoupled redox catalytic hydrogen production with a robust electrolyte-borne electron and proton carrier. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 223–231 (2021).10.1021/jacs.0c09510 ↗
16. Rausch, B., Symes, M. D., Chisholm, G. & Cronin, L. Decoupled catalytic hydrogen evolution from a molecular metal oxide redox mediator in water splitting. Science 345, 1326–1330 (2014).10.1126/science.1257443 ↗
17. Bazant, M. Z. Theory of chemical kinetics and charge transfer based on nonequilibrium thermodynamics. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1144–1160 (2013).10.1021/ar300145c ↗
18. Suen, N. T. et al. Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 337–365 (2017).10.1039/C6CS00328A ↗
19. Bratsch, S. G. Standard electrode potentials and temperature coefficients in water at 298.15 K. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 18, 1–21 (1989).10.1063/1.555839 ↗
20. Hayes, W. M. (ed.) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 97th edn (CRC Press, 2016).10.1201/9781315380476 ↗
21. Grinbaum, B. & Freiberg, M. in Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology https://doi.org/10.1002/0471238961.0218151310010311.A01.PUB2 (2002).10.1002/0471238961.0218151310010311.A01.PUB2 ↗
22. Amoore, J. E. & Hautala, E. Odor as an aid to chemical safety: odor thresholds compared with threshold limit values and volatilities for 214 industrial chemicals in air and water dilution. J. Appl. Toxicol. 3, 272–290 (1983).10.1002/jat.2550030603 ↗
23. Viswanathan, K. & Tilak, B. V. Chemical, electrochemical, and technological aspects of sodium chlorate manufacture. J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 1551–1559 (1984).10.1149/1.2115908 ↗
24. Osuga, T. & Sugino, K. Electrolytic production of bromates. J. Electrochem. Soc. 104, 448 (1957).10.1149/1.2428623 ↗
25. Cettou, P., Robertson, P. M. & Ibl, N. On the electrolysis of aqueous bromide solutions to bromate. Electrochim. Acta 29, 875–885 (1984).10.1016/0013-4686(84)87131-5 ↗
26. Pavlović, O. Ž., Krstajić, N. V. & Spasojević, M. D. Formation of bromates at a RuO2TiO2 titanium anode. Surf. Coat. Technol. 34, 177–183 (1988).10.1016/0257-8972(88)90079-5 ↗
27. Vasudevan, S. Studies relating to electrolytic preparation of potassium bromate. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47, 1743–1746 (2008).10.1021/ie071554e ↗
28. Gomes, A. S. O., Busch, M., Wildlock, M., Simic, N. & Ahlberg, E. Understanding selectivity in the chlorate process: a step towards efficient hydrogen production. ChemistrySelect 3, 6683–6690 (2018).10.1002/slct.201800628 ↗
29. Endrődi, B., Sandin, S., Wildlock, M., Simic, N. & Cornell, A. Suppressed oxygen evolution during chlorate formation from hypochlorite in the presence of chromium(VI). J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 94, 1520–1527 (2019).10.1002/jctb.5911 ↗
30. Endrődi, B., Simic, N., Wildlock, M. & Cornell, A. A review of chromium(VI) use in chlorate electrolysis: functions, challenges and suggested alternatives. Electrochim. Acta 234, 108–122 (2017).10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.150 ↗
31. Endrődi, B. et al. Towards sustainable chlorate production: the effect of permanganate addition on current efficiency. J. Clean. Prod. 182, 529–537 (2018).10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.071 ↗
32. Amit, L., Naar, D., Gloukhovski, R., la O’, G. J. & Suss, M. E. A single-flow battery with multiphase flow. ChemSusChem 14, 1068–1073 (2021).10.1002/cssc.202002135 ↗
33. Jackson, M. N., Jung, O., Lamotte, H. C. & Surendranath, Y. Donor-dependent promotion of interfacial proton-coupled electron transfer in aqueous electrocatalysis. ACS Catal. 9, 3737–3743 (2019).10.1021/acscatal.9b00056 ↗
34. Strmcnik, D. et al. Improving the hydrogen oxidation reaction rate by promotion of hydroxyl adsorption. Nat. Chem. 5, 300–306 (2013).10.1038/nchem.1574 ↗
35. Mills, A. & Meadows, G. Heterogeneous redox catalysis: a novel route for removing bromate ions from water. Water Res. 29, 2181–2185 (1995).10.1016/0043-1354(95)00037-L ↗
36. Duonghong, D., Erbs, W., Shuben, L. & Grätzel, M. Efficient redox catalysis by RuO2 in the generation of oxygen and bromine from aqueous bromate solutions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 95, 266–268 (1983).10.1016/0009-2614(83)87246-7 ↗
37. Dong, Z., Dong, W., Sun, F., Zhu, R. & Ouyang, F. Effects of preparation conditions on catalytic activity of Ru/AC catalyst to reduce bromate ion in water. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 107, 231–244 (2012).10.1007/s11144-012-0473-x ↗
38. Thakur, D. B. et al. Ruthenium catalyst on carbon nanofiber support layers for use in silicon-based structured microreactors. Part II: catalytic reduction of bromate contaminants in aqueous phase. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 102, 243–250 (2011).10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.12.004 ↗
39. Fan, C. et al. Enhanced performance and mechanism of bromate removal in aqueous solution by ruthenium oxide modified biochar (RuO2/BC). Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 572, 27–36 (2019).10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.03.080 ↗
40. Adams, R., Voorhees, V. & Shriner, R. L. Platinum catalyst for reductions: platinic oxide. Org. Synth. 8, 92 (1928).10.15227/orgsyn.008.0092 ↗
41. Vogel, A., Jeffery, G. H., Bassett, J., Mendham, J. & Denney, R. C. Vogel’s Textbook of Quantitative Chemical Analysis 5th edn, 406 (Longman Scientific & Technical, 1989).
42. Asakai, T. & Hioki, A. Potassium bromate assay by primary methods through iodine liberation reaction. Anal. Methods 5, 6240–6245 (2013).10.1039/c3ay40854j ↗
43. Walker, M., Zhang, Y., Heaven, S. & Banks, C. Potential errors in the quantitative evaluation of biogas production in anaerobic digestion processes. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 6339–6346 (2009).10.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.018 ↗
44. El Asri, O., Mahaouch, M. & Afilal, M. E. The evaluation and the development of three devices for measurement of biogas production. Phys. Chem. News 75, 75–85 (2015).
45. Brack, P., Dann, S., Upul Wijayantha, K. G., Adcock, P. & Foster, S. A simple, low-cost, and robust system to measure the volume of hydrogen evolved by chemical reactions with aqueous solutions. J. Vis. Exp. 2016, e54383 (2016).