journal article·2021-11

Supersonic impact resilience of nanoarchitected carbon

Carlos M. Portela, Bryce W. Edwards, David Veysset, Yuchen Sun, Keith A. Nelson, Dennis M. Kochmann, Julia R. Greer

Nature Materials· Volume 20· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Architected materials with nanoscale features have enabled extreme combinations of properties by exploiting the ultralightweight structural design space together with size-induced mechanical enhancement at small scales. Apart from linear waves in metamaterials, this principle has been restricted to quasi-static properties or to low-speed phenomena, leaving nanoarchitected materials under extreme dynamic conditions largely unexplored. Here, using supersonic microparticle impact experiments, we demonstrate extreme impact energy dissipation in three-dimensional nanoarchitected carbon materials that exhibit mass-normalized energy dissipation superior to that of traditional impact-resistant materials such as steel, aluminium, polymethyl methacrylate and Kevlar. In-situ ultrahigh-speed imaging and post-mortem confocal microscopy reveal consistent mechanisms such as compaction cratering and microparticle capture that enable this superior response. By analogy to planetary impact, we introduce predictive tools for crater formation in these materials using dimensional analysis. These results substantially uncover the dynamic regime over which nanoarchitecture enables the design of ultralightweight, impact-resistant materials that could open the way to design principles for lightweight armour, protective coatings and blast-resistant shields for sensitive electronics.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Planetary Science and Exploration

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Zheng, X. et al. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science 344, 1373–1377 (2014).10.1126/science.1252291 ↗
2. Bauer, J., Schroer, A., Schwaiger, R. & Kraft, O. Approaching theoretical strength in glassy carbon nanolattices. Nat. Mater. 15, 438–443 (2016).10.1038/nmat4561 ↗
3. Portela, C. M. et al. Extreme mechanical resilience of self-assembled nanolabyrinthine materials. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 5686–5693 (2020).10.1073/pnas.1916817117 ↗
4. Frenzel, T., Findeisen, C., Kadic, M., Gumbsch, P. & Wegener, M. Tailored buckling microlattices as reusable light-weight shock absorbers. Adv. Mater. 28, 5865–5870 (2016).10.1002/adma.201600610 ↗
5. Krödel, S. & Daraio, C. Microlattice metamaterials for tailoring ultrasonic transmission with elastoacoustic hybridization. Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 064005 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.064005 ↗
6. Frenzel, T., Kadic, M. & Wegener, M. Three-dimensional mechanical metamaterials with a twist. Science 358, 1072–1074 (2017).10.1126/science.aao4640 ↗
7. Meyers, M. A. Dynamic Behavior of Materials Ch. 5 (Wiley, 1994).10.1002/9780470172278 ↗
8. Schaedler, T. A. et al. Designing metallic microlattices for energy absorber applications. Adv. Eng. Mater. 16, 276–283 (2014).10.1002/adem.201300206 ↗
9. Dattelbaum, D. M., Ionita, A., Patterson, B. M., Branch, B. A. & Kuettner, L. Shockwave dissipation by interface-dominated porous structures. AIP Adv. 10, 075016 (2020).10.1063/5.0015179 ↗
10. Deshpande, V. S. & Fleck, N. A. High strain rate compressive behaviour of aluminum alloy foams. Int. J. Impact Eng. 24, 277–298 (2000).10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00153-0 ↗
11. Barnes, A. T., Ravi-Chandar, K., Kyriakides, S. & Gaitanaros, S. Dynamic crushing of aluminum foams: part I—experiments. Int. J. Solids Struct. 51, 1631–1645 (2014).10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.11.019 ↗
12. Yungwirth, C. J., Wadley, H. N., O’Connor, J. H., Zakraysek, A. J. & Deshpande, V. S. Impact response of sandwich plates with a pyramidal lattice core. Int. J. Impact Eng. 35, 920–936 (2008).10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.07.001 ↗
13. Xue, Z. & Hutchinson, J. W. A comparative study of impulse-resistant metal sandwich plates. Int. J. Impact Eng. 30, 1283–1305 (2004).10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.08.007 ↗
14. Mueller, J., Matlack, K. H., Shea, K. & Daraio, C. Energy absorption properties of periodic and stochastic 3D lattice materials. Adv. Theory Simul. 2, 1900081 (2019).10.1002/adts.201900081 ↗
15. Mines, R. A., Tsopanos, S., Shen, Y., Hasan, R. & McKown, S. T. Drop weight impact behaviour of sandwich panels with metallic micro lattice cores. Int. J. Impact Eng. 60, 120–132 (2013).10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.04.007 ↗
16. Harris, J. A., Winter, R. E. & McShane, G. J. Impact response of additively manufactured metallic hybrid lattice materials. Int. J. Impact Eng. 104, 177–191 (2017).10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.02.007 ↗
17. Ozdemir, Z. et al. Energy absorption in lattice structures in dynamics: experiments. Int. J. Impact Eng. 89, 49–61 (2016).10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.10.007 ↗
18. Tancogne-Dejean, T., Li, X., Diamantopoulou, M., Roth, C. C. & Mohr, D. High strain rate response of additively-manufactured plate-lattices: experiments and modeling. J. Dyn. Behav. Mater. 5, 361–375 (2019).10.1007/s40870-019-00219-6 ↗
19. Lai, C. Q. & Daraio, C. Highly porous microlattices as ultrathin and efficient impact absorbers. Int. J. Impact Eng. 120, 138–149 (2018).10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.05.014 ↗
20. Hawreliak, J. A. et al. Dynamic behavior of engineered lattice materials. Sci. Rep. 6, 28094 (2016).10.1038/srep28094 ↗
21. Lee, J.-H., Loya, P. E., Lou, J. & Thomas, E. L. Dynamic mechanical behavior of multilayer graphene via supersonic projectile penetration. Science 346, 1092–1096 (2014).10.1126/science.1258544 ↗
22. Hyon, J. et al. Extreme energy absorption in glassy polymer thin films by supersonic micro-projectile impact. Mater. Today 21, 817–824 (2018).10.1016/j.mattod.2018.07.014 ↗
23. Zhang, X., Vyatskikh, A., Gao, H., Greer, J. R. & Li, X. Lightweight, flaw-tolerant, and ultrastrong nanoarchitected carbon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 6665–6672 (2019).10.1073/pnas.1817309116 ↗
24. Portela, C. M., Greer, J. R. & Kochmann, D. M. Impact of node geometry on the effective stiffness of non-slender three-dimensional truss lattice architectures. Extreme Mech. Lett. 22, 110–138 (2018).10.1016/j.eml.2018.06.004 ↗
25. Deshpande, V. S., Ashby, M. F. & Fleck, N. A. Foam topology: bending versus stretching dominated architectures. Acta Mater. 49, 1035–1040 (2001).10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00379-7 ↗
26. Ashby, M. F. The properties of foams and lattices. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 364, 15–30 (2006).10.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗
27. Evans, A. G. et al. Concepts for enhanced energy absorption using hollow micro-lattices. Int. J. Impact Eng. 37, 947–959 (2010).10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.007 ↗
28. Zhang, X. et al. Theoretical strength and rubber-like behaviour in micro-sized pyrolytic carbon. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 762–769 (2019).10.1038/s41565-019-0486-y ↗
29. Crook, C. et al. Plate-nanolattices at the theoretical limit of stiffness and strength. Nat. Commun. 11, 1579 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-15434-2 ↗
30. Veysset, D. et al. Dynamics of supersonic microparticle impact on elastomers revealed by real-time multi-frame imaging. Sci. Rep. 6, 25577 (2016).10.1038/srep25577 ↗
31. Schill, W., Heyden, S., Conti, S. & Ortiz, M. The anomalous yield behavior of fused silica glass. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 113, 105–125 (2018).10.1016/j.jmps.2018.01.004 ↗
32. Lind, J., Jensen, B. J., Barham, M. & Kumar, M. In situ dynamic compression wave behavior in additively manufactured lattice materials. J. Mater. Res. 34, 2–19 (2019).10.1557/jmr.2018.351 ↗
33. Dean, J., Dunleavy, C. S., Brown, P. M. & Clyne, T. W. Energy absorption during projectile perforation of thin steel plates and the kinetic energy of ejected fragments. Int. J. Impact Eng. 36, 1250–1258 (2009).10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.05.002 ↗
34. Yungwirth, C. J., O’Connor, J., Zakraysek, A., Deshpande, V. S. & Wadley, H. N. Explorations of hybrid sandwich panel concepts for projectile impact mitigation. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94, 62–75 (2011).10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04501.x ↗
35. Golsdmith, W. & Finnegan, S. A. Penetration and perforation processes in metal targets at and above ballistic velocities. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 13, 843–866 (1971).10.1016/0020-7403(71)90111-1 ↗
36. Gupta, N. K., Iqbal, M. A. & Sekhon, G. S. Experimental and numerical studies on the behavior of thin aluminum plates subjected to impact by blunt- and hemispherical-nosed projectiles. Int. J. Impact Eng. 32, 1921–1944 (2006).10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.06.007 ↗
37. Abbud, L. H., Talib, A. R., Mustapha, F., Tawfique, H. & Najim, F. A. Behaviour of transparent material under high velocity impact. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Eng. 5, 123–128 (2010).
38. Lee, B. L. et al. Penetration failure mechanisms of armor-grade fiber composites under impact. J. Compos. Mater. 35, 1605–1633 (2001).10.1106/YRBH-JGT9-U6PT-L555 ↗
39. Lind, J., Robinson, A. K. & Kumar, M. Insight into the coordinated jetting behavior in periodic lattice structures under dynamic compression. J. Appl. Phys. 128, 015901 (2020).10.1063/5.0003776 ↗
40. Branch, B. et al. Controlling shockwave dynamics using architecture in periodic porous materials. J. Appl. Phys. 121, 135102 (2017).10.1063/1.4978910 ↗
41. Branch, B. et al. A comparison of shockwave dynamics in stochastic and periodic porous polymer architectures. Polymer 160, 325–337 (2019).10.1016/j.polymer.2018.10.074 ↗
42. Housen, K. R. & Holsapple, K. A. Impact cratering on porous asteroids. Icarus 163, 102–119 (2003).10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00024-1 ↗
43. Housen, K. R., Sweet, W. J. & Holsapple, K. A. Impacts into porous asteroids. Icarus 300, 72–96 (2018).10.1016/j.icarus.2017.08.019 ↗