What diffraction limit?
Source abstract
Abstract
Several approaches are capable of beating the classical 'diffraction limit'. In the optical domain, not only are superlenses a promising choice: concepts such as super-oscillations could provide feasible alternatives.
The source flagged this abstract for review. Check formulas and completeness against the original publication.
Source: europepmc · Quality: needs review · Source record ↗
Source flags: short_text
Source flags: short_text
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Veselago, V. G. Sov. Phys. Usp. 10, 509–514 (1968).10.1070/PU1968v010n04ABEH003699 ↗
2. Smith, D. R. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4184–4187 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4184 ↗
3. Riikonen, S., Romero, I. & García de Abajo, F. J. Phys. Rev. B 71, 235104 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevB.71.235104 ↗
4. Alù, A., Silveirinha, M. G., Salandrino, A. & Engheta, N. Phys. Rev. B 75, 155410 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.75.155410 ↗
5. Schwanecke, A. S. et al. J. Opt. A 9, L1–L2 (2007).10.1088/1464-4258/9/1/L01 ↗
6. Alù, A. & Engheta, N. Phys. Rev. E 72, 016623 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevE.72.016623 ↗
7. Fedotov, V. A., Mladyonov, P. L., Prosvirnin, S. L. & Zheludev, N. I. Phys. Rev. E 72, 056613 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevE.72.056613 ↗
8. Leonhardt, U. Science 312, 1777–1780 (2006).10.1126/science.1126493 ↗
9. Schurig, D. et al. Science 314, 977–980 (2006).10.1126/science.1133628 ↗
10. Fedotov, V. A. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 167401 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.167401 ↗
11. Leonhardt, U. & Philbin, T. G. New J. Phys. 9, 254 (2007).10.1088/1367-2630/9/8/254 ↗
12. Pendry, J. B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966–3969 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3966 ↗
13. Chao, W., Harteneck, B. D., Liddle, J. A., Anderson, E. H. & Attwood, D. T. Nature 435, 1210–1213 (2005).10.1038/nature03719 ↗
14. Synge, E. H. Phil Mag. 6, 356–362 (1928).10.1080/14786440808564615 ↗
15. Zhang, X. & Liu, Z. Nature Mater. 7, 435–441 (2008).10.1038/nmat2141 ↗
16. Blaikie, R. J. & Melville, D. O. S. J. Opt. A 7, S176–S183 (2005).10.1088/1464-4258/7/2/023 ↗
17. Fang, N. et al. Science 308, 534–537 (2005).10.1126/science.1108759 ↗
18. Toraldo di Francia, G. Suppl. Nuovo Cim. 9, 426–438 (1952).10.1007/BF02903413 ↗
19. Oseen, C. W. Annln Phys. (Leipz.) 374, 202–204 (1922).10.1002/andp.19223741903 ↗
20. Schelkunoff, S. A. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 22, 80–107 (1943).10.1002/j.1538-7305.1943.tb01306.x ↗
21. Bouwkamp, C. J. & de Bruijn, N. G. Philips Res. Rep. 1, 135–158 (1945/1946).
22. Woodward, P. M. & Lawson, J. D. J. Inst. Elect. Eng. III 95, 363–370 (1948).
23. Berry, M. V. & Popescu, S. J. Phys. A 39, 6965–6977 (2006).10.1088/0305-4470/39/22/011 ↗
24. Ferreira, P. J. S. G. & Kempf, A. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 54, 3732–3740 (2006).10.1109/TSP.2006.877642 ↗
25. Huang, F. M., Zheludev, N., Chen, Y. & Garcia de Abajo, F. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 091119 (2007).10.1063/1.2710775 ↗
26. Huang, F. M., Chen, Y., Garcia de Abajo, F. J. & Zheludev, N. I. J. Opt. A 9, S285–S288 (2007).10.1088/1464-4258/9/9/S01 ↗